The origins of agile methodology: where did we come from and where are we? a systematic literature review

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Akiyoshi Nagai, Ronaldo
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Sbragia, Roberto
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Gestão e Projetos (GeP)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.uninove.br/gep/article/view/23723
Resumo: Agile methods gained great popularity from 2001 onwards, with the advent of the Agile Manifesto. However, the excessive application of this approach has raised questions about its use as a magnet for anyone to commercialize theories and frameworks. Therefore, it is necessary to rescue the bases (or basic foundations) of agile thinking. We carried out a systematic literature review, seeking to consolidate the relevant scientific production and the body of knowledge prior to the 2001 Agile Manifesto and, with that, rescue the principles of agility and minimize the effects of marketable rediscovery cycles. The initial corpus obtained from Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus databases totaled 311 articles, reduced to 298 at the end of the first screening, and finally 318 papers, after the inclusion of relevant articles identified during the reading process of the initial corpus. The findings enabled the identification of the main articles that preceded the Agile Manifesto, adopted as the landmark of this literature review, and the identification of 27 variables grouped into four dimensions, resulting in a proposal for a conceptual structure for "the basic foundations of agile thinking". We suggest that the agile methodology is not a counterpoint to the industrial process, but adapted, derived, and with its fundamental bases originating from it. The fundamentals of the agile mentality generated in the quality improvement systems and the Toyota Production System (TPS) have always been present, just undergoing nomenclature changes to adapt to the management fashion movements.
id UNINOVE-4_95835fa9ab93113ba2f53630b157f199
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.uninove.br:article/23723
network_acronym_str UNINOVE-4
network_name_str Revista Gestão e Projetos (GeP)
repository_id_str
spelling The origins of agile methodology: where did we come from and where are we? a systematic literature reviewAs origens da metodologia ágil: de onde saímos e onde estamos? Uma revisão sistemática da literaturaAgile methodologyIncremental and iterative developmentLean thinkingproject management.Metodologia ágilIncremental and Iterative DevelopmentLean thinkingGestão de projetosAgile methods gained great popularity from 2001 onwards, with the advent of the Agile Manifesto. However, the excessive application of this approach has raised questions about its use as a magnet for anyone to commercialize theories and frameworks. Therefore, it is necessary to rescue the bases (or basic foundations) of agile thinking. We carried out a systematic literature review, seeking to consolidate the relevant scientific production and the body of knowledge prior to the 2001 Agile Manifesto and, with that, rescue the principles of agility and minimize the effects of marketable rediscovery cycles. The initial corpus obtained from Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus databases totaled 311 articles, reduced to 298 at the end of the first screening, and finally 318 papers, after the inclusion of relevant articles identified during the reading process of the initial corpus. The findings enabled the identification of the main articles that preceded the Agile Manifesto, adopted as the landmark of this literature review, and the identification of 27 variables grouped into four dimensions, resulting in a proposal for a conceptual structure for "the basic foundations of agile thinking". We suggest that the agile methodology is not a counterpoint to the industrial process, but adapted, derived, and with its fundamental bases originating from it. The fundamentals of the agile mentality generated in the quality improvement systems and the Toyota Production System (TPS) have always been present, just undergoing nomenclature changes to adapt to the management fashion movements.Os métodos ágeis ganharam grande popularidade a partir de 2001, com o advento do Manifesto Ágil. Contudo, a aplicação excessiva desta abordagem tem levantado questionamentos sobre sua utilização como um ímã para qualquer pessoa mercantilizar teorias e frameworks. Assim, torna-se necessário resgatar as bases (ou os fundamentos basilares) do pensamento ágil. Adotamos uma revisão sistemática de literatura buscando consolidar a produção científica relevante e o corpo de conhecimento anterior ao Manifesto Ágil de 2001, e, com isso, resgatar os princípios da agilidade e minimizar os efeitos dos ciclos de redescoberta mercantilizáveis. O corpus inicial obtido das bases Web of Science (WoS) e Scopus totalizou 311 artigos, reduzidos para 298 ao fim da primeira triagem, e, finalmente, 318 trabalhos, após a inclusão de artigos relevantes identificados durante o processo de leitura do corpus inicial. Os achados permitiram a identificação dos principais trabalhos que antecederam o Manifesto Ágil, adotado como marco desta revisão da literatura, e a identificação de 27 variáveis agrupadas em quatro dimensões, resultando em uma proposta de estrutura conceitual para "os fundamentos basilares do pensamento ágil". Sugere-se que a metodologia ágil não é um contraponto ao processo industrial, mas adaptada, derivada, e com suas bases fundamentais dele originadas. Os fundamentos basilares da mentalidade ágil, gestados nos sistemas de melhoria da qualidade e no Sistema Toyota de Produção (TPS), sempre estiveram presentes, experimentando apenas