ECONOMIC, ENVIRONMENTAL AND DURABILITY ADVANTAGES OF LED LAMPS IN COMPARISON TO FLUORESCENT TUBE LAMPS

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: PEREIRA, YSABELA THAIZ
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: CARVELLI, EDENIR
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: UNINGÁ Review
Texto Completo: https://revista.uninga.br/uningareviews/article/view/130
Resumo: This academic paper aims to analyze energy efficiency in lighting, analyze applicable environmental legislation and identifying the cost-benefit ratio of economic and durability factors between fluorescent tube lamps and LED lamps. An information collection was made via literature readings on economic, environmental and durability issues of LED and fluorescent tube lamps. The analyzed data were subdivided in stages, for better understanding, being: cost of kWh in residential consumption; lamps cost; technical specifications of fluorescent tube and LED lamps; economic and durability factors; laws regarding the disposal of residues and components present in both lamps. The results show that LED lamps cost more than fluorescent tube ones, however they are cost-effective, as their durability is proven to be much more viable as they are approximately 50% more durable than fluorescent tube lamps. Regarding environmental issues, tubular fluorescent lamps contain heavy materials in their composition, such as mercury – a material absent from LED. In conclusion, comparing cost-benefit and environmental issues, LED is more advantageous than fluorescent tube lamps.
id UNINGA-2_dba789186e199a259c25bf42752f7499
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revista.uninga.br:article/130
network_acronym_str UNINGA-2
network_name_str UNINGÁ Review
repository_id_str
spelling ECONOMIC, ENVIRONMENTAL AND DURABILITY ADVANTAGES OF LED LAMPS IN COMPARISON TO FLUORESCENT TUBE LAMPSVANTAGENS ECONÔMICAS, AMBIENTAIS E DE DURABILIDADE DA LÂMPADA DE LED EM COMPARAÇÃO AS LÂMPADAS FLUORESCENTES TUBULARESEficiência EnergéticaLâmpada Fluorescente TubularLEDEngenharia CivilEnergy EfficiencyFluorescent Tube LampLEDThis academic paper aims to analyze energy efficiency in lighting, analyze applicable environmental legislation and identifying the cost-benefit ratio of economic and durability factors between fluorescent tube lamps and LED lamps. An information collection was made via literature readings on economic, environmental and durability issues of LED and fluorescent tube lamps. The analyzed data were subdivided in stages, for better understanding, being: cost of kWh in residential consumption; lamps cost; technical specifications of fluorescent tube and LED lamps; economic and durability factors; laws regarding the disposal of residues and components present in both lamps. The results show that LED lamps cost more than fluorescent tube ones, however they are cost-effective, as their durability is proven to be much more viable as they are approximately 50% more durable than fluorescent tube lamps. Regarding environmental issues, tubular fluorescent lamps contain heavy materials in their composition, such as mercury – a material absent from LED. In conclusion, comparing cost-benefit and environmental issues, LED is more advantageous than fluorescent tube lamps.O trabalho teve por objetivo analisar a eficiência energética em iluminação, analisar a legislação ambiental aplicável e identificar a relação custo-benefício dos fatores econômicos e de durabilidade entre as lâmpadas fluorescentes tubulares e de lâmpadas LED. Foi realizada uma coleta de informações na literatura sobre questões econômicas, ambientais e de durabilidade de lâmpadas LED e fluorescente tubular. Os dados analisados foram subdivididos em fases, para melhor compreensão, sendo elas: custo do Kwh em consumo residencial; custo do modelo das lâmpadas; especificações técnicas da lâmpada fluorescente tubular e LED; fatores econômicos e de durabilidade; leis referentes a destinação dos resíduos e componentes presentes nas lâmpadas fluorescentes tubular e LED. Os resultados mostram que a Lâmpada de LED (LED) possui um custo econômico maior do que a lâmpada fluorescente tubular, mas ao final seu custo-benefício é compensador. Quanto à sua durabilidade, a LED mostrou-se bem mais viável, pois ela é aproximadamente 50% mais durável do que a outra. Em relação a questões ambientais, a fluorescente tubular possui em sua composição materiais pesados, como o mercúrio, material ausente na LED. Conclui-se que a LED é mais vantajosa do que a fluorescente tubular comparando a relação custo-benefício e os impactos ambientais.Editora Uningá2018-06-23info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revista.uninga.br/uningareviews/article/view/130Uningá Review ; Vol. 33 No. 2 (2018): REVISTA UNINGÁ REVIEW; 180 - 190Uningá Review