Building Productivity in Virtual Project Teams
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2015 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista Gestão e Projetos (GeP) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.uninove.br/gep/article/view/9608 |
Resumo: | The steady increase in project failure rates is leaving businesses searching for better integration techniques to virtualize their project environments. Through virtualization, organizations may have positive impacts on communities across geographical boundaries and resource constraints. The focus of this phenomenological study was to explore, via the experiences of successful project management practitioners, best practice strategies for integrating virtual project teams through data analysis. The conceptual framework included von Bertalanffy’s general systems theory, decomposition model of business process and project management frameworks, and the recomposition approach. Twenty-two senior project managers with more than 5 years of experience managing virtual project environments participated in semistructured telephone interviews. The van Kaam process employing normalization and bracketing approaches in data analysis resulted in the emergence of 34 thematic categories. The 10 most common themes culminated in the identification of strategies relevant for virtual project teams. The major themes pertained to 3 broad areas: (a) structure that accommodates skills and technology for virtual team success, (b) governance leading to efficient virtual project team management, and (c) collaboration practices across diverse environments. This study involved the exploration of the experiences of the participants. Using the van Kaam method for normalization of the data and clustering like experiences into thematic statements, the study provided a plethora of new information concentrated on 10 themes that emerged. |
id |
UNINOVE-4_f5ac31f0154fecfc5d108733f90ad243 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:https://periodicos.uninove.br:article/9608 |
network_acronym_str |
UNINOVE-4 |
network_name_str |
Revista Gestão e Projetos (GeP) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Building Productivity in Virtual Project TeamsBuilding Productivity in Virtual Project TeamsProject; Project Management; Governance; Communication; Strategy; Diversity; Structure; Virtual; Virtuality; Virtual Project TeamsProject, Project Management; Governance; Communication; Strategy; Diversity; Structure; Virtual; Virtuality; Virtual Project Teams.The steady increase in project failure rates is leaving businesses searching for better integration techniques to virtualize their project environments. Through virtualization, organizations may have positive impacts on communities across geographical boundaries and resource constraints. The focus of this phenomenological study was to explore, via the experiences of successful project management practitioners, best practice strategies for integrating virtual project teams through data analysis. The conceptual framework included von Bertalanffy’s general systems theory, decomposition model of business process and project management frameworks, and the recomposition approach. Twenty-two senior project managers with more than 5 years of experience managing virtual project environments participated in semistructured telephone interviews. The van Kaam process employing normalization and bracketing approaches in data analysis resulted in the emergence of 34 thematic categories. The 10 most common themes culminated in the identification of strategies relevant for virtual project teams. The major themes pertained to 3 broad areas: (a) structure that accommodates skills and technology for virtual team success, (b) governance leading to efficient virtual project team management, and (c) collaboration practices across diverse environments. This study involved the exploration of the experiences of the participants. Using the van Kaam method for normalization of the data and clustering like experiences into thematic statements, the study provided a plethora of new information concentrated on 10 themes that emerged.The steady increase in project failure rates is leaving businesses searching for better integration techniques to virtualize their project environments. Through virtualization, organizations may have positive impacts on communities across geographical boundaries and resource constraints. The focus of this phenomenological study was to explore, via the experiences of successful project management practitioners, best practice strategies for integrating virtual project teams through data analysis. The conceptual framework included von Bertalanffy’s general systems theory, decomposition model of business process and project management frameworks, and the recomposition approach. Twenty-two senior project managers with more than 5 years of experience managing virtual project environments participated in semistructured telephone interviews. The van Kaam process employing normalization and bracketing approaches in data analysis resulted in the emergence of 34 thematic categories. The 10 most common themes culminated in the identification of strategies relevant for virtual project teams. The major themes pertained to 3 broad areas: (a) structure that accommodates skills and technology for virtual team success, (b) governance leading to efficient virtual project team management, and (c) collaboration practices across diverse environments. This study involved the exploration of the experiences of the participants. Using the van Kaam method for normalization of the data and clustering like experiences into thematic