O problema da amizade nos Ensaios de Montaigne: sobre “Da Amizade” (I,28).

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Luna, Junior Cesar
Data de Publicação: 2016
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UNIOESTE
Texto Completo: http://tede.unioeste.br/handle/tede/3071
Resumo: This dissertation aims to discuss the philosophical status of the concept of friendship on Montaigne´s work, presented in the chapter Of Friendship (I, 28). The central problem is the distinction of the conception of friendship by our author when compared to the other interpretations existing in his time, since, according to Michel Montaigne, friendship is an experience and not a pure concept. More than that: Friendship is an immeasurable affection, because it is the greatest feeling that the man can desire. Our arguments try to state that, for Montaigne, the friendship is the place of a meeting of the self, because the identity of the self is affirmed by itself. Thus, the friendship is the place of the experience of the self: which is, it is nor in the solitude, neither in the pure return to himself, that Montaigne finds the solidity of a true life, the real existence of the self, but in the singularity with the other. In the same way, we present that, Of friendship, as an experience of the self marked by the otherness, will exist always the other is constitutive of the identity of the self. The friendship is the highest degree of perfection of human relations. The author seeks the inspection which supports the relational judgment will follow from the experience of the self towards experience of the collective and of public opinion. The idea of humanity stands above the idea of homeland, and states the friendship even higher, which he dedicates to the human genus. La Boétie is the guardian of its purest image. The essayist points out the unique and unequalled aspect of the friendship. He describes characteristics that can only be experienced by humans who know how to live with reciprocity, to the point that their souls unite in such a way that there is no longer a dividing line between them, and they become a soul in two bodies. Montaigne carries out a calm surveillance on affections, which are exacerbated in the examples of excesses he refuses: the only excess admitted is the friendship with La Boétie. Tensioning the idea of Aristotle, for whom the friendship is mediated by the virtú, he describes a friendship which is difficult to be found. Whereas Aristotle sees in the friendship paradigmatic social relations, Montaigne considers that it expresses an absolutely single and rare property. Thus, the friendship cannot be considered the model of a perfect social or political relationship, as it was the case of La Boétie himself.
id UNIOESTE-1_4a34acd5d524a03fe500fd6693f47594
oai_identifier_str oai:tede.unioeste.br:tede/3071
network_acronym_str UNIOESTE-1
network_name_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UNIOESTE
repository_id_str
spelling Conceição, Gilmar Henrique dahttp://lattes.cnpq.br/0377185734454554Conceição, Gilmar Henrique dahttp://lattes.cnpq.br/0377185734454554Theobaldo, Maria Cristinahttp://lattes.cnpq.br/8561299541656407Heuser, Ester Maria Dreherhttp://lattes.cnpq.br/5548908138476554http://lattes.cnpq.br/6635581536141136Luna, Junior Cesar2017-09-19T22:14:00Z2016-10-31LUNA, Junior Cesar. O problema da amizade nos Ensaios de Montaigne: sobre “Da Amizade” (I,28).. 2016. 106 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Filosofia) - Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná, Toledo, 2016.http://tede.unioeste.br/handle/tede/3071This dissertation aims to discuss the philosophical status of the concept of friendship on Montaigne´s work, presented in the chapter Of Friendship (I, 28). The central problem is the distinction of the conception of friendship by our author when compared to the other interpretations existing in his time, since, according to Michel Montaigne, friendship is an experience and not a pure concept. More than that: Friendship is an immeasurable affection, because it is the greatest feeling that the man can desire. Our arguments try to state that, for Montaigne, the friendship is the place of a meeting of the self, because the identity of the self is affirmed by itself. Thus, the friendship is the place of the experience of the self: which is, it is nor in the solitude, neither in the pure return to himself, that Montaigne finds the solidity of a true life, the real existence of the self, but in the singularity with the other. In the same way, we present that, Of friendship, as an experience of the self marked by the otherness, will exist always the other is constitutive of the identity of the self. The friendship is the highest degree of perfection of human relations. The author seeks the inspection which supports the relational judgment will follow from the experience of the self towards experience of the collective and of public opinion. The idea of humanity stands above the idea of homeland, and states the friendship even higher, which he dedicates to the human genus. La Boétie is the guardian of its purest image. The essayist points out the unique and unequalled aspect of the friendship. He describes characteristics that can only be experienced by humans who know how to live with reciprocity, to the point that their souls unite in such a way that there is no