Challenges in adopting interpretative tradition in social sciences
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Diálogo |
Texto Completo: | https://revistas.unilasalle.edu.br/index.php/Dialogo/article/view/4110 |
Resumo: | This theoretical essay contributes to the discussion about the adoption of the interpretative tradition in social sciences. In order to do so, it focuses on the paths that sciences have gone through to understand intersubjective knowledge and its implications in social sciences. In addition, it is possible to observe the growing number of researchers adopting methods and strategies originated from the interpretative tradition in the field of organizational studies in administration, which are opposite to the mainstream perspective - functionalist tradition. Finally, it is emphasized that this mainstream is influenced by academic productivism. |
id |
UNILASALLE-5_8c600b391f51dccd15d79d62e3819d59 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revistas.unilasalle.edu.br:article/4110 |
network_acronym_str |
UNILASALLE-5 |
network_name_str |
Revista Diálogo |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Challenges in adopting interpretative tradition in social sciencesOs desafios na adoção da tradição interpretativista nas ciências sociaisSocial sciencesintersubjective knowledgeinterpretative traditionorganizational studiesCiências sociaisconhecimento intersubjetivotradição interpretativistaestudos organizacionaisThis theoretical essay contributes to the discussion about the adoption of the interpretative tradition in social sciences. In order to do so, it focuses on the paths that sciences have gone through to understand intersubjective knowledge and its implications in social sciences. In addition, it is possible to observe the growing number of researchers adopting methods and strategies originated from the interpretative tradition in the field of organizational studies in administration, which are opposite to the mainstream perspective - functionalist tradition. Finally, it is emphasized that this mainstream is influenced by academic productivism.Esse ensaio teórico contribui para a discussão sobre a adoção da tradição interpretativista nas ciências sociais. Para tanto, debruça-se sobre os caminhos trilhados pelas ciências para a compreensão do conhecimento intersubjetivo e suas implicações nas ciências sociais. Ademais, observa-se o número crescente de pesquisadores que adotam métodos e estratégias originários da tradição interpretativista no campo dos estudos organizacionais em administração, que se contrapõem à perspectiva mainstream – tradição funcionalista. Por fim, reforça-se que este mainstream é influenciado pelo produtivismo acadêmico. Universidade LaSalle - Unilasalle Canoas2018-10-09info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.unilasalle.edu.br/index.php/Dialogo/article/view/411010.18316/dialogo.v0i39.4110Diálogo; n. 39 (2018); p. 25-372238-9024reponame:Revista Diálogoinstname:Universidade La Salle (UNILASALLE)instacron:UNILASALLEporhttps://revistas.unilasalle.edu.br/index.php/Dialogo/article/view/4110/pdfCopyright (c) 2018 Diálogoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessProlo, IvorLima, Manolita CorreiaSilva, Luciano Ferreira da2023-01-04T17:59:37Zoai:ojs.revistas.unilasalle.edu.br:article/4110Revistahttps://revistas.unilasalle.edu.br/index.php/DialogoONGhttps://revistas.unilasalle.edu.br/index.php/Dialogo/oairevistas@unilasalle.edu.br||dialogo@unilasalle.edu.br2238-90241519-3640opendoar:2023-01-04T17:59:37Revista Diálogo - Universidade La Salle (UNILASALLE)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Challenges in adopting interpretative tradition in social sciences Os desafios na adoção da tradição interpretativista nas ciências sociais |
title |
Challenges in adopting interpretative tradition in social sciences |
spellingShingle |
Challenges in adopting interpretative tradition in social sciences Prolo, Ivor Social sciences intersubjective knowledge interpretative tradition organizational studies Ciências sociais conhecimento intersubjetivo tradição interpretativista estudos organizacionais |
title_short |
Challenges in adopting interpretative tradition in social sciences |
title_full |
Challenges in adopting interpretative tradition in social sciences |
title_fullStr |
Challenges in adopting interpretative tradition in social sciences |
title_full_unstemmed |
Challenges in adopting interpretative tradition in social sciences |
title_sort |
Challenges in adopting interpretative tradition in social sciences |
author |
Prolo, Ivor |
author_facet |
Prolo, Ivor Lima, Manolita Correia Silva, Luciano Ferreira da |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Lima, Manolita Correia Silva, Luciano Ferreira da |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Prolo, Ivor Lima, Manolita Correia Silva, Luciano Ferreira da |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Social sciences intersubjective knowledge interpretative tradition organizational studies Ciências sociais conhecimento intersubjetivo tradição interpretativista estudos organizacionais |
topic |
Social sciences intersubjective knowledge interpretative tradition organizational studies Ciências sociais conhecimento intersubjetivo tradição interpretativista estudos organizacionais |
description |
This theoretical essay contributes to the discussion about the adoption of the interpretative tradition in social sciences. In order to do so, it focuses on the paths that sciences have gone through to understand intersubjective knowledge and its implications in social sciences. In addition, it is possible to observe the growing number of researchers adopting methods and strategies originated from the interpretative tradition in the field of organizational studies in administration, which are opposite to the mainstream perspective - functionalist tradition. Finally, it is emphasized that this mainstream is influenced by academic productivism. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-10-09 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.unilasalle.edu.br/index.php/Dialogo/article/view/4110 10.18316/dialogo.v0i39.4110 |
url |
https://revistas.unilasalle.edu.br/index.php/Dialogo/article/view/4110 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.18316/dialogo.v0i39.4110 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.unilasalle.edu.br/index.php/Dialogo/article/view/4110/pdf |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Diálogo info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Diálogo |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade LaSalle - Unilasalle Canoas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade LaSalle - Unilasalle Canoas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Diálogo; n. 39 (2018); p. 25-37 2238-9024 reponame:Revista Diálogo instname:Universidade La Salle (UNILASALLE) instacron:UNILASALLE |
instname_str |
Universidade La Salle (UNILASALLE) |
instacron_str |
UNILASALLE |
institution |
UNILASALLE |
reponame_str |
Revista Diálogo |
collection |
Revista Diálogo |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Diálogo - Universidade La Salle (UNILASALLE) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revistas@unilasalle.edu.br||dialogo@unilasalle.edu.br |
_version_ |
1800217362206556160 |