mudanças de nomenclatura para se adaptarem aos movimentos de management fashion.Universidade Nove de Julho - Uninove2023-03-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.uninove.br/gep/article/view/2372310.5585/gep.v14i1.23723Revista de Gestão e Projetos; v. 14 n. 1 (2023): (jan./abr.); 11-412236-0972reponame:Revista Gestão e Projetos (GeP)instname:Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE)instacron:UNINOVEporhttps://periodicos.uninove.br/gep/article/view/23723/10098Copyright (c) 2023 Dos autoreshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAkiyoshi Nagai, RonaldoSbragia, Roberto2023-03-31T14:44:47Zoai:ojs.periodicos.uninove.br:article/23723Revistahttps://periodicos.uninove.br/gepPRIhttps://periodicos.uninove.br/gep/oaigep@uninove.br || editor@revistagep.org || crismonteiro@uninove.br2236-09722236-0972opendoar:2023-03-31T14:44:47Revista Gestão e Projetos (GeP) - Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The origins of agile methodology: where did we come from and where are we? a systematic literature review
As origens da metodologia ágil: de onde saímos e onde estamos? Uma revisão sistemática da literatura
title The origins of agile methodology: where did we come from and where are we? a systematic literature review
spellingShingle The origins of agile methodology: where did we come from and where are we? a systematic literature review
Akiyoshi Nagai, Ronaldo
Agile methodology
Incremental and iterative development
Lean thinking
project management.
Metodologia ágil
Incremental and Iterative Development
Lean thinking
Gestão de projetos
title_short The origins of agile methodology: where did we come from and where are we? a systematic literature review
title_full The origins of agile methodology: where did we come from and where are we? a systematic literature review
title_fullStr The origins of agile methodology: where did we come from and where are we? a systematic literature review
title_full_unstemmed The origins of agile methodology: where did we come from and where are we? a systematic literature review
title_sort The origins of agile methodology: where did we come from and where are we? a systematic literature review
author Akiyoshi Nagai, Ronaldo
author_facet Akiyoshi Nagai, Ronaldo
Sbragia, Roberto
author_role author
author2 Sbragia, Roberto
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Akiyoshi Nagai, Ronaldo
Sbragia, Roberto
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Agile methodology
Incremental and iterative development
Lean thinking
project management.
Metodologia ágil
Incremental and Iterative Development
Lean thinking
Gestão de projetos
topic Agile methodology
Incremental and iterative development
Lean thinking
project management.
Metodologia ágil
Incremental and Iterative Development
Lean thinking
Gestão de projetos
description Agile methods gained great popularity from 2001 onwards, with the advent of the Agile Manifesto. However, the excessive application of this approach has raised questions about its use as a magnet for anyone to commercialize theories and frameworks. Therefore, it is necessary to rescue the bases (or basic foundations) of agile thinking. We carried out a systematic literature review, seeking to consolidate the relevant scientific production and the body of knowledge prior to the 2001 Agile Manifesto and, with that, rescue the principles of agility and minimize the effects of marketable rediscovery cycles. The initial corpus obtained from Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus databases totaled 311 articles, reduced to 298 at the end of the first screening, and finally 318 papers, after the inclusion of relevant articles identified during the reading process of the initial corpus. The findings enabled the identification of the main articles that preceded the Agile Manifesto, adopted as the landmark of this literature review, and the identification of 27 variables grouped into four dimensions, resulting in a proposal for a conceptual structure for "the basic foundations of agile thinking". We suggest that the agile methodology is not a counterpoint to the industrial process, but adapted, derived, and with its fundamental bases originating from it. The fundamentals of the agile mentality generated in the quality improvement systems and the Toyota Production System (TPS) have always been present, just undergoing nomenclature changes to adapt to the management fashion movements.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-03-31
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.uninove.br/gep/article/view/23723
10.5585/gep.v14i1.23723
url https://periodicos.uninove.br/gep/article/view/23723
identifier_str_mv 10.5585/gep.v14i1.23723
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.uninove.br/gep/article/view/23723/10098
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Dos autores
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Dos autores
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Nove de Julho - Uninove
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Nove de Julho - Uninove
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista de Gestão e Projetos; v. 14 n. 1 (2023): (jan./abr.); 11-41
2236-0972
reponame:Revista Gestão e Projetos (GeP)
instname:Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE)
instacron:UNINOVE
instname_str Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE)
instacron_str UNINOVE
institution UNINOVE
reponame_str Revista Gestão e Projetos (GeP)
collection Revista Gestão e Projetos (GeP)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Gestão e Projetos (GeP) - Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv gep@uninove.br || editor@revistagep.org || crismonteiro@uninove.br
_version_ 1797052864590249984

Registros relacionados