PENSION CONTRIBUTIONS FROM THE WORK CONTRACT AS FUNDAMENTAL LAW: SOURCE DIALOGUE THEORY AS AN INSTRUMENT FOR ITS EFFECTIVENESS

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Bebiano, Fernando Nogueira
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Morais, Océlio de Jesus Carneiro
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Thesis Juris
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.uninove.br/thesisjuris/article/view/9007
Resumo: There is a dichotomy between labor and social security law caused by a literal interpretation of paragraph 3, article 55 of Law nº 8.213/91 carried out by the INSS that does not automatically accept the effects of labor decisions for social security purposes. This creates an antagonism between the specialized justice subsystems that have the potential to create a gap in the legal system, preventing the insured worker from exercising his or her fundamental right to social security. This research was developed in light of an analytical approach in order to identify the gaps caused by this normative antagonism, and to promote the heterointegration of subsystems, the theory of the Source Dialogue was proposed, being this the social relevance of this research.
id UNINOVE-2_2f124b65c44acc034ef7794985bca255
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.uninove.br:article/9007
network_acronym_str UNINOVE-2
network_name_str Revista Thesis Juris
repository_id_str
spelling PENSION CONTRIBUTIONS FROM THE WORK CONTRACT AS FUNDAMENTAL LAW: SOURCE DIALOGUE THEORY AS AN INSTRUMENT FOR ITS EFFECTIVENESSPENSION CONTRIBUTIONS FROM THE WORK CONTRACT AS FUNDAMENTAL LAW: SOURCE DIALOGUE THEORY AS AN INSTRUMENT FOR ITS EFFECTIVENESSCONTRIBUIÇÕES PREVIDENCIÁRIAS ORIUNDAS DO CONTRATO DE TRABALHO COMO DIREITO FUNDAMENTAL: TEORIA DO DIÁLOGO DAS FONTES COMO INSTRUMENTO PARA SUA EFETIVAÇÃOSocial security. Fundamental right. Source Dialogue.Previdência social. Direito fundamental. Diálogo das Fontes.There is a dichotomy between labor and social security law caused by a literal interpretation of paragraph 3, article 55 of Law nº 8.213/91 carried out by the INSS that does not automatically accept the effects of labor decisions for social security purposes. This creates an antagonism between the specialized justice subsystems that have the potential to create a gap in the legal system, preventing the insured worker from exercising his or her fundamental right to social security. This research was developed in light of an analytical approach in order to identify the gaps caused by this normative antagonism, and to promote the heterointegration of subsystems, the theory of the Source Dialogue was proposed, being this the social relevance of this research.Há uma dicotomia entre o direito do trabalho e o previdenciário provocado por uma interpretação literal do parágrafo 3º, artigo 55 da Lei nº 8.213/91 realizada pelo INSS que não aceita de forma automática os efeitos das decisões trabalhistas para fins previdenciários. Criando, desta forma, um antagonismo entre os subsistemas de justiça especializada que tem potencial de gerar lacuna no ordenamento jurídico, obstaculizando o trabalhador segurado o exercício de seu direito fundamental à previdência social. Essa pesquisa foi desenvolvida a luz de uma abordagem analítica afim de identificar as lacunas provocadas por esse antagonismo normativo, e para promover a heterointegração dos subsistemas, foi proposta a teoria do Diálogo das fontes, sendo esta a relevância social desta pesquisa. Universidade Nove de Julho - Uninove2017-12-13info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.uninove.br/thesisjuris/article/view/900710.5585/rtj.v6i2.573Revista Thesis Juris; v. 6 n. 2 (2017): Maio/Agosto; 349-3642317-3580reponame:Revista Thesis Jurisinstname:Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE)instacron:UNINOVEporhttps://periodicos.uninove.br/thesisjuris/article/view/9007/3841Copyright (c) 2018 Fernando Nogueira Bebiano, Océlio de Jesus Carneiro Moraisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBebiano, Fernando NogueiraMorais, Océlio de Jesus Carneiro2019-09-12T18:59:15Zoai:ojs.periodicos.uninove.br:article/9007Revistahttps://periodicos.uninove.br/thesisjurisPRIhttps://periodicos.uninove.br/thesisjuris/oaithesis@uninove.br2317-35802317-3580opendoar:2019-09-12T18:59:15Revista Thesis Juris - Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv PENSION CONTRIBUTIONS FROM THE WORK CONTRACT AS FUNDAMENTAL LAW: SOURCE DIALOGUE THEORY AS AN INSTRUMENT FOR ITS EFFECTIVENESS
PENSION CONTRIBUTIONS FROM THE WORK CONTRACT AS FUNDAMENTAL LAW: SOURCE DIALOGUE THEORY AS AN INSTRUMENT FOR ITS EFFECTIVENESS
CONTRIBUIÇÕES PREVIDENCIÁRIAS ORIUNDAS DO CONTRATO DE TRABALHO COMO DIREITO FUNDAMENTAL: TEORIA DO DIÁLOGO DAS FONTES COMO INSTRUMENTO PARA SUA EFETIVAÇÃO
title PENSION CONTRIBUTIONS FROM THE WORK CONTRACT AS FUNDAMENTAL LAW: SOURCE DIALOGUE THEORY AS AN INSTRUMENT FOR ITS EFFECTIVENESS
spellingShingle PENSION CONTRIBUTIONS FROM THE WORK CONTRACT AS FUNDAMENTAL LAW: SOURCE DIALOGUE THEORY AS AN INSTRUMENT FOR ITS EFFECTIVENESS
Bebiano, Fernando Nogueira
Social security. Fundamental right. Source Dialogue.
