The Legal Pragmatism of Holmes and his Interpretation of Freedom of Speech: the Use of the Burqa as a Problem of Freedom of Religious Expression

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Catão, Adrualdo de Lima
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Tenório de Amorim, Fernando Sérgio
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Thesis Juris
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.uninove.br/thesisjuris/article/view/9037
Resumo: The prohibition of using full-face veil necessarily implies the restriction on the expression of thought, religious freedom and privacy. In the legal reasoning of the case of S.A.S. v. France, the European Court of Human Rights recognized the question of freedom as the main legal issue to be analyzed. In this sense, legal pragmatism of Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. can contribute to the debate on the democratic legitimacy of the decision taken by the European Court of Human Rights, especially in light of its views on freedom of expression and manifestation of thought.
id UNINOVE-2_ee76af588b7f354fc2ba07ec054b94cc
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.uninove.br:article/9037
network_acronym_str UNINOVE-2
network_name_str Revista Thesis Juris
repository_id_str
spelling The Legal Pragmatism of Holmes and his Interpretation of Freedom of Speech: the Use of the Burqa as a Problem of Freedom of Religious ExpressionO Pragmatismo Legal de Holmes e sua Interpretação da Liberdade de Expressão: o Uso da Burca como um Problema da Liberdade de Expressão ReligiosaPragmatismHuman RightsDemocracyPragmatismoDireitos HumanosDemocraciaThe prohibition of using full-face veil necessarily implies the restriction on the expression of thought, religious freedom and privacy. In the legal reasoning of the case of S.A.S. v. France, the European Court of Human Rights recognized the question of freedom as the main legal issue to be analyzed. In this sense, legal pragmatism of Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. can contribute to the debate on the democratic legitimacy of the decision taken by the European Court of Human Rights, especially in light of its views on freedom of expression and manifestation of thought.A proibição do uso do véu implica necessariamente na restrição da expressão do pensamento, da liberdade religiosa e da privacidade. Na fundamentação legal da decisão proferida no caso S.A.S v. França, a Corte Europeia de Direitos Humanos reconheceu a questão da Liberdade como o problema central a ser analisado. Nesse sentido, o pragmatismo jurídico de Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. pode contribuir para o debate sobre a legitimação democrática da decisão adotada pela Corte Europeia de Direitos Humanos, especialmente em relação às suas concepções de Liberdade de expressão e de manifestação do pensamento.Universidade Nove de Julho - Uninove2017-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.uninove.br/thesisjuris/article/view/903710.5585/rtj.v6i1.474Revista Thesis Juris; v. 6 n. 1 (2017): Janeiro / Abril; 223-2372317-3580reponame:Revista Thesis Jurisinstname:Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE)instacron:UNINOVEenghttps://periodicos.uninove.br/thesisjuris/article/view/9037/3871Copyright (c) 2018 Adrualdo de Lima Catão, Fernando Sérgio Tenório de Amoriminfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCatão, Adrualdo de LimaTenório de Amorim, Fernando Sérgio2019-09-12T18:59:27Zoai:ojs.periodicos.uninove.br:article/9037Revistahttps://periodicos.uninove.br/thesisjurisPRIhttps://periodicos.uninove.br/thesisjuris/oaithesis@uninove.br2317-35802317-3580opendoar:2019-09-12T18:59:27Revista Thesis Juris - Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The Legal Pragmatism of Holmes and his Interpretation of Freedom of Speech: the Use of the Burqa as a Problem of Freedom of Religious Expression
O Pragmatismo Legal de Holmes e sua Interpretação da Liberdade de Expressão: o Uso da Burca como um Problema da Liberdade de Expressão Religiosa
title The Legal Pragmatism of Holmes and his Interpretation of Freedom of Speech: the Use of the Burqa as a Problem of Freedom of Religious Expression
spellingShingle The Legal Pragmatism of Holmes and his Interpretation of Freedom of Speech: the Use of the Burqa as a Problem of Freedom of Religious Expression
Catão, Adrualdo de Lima
Pragmatism
Human Rights
Democracy
Pragmatismo
Direitos Humanos
Democracia
title_short The Legal Pragmatism of Holmes and his Interpretation of Freedom of Speech: the Use of the Burqa as a Problem of Freedom of Religious Expression
title_full The Legal Pragmatism of Holmes and his Interpretation of Freedom of Speech: the Use of the Burqa as a Problem of Freedom of Religious Expression
title_fullStr The Legal Pragmatism of Holmes and his Interpretation of Freedom of Speech: the Use of the Burqa as a Problem of Freedom of Religious Expression
title_full_unstemmed The Legal Pragmatism of Holmes and his Interpretation of Freedom of Speech: the Use of the Burqa as a Problem of Freedom of Religious Expression
title_sort The Legal Pragmatism of Holmes and his Interpretation of Freedom of Speech: the Use of the Burqa as a Problem of Freedom of Religious Expression
author Catão, Adrualdo de Lima
author_facet Catão, Adrualdo de Lima
Tenório de Amorim, Fernando Sérgio
author_role author
author2 Tenório de Amorim, Fernando Sérgio
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Catão, Adrualdo de Lima
Tenório de Amorim, Fernando Sérgio
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Pragmatism
Human Rights
Democracy
Pragmatismo
Direitos Humanos
Democracia
topic Pragmatism
Human Rights
Democracy
Pragmatismo
Direitos Humanos
Democracia
description The prohibition of using full-face veil necessarily implies the restriction on the expression of thought, religious freedom and privacy. In the legal reasoning of the case of S.A.S. v. France, the European Court of Human Rights recognized the question of freedom as the main legal issue to be analyzed. In this sense, legal pragmatism of Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. can contribute to the debate on the democratic legitimacy of the decision taken by the European Court of Human Rights, especially in light of its views on freedom of expression and manifestation of thought.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-04-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.uninove.br/thesisjuris/article/view/9037
10.5585/rtj.v6i1.474
url https://periodicos.uninove.br/thesisjuris/article/view/9037
identifier_str_mv 10.5585/rtj.v6i1.474
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.uninove.br/thesisjuris/article/view/9037/3871
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Adrualdo de Lima Catão, Fernando Sérgio Tenório de Amorim
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Adrualdo de Lima Catão, Fernando Sérgio Tenório de Amorim
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Nove de Julho - Uninove
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Nove de Julho - Uninove
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Thesis Juris; v. 6 n. 1 (2017): Janeiro / Abril; 223-237
2317-3580
reponame:Revista Thesis Juris
instname:Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE)
instacron:UNINOVE
instname_str Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE)
instacron_str UNINOVE
institution UNINOVE
reponame_str Revista Thesis Juris
collection Revista Thesis Juris
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Thesis Juris - Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv thesis@uninove.br
_version_ 1800218168804769792

Registros relacionados