longer a dividing line between them, and they become a soul in two bodies. Montaigne carries out a calm surveillance on affections, which are exacerbated in the examples of excesses he refuses: the only excess admitted is the friendship with La Boétie. Tensioning the idea of Aristotle, for whom the friendship is mediated by the virtú, he describes a friendship which is difficult to be found. Whereas Aristotle sees in the friendship paradigmatic social relations, Montaigne considers that it expresses an absolutely single and rare property. Thus, the friendship cannot be considered the model of a perfect social or political relationship, as it was the case of La Boétie himself.Esta dissertação objetiva discutir o estatuto filosófico do conceito de amizade montaigniano, apresentado no capítulo Da amizade (I, 28). O problema central é a distinção da concepção de amizade por nosso autor em relação as demais interpretações vigentes em seu tempo, uma vez que, no entendimento de Michel de Montaigne, a amizade é uma experiência e não puramente um conceito. Mais que isso: a amizade é um afeto incomensurável, porque ela é o maior sentimento que o homem pode desejar. Nossos argumentos buscam afirmar que, para Montaigne, a amizade é o lugar de um encontro de si, pois a identidade do eu é afirmada por meio dela. Assim, a amizade é o lugar da experiência de si: ou seja, não é na solidão, ou na pura volta a si, que Montaigne encontra a solidez de uma vida verdadeira, a real existência de si mesmo, mas numa singularidade com o outro. Da mesma maneira apresentamos que, da amizade como experiência de si marcada pela alteridade ficará sempre que o outro é constitutivo da identidade do eu. A amizade é o grau máximo de perfeição das relações humanas. O ensaísta quer que a inspeção que respalda o juízo relacional desloque-se da experiência de si para a experiência do coletivo e da opinião pública. A ideia de humanidade se coloca acima da ideia de pátria, e declara a amizade mais alta ainda a que dedica ao gênero humano. La Boétie é o guardião da sua mais pura imagem. O ensaísta destaca o aspecto exemplar e inigualável da relação de amizade. Descreve características que só podem ser vividas por homens que saibam viver com reciprocidade, ao ponto de suas almas unirem-se de tal forma que não haja mais uma linha divisória entre elas, e torna-se uma alma em dois corpos. Montaigne exerce uma calma vigilância sobre as paixões, que de resto estão exacerbadas nos exemplos de excessos que recusa: o único excesso admitido é a amizade com La Boétie. Tencionando a ideia de Aristóteles, para quem a amizade é mediada pela virtú, descreve uma amizade difícil de ser encontrada. Enquanto Aristóteles vê na amizade relações sociais paradigmáticas, Montaigne considera que ela exprime uma propriedade absolutamente singular e rara. Assim, a amizade não pode ser o modelo de relacionamento social ou político perfeito, como era ainda o caso do próprio La Boétie.Submitted by Marilene Donadel (marilene.donadel@unioeste.br) on 2017-09-19T22:14:00Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Junior_C_Luna_2016.pdf: 1329296 bytes, checksum: 50e6c65bf12b4f3bd4d1c90ba424fac4 (MD5)Made available in DSpace on 2017-09-19T22:14:00Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Junior_C_Luna_2016.pdf: 1329296 bytes, checksum: 50e6c65bf12b4f3bd4d1c90ba424fac4 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016-10-31Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - CAPESapplication/pdfpor-2624803687637593200500Universidade Estadual do Oeste do ParanáToledoPrograma de Pós-Graduação em FilosofiaUNIOESTEBrasilCentro de Ciências Humanas e SociaisEnsaiosAmizadeÉticaCeticismoEthicSkepticismEssayFriendshipCIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIAO problema da amizade nos Ensaios de Montaigne: sobre “Da Amizade” (I,28).The problem of friendship in the Montaigne's Essays: on "Friendship" (I,28).info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis-83053276064321663936006006006006640233372697234262-6723520209401670532075167498588264571info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UNIOESTEinstname:Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná (UNIOESTE)instacron:UNIOESTEORIGINALJunior_C_Luna_2016.pdfJunior_C_Luna_2016.pdfapplication/pdf1329296http://tede.unioeste.br:8080/tede/bitstream/tede/3071/2/Junior_C_Luna_2016.pdf50e6c65bf12b4f3bd4d1c90ba424fac4MD52LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-82165http://tede.unioeste.br:8080/tede/bitstream/tede/3071/1/license.txtbd3efa91386c1718a7f26a329fdcb468MD51tede/30712017-09-19 19:14:00.655oai:tede.unioeste.br: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Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttp://tede.unioeste.br/PUBhttp://tede.unioeste.br/oai/requestbiblioteca.repositorio@unioeste.bropendoar:2017-09-19T22:14Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UNIOESTE - Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná (UNIOESTE)false
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv O problema da amizade nos Ensaios de Montaigne: sobre “Da Amizade” (I,28).
dc.title.alternative.eng.fl_str_mv The problem of friendship in the Montaigne's Essays: on "Friendship" (I,28).
title O problema da amizade nos Ensaios de Montaigne: sobre “Da Amizade” (I,28).
spellingShingle O problema da amizade nos Ensaios de Montaigne: sobre “Da Amizade” (I,28).
