As sutilezas metafísicas e manhas teológicas da economia política: contribuições da crítica feuerbachiana da religião para a crítica da economia e da política em Karl Marx
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Tipo de documento: | Tese |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UNIOESTE |
Texto Completo: | https://tede.unioeste.br/handle/tede/7187 |
Resumo: | This thesis seeks to deepen the understanding of the structural assumptions of the capitalist mode of production through a study of the relationship and argumentative analogy that exists, according to Feuerbach and Marx respectively, between the criticism of theology and Political Economy. We therefore highlight the analogous structure of the process of alienation and estrangement of man from himself and his own essence, as well as from nature itself. The alienated work and estrangement caused by the capitalist mode of production, based on private property, that is, on the separation of the worker from himself, his product, his creation, causes it to assume an autonomous, fetishizing form and, therefore, Even religious. Therefore, the present work aims to problematize the following questions: 1) What is the relationship or what are the common elements between Capital (or capitalism) and religion? 2) The influence and contributions of Feuerbach's critique of religion to the critique of political economy are present only in the works of the “young Marx”, or, they would also be present in his works of theoretical maturity, like Capital, for example? We also need to ask ourselves about Marx and Feuerbach: the criticism presented by Marx in relation to Feuerbach, as in his famous “Theses on Feuerbach”, for example, would represent, in essence, an “epistemological rupture” of Marx in relation to Feuerbach's critique or would it actually represent a complementation and development of Feuerbach's positions? 3) What are the similarities and differences between modern political economy and theology? Finally, we asked ourselves if we could say that capitalism, in addition to corresponding to a specific and historical mode of production, can also be considered a type of religion? In this sense, the present work seeks to compare the principles that give rise to religion and religious idolatry with the principles that give rise to idolatry or fetishism of merchandise, the State and, finally, capital. Therefore, we intend to highlight the function that metaphysical-theological assumptions have in the process of reproduction and legitimization of capital, seeking to explore, furthermore, the critical potential that theological metaphors assume in the work of Karl Marx. The theses we defend here are that: 1) Capitalism is not a religion, but rather a historical and transitory mode of production; However, modern political economy and, therefore, liberalism itself presents itself much more as a kind of “economic theology” than an “economic science” itself. 2) There is no epistemological break between Marx and his works and “theses of youth”; 3) In a general and particular, direct and indirect way, it is possible to observe how much the influence of Feuerbach's method and criticism of religion is decisive for the elaboration of the method and criticism developed by Marx, not only during his youth, but also in Capital (1867). 4) The structural analogy of capitalism with religion is an accurate diagnosis by Marx, which indicates the need for an adequate praxis, capable of facing the 'theological tricks and metaphysical subtleties' of capital. |
id |
UNIOESTE-1_a69eb5f3cf12157937611dc164532900 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:tede.unioeste.br:tede/7187 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIOESTE-1 |
