Família, pobreza e renda no Paraná

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ramos, Sonia Aparecida Gomes de
Data de Publicação: 2022
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UNIOESTE
Texto Completo: https://tede.unioeste.br/handle/tede/7357
Resumo: The aim of the study was to identify and analyze the impacts of recent changes observed in the structure of families and their relationship with poverty. The object of study is the state of Paraná, with geographic coverage of the Immediate Geographical Regions (RGI), comparing rural and urban areas. The used methodology was the estimation of a Family Multidimensional Poverty Index (IPMF), using data from IPARDES, with an excerpt between 2006 and 2016. The survey results indicate that the state showed an increase in the number of families from 2006/2010 of 1% and 8% between 2010/2016. From the 29 RGIs, 17 of these were considered urban areas with a share of the agricultural GDP between 5% and 20%, while there are 12 rural areas with a share of the GDP between 21% and 37%. Regarding the classification of the sex of individuals, predominance of adult females. In children and teenagers, the percentage was higher in males, an average of 4%. The rural regions had an average per capita GDP between R$ 17,000.00 and R$ 32,000.00 and the urban ones between R$ 22,000.00 and R$ 48,000.00. Regarding the IPMF, the results indicate that poverty has been decreasing over the period, although with oscillations showing a reduction in the indexes and a subsequent increase. In the infant mortality dimension, a decrease of -0.52% in urban RGIs and -0.3% in rural ones. In the illiteracy dimension, urban areas have 22.16%, more illiterates than in rural regions, however there was a reduction of -1.74% from 2006 to 2016 in urban areas and -1.49% in rural areas. In the income dimension between 2006 and 2016, urban areas present a reduction of - 0.43%, and in rural areas it was - 3.89%. In the undernutrition dimension, both regionalizations had a considerable decrease until 2015, and 3% average increase for 2016. The proportion of poor people (H) in urban regions was higher than in rural regions, except for the year 2016, which presented a proportion of poverty lower than that of rural regions by 0.66%. The intensity of poverty in 2006 was 1.08% in rural regions and 0.99% in urban areas. Deprivation in rural regions between 2006 and 2016 increased by 0.45%. In urban regions, multidimensional family poverty in 2006 was 33.95%; 2010 of 33.91% and 2016 of 33.99%. In rural areas 2006 of 34.03%; 2011 of 34.08% and in 2016 of 33.92%. The analysis allows us to conclude that the dimensions and indicators have higher percentages, in most of the determinant variables in urban regions, than in rural regions. The conclusion is that there have been changes in family demography and the presence of poverty in Paraná.
id UNIOESTE-1_3f6bf6ce4bb3774b9625de75c91da2f1
oai_identifier_str oai:tede.unioeste.br:tede/7357
network_acronym_str UNIOESTE-1
network_name_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UNIOESTE
repository_id_str