Journal; v. 33 n. 2 (2018): REVISTA UNINGÁ REVIEW; 180 - 1902178-2571reponame:UNINGÁ Reviewinstname:Centro Universitário Uningáinstacron:UNINGAporhttps://revista.uninga.br/uningareviews/article/view/130/1700Copyright (c) 2018 REVISTA UNINGÁ REVIEWinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPEREIRA, YSABELA THAIZCARVELLI, EDENIR2019-10-09T21:40:20Zoai:ojs.revista.uninga.br:article/130Revistahttps://revista.uninga.br/uningareviews/indexPUBhttps://revista.uninga.br/uningareviews/oairevistauningareview@uninga.edu.br || sec.revistas@uninga.edu.br2178-25712178-2571opendoar:2019-10-09T21:40:20UNINGÁ Review - Centro Universitário Uningáfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv ECONOMIC, ENVIRONMENTAL AND DURABILITY ADVANTAGES OF LED LAMPS IN COMPARISON TO FLUORESCENT TUBE LAMPS
VANTAGENS ECONÔMICAS, AMBIENTAIS E DE DURABILIDADE DA LÂMPADA DE LED EM COMPARAÇÃO AS LÂMPADAS FLUORESCENTES TUBULARES
title ECONOMIC, ENVIRONMENTAL AND DURABILITY ADVANTAGES OF LED LAMPS IN COMPARISON TO FLUORESCENT TUBE LAMPS
spellingShingle ECONOMIC, ENVIRONMENTAL AND DURABILITY ADVANTAGES OF LED LAMPS IN COMPARISON TO FLUORESCENT TUBE LAMPS
PEREIRA, YSABELA THAIZ
Eficiência Energética
Lâmpada Fluorescente Tubular
LED
Engenharia Civil
Energy Efficiency
Fluorescent Tube Lamp
LED
title_short ECONOMIC, ENVIRONMENTAL AND DURABILITY ADVANTAGES OF LED LAMPS IN COMPARISON TO FLUORESCENT TUBE LAMPS
title_full ECONOMIC, ENVIRONMENTAL AND DURABILITY ADVANTAGES OF LED LAMPS IN COMPARISON TO FLUORESCENT TUBE LAMPS
title_fullStr ECONOMIC, ENVIRONMENTAL AND DURABILITY ADVANTAGES OF LED LAMPS IN COMPARISON TO FLUORESCENT TUBE LAMPS
title_full_unstemmed ECONOMIC, ENVIRONMENTAL AND DURABILITY ADVANTAGES OF LED LAMPS IN COMPARISON TO FLUORESCENT TUBE LAMPS
title_sort ECONOMIC, ENVIRONMENTAL AND DURABILITY ADVANTAGES OF LED LAMPS IN COMPARISON TO FLUORESCENT TUBE LAMPS
author PEREIRA, YSABELA THAIZ
author_facet PEREIRA, YSABELA THAIZ
CARVELLI, EDENIR
author_role author
author2 CARVELLI, EDENIR
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv PEREIRA, YSABELA THAIZ
CARVELLI, EDENIR
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Eficiência Energética
Lâmpada Fluorescente Tubular
LED
Engenharia Civil
Energy Efficiency
Fluorescent Tube Lamp
LED
topic Eficiência Energética
Lâmpada Fluorescente Tubular
LED
Engenharia Civil
Energy Efficiency
Fluorescent Tube Lamp
LED
description This academic paper aims to analyze energy efficiency in lighting, analyze applicable environmental legislation and identifying the cost-benefit ratio of economic and durability factors between fluorescent tube lamps and LED lamps. An information collection was made via literature readings on economic, environmental and durability issues of LED and fluorescent tube lamps. The analyzed data were subdivided in stages, for better understanding, being: cost of kWh in residential consumption; lamps cost; technical specifications of fluorescent tube and LED lamps; economic and durability factors; laws regarding the disposal of residues and components present in both lamps. The results show that LED lamps cost more than fluorescent tube ones, however they are cost-effective, as their durability is proven to be much more viable as they are approximately 50% more durable than fluorescent tube lamps. Regarding environmental issues, tubular fluorescent lamps contain heavy materials in their composition, such as mercury – a material absent from LED. In conclusion, comparing cost-benefit and environmental issues, LED is more advantageous than fluorescent tube lamps.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-06-23
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revista.uninga.br/uningareviews/article/view/130
url https://revista.uninga.br/uningareviews/article/view/130
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revista.uninga.br/uningareviews/article/view/130/1700
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 REVISTA UNINGÁ REVIEW
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 REVISTA UNINGÁ REVIEW
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora Uningá
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora Uningá
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Uningá Review ; Vol. 33 No. 2 (2018): REVISTA UNINGÁ REVIEW; 180 - 190
Uningá Review Journal; v. 33 n. 2 (2018): REVISTA UNINGÁ REVIEW; 180 - 190
2178-2571
reponame:UNINGÁ Review
instname:Centro Universitário Uningá
instacron:UNINGA
instname_str Centro Universitário Uningá
instacron_str UNINGA
institution UNINGA
reponame_str UNINGÁ Review
collection UNINGÁ Review
repository.name.fl_str_mv UNINGÁ Review - Centro Universitário Uningá
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistauningareview@uninga.edu.br || sec.revistas@uninga.edu.br
_version_ 1797042211256270848

Registros relacionados