Building Productivity in Virtual Project Teams

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Hamersly, Bill
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Land, Denise
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Gestão e Projetos (GeP)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.uninove.br/gep/article/view/9608
Resumo: The steady increase in project failure rates is leaving businesses searching for better integration techniques to virtualize their project environments. Through virtualization, organizations may have positive impacts on communities across geographical boundaries and resource constraints. The focus of this phenomenological study was to explore, via the experiences of successful project management practitioners, best practice strategies for integrating virtual project teams through data analysis. The conceptual framework included von Bertalanffy’s general systems theory, decomposition model of business process and project management frameworks, and the recomposition approach. Twenty-two senior project managers with more than 5 years of experience managing virtual project environments participated in semistructured telephone interviews. The van Kaam process employing normalization and bracketing approaches in data analysis resulted in the emergence of 34 thematic categories. The 10 most common themes culminated in the identification of strategies relevant for virtual project teams. The major themes pertained to 3 broad areas: (a) structure that accommodates skills and technology for virtual team success, (b) governance leading to efficient virtual project team management, and (c) collaboration practices across diverse environments. This study involved the exploration of the experiences of the participants. Using the van Kaam method for normalization of the data and clustering like experiences into thematic statements, the study provided a plethora of new information concentrated on 10 themes that emerged.
id UNINOVE-4_f5ac31f0154fecfc5d108733f90ad243
oai_identifier_str oai:https://periodicos.uninove.br:article/9608
network_acronym_str UNINOVE-4
network_name_str Revista Gestão e Projetos (GeP)
repository_id_str
spelling Building Productivity in Virtual Project TeamsBuilding Productivity in Virtual Project TeamsProject; Project Management; Governance; Communication; Strategy; Diversity; Structure; Virtual; Virtuality; Virtual Project TeamsProject, Project Management; Governance; Communication; Strategy; Diversity; Structure; Virtual; Virtuality; Virtual Project Teams.The steady increase in project failure rates is leaving businesses searching for better integration techniques to virtualize their project environments. Through virtualization, organizations may have positive impacts on communities across geographical boundaries and resource constraints. The focus of this phenomenological study was to explore, via the experiences of successful project management practitioners, best practice strategies for integrating virtual project teams through data analysis. The conceptual framework included von Bertalanffy’s general systems theory, decomposition model of business process and project management frameworks, and the recomposition approach. Twenty-two senior project managers with more than 5 years of experience managing virtual project environments participated in semistructured telephone interviews. The van Kaam process employing normalization and bracketing approaches in data analysis resulted in the emergence of 34 thematic categories. The 10 most common themes culminated in the identification of strategies relevant for virtual project teams. The major themes pertained to 3 broad areas: (a) structure that accommodates skills and technology for virtual team success, (b) governance leading to efficient virtual project team management, and (c) collaboration practices across diverse environments. This study involved the exploration of the experiences of the participants. Using the van Kaam method for normalization of the data and clustering like experiences into thematic statements, the study provided a plethora of new information concentrated on 10 themes that emerged.The steady increase in project failure rates is leaving businesses searching for better integration techniques to virtualize their project environments. Through virtualization, organizations may have positive impacts on communities across geographical boundaries and resource constraints. The focus of this phenomenological study was to explore, via the experiences of successful project management practitioners, best practice strategies for integrating virtual project teams through data analysis. The conceptual framework included von Bertalanffy’s general systems theory, decomposition model of business process and project management frameworks, and the recomposition approach. Twenty-two senior project managers with more than 5 years of experience managing virtual project environments participated in semistructured telephone interviews. The van Kaam process employing normalization and bracketing approaches in data analysis resulted in the emergence of 34 thematic categories. The 10 most common themes culminated in the identification of strategies relevant for virtual project teams. The major themes pertained to 3 broad areas: (a) structure that accommodates skills and technology for virtual team success, (b) governance leading to efficient virtual project team management, and (c) collaboration practices across diverse environments. This study involved the exploration of the experiences of the participants. Using the van Kaam method for normalization of the data and clustering like experiences into thematic statements, the study provided a plethora of new information concentrated on 10 themes that emerged. Universidade Nove de Julho (Uninove)Hamersly, BillLand, Denise2015-04-28info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.uninove.br/gep/article/view/960810.5585/gep.v6i1.305Revista de Gestão e Projetos; v. 6, n. 1 (2015): janeiro-abril; 01-132236-0972reponame:Revista Gestão e Projetos (GeP)instname:Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE)instacron:UNINOVEenghttps://periodicos.uninove.br/gep/article/view/9608/4353Direitos autorais 2015 Bill Hamersly, Denise Landinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2019-05-27T21:11:10Zoai:https://periodicos.uninove.br:article/9608Revistahttps://periodicos.uninove.br/gepPRIhttps://periodicos.uninove.br/gep/oaigep@uninove.br || editor@revistagep.org || crismonteiro@uninove.br2236-09722236-0972opendoar:2019-05-27T21:11:10Revista Gestão e Projetos (GeP) - Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Building Productivity in Virtual Project Teams
Building Productivity in Virtual Project Teams
title Building Productivity in Virtual Project Teams
spellingShingle Building Productivity in Virtual Project Teams
Hamersly, Bill
Project; Project Management; Governance; Communication; Strategy; Diversity; Structure; Virtual; Virtuality; Virtual Project Teams
Project, Project Management; Governance; Communication; Strategy; Diversity; Structure; Virtual; Virtuality; Virtual Project Teams.