spelling Lima, Jandir Ferrera dehttp://lattes.cnpq.br/8590492041554583Gabriel, Flavio Braga de Almeidahttp://lattes.cnpq.br/9084287979694927Morais, Ana Cristina dos Santoshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/0414780885182679Lima, Jandir Ferrera dehttp://lattes.cnpq.br/8590492041554583http://lattes.cnpq.br/4136572440933979Ramos, Sonia Aparecida Gomes de2024-08-29T20:51:57Z2022-11-16RAMOS, Sonia Aparecida Gomes de. Família, pobreza e renda no Paraná. 2022. 91 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Economia) - Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná, Toledo, 2022 .https://tede.unioeste.br/handle/tede/7357The aim of the study was to identify and analyze the impacts of recent changes observed in the structure of families and their relationship with poverty. The object of study is the state of Paraná, with geographic coverage of the Immediate Geographical Regions (RGI), comparing rural and urban areas. The used methodology was the estimation of a Family Multidimensional Poverty Index (IPMF), using data from IPARDES, with an excerpt between 2006 and 2016. The survey results indicate that the state showed an increase in the number of families from 2006/2010 of 1% and 8% between 2010/2016. From the 29 RGIs, 17 of these were considered urban areas with a share of the agricultural GDP between 5% and 20%, while there are 12 rural areas with a share of the GDP between 21% and 37%. Regarding the classification of the sex of individuals, predominance of adult females. In children and teenagers, the percentage was higher in males, an average of 4%. The rural regions had an average per capita GDP between R$ 17,000.00 and R$ 32,000.00 and the urban ones between R$ 22,000.00 and R$ 48,000.00. Regarding the IPMF, the results indicate that poverty has been decreasing over the period, although with oscillations showing a reduction in the indexes and a subsequent increase. In the infant mortality dimension, a decrease of -0.52% in urban RGIs and -0.3% in rural ones. In the illiteracy dimension, urban areas have 22.16%, more illiterates than in rural regions, however there was a reduction of -1.74% from 2006 to 2016 in urban areas and -1.49% in rural areas. In the income dimension between 2006 and 2016, urban areas present a reduction of - 0.43%, and in rural areas it was - 3.89%. In the undernutrition dimension, both regionalizations had a considerable decrease until 2015, and 3% average increase for 2016. The proportion of poor people (H) in urban regions was higher than in rural regions, except for the year 2016, which presented a proportion of poverty lower than that of rural regions by 0.66%. The intensity of poverty in 2006 was 1.08% in rural regions and 0.99% in urban areas. Deprivation in rural regions between 2006 and 2016 increased by 0.45%. In urban regions, multidimensional family poverty in 2006 was 33.95%; 2010 of 33.91% and 2016 of 33.99%. In rural areas 2006 of 34.03%; 2011 of 34.08% and in 2016 of 33.92%. The analysis allows us to conclude that the dimensions and indicators have higher percentages, in most of the determinant variables in urban regions, than in rural regions. The conclusion is that there have been changes in family demography and the presence of poverty in Paraná.O objetivo do estudo foi identificar e analisar os impactos das mudanças recentemente observadas na estrutura das famílias e sua relação com a pobreza. O objeto de estudo é o estado do Paraná, com recorte geográfico das Regiões Geográficas Imediatas (RGI), comparando áreas rurais e urbanas. A metodologia utilizada foi a estimativa de um Índice de Pobreza Multidimensional Familiar (IPMF), utilizando dados do IPARDES, com recorte entre 2006 e 2016. Os resultados da pesquisa apontam que o estado apresentou aumento no número de famílias de 2006/2010 de 1% e 8% entre 2010/2016. Das 29 RGIs,17 