Luna, Junior Cesar
Ensaios
Amizade
Ética
Ceticismo
Ethic
Skepticism
Essay
Friendship
CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIA
title_short O problema da amizade nos Ensaios de Montaigne: sobre “Da Amizade” (I,28).
title_full O problema da amizade nos Ensaios de Montaigne: sobre “Da Amizade” (I,28).
title_fullStr O problema da amizade nos Ensaios de Montaigne: sobre “Da Amizade” (I,28).
title_full_unstemmed O problema da amizade nos Ensaios de Montaigne: sobre “Da Amizade” (I,28).
title_sort O problema da amizade nos Ensaios de Montaigne: sobre “Da Amizade” (I,28).
author Luna, Junior Cesar
author_facet Luna, Junior Cesar
author_role author
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv Conceição, Gilmar Henrique da
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/0377185734454554
dc.contributor.referee1.fl_str_mv Conceição, Gilmar Henrique da
dc.contributor.referee1Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/0377185734454554
dc.contributor.referee2.fl_str_mv Theobaldo, Maria Cristina
dc.contributor.referee2Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/8561299541656407
dc.contributor.referee3.fl_str_mv Heuser, Ester Maria Dreher
dc.contributor.referee3Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/5548908138476554
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/6635581536141136
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Luna, Junior Cesar
contributor_str_mv Conceição, Gilmar Henrique da
Conceição, Gilmar Henrique da
Theobaldo, Maria Cristina
Heuser, Ester Maria Dreher
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Ensaios
Amizade
Ética
Ceticismo
Ethic
Skepticism
topic Ensaios
Amizade
Ética
Ceticismo
Ethic
Skepticism
Essay
Friendship
CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIA
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Essay
Friendship
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIA
description This dissertation aims to discuss the philosophical status of the concept of friendship on Montaigne´s work, presented in the chapter Of Friendship (I, 28). The central problem is the distinction of the conception of friendship by our author when compared to the other interpretations existing in his time, since, according to Michel Montaigne, friendship is an experience and not a pure concept. More than that: Friendship is an immeasurable affection, because it is the greatest feeling that the man can desire. Our arguments try to state that, for Montaigne, the friendship is the place of a meeting of the self, because the identity of the self is affirmed by itself. Thus, the friendship is the place of the experience of the self: which is, it is nor in the solitude, neither in the pure return to himself, that Montaigne finds the solidity of a true life, the real existence of the self, but in the singularity with the other. In the same way, we present that, Of friendship, as an experience of the self marked by the otherness, will exist always the other is constitutive of the identity of the self. The friendship is the highest degree of perfection of human relations. The author seeks the inspection which supports the relational judgment will follow from the experience of the self towards experience of the collective and of public opinion. The idea of humanity stands above the idea of homeland, and states the friendship even higher, which he dedicates to the human genus. La Boétie is the guardian of its purest image. The essayist points out the unique and unequalled aspect of the friendship. He describes characteristics that can only be experienced by humans who know how to live with reciprocity, to the point that their souls unite in such a way that there is no longer a dividing line between them, and they become a soul in two bodies. Montaigne carries out a calm surveillance on affections, which are exacerbated in the examples of excesses he refuses: the only excess admitted is the friendship with La Boétie. Tensioning the idea of Aristotle, for whom the friendship is mediated by the virtú, he describes a friendship which is difficult to be found. Whereas Aristotle sees in the friendship paradigmatic social relations, Montaigne considers that it expresses an absolutely single and rare property. Thus, the friendship cannot be considered the model of a perfect social or political relationship, as it was the case of La Boétie himself.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2016-10-31
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2017-09-19T22:14:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv LUNA, Junior Cesar. O problema da amizade nos Ensaios de Montaigne: sobre “Da Amizade” (I,28).. 2016. 106 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Filosofia) - Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná, Toledo, 2016.
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://tede.unioeste.br/handle/tede/3071
identifier_str_mv LUNA, Junior Cesar. O problema da amizade nos Ensaios de Montaigne: sobre “Da Amizade” (I,28).. 2016. 106 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Filosofia) - Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná, Toledo, 2016.
url http://tede.unioeste.br/handle/tede/3071
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.program.fl_str_mv -8305327606432166393
dc.relation.confidence.fl_str_mv 600
600
600
600
dc.relation.department.fl_str_mv 6640233372697234262
dc.relation.cnpq.fl_str_mv -672352020940167053
dc.relation.sponsorship.fl_str_mv 2075167498588264571
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná
Toledo
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv Programa de Pós-Graduação em Filosofia
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv UNIOESTE
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv Brasil
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv Centro de Ciências Humanas e Sociais
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná
Toledo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UNIOESTE
instname:Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná (UNIOESTE)
instacron:UNIOESTE
instname_str Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná (UNIOESTE)
instacron_str UNIOESTE
institution UNIOESTE
reponame_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UNIOESTE
collection Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UNIOESTE
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://tede.unioeste.br:8080/tede/bitstream/tede/3071/2/Junior_C_Luna_2016.pdf
http://tede.unioeste.br:8080/tede/bitstream/tede/3071/1/license.txt
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 50e6c65bf12b4f3bd4d1c90ba424fac4
bd3efa91386c1718a7f26a329fdcb468
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UNIOESTE - Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná (UNIOESTE)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv biblioteca.repositorio@unioeste.br
_version_ 1811723383181672448