SINAES meta-evaluation: the view of ad hoc evaluators

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Lopes Costa, Barbara Regina
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Araújo, Richard Medeiros de, El Hajj, Zaina Said, do Nascimento, Leide Albergoni
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Diálogo
Texto Completo: https://revistas.unilasalle.edu.br/index.php/Dialogo/article/view/9046
Resumo: The study aims to carry out a meta-evaluation of SINAES as a public policy for the evaluation of higher education from the perspective of the ad hoc evaluators of INEP/MEC. The methodology is designed as an exploratory study, with a quantitative approach, with a sample stratified by region of 369 evaluators. Data were collected using desurvey and processed in Excel® using descriptive statistics. The results show a predominance of doctor evaluators (66%) with less than 10 years (51%) of participation in BASis. The analysis demonstrates the need to differentiate assessment instruments between acts, modality and types of HEIs, to improve the system to speed up the processes, in addition to reviewing the ENADE methodology and the quality indicators derived from it.
id UNILASALLE-5_6ca190438de91050bc7e4db2e66f04fe
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revistas.unilasalle.edu.br:article/9046
network_acronym_str UNILASALLE-5
network_name_str Revista Diálogo
repository_id_str
spelling SINAES meta-evaluation: the view of ad hoc evaluatorsMeta-avaliação do SINAES: a visão dos avaliadores ad hocEducational assessmentSINAEScollege educationad hoc evaluatorsmeta-assessmentAvaliação educacionalSINAESeducação superioravaliadores ad hocmeta-avaliaçãoThe study aims to carry out a meta-evaluation of SINAES as a public policy for the evaluation of higher education from the perspective of the ad hoc evaluators of INEP/MEC. The methodology is designed as an exploratory study, with a quantitative approach, with a sample stratified by region of 369 evaluators. Data were collected using desurvey and processed in Excel® using descriptive statistics. The results show a predominance of doctor evaluators (66%) with less than 10 years (51%) of participation in BASis. The analysis demonstrates the need to differentiate assessment instruments between acts, modality and types of HEIs, to improve the system to speed up the processes, in addition to reviewing the ENADE methodology and the quality indicators derived from it.O estudo objetiva realizar uma meta-avaliação do SINAES enquanto política pública de avaliação do ensino superior sob a ótica dos avaliadores ad hoc do INEP/MEC. A metodologia se desenha como estudo exploratório, com abordagem quantitativa, tendo uma amostra estratificada por região de 369 avaliadores. Os dados foram coletados por meio desurvey e tratados em Excel® por meio de estatística descritiva. Os resultados mostram a predominância de avaliadores doutores (66%) com menos de 10 anos (51%) de participação no BASis. A análise demonstra a necessidade de diferenciar instrumentos de avaliação entre atos, modalidade e tipos de IES, aperfeiçoamento o sistema para dar maior celeridade aos processos, além de revisão da metodologia do ENADE e os indicadores de qualidade dele derivados.Universidade LaSalle - Unilasalle Canoas2022-11-28info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.unilasalle.edu.br/index.php/Dialogo/article/view/904610.18316/dialogo.v0i50.9046Diálogo; n. 50 (2022)2238-9024reponame:Revista Diálogoinstname:Universidade La Salle (UNILASALLE)instacron:UNILASALLEporhttps://revistas.unilasalle.edu.br/index.php/Dialogo/article/view/9046/pdfCopyright (c) 2022 Diálogoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLopes Costa, Barbara ReginaAraújo, Richard Medeiros deEl Hajj, Zaina Saiddo Nascimento, Leide Albergoni2022-12-22T17:52:07Zoai:ojs.revistas.unilasalle.edu.br:article/9046Revistahttps://revistas.unilasalle.edu.br/index.php/DialogoONGhttps://revistas.unilasalle.edu.br/index.php/Dialogo/oairevistas@unilasalle.edu.br||dialogo@unilasalle.edu.br2238-90241519-3640opendoar:2022-12-22T17:52:07Revista Diálogo - Universidade La Salle (UNILASALLE)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv SINAES meta-evaluation: the view of ad hoc evaluators
Meta-avaliação do SINAES: a visão dos avaliadores ad hoc
title SINAES meta-evaluation: the view of ad hoc evaluators
spellingShingle SINAES meta-evaluation: the view of ad hoc evaluators
Lopes Costa, Barbara Regina
Educational assessment
SINAES
college education
ad hoc evaluators
meta-assessment
Avaliação educacional
SINAES
educação superior
avaliadores ad hoc
meta-avaliação
title_short SINAES meta-evaluation: the view of ad hoc evaluators
title_full SINAES meta-evaluation: the view of ad hoc evaluators
title_fullStr SINAES meta-evaluation: the view of ad hoc evaluators
title_full_unstemmed SINAES meta-evaluation: the view of ad hoc evaluators
title_sort SINAES meta-evaluation: the view of ad hoc evaluators
author Lopes Costa, Barbara Regina
author_facet Lopes Costa, Barbara Regina
Araújo, Richard Medeiros de
El Hajj, Zaina Said
do Nascimento, Leide Albergoni
author_role author
author2 Araújo, Richard Medeiros de
El Hajj, Zaina Said
do Nascimento, Leide Albergoni
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Lopes Costa, Barbara Regina
Araújo, Richard Medeiros de
El Hajj, Zaina Said
do Nascimento, Leide Albergoni
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Educational assessment
SINAES
college education
ad hoc evaluators
meta-assessment
Avaliação educacional
SINAES
educação superior
avaliadores ad hoc
meta-avaliação
topic Educational assessment
SINAES
college education
ad hoc evaluators
meta-assessment
Avaliação educacional
SINAES
educação superior
avaliadores ad hoc
meta-avaliação
description The study aims to carry out a meta-evaluation of SINAES as a public policy for the evaluation of higher education from the perspective of the ad hoc evaluators of INEP/MEC. The methodology is designed as an exploratory study, with a quantitative approach, with a sample stratified by region of 369 evaluators. Data were collected using desurvey and processed in Excel® using descriptive statistics. The results show a predominance of doctor evaluators (66%) with less than 10 years (51%) of participation in BASis. The analysis demonstrates the need to differentiate assessment instruments between acts, modality and types of HEIs, to improve the system to speed up the processes, in addition to reviewing the ENADE methodology and the quality indicators derived from it.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-11-28
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistas.unilasalle.edu.br/index.php/Dialogo/article/view/9046
10.18316/dialogo.v0i50.9046
url https://revistas.unilasalle.edu.br/index.php/Dialogo/article/view/9046
identifier_str_mv 10.18316/dialogo.v0i50.9046
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.unilasalle.edu.br/index.php/Dialogo/article/view/9046/pdf
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Diálogo
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Diálogo
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade LaSalle - Unilasalle Canoas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade LaSalle - Unilasalle Canoas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Diálogo; n. 50 (2022)
2238-9024
reponame:Revista Diálogo
instname:Universidade La Salle (UNILASALLE)
instacron:UNILASALLE
instname_str Universidade La Salle (UNILASALLE)
instacron_str UNILASALLE
institution UNILASALLE
reponame_str Revista Diálogo
collection Revista Diálogo
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Diálogo - Universidade La Salle (UNILASALLE)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistas@unilasalle.edu.br||dialogo@unilasalle.edu.br
_version_ 1824495582832492544

Registros relacionados