statements, the study provided a plethora of new information concentrated on 10 themes that emerged. Universidade Nove de Julho (Uninove)Hamersly, BillLand, Denise2015-04-28info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.uninove.br/gep/article/view/960810.5585/gep.v6i1.305Revista de Gestão e Projetos; v. 6, n. 1 (2015): janeiro-abril; 01-132236-0972reponame:Revista Gestão e Projetos (GeP)instname:Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE)instacron:UNINOVEenghttps://periodicos.uninove.br/gep/article/view/9608/4353Direitos autorais 2015 Bill Hamersly, Denise Landinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2019-05-27T21:11:10Zoai:https://periodicos.uninove.br:article/9608Revistahttps://periodicos.uninove.br/gepPRIhttps://periodicos.uninove.br/gep/oaigep@uninove.br || editor@revistagep.org || crismonteiro@uninove.br2236-09722236-0972opendoar:2019-05-27T21:11:10Revista Gestão e Projetos (GeP) - Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Building Productivity in Virtual Project Teams Building Productivity in Virtual Project Teams |
title |
Building Productivity in Virtual Project Teams |
spellingShingle |
Building Productivity in Virtual Project Teams Hamersly, Bill Project; Project Management; Governance; Communication; Strategy; Diversity; Structure; Virtual; Virtuality; Virtual Project Teams Project, Project Management; Governance; Communication; Strategy; Diversity; Structure; Virtual; Virtuality; Virtual Project Teams. |
title_short |
Building Productivity in Virtual Project Teams |
title_full |
Building Productivity in Virtual Project Teams |
title_fullStr |
Building Productivity in Virtual Project Teams |
title_full_unstemmed |
Building Productivity in Virtual Project Teams |
title_sort |
Building Productivity in Virtual Project Teams |
author |
Hamersly, Bill |
author_facet |
Hamersly, Bill Land, Denise |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Land, Denise |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Hamersly, Bill Land, Denise |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Project; Project Management; Governance; Communication; Strategy; Diversity; Structure; Virtual; Virtuality; Virtual Project Teams Project, Project Management; Governance; Communication; Strategy; Diversity; Structure; Virtual; Virtuality; Virtual Project Teams. |
topic |
Project; Project Management; Governance; Communication; Strategy; Diversity; Structure; Virtual; Virtuality; Virtual Project Teams Project, Project Management; Governance; Communication; Strategy; Diversity; Structure; Virtual; Virtuality; Virtual Project Teams. |
description |
The steady increase in project failure rates is leaving businesses searching for better integration techniques to virtualize their project environments. Through virtualization, organizations may have positive impacts on communities across geographical boundaries and resource constraints. The focus of this phenomenological study was to explore, via the experiences of successful project management practitioners, best practice strategies for integrating virtual project teams through data analysis. The conceptual framework included von Bertalanffy’s general systems theory, decomposition model of business process and project management frameworks, and the recomposition approach. Twenty-two senior project managers with more than 5 years of experience managing virtual project environments participated in semistructured telephone interviews. The van Kaam process employing normalization and bracketing approaches in data analysis resulted in the emergence of 34 thematic categories. The 10 most common themes culminated in the identification of strategies relevant for virtual project teams. The major themes pertained to 3 broad areas: (a) structure that accommodates skills and technology for virtual team success, (b) governance leading to efficient virtual project team management, and (c) collaboration practices across diverse environments. This study involved the exploration of the experiences of the participants. Using the van Kaam method for normalization of the data and clustering like experiences into thematic statements, the study provided a plethora of new information concentrated on 10 themes that emerged. |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-04-28 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.uninove.br/gep/article/view/9608 10.5585/gep.v6i1.305 |
url |
https://periodicos.uninove.br/gep/article/view/9608 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5585/gep.v6i1.305 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.uninove.br/gep/article/view/9608/4353 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Direitos autorais 2015 Bill Hamersly, Denise Land info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Direitos autorais 2015 Bill Hamersly, Denise Land |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Nove de Julho (Uninove) |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Nove de Julho (Uninove) |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Gestão e Projetos; v. 6, n. 1 (2015): janeiro-abril; 01-13 2236-0972 reponame:Revista Gestão e Projetos (GeP) instname:Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE) instacron:UNINOVE |
instname_str |
Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE) |
instacron_str |
UNINOVE |
institution |
UNINOVE |
reponame_str |
Revista Gestão e Projetos (GeP) |
collection |
Revista Gestão e Projetos (GeP) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Gestão e Projetos (GeP) - Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
gep@uninove.br || editor@revistagep.org || crismonteiro@uninove.br |
_version_ |
1797052864709787648 |