LAW AND PHILOSOPHY: IT IS POSSIBLE TO CONSTRUCT A COHERENT LEGAL THEORY WITHOUT PHILOSOPHICAL REFLECTION?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Castro Melo, Rafael Veras
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Marcílio Pompeu, Gina Vidal
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Thesis Juris
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.uninove.br/thesisjuris/article/view/9005
Resumo: This article discusses the relationship between law and philosophy, especially in view of the possibility of a coherent legal theory without philosophical reflection. It emphasizes the thoughts of philosophy of positivism, of the contemporary liberalism of Ronald Dworkin and classical tradition. It constitutes a qualitative, literature and theoretical research. Therefore, it is normally Hans Kelsen's analysis of the scientific Law, with its concepts in order to introduce the author's defense of positivist legal theory, criticizing the natural law. After, studies the thought of Ronald Dworkin liberalism, to which the law cannot distinguish between values ​​with respect to all valuations with the same consideration and respect. Finally, it discusses the thinking of the classical tradition, for whom the pursuit of virtue must be the main guiding principle of philosophical reflection. In the end, it’s evaluated by the above authors and dialectical confrontation of philosophical traditions, if is possible the building of a coherent legal theory without philosophical reflection.
id UNINOVE-2_b2fb99a1637faf2c5f9d052763761b54
oai_identifier_str oai:https://periodicos.uninove.br:article/9005
network_acronym_str UNINOVE-2
network_name_str Revista Thesis Juris
repository_id_str
spelling LAW AND PHILOSOPHY: IT IS POSSIBLE TO CONSTRUCT A COHERENT LEGAL THEORY WITHOUT PHILOSOPHICAL REFLECTION?DIREITO E FILOSOFIA: É POSSÍVEL CONSTRUIR UMA TEORIA JURÍDICA COERENTE SEM A REFLEXÃO FILOSÓFICA?Law Theory. Philosophy. Conflict of Traditions.Teoria do Direito. Filosofia. Conflito de TradiçõesThis article discusses the relationship between law and philosophy, especially in view of the possibility of a coherent legal theory without philosophical reflection. It emphasizes the thoughts of philosophy of positivism, of the contemporary liberalism of Ronald Dworkin and classical tradition. It constitutes a qualitative, literature and theoretical research. Therefore, it is normally Hans Kelsen's analysis of the scientific Law, with its concepts in order to introduce the author's defense of positivist legal theory, criticizing the natural law. After, studies the thought of Ronald Dworkin liberalism, to which the law cannot distinguish between values ​​with respect to all valuations with the same consideration and respect. Finally, it discusses the thinking of the classical tradition, for whom the pursuit of virtue must be the main guiding principle of philosophical reflection. In the end, it’s evaluated by the above authors and dialectical confrontation of philosophical traditions, if is possible the building of a coherent legal theory without philosophical reflection.Por meio desse artigo, aborda-se a relação entre direito e filosofia, notadamente na perspectiva da possibilidade da existência de uma teoria jurídica coerente sem a reflexão filosófica. Enfatiza-se os pensamentos da filosofia do positivismo, do liberalismo contemporâneo de Ronald Dworkin e da tradição clássica. Constitui-se como pesquisa qualitativa, bibliográfica e teórica. Para tanto, parte-se da análise de Hans Kelsen da cientificidade do Direito, com seus conceitos, a fim de introduz a defesa do autor de teoria jurídica positivista, com críticas ao jusnaturalismo. Empós, estuda-se o pensamento do liberalismo de Ronald Dworkin, para o qual o Direito não pode fazer distinção entre valores, com respeito a todas as valorações com a mesma consideração e respeito. Por fim, aborda o pensamento da tradição clássica, para quem a busca da virtude deve ser o principal eixo norteador da reflexão filosófica. Ao final, avalia-se, através dos autores supracitados e do confronto dialético das tradições filosóficas, se é possível a edificação de uma teoria jurídica coerente sem a reflexão filosófica. Universidade Nove de Julho - UNINOVE2017-12-13info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.uninove.br/thesisjuris/article/view/900510.5585/rtj.v6i2.439Revista Thesis Juris; v. 6, n. 2 (2017): Maio/Agosto; 312-3272317-3580reponame:Revista Thesis Jurisinstname:Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE)instacron:UNINOVEporhttps://periodicos.uninove.br/thesisjuris/article/view/9005/3839Direitos autorais 2018 Rafael Veras Castro Melo, Gina Vidal Marcílio Pompeuinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCastro Melo, Rafael VerasMarcílio Pompeu, Gina Vidal2019-09-12T18:59:15Zoai:https://periodicos.uninove.br:article/9005Revistahttps://periodicos.uninove.br/thesisjurisPRIhttps://periodicos.uninove.br/thesisjuris/oaithesis@uninove.br2317-35802317-3580opendoar:2019-09-12T18:59:15Revista Thesis Juris - Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv LAW AND PHILOSOPHY: IT IS POSSIBLE TO CONSTRUCT A COHERENT LEGAL THEORY WITHOUT PHILOSOPHICAL REFLECTION?