destas foram consideradas áreas urbanas com participação do PIB agropecuário entre 5% e 20%, já as áreas rurais são 12 com participação do PIB entre 21% e 37%. Em relação a classificação do sexo dos indivíduos, predominância de pessoas adultas do sexo feminino. Já nas crianças e adolescentes, o percentual foi maior no sexo masculino, em média de 4%. As regiões rurais apresentaram um PIB per capita em média de R$ 17.000,00 a R$ 32.000,00 e as urbanas entre R$ 22.000,00 e R$ 48.000,00. Em relação ao IPMF, os resultados apontam que a pobreza vem diminuindo ao longo do período, embora, com oscilações apresentando redução dos índices e posterior aumento. Na dimensão mortalidade infantil queda de - 0,52% nas RGIs urbanas e - 0,3% nas rurais. Na dimensão analfabetismo áreas urbanas apresentam 22,16% a mais de analfabetos do que nas regiões rurais, contudo, houve redução de -1,74% de 2006 para 2016 nas áreas urbanas e -1,49%, nas rurais. Na dimensão renda entre 2006 e 2016, áreas urbanas apresentam redução de -0,43%, e nas rurais foi de -3,89%. Na Dimensão desnutrição, ambas as regionalizações tiveram diminuição considerável até 2015, e aumento em média de 3% para 2016. A proporção de pobres (H) nas regiões urbanas foi superior as das regiões rurais, exceto para o ano 2016, que apresentou proporção de pobreza inferior ao das regiões rurais em 0,66%. A intensidade da pobreza em 2006, foi de 1,08% em regiões rurais e 0,99% nas urbanas. A privação das regiões rurais entre 2006 e 2016 aumentou em 0,45%. Nas regiões urbanas a pobreza multidimensional familiar em 2006 era de 33,95%; 2010 de 33,91% e 2016 de 33,99%. Nas áreas rurais 2006 de 34,03%; 2011 de 34,08% e em 2016 de 33,92%. A análise permite concluir que as dimensões e indicadores apresentam percentuais maiores, na maioria das variáveis analisadas nas regiões urbanas, do que nas regiões rurais. Conclui-se que houve alterações na demografia familiar e presença de pobreza no Paraná.Submitted by Marilene Donadel (marilene.donadel@unioeste.br) on 2024-08-29T20:51:57Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Sonia_Ramos_2022.pdf: 766879 bytes, checksum: 922cddbbafe66e3eecbc70ea39b2e5bd (MD5)Made available in DSpace on 2024-08-29T20:51:57Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Sonia_Ramos_2022.pdf: 766879 bytes, checksum: 922cddbbafe66e3eecbc70ea39b2e5bd (MD5) Previous issue date: 2022-11-16Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - CAPESapplication/pdfpor-2624803687637593200500Universidade Estadual do Oeste do ParanáToledoPrograma de Pós-Graduação em EconomiaUNIOESTEBrasilCentro de Ciências Sociais Aplicadashttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPobrezaFamíliaParanáUrbanoRuralPovertyFamilyParanáUrbanRuralCIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::ECONOMIAFamília, pobreza e renda no ParanáFamily, poverty, and income in Paranáinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis-15453328537787102636006006006008872935161184826606-25049033926000988222075167498588264571reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UNIOESTEinstname:Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná (UNIOESTE)instacron:UNIOESTEORIGINALSonia_Ramos_2022.pdfSonia_Ramos_2022.pdfapplication/pdf766879http://tede.unioeste.br:8080/tede/bitstream/tede/7357/2/Sonia_Ramos_2022.pdf922cddbbafe66e3eecbc70ea39b2e5bdMD52LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-82165http://tede.unioeste.br:8080/tede/bitstream/tede/7357/1/license.txtbd3efa91386c1718a7f26a329fdcb468MD51tede/73572024-08-29 