title_short Building Productivity in Virtual Project Teams
title_full Building Productivity in Virtual Project Teams
title_fullStr Building Productivity in Virtual Project Teams
title_full_unstemmed Building Productivity in Virtual Project Teams
title_sort Building Productivity in Virtual Project Teams
author Hamersly, Bill
author_facet Hamersly, Bill
Land, Denise
author_role author
author2 Land, Denise
author2_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Hamersly, Bill
Land, Denise
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Project; Project Management; Governance; Communication; Strategy; Diversity; Structure; Virtual; Virtuality; Virtual Project Teams
Project, Project Management; Governance; Communication; Strategy; Diversity; Structure; Virtual; Virtuality; Virtual Project Teams.
topic Project; Project Management; Governance; Communication; Strategy; Diversity; Structure; Virtual; Virtuality; Virtual Project Teams
Project, Project Management; Governance; Communication; Strategy; Diversity; Structure; Virtual; Virtuality; Virtual Project Teams.
description The steady increase in project failure rates is leaving businesses searching for better integration techniques to virtualize their project environments. Through virtualization, organizations may have positive impacts on communities across geographical boundaries and resource constraints. The focus of this phenomenological study was to explore, via the experiences of successful project management practitioners, best practice strategies for integrating virtual project teams through data analysis. The conceptual framework included von Bertalanffy’s general systems theory, decomposition model of business process and project management frameworks, and the recomposition approach. Twenty-two senior project managers with more than 5 years of experience managing virtual project environments participated in semistructured telephone interviews. The van Kaam process employing normalization and bracketing approaches in data analysis resulted in the emergence of 34 thematic categories. The 10 most common themes culminated in the identification of strategies relevant for virtual project teams. The major themes pertained to 3 broad areas: (a) structure that accommodates skills and technology for virtual team success, (b) governance leading to efficient virtual project team management, and (c) collaboration practices across diverse environments. This study involved the exploration of the experiences of the participants. Using the van Kaam method for normalization of the data and clustering like experiences into thematic statements, the study provided a plethora of new information concentrated on 10 themes that emerged.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-04-28
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv

dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.uninove.br/gep/article/view/9608
10.5585/gep.v6i1.305
url https://periodicos.uninove.br/gep/article/view/9608
identifier_str_mv 10.5585/gep.v6i1.305
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.uninove.br/gep/article/view/9608/4353
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Direitos autorais 2015 Bill Hamersly, Denise Land
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Direitos autorais 2015 Bill Hamersly, Denise Land
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Nove de Julho (Uninove)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Nove de Julho (Uninove)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista de Gestão e Projetos; v. 6, n. 1 (2015): janeiro-abril; 01-13
2236-0972
reponame:Revista Gestão e Projetos (GeP)
instname:Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE)
instacron:UNINOVE
instname_str Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE)
instacron_str UNINOVE
institution UNINOVE
reponame_str Revista Gestão e Projetos (GeP)
collection Revista Gestão e Projetos (GeP)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Gestão e Projetos (GeP) - Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv gep@uninove.br || editor@revistagep.org || crismonteiro@uninove.br
_version_ 1797052864709787648