network_name_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UNIOESTE |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Schütz, Rosalvohttp://lattes.cnpq.br/0920572653737862Mejias Herrera, Maria LuzChagas, Eduardo Ferreirahttp://lattes.cnpq.br/2479899457642563Costa Neto, Pedro Leão dahttp://lattes.cnpq.br/8913925209981626Lorenzoni, Anna Mariahttp://lattes.cnpq.br/6534743346958799http://lattes.cnpq.br/3586811857145440Ariza, Péricles2024-05-07T17:25:04Z2023-08-15ARIZA, Péricles. As sutilezas metafísicas e manhas teológicas da economia política: contribuições da crítica feuerbachiana da religião para a crítica da economia e da política em Karl Marx. 2023. 218 f. Tese (Doutorado em Filosofia) - Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná, Toledo, 2023.https://tede.unioeste.br/handle/tede/7187This thesis seeks to deepen the understanding of the structural assumptions of the capitalist mode of production through a study of the relationship and argumentative analogy that exists, according to Feuerbach and Marx respectively, between the criticism of theology and Political Economy. We therefore highlight the analogous structure of the process of alienation and estrangement of man from himself and his own essence, as well as from nature itself. The alienated work and estrangement caused by the capitalist mode of production, based on private property, that is, on the separation of the worker from himself, his product, his creation, causes it to assume an autonomous, fetishizing form and, therefore, Even religious. Therefore, the present work aims to problematize the following questions: 1) What is the relationship or what are the common elements between Capital (or capitalism) and religion? 2) The influence and contributions of Feuerbach's critique of religion to the critique of political economy are present only in the works of the “young Marx”, or, they would also be present in his works of theoretical maturity, like Capital, for example? We also need to ask ourselves about Marx and Feuerbach: the criticism presented by Marx in relation to Feuerbach, as in his famous “Theses on Feuerbach”, for example, would represent, in essence, an “epistemological rupture” of Marx in relation to Feuerbach's critique or would it actually represent a complementation and development of Feuerbach's positions? 3) What are the similarities and differences between modern political economy and theology? Finally, we asked ourselves if we could say that capitalism, in addition to corresponding to a specific and historical mode of production, can also be considered a type of religion? In this sense, the present work seeks to compare the principles that give rise to religion and religious idolatry with the principles that give rise to idolatry or fetishism of merchandise, the State and, finally, capital. Therefore, we intend to highlight the function that metaphysical-theological assumptions have in the process of reproduction and legitimization of capital, seeking to explore, furthermore, the critical potential that theological metaphors assume in the work of Karl Marx. The theses we defend here are that: 1) Capitalism is not a religion, but rather a historical and transitory mode of production; However, modern political economy and, therefore, liberalism itself presents itself much more as a kind of “economic theology” than an “economic science” itself. 2) There is no epistemological break between Marx and his works and “theses of youth”; 3) In a general and particular, direct and indirect way, it is possible to observe how much the influence of Feuerbach's method and criticism of religion is decisive for the elaboration of the method and criticism developed by Marx, not only during his youth, but also in Capital (1867). 4) The structural analogy of capitalism with religion is an accurate diagnosis by Marx, which indicates the need for an adequate praxis, capable of facing the 'theological tricks and metaphysical subtleties' of capital.A presente tese busca aprofundar a compreensão dos pressupostos estruturais do modo de produção capitalista através de um estudo da relação e analogia argumentativa existente, conforme Feuerbach e Marx respectivamente, entre a crítica da teologia e da Economia Política. Destacamos, portanto, a estrutura análoga do processo de alienação e estranhamento do homem de si e de sua própria essência, assim como da própria natureza. O trabalho alienado e o estranhamento provocado pelo modo de produção capitalista, baseado na propriedade privada, ou seja, na separação do trabalhador de si, de seu produto, de sua criação, faz com que esta assuma uma forma autônoma, fetichizante e, por isso mesmo, religiosa. Por isso, o presente trabalho visa problematizar as seguintes questões: 1) Qual a relação ou quais os elementos comuns entre o Capital (ou capitalismo) e a religião? 