17:51:57.171oai:tede.unioeste.br:tede/7357Tk9UQTogQ09MT1FVRSBBUVVJIEEgU1VBIFBSw5NQUklBIExJQ0VOw4dBCkVzdGEgbGljZW7Dp2EgZGUgZXhlbXBsbyDDqSBmb3JuZWNpZGEgYXBlbmFzIHBhcmEgZmlucyBpbmZvcm1hdGl2b3MuCgpMSUNFTsOHQSBERSBESVNUUklCVUnDh8ODTyBOw4NPLUVYQ0xVU0lWQQoKQ29tIGEgYXByZXNlbnRhw6fDo28gZGVzdGEgbGljZW7Dp2EsIHZvY8OqIChvIGF1dG9yIChlcykgb3UgbyB0aXR1bGFyIGRvcyBkaXJlaXRvcyBkZSBhdXRvcikgY29uY2VkZSDDoCBVbml2ZXJzaWRhZGUgClhYWCAoU2lnbGEgZGEgVW5pdmVyc2lkYWRlKSBvIGRpcmVpdG8gbsOjby1leGNsdXNpdm8gZGUgcmVwcm9kdXppciwgIHRyYWR1emlyIChjb25mb3JtZSBkZWZpbmlkbyBhYmFpeG8pLCBlL291IApkaXN0cmlidWlyIGEgc3VhIHRlc2Ugb3UgZGlzc2VydGHDp8OjbyAoaW5jbHVpbmRvIG8gcmVzdW1vKSBwb3IgdG9kbyBvIG11bmRvIG5vIGZvcm1hdG8gaW1wcmVzc28gZSBlbGV0csO0bmljbyBlIAplbSBxdWFscXVlciBtZWlvLCBpbmNsdWluZG8gb3MgZm9ybWF0b3Mgw6F1ZGlvIG91IHbDrWRlby4KClZvY8OqIGNvbmNvcmRhIHF1ZSBhIFNpZ2xhIGRlIFVuaXZlcnNpZGFkZSBwb2RlLCBzZW0gYWx0ZXJhciBvIGNvbnRlw7pkbywgdHJhbnNwb3IgYSBzdWEgdGVzZSBvdSBkaXNzZXJ0YcOnw6NvIApwYXJhIHF1YWxxdWVyIG1laW8gb3UgZm9ybWF0byBwYXJhIGZpbnMgZGUgcHJlc2VydmHDp8Ojby4KClZvY8OqIHRhbWLDqW0gY29uY29yZGEgcXVlIGEgU2lnbGEgZGUgVW5pdmVyc2lkYWRlIHBvZGUgbWFudGVyIG1haXMgZGUgdW1hIGPDs3BpYSBhIHN1YSB0ZXNlIG91IApkaXNzZXJ0YcOnw6NvIHBhcmEgZmlucyBkZSBzZWd1cmFuw6dhLCBiYWNrLXVwIGUgcHJlc2VydmHDp8Ojby4KClZvY8OqIGRlY2xhcmEgcXVlIGEgc3VhIHRlc2Ugb3UgZGlzc2VydGHDp8OjbyDDqSBvcmlnaW5hbCBlIHF1ZSB2b2PDqiB0ZW0gbyBwb2RlciBkZSBjb25jZWRlciBvcyBkaXJlaXRvcyBjb250aWRvcyAKbmVzdGEgbGljZW7Dp2EuIFZvY8OqIHRhbWLDqW0gZGVjbGFyYSBxdWUgbyBkZXDDs3NpdG8gZGEgc3VhIHRlc2Ugb3UgZGlzc2VydGHDp8OjbyBuw6NvLCBxdWUgc2VqYSBkZSBzZXUgCmNvbmhlY2ltZW50bywgaW5mcmluZ2UgZGlyZWl0b3MgYXV0b3JhaXMgZGUgbmluZ3XDqW0uCgpDYXNvIGEgc3VhIHRlc2Ugb3UgZGlzc2VydGHDp8OjbyBjb250ZW5oYSBtYXRlcmlhbCBxdWUgdm9jw6ogbsOjbyBwb3NzdWkgYSB0aXR1bGFyaWRhZGUgZG9zIGRpcmVpdG9zIGF1dG9yYWlzLCB2b2PDqiAKZGVjbGFyYSBxdWUgb2J0ZXZlIGEgcGVybWlzc8OjbyBpcnJlc3RyaXRhIGRvIGRldGVudG9yIGRvcyBkaXJlaXRvcyBhdXRvcmFpcyBwYXJhIGNvbmNlZGVyIMOgIFNpZ2xhIGRlIFVuaXZlcnNpZGFkZSAKb3MgZGlyZWl0b3MgYXByZXNlbnRhZG9zIG5lc3RhIGxpY2Vuw6dhLCBlIHF1ZSBlc3NlIG1hdGVyaWFsIGRlIHByb3ByaWVkYWRlIGRlIHRlcmNlaXJvcyBlc3TDoSBjbGFyYW1lbnRlIAppZGVudGlmaWNhZG8gZSByZWNvbmhlY2lkbyBubyB0ZXh0byBvdSBubyBjb250ZcO6ZG8gZGEgdGVzZSBvdSBkaXNzZXJ0YcOnw6NvIG9yYSBkZXBvc2l0YWRhLgoKQ0FTTyBBIFRFU0UgT1UgRElTU0VSVEHDh8ODTyBPUkEgREVQT1NJVEFEQSBURU5IQSBTSURPIFJFU1VMVEFETyBERSBVTSBQQVRST0PDjU5JTyBPVSAKQVBPSU8gREUgVU1BIEFHw4pOQ0lBIERFIEZPTUVOVE8gT1UgT1VUUk8gT1JHQU5JU01PIFFVRSBOw4NPIFNFSkEgQSBTSUdMQSBERSAKVU5JVkVSU0lEQURFLCBWT0PDiiBERUNMQVJBIFFVRSBSRVNQRUlUT1UgVE9ET1MgRSBRVUFJU1FVRVIgRElSRUlUT1MgREUgUkVWSVPDg08gQ09NTyAKVEFNQsOJTSBBUyBERU1BSVMgT0JSSUdBw4fDlUVTIEVYSUdJREFTIFBPUiBDT05UUkFUTyBPVSBBQ09SRE8uCgpBIFNpZ2xhIGRlIFVuaXZlcnNpZGFkZSBzZSBjb21wcm9tZXRlIGEgaWRlbnRpZmljYXIgY2xhcmFtZW50ZSBvIHNldSBub21lIChzKSBvdSBvKHMpIG5vbWUocykgZG8ocykgCmRldGVudG9yKGVzKSBkb3MgZGlyZWl0b3MgYXV0b3JhaXMgZGEgdGVzZSBvdSBkaXNzZXJ0YcOnw6NvLCBlIG7Do28gZmFyw6EgcXVhbHF1ZXIgYWx0ZXJhw6fDo28sIGFsw6ltIGRhcXVlbGFzIApjb25jZWRpZGFzIHBvciBlc3RhIGxpY2Vuw6dhLgo=Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttp://tede.unioeste.br/PUBhttp://tede.unioeste.br/oai/requestbiblioteca.repositorio@unioeste.bropendoar:2024-08-29T20:51:57Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UNIOESTE - Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná (UNIOESTE)false
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv Família, pobreza e renda no Paraná
dc.title.alternative.eng.fl_str_mv Family, poverty, and income in Paraná
title Família, pobreza e renda no Paraná