DIREITO E FILOSOFIA: É POSSÍVEL CONSTRUIR UMA TEORIA JURÍDICA COERENTE SEM A REFLEXÃO FILOSÓFICA?
title LAW AND PHILOSOPHY: IT IS POSSIBLE TO CONSTRUCT A COHERENT LEGAL THEORY WITHOUT PHILOSOPHICAL REFLECTION?
spellingShingle LAW AND PHILOSOPHY: IT IS POSSIBLE TO CONSTRUCT A COHERENT LEGAL THEORY WITHOUT PHILOSOPHICAL REFLECTION?
Castro Melo, Rafael Veras
Law Theory. Philosophy. Conflict of Traditions.
Teoria do Direito. Filosofia. Conflito de Tradições
title_short LAW AND PHILOSOPHY: IT IS POSSIBLE TO CONSTRUCT A COHERENT LEGAL THEORY WITHOUT PHILOSOPHICAL REFLECTION?
title_full LAW AND PHILOSOPHY: IT IS POSSIBLE TO CONSTRUCT A COHERENT LEGAL THEORY WITHOUT PHILOSOPHICAL REFLECTION?
title_fullStr LAW AND PHILOSOPHY: IT IS POSSIBLE TO CONSTRUCT A COHERENT LEGAL THEORY WITHOUT PHILOSOPHICAL REFLECTION?
title_full_unstemmed LAW AND PHILOSOPHY: IT IS POSSIBLE TO CONSTRUCT A COHERENT LEGAL THEORY WITHOUT PHILOSOPHICAL REFLECTION?
title_sort LAW AND PHILOSOPHY: IT IS POSSIBLE TO CONSTRUCT A COHERENT LEGAL THEORY WITHOUT PHILOSOPHICAL REFLECTION?
author Castro Melo, Rafael Veras
author_facet Castro Melo, Rafael Veras
Marcílio Pompeu, Gina Vidal
author_role author
author2 Marcílio Pompeu, Gina Vidal
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Castro Melo, Rafael Veras
Marcílio Pompeu, Gina Vidal
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Law Theory. Philosophy. Conflict of Traditions.
Teoria do Direito. Filosofia. Conflito de Tradições
topic Law Theory. Philosophy. Conflict of Traditions.
Teoria do Direito. Filosofia. Conflito de Tradições
description This article discusses the relationship between law and philosophy, especially in view of the possibility of a coherent legal theory without philosophical reflection. It emphasizes the thoughts of philosophy of positivism, of the contemporary liberalism of Ronald Dworkin and classical tradition. It constitutes a qualitative, literature and theoretical research. Therefore, it is normally Hans Kelsen's analysis of the scientific Law, with its concepts in order to introduce the author's defense of positivist legal theory, criticizing the natural law. After, studies the thought of Ronald Dworkin liberalism, to which the law cannot distinguish between values ​​with respect to all valuations with the same consideration and respect. Finally, it discusses the thinking of the classical tradition, for whom the pursuit of virtue must be the main guiding principle of philosophical reflection. In the end, it’s evaluated by the above authors and dialectical confrontation of philosophical traditions, if is possible the building of a coherent legal theory without philosophical reflection.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-12-13
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv

dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.uninove.br/thesisjuris/article/view/9005
10.5585/rtj.v6i2.439
url https://periodicos.uninove.br/thesisjuris/article/view/9005
identifier_str_mv 10.5585/rtj.v6i2.439
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.uninove.br/thesisjuris/article/view/9005/3839
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Direitos autorais 2018 Rafael Veras Castro Melo, Gina Vidal Marcílio Pompeu
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Direitos autorais 2018 Rafael Veras Castro Melo, Gina Vidal Marcílio Pompeu
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Nove de Julho - UNINOVE
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Nove de Julho - UNINOVE
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Thesis Juris; v. 6, n. 2 (2017): Maio/Agosto; 312-327
2317-3580
reponame:Revista Thesis Juris
instname:Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE)
instacron:UNINOVE
instname_str Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE)
instacron_str UNINOVE
institution UNINOVE
reponame_str Revista Thesis Juris
collection Revista Thesis Juris
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Thesis Juris - Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv thesis@uninove.br
_version_ 1792205532079063040

Registros relacionados