2) A influência e as contribuições da crítica da religião de Feuerbach para a crítica da economia política, encontram-se presentes somente nas obras do “jovem Marx”, ou, também, encontrar-se-iam presentes em suas obras de maturidade teórica, como O Capital, por exemplo? Sobre Marx e Feuerbach é preciso, ainda, nos perguntarmos: a crítica apresentada por Marx em relação à Feuerbach, como em suas famosas “Teses sobre Feuerbach”, por exemplo, representaria, em essência, uma “ruptura epistemológica” de Marx em relação à crítica de Feuerbach ou representaria, na verdade, uma complementação e desenvolvimento das posições feuerbachianas? 3) Quais as semelhanças e diferenças existentes entre a economia política moderna e a teologia? Por fim, nos questionamos se poderíamos afirmar que o capitalismo, além de corresponder a um modo de produção específico e histórico, também pode ser considerado uma espécie de religião? Neste sentido, o presente trabalho busca comparar os princípios que dão origem a religião e a idolatria religiosa com os princípios que dão origem a idolatria ou fetichismo da mercadoria, do Estado e, por fim, do capital. Assim sendo, pretendemos destacar a função que os pressupostos metafísicos-teológicos possuem no processo de reprodução e legitimação do capital, procurando explorar, ainda, a potencialidade crítica que as metáforas teológicas assumem na obra de Karl Marx. As teses que aqui defendemos são as de que: 1) O capitalismo não é uma religião, mas sim um modo de produção, histórico e transitório; Todavia, a economia política moderna e, portanto, o próprio liberalismo se apresenta muito mais como uma espécie de “teologia econômica” do que uma “ciência econômica” propriamente dita. 2) Não existe ruptura epistemológica de Marx com suas obras e “teses da juventude”; 3) De um modo geral e particular, direto e indireto, é possível observarmos o quanto a influência do método e da crítica da religião de Feuerbach é decisiva para a elaboração do método e da crítica desenvolvida por Marx, não apenas durante sua juventude, mas também em O Capital (1867).4) A analogia estrutural do capitalismo com a religião é um diagnóstico acertado de Marx, o qual indica para a necessidade de uma práxis adequada, capaz de enfrentar as ‘manhas teológicas e sutilezas metafísicas’ do capital.Submitted by Marilene Donadel (marilene.donadel@unioeste.br) on 2024-05-07T17:25:04Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Pericles_Ariza_2023.pdf: 1643316 bytes, checksum: f2c36473f5e4e4a839ad39d81d1fdf08 (MD5)Made available in DSpace on 2024-05-07T17:25:04Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Pericles_Ariza_2023.pdf: 1643316 bytes, checksum: f2c36473f5e4e4a839ad39d81d1fdf08 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2023-08-15Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - CAPESapplication/pdfpor-2624803687637593200500Universidade Estadual do Oeste do ParanáToledoPrograma de Pós-Graduação em FilosofiaUNIOESTEBrasilCentro de Ciências Humanas e Sociaishttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessEconomiaPolíticaReligiãoMetafísicaTeologiaEconomyPoliticsReligionMetaphysicsTheologyCIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIAAs sutilezas metafísicas e manhas teológicas da economia política: contribuições da crítica feuerbachiana da religião para a crítica da economia e da política em Karl MarxThe metaphysical subtleties and theological niceties of the political economyinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis-83053276064321663936006006006006640233372697234262-6723520209401670532075167498588264571reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UNIOESTEinstname:Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná (UNIOESTE)instacron:UNIOESTEORIGINALPericles_Ariza_2023.pdfPericles_Ariza_2023.pdfapplication/pdf1643316http://tede.unioeste.br:8080/tede/bitstream/tede/7187/2/Pericles_Ariza_2023.pdff2c36473f5e4e4a839ad39d81d1fdf08MD52LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-82165http://tede.unioeste.br:8080/tede/bitstream/tede/7187/1/license.txtbd3efa91386c1718a7f26a329fdcb468MD51tede/71872024-05-07 14:25:04.672oai:tede.unioeste.br:tede/7187Tk9UQTogQ09MT1FVRSBBUVVJIEEgU1VBIFBSw5NQUklBIExJQ0VOw4dBCkVzdGEgbGljZW7Dp2EgZGUgZXhlbXBsbyDDqSBmb3JuZWNpZGEgYXBlbmFzIHBhcmEgZmlucyBpbmZvcm1hdGl2b3MuCgpMSUNFTsOHQSBERSBESVNUUklCVUnDh8ODTyBOw4NPLUVYQ0xVU0lWQQoKQ29tIGEgYXByZXNlbnRhw6fDo28gZGVzdGEgbGljZW7Dp2EsIHZvY8OqIChvIGF1dG9yIChlcykgb3UgbyB0aXR1bGFyIGRvcyBkaXJlaXRvcyBkZSBhdXRvcikgY29uY2VkZSDDoCBVbml2ZXJzaWRhZGUgClhYWCAoU2lnbGEgZGEgVW5pdmVyc2lkYWRlKSBvIGRpcmVpdG8gbsOjby1leGNsdXNpdm8gZGUgcmVwcm9kdXppciwgIHRyYWR1emlyIChjb25mb3JtZSBkZWZpbmlkbyBhYmFpeG8pLCBlL291IApkaXN0cmlidWlyIGEgc3VhIHRlc2Ugb3UgZGlzc2VydGHDp8OjbyAoaW5jbHVpbmRvIG8gcmVzdW1vKSBwb3IgdG9kbyBvIG11bmRvIG5vIGZvcm1hdG8gaW1wcmVzc28gZSBlbGV0csO0bmljbyBlIAplbSBxdWFscXVlciBtZWlvLCBpbmNsdWluZG8gb3MgZm9ybWF0b3Mgw6F1ZGlvIG91IHbDrWRlby4KClZvY8OqIGNvbmNvcmRhIHF1ZSBhIFNpZ2xhIGRlIFVuaXZlcnNpZGFkZSBwb2RlLCBzZW0gYWx0ZXJhciBvIGNvbnRlw7pkbywgdHJhbnNwb3IgYSBzdWEgdGVzZSBvdSBkaXNzZXJ0YcOnw6NvIApwYXJhIHF1YWxxdWVyIG1laW8gb3UgZm9ybWF0byBwYXJhIGZpbnMgZGUgcHJlc2VydmHDp8Ojby4KClZvY8OqIHRhbWLDqW0gY29uY29yZGEgcXVlIGEgU2lnbGEgZGUgVW5pdmVyc2lkYWRlIHBvZGUgbWFudGVyIG1haXMgZGUgdW1hIGPDs3BpYSBhIHN1YSB0ZXNlIG91IApkaXNzZXJ0YcOnw6NvIHBhcmEgZmlucyBkZSBzZWd1cmFuw6dhLCBiYWNrLXVwIGUgcHJlc2VydmHDp8Ojby4KClZvY8OqIGRlY2xhcmEgcXVlIGEgc3VhIHRlc2Ugb3UgZGlzc2VydGHDp8OjbyDDqSBvcmlnaW5hbCBlIHF1ZSB2b2PDqiB0ZW0gbyBwb2RlciBkZSBjb25jZWRlciBvcyBkaXJlaXRvcyBjb250aWRvcyAKbmVzdGEgbGljZW7Dp2EuIFZvY8OqIHRhbWLDqW0gZGVjbGFyYSBxdWUgbyBkZXDDs3NpdG8gZGEgc3VhIHRlc2Ugb3UgZGlzc2VydGHDp8OjbyBuw6NvLCBxdWUgc2VqYSBkZSBzZXUgCmNvbmhlY2ltZW50bywgaW5mcmluZ2UgZGlyZWl0b3MgYXV0b3JhaXMgZGUgbmluZ3XDqW0uCgpDYXNvIGEgc3VhIHRlc2Ugb3UgZGlzc2VydGHDp8OjbyBjb250ZW5oYSBtYXRlcmlhbCBxdWUgdm9jw6ogbsOjbyBwb3NzdWkgYSB0aXR1bGFyaWRhZGUgZG9zIGRpcmVpdG9zIGF1dG9yYWlzLCB2b2PDqiAKZGVjbGFyYSBxdWUgb2J0ZXZlIGEgcGVybWlzc8OjbyBpcnJlc3RyaXRhIGRvIGRldGVudG9yIGRvcyBkaXJlaXRvcyBhdXRvcmFpcyBwYXJhIGNvbmNlZGVyIMOgIFNpZ2xhIGRlIFVuaXZlcnNpZGFkZSAKb3MgZGlyZWl0b3MgYXByZXNlbnRhZG9zIG5lc3RhIGxpY2Vuw6dhLCBlIHF1ZSBlc3NlIG1hdGVyaWFsIGRlIHByb3ByaWVkYWRlIGRlIHRlcmNlaXJvcyBlc3TDoSBjbGFyYW1lbnRlIAppZGVudGlmaWNhZG8gZSByZWNvbmhlY2lkbyBubyB0ZXh0byBvdSBubyBjb250ZcO6ZG8gZGEgdGVzZSBvdSBkaXNzZXJ0YcOnw6NvIG9yYSBkZXBvc2l0YWRhLgoKQ0FTTyBBIFRFU0UgT1UgRElTU0VSVEHDh8ODTyBPUkEgREVQT1NJVEFEQSBURU5IQSBTSURPIFJFU1VMVEFETyBERSBVTSBQQVRST0PDjU5JTyBPVSAKQVBPSU8gREUgVU1BIEFHw4pOQ0lBIERFIEZPTUVOVE8gT1UgT1VUUk8gT1JHQU5JU01PIFFVRSBOw4NPIFNFSkEgQSBTSUdMQSBERSAKVU5JVkVSU0lEQURFLCBWT0PDiiBERUNMQVJBIFFVRSBSRVNQRUlUT1UgVE9ET1MgRSBRVUFJU1FVRVIgRElSRUlUT1MgREUgUkVWSVPDg08gQ09NTyAKVEFNQsOJTSBBUyBERU1BSVMgT0JSSUdBw4fDlUVTIEVYSUdJREFTIFBPUiBDT05UUkFUTyBPVSBBQ09SRE8uCgpBIFNpZ2xhIGRlIFVuaXZlcnNpZGFkZSBzZSBjb21wcm9tZXRlIGEgaWRlbnRpZmljYXIgY2xhcmFtZW50ZSBvIHNldSBub21lIChzKSBvdSBvKHMpIG5vbWUocykgZG8ocykgCmRldGVudG9yKGVzKSBkb3MgZGlyZWl0b3MgYXV0b3JhaXMgZGEgdGVzZSBvdSBkaXNzZXJ0YcOnw6NvLCBlIG7Do28gZmFyw6EgcXVhbHF1ZXIgYWx0ZXJhw6fDo28sIGFsw6ltIGRhcXVlbGFzIApjb25jZWRpZGFzIHBvciBlc3RhIGxpY2Vuw6dhLgo=Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttp://tede.unioeste.br/PUBhttp://tede.unioeste.br/oai/requestbiblioteca.repositorio@unioeste.bropendoar:2024-05-07T17:25:04Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UNIOESTE - Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná (UNIOESTE)false |
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv |
As sutilezas metafísicas e manhas teológicas da economia política: contribuições da crítica feuerbachiana da religião para a crítica da economia e da política em Karl Marx |
dc.title.alternative.eng.fl_str_mv |
The metaphysical subtleties and theological niceties of the political economy |
title |
As sutilezas metafísicas e manhas teológicas da economia política: contribuições da crítica feuerbachiana da religião para a crítica da economia e da política em Karl Marx |
spellingShingle |
As sutilezas metafísicas e manhas teológicas da economia política: contribuições da crítica feuerbachiana da religião para a crítica da economia e da política em Karl Marx Ariza, Péricles Economia Política Religião Metafísica Teologia Economy Politics Religion Metaphysics Theology CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIA |
title_short |
As sutilezas metafísicas e manhas teológicas da economia política: contribuições da crítica feuerbachiana da religião para a crítica da economia e da política em Karl Marx |
title_full |
As sutilezas metafísicas e manhas teológicas da economia política: contribuições da crítica feuerbachiana da religião para a crítica da economia e da política em Karl Marx |
title_fullStr |
As sutilezas metafísicas e manhas teológicas da economia política: contribuições da crítica feuerbachiana da religião para a crítica da economia e da política em Karl Marx |
title_full_unstemmed |
As sutilezas metafísicas e manhas teológicas da economia política: contribuições da crítica feuerbachiana da religião para a crítica da economia e da política em Karl Marx |
title_sort |
As sutilezas metafísicas e manhas teológicas da economia política: contribuições da crítica feuerbachiana da religião para a crítica da economia e da política em Karl Marx |
author |
Ariza, Péricles |
author_facet |
Ariza, Péricles |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv |
Schütz, Rosalvo |
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/0920572653737862 |
dc.contributor.referee1.fl_str_mv |
Mejias Herrera, Maria Luz |
dc.contributor.referee2.fl_str_mv |
Chagas, Eduardo Ferreira |
dc.contributor.referee2Lattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/2479899457642563 |
dc.contributor.referee3.fl_str_mv |
Costa Neto, Pedro Leão da |
dc.contributor.referee3Lattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/8913925209981626 |
dc.contributor.referee4.fl_str_mv |
Lorenzoni, Anna Maria |
dc.contributor.referee4Lattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/6534743346958799 |
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/3586811857145440 |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Ariza, Péricles |
contributor_str_mv |
Schütz, Rosalvo Mejias Herrera, Maria Luz Chagas, Eduardo Ferreira Costa Neto, Pedro Leão da Lorenzoni, Anna Maria |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Economia Política Religião Metafísica Teologia |
topic |
Economia Política Religião Metafísica Teologia Economy Politics Religion Metaphysics Theology CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIA |
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Economy Politics Religion Metaphysics Theology |
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIA |
description |
This thesis seeks to deepen the understanding of the structural assumptions of the capitalist mode of production through a study of the relationship and argumentative analogy that exists, according to Feuerbach and Marx respectively, between the criticism of theology and Political Economy. We therefore highlight the analogous structure of the process of alienation and estrangement of man from himself and his own essence, as well as from nature itself. The alienated work and estrangement caused by the capitalist mode of production, based on private property, that is, on the separation of the worker from himself, his product, his creation, causes it to assume an autonomous, fetishizing form and, therefore, Even religious. Therefore, the present work aims to problematize the following questions: 1) What is the relationship or what are the common elements between Capital (or capitalism) and religion? 2) The influence and contributions of Feuerbach's critique of religion to the critique of political economy are present only in the works of the “young Marx”, or, they would also be present in his works of theoretical maturity, like Capital, for example? We also need to ask ourselves about Marx and Feuerbach: the criticism presented by Marx in relation to Feuerbach, as in his famous “Theses on Feuerbach”, for example, would represent, in essence, an “epistemological rupture” of Marx in relation to Feuerbach's critique or would it actually represent a complementation and development of Feuerbach's positions? 3) What are the similarities and differences between modern political economy and theology? Finally, we asked ourselves if we could say that capitalism, in addition to corresponding to a specific and historical mode of production, can also be considered a type of religion? In this sense, the present work seeks to compare the principles that give rise to religion and religious idolatry with the principles that give rise to idolatry or fetishism of merchandise, the State and, finally, capital. Therefore, we intend to highlight the function that metaphysical-theological assumptions have in the process of reproduction and legitimization of capital, seeking to explore, furthermore, the critical potential that theological metaphors assume in the work of Karl Marx. The theses we defend here are that: 1) Capitalism is not a religion, but rather a historical and transitory mode of production; However, modern political economy and, therefore, liberalism itself presents itself much more as a kind of “economic theology” than an “economic science” itself. 2) There is no epistemological break between Marx and his works and “theses of youth”; 3) In a general and particular, direct and indirect way, it is possible to