spellingShingle Família, pobreza e renda no Paraná
Ramos, Sonia Aparecida Gomes de
Pobreza
Família
Paraná
Urbano
Rural
Poverty
Family
Paraná
Urban
Rural
CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::ECONOMIA
title_short Família, pobreza e renda no Paraná
title_full Família, pobreza e renda no Paraná
title_fullStr Família, pobreza e renda no Paraná
title_full_unstemmed Família, pobreza e renda no Paraná
title_sort Família, pobreza e renda no Paraná
author Ramos, Sonia Aparecida Gomes de
author_facet Ramos, Sonia Aparecida Gomes de
author_role author
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv Lima, Jandir Ferrera de
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/8590492041554583
dc.contributor.referee1.fl_str_mv Gabriel, Flavio Braga de Almeida
dc.contributor.referee1Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/9084287979694927
dc.contributor.referee2.fl_str_mv Morais, Ana Cristina dos Santos
dc.contributor.referee2Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/0414780885182679
dc.contributor.referee3.fl_str_mv Lima, Jandir Ferrera de
dc.contributor.referee3Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/8590492041554583
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/4136572440933979
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ramos, Sonia Aparecida Gomes de
contributor_str_mv Lima, Jandir Ferrera de
Gabriel, Flavio Braga de Almeida
Morais, Ana Cristina dos Santos
Lima, Jandir Ferrera de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Pobreza
Família
Paraná
Urbano
Rural
topic Pobreza
Família
Paraná
Urbano
Rural
Poverty
Family
Paraná
Urban
Rural
CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::ECONOMIA
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Poverty
Family
Paraná
Urban
Rural
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::ECONOMIA
description The aim of the study was to identify and analyze the impacts of recent changes observed in the structure of families and their relationship with poverty. The object of study is the state of Paraná, with geographic coverage of the Immediate Geographical Regions (RGI), comparing rural and urban areas. The used methodology was the estimation of a Family Multidimensional Poverty Index (IPMF), using data from IPARDES, with an excerpt between 2006 and 2016. The survey results indicate that the state showed an increase in the number of families from 2006/2010 of 1% and 8% between 2010/2016. From the 29 RGIs, 17 of these were considered urban areas with a share of the agricultural GDP between 5% and 20%, while there are 12 rural areas with a share of the GDP between 21% and 37%. Regarding the classification of the sex of individuals, predominance of adult females. In children and teenagers, the percentage was higher in males, an average of 4%. The rural regions had an average per capita GDP between R$ 17,000.00 and R$ 32,000.00 and the urban ones between R$ 22,000.00 and R$ 48,000.00. Regarding the IPMF, the results indicate that poverty has been decreasing over the period, although with oscillations showing a reduction in the indexes and a subsequent increase. In the infant mortality dimension, a decrease of -0.52% in urban RGIs and -0.3% in rural ones. In the illiteracy dimension, urban areas have 22.16%, more illiterates than in rural regions, however there was a reduction of -1.74% from 2006 to 2016 in urban areas and -1.49% in rural areas. In the income dimension between 2006 and 2016, urban