Popular participation and master plan’s review: guarantee of a proper performance from the municipal manager

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Lunelli, Carlos Alberto
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Brandelli, Ailor Carlos
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Thesis Juris
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.uninove.br/thesisjuris/article/view/14423
Resumo: The every ten years reviey of the municipal master plan is due a legal provision in the City Statute. This procedure implies minimal intervention of the municipal manager, who inaugurates the process of revision and conducts its processing, making available to the community, for evaluation and voting, the proposals for changes to be implemented. The administrative discretion is limited to the conduct of the instead of to the merits of the review. The review itself will be the result of decisions arising out of public hearings and, mainly, from popular participation. Therefore, it is indispensable to make available to society, in a clear and complete manner, all the communication tools necessary for the assessment of the technical data that would justify the change of the master plan and the comparison of what is intended to change with the already existing norms.  Any different leading implies in dishonest acting, witch is doomable, since in the urban relation the citizen is the main actor of the revision and the main recipient of the norm.
id UNINOVE-2_1d7ba38fe5a9fba6e42c0ce1d846face
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.uninove.br:article/14423
network_acronym_str UNINOVE-2
network_name_str Revista Thesis Juris
repository_id_str
spelling Popular participation and master plan’s review: guarantee of a proper performance from the municipal managerParticipação popular e revisão do plano diretor: garantia de adequada atuação do gestor municipalPopular participationLegitimacyRevisionImprobity.Participação popularLegitimidadeRevisãoImprobidade.The every ten years reviey of the municipal master plan is due a legal provision in the City Statute. This procedure implies minimal intervention of the municipal manager, who inaugurates the process of revision and conducts its processing, making available to the community, for evaluation and voting, the proposals for changes to be implemented. The administrative discretion is limited to the conduct of the instead of to the merits of the review. The review itself will be the result of decisions arising out of public hearings and, mainly, from popular participation. Therefore, it is indispensable to make available to society, in a clear and complete manner, all the communication tools necessary for the assessment of the technical data that would justify the change of the master plan and the comparison of what is intended to change with the already existing norms.  Any different leading implies in dishonest acting, witch is doomable, since in the urban relation the citizen is the main actor of the revision and the main recipient of the norm.A revisão decenal do plano diretor municipal decorre da previsão legal do Estatuto da Cidade. Esse procedimento implica intervenção mínima do gestor municipal, que inaugura o processo de revisão e conduz sua tramitação, disponibilizando à coletividade, para avaliação e votação, as propostas de mudanças a serem implementadas. A discricionariedade administrativa é limitada à condução do processo e não ao mérito da revisão. A revisão em si será o resultado das decisões decorrentes das audiências públicas e precipuamente, da participação popular. Para tanto, é imperioso disponibilizar à sociedade, de forma clara e completa, todos os instrumentos de comunicação necessários para a apreciação dos dados técnicos que justificariam a alteração do plano diretor e o cotejo do que se pretende alterar com as normas já existentes. Qualquer condução diversa importa em ato ímprobo, passível de condenação, uma vez que na relação urbanística o cidadão é o ator principal da revisão e o principal destinatário da norma.Universidade Nove de Julho - Uninove2019-07-03info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.uninove.br/thesisjuris/article/view/1442310.5585/rtj.v8i1.722Revista Thesis Juris; v. 8 n. 1 (2019): (jan./jun.); 1-162317-3580reponame:Revista Thesis Jurisinstname:Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE)instacron:UNINOVEporhttps://periodicos.uninove.br/thesisjuris/article/view/14423/6956Copyright (c) 2019 Revista Thesis Jurishttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLunelli, Carlos AlbertoBrandelli, Ailor Carlos2020-01-11T14:07:41Zoai:ojs.periodicos.uninove.br:article/14423Revistahttps://periodicos.uninove.br/thesisjurisPRIhttps://periodicos.uninove.br/thesisjuris/oaithesis@uninove.br2317-35802317-3580opendoar:2020-01-11T14:07:41Revista Thesis Juris - Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Popular participation and master plan’s review: guarantee of a proper performance from the municipal manager
Participação popular e revisão do plano diretor: garantia de adequada atuação do gestor municipal
title Popular participation and master plan’s review: guarantee of a proper performance from the municipal manager
spellingShingle Popular participation and master plan’s review: guarantee of a proper performance from the municipal manager
Lunelli, Carlos Alberto
Popular participation
Legitimacy
Revision
Improbity.
Participação popular
Legitimidade
Revisão
Improbidade.
title_short Popular participation and master plan’s review: guarantee of a proper performance from the municipal manager
title_full Popular participation and master plan’s review: guarantee of a proper performance from the municipal manager
title_fullStr Popular participation and master plan’s review: guarantee of a proper performance from the municipal manager
title_full_unstemmed Popular participation and master plan’s review: guarantee of a proper performance from the municipal manager
title_sort Popular participation and master plan’s review: guarantee of a proper performance from the municipal manager
author Lunelli, Carlos Alberto
author_facet Lunelli, Carlos Alberto
Brandelli, Ailor Carlos
author_role author
author2 Brandelli, Ailor Carlos
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Lunelli, Carlos Alberto
Brandelli, Ailor Carlos
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Popular participation
Legitimacy
Revision
Improbity.
Participação popular
Legitimidade
Revisão
Improbidade.
topic Popular participation
Legitimacy
Revision
Improbity.
Participação popular
Legitimidade
Revisão
Improbidade.
description The every ten years reviey of the municipal master plan is due a legal provision in the City Statute. This procedure implies minimal intervention of the municipal manager, who inaugurates the process of revision and conducts its processing, making available to the community, for evaluation and voting, the proposals for changes to be implemented. The administrative discretion is limited to the conduct of the instead of to the merits of the review. The review itself will be the result of decisions arising out of public hearings and, mainly, from popular participation. Therefore, it is indispensable to make available to society, in a clear and complete manner, all the communication tools necessary for the assessment of the technical data that would justify the change of the master plan and the comparison of what is intended to change with the already existing norms.  Any different leading implies in dishonest acting, witch is doomable, since in the urban relation the citizen is the main actor of the revision and the main recipient of the norm.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-07-03
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.uninove.br/thesisjuris/article/view/14423
10.5585/rtj.v8i1.722
url https://periodicos.uninove.br/thesisjuris/article/view/14423
identifier_str_mv 10.5585/rtj.v8i1.722
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.uninove.br/thesisjuris/article/view/14423/6956
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Revista Thesis Juris
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Revista Thesis Juris
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Nove de Julho - Uninove
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Nove de Julho - Uninove
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Thesis Juris; v. 8 n. 1 (2019): (jan./jun.); 1-16
2317-3580
reponame:Revista Thesis Juris
instname:Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE)
instacron:UNINOVE
instname_str Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE)
instacron_str UNINOVE
institution UNINOVE
reponame_str Revista Thesis Juris
collection Revista Thesis Juris
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Thesis Juris - Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv thesis@uninove.br
_version_ 1800218169312280576

Registros relacionados