Previdência social. Direito fundamental. Diálogo das Fontes.
title_short PENSION CONTRIBUTIONS FROM THE WORK CONTRACT AS FUNDAMENTAL LAW: SOURCE DIALOGUE THEORY AS AN INSTRUMENT FOR ITS EFFECTIVENESS
title_full PENSION CONTRIBUTIONS FROM THE WORK CONTRACT AS FUNDAMENTAL LAW: SOURCE DIALOGUE THEORY AS AN INSTRUMENT FOR ITS EFFECTIVENESS
title_fullStr PENSION CONTRIBUTIONS FROM THE WORK CONTRACT AS FUNDAMENTAL LAW: SOURCE DIALOGUE THEORY AS AN INSTRUMENT FOR ITS EFFECTIVENESS
title_full_unstemmed PENSION CONTRIBUTIONS FROM THE WORK CONTRACT AS FUNDAMENTAL LAW: SOURCE DIALOGUE THEORY AS AN INSTRUMENT FOR ITS EFFECTIVENESS
title_sort PENSION CONTRIBUTIONS FROM THE WORK CONTRACT AS FUNDAMENTAL LAW: SOURCE DIALOGUE THEORY AS AN INSTRUMENT FOR ITS EFFECTIVENESS
author Bebiano, Fernando Nogueira
author_facet Bebiano, Fernando Nogueira
Morais, Océlio de Jesus Carneiro
author_role author
author2 Morais, Océlio de Jesus Carneiro
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Bebiano, Fernando Nogueira
Morais, Océlio de Jesus Carneiro
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Social security. Fundamental right. Source Dialogue.
Previdência social. Direito fundamental. Diálogo das Fontes.
topic Social security. Fundamental right. Source Dialogue.
Previdência social. Direito fundamental. Diálogo das Fontes.
description There is a dichotomy between labor and social security law caused by a literal interpretation of paragraph 3, article 55 of Law nº 8.213/91 carried out by the INSS that does not automatically accept the effects of labor decisions for social security purposes. This creates an antagonism between the specialized justice subsystems that have the potential to create a gap in the legal system, preventing the insured worker from exercising his or her fundamental right to social security. This research was developed in light of an analytical approach in order to identify the gaps caused by this normative antagonism, and to promote the heterointegration of subsystems, the theory of the Source Dialogue was proposed, being this the social relevance of this research.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-12-13
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.uninove.br/thesisjuris/article/view/9007
10.5585/rtj.v6i2.573
url https://periodicos.uninove.br/thesisjuris/article/view/9007
identifier_str_mv 10.5585/rtj.v6i2.573
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.uninove.br/thesisjuris/article/view/9007/3841
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Fernando Nogueira Bebiano, Océlio de Jesus Carneiro Morais
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Fernando Nogueira Bebiano, Océlio de Jesus Carneiro Morais
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Nove de Julho - Uninove
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Nove de Julho - Uninove
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Thesis Juris; v. 6 n. 2 (2017): Maio/Agosto; 349-364
2317-3580
reponame:Revista Thesis Juris
instname:Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE)
instacron:UNINOVE
instname_str Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE)
instacron_str UNINOVE
institution UNINOVE
reponame_str Revista Thesis Juris
collection Revista Thesis Juris
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Thesis Juris - Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv thesis@uninove.br
_version_ 1800218168780652544

Registros relacionados