areas present a reduction of - 0.43%, and in rural areas it was - 3.89%. In the undernutrition dimension, both regionalizations had a considerable decrease until 2015, and 3% average increase for 2016. The proportion of poor people (H) in urban regions was higher than in rural regions, except for the year 2016, which presented a proportion of poverty lower than that of rural regions by 0.66%. The intensity of poverty in 2006 was 1.08% in rural regions and 0.99% in urban areas. Deprivation in rural regions between 2006 and 2016 increased by 0.45%. In urban regions, multidimensional family poverty in 2006 was 33.95%; 2010 of 33.91% and 2016 of 33.99%. In rural areas 2006 of 34.03%; 2011 of 34.08% and in 2016 of 33.92%. The analysis allows us to conclude that the dimensions and indicators have higher percentages, in most of the determinant variables in urban regions, than in rural regions. The conclusion is that there have been changes in family demography and the presence of poverty in Paraná.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2022-11-16
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2024-08-29T20:51:57Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv RAMOS, Sonia Aparecida Gomes de. Família, pobreza e renda no Paraná. 2022. 91 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Economia) - Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná, Toledo, 2022 .
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://tede.unioeste.br/handle/tede/7357
identifier_str_mv RAMOS, Sonia Aparecida Gomes de. Família, pobreza e renda no Paraná. 2022. 91 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Economia) - Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná, Toledo, 2022 .
url https://tede.unioeste.br/handle/tede/7357
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.program.fl_str_mv -1545332853778710263
dc.relation.confidence.fl_str_mv 600
600
600
600
dc.relation.department.fl_str_mv 8872935161184826606
dc.relation.cnpq.fl_str_mv -2504903392600098822
dc.relation.sponsorship.fl_str_mv 2075167498588264571
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná
Toledo
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv Programa de Pós-Graduação em Economia
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv UNIOESTE
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv Brasil
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv Centro de Ciências Sociais Aplicadas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná
Toledo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UNIOESTE
instname:Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná (UNIOESTE)
instacron:UNIOESTE
instname_str Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná (UNIOESTE)
instacron_str UNIOESTE
institution UNIOESTE
reponame_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UNIOESTE
collection Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UNIOESTE
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://tede.unioeste.br:8080/tede/bitstream/tede/7357/2/Sonia_Ramos_2022.pdf
http://tede.unioeste.br:8080/tede/bitstream/tede/7357/1/license.txt
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 922cddbbafe66e3eecbc70ea39b2e5bd
bd3efa91386c1718a7f26a329fdcb468
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UNIOESTE - Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná (UNIOESTE)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv biblioteca.repositorio@unioeste.br
_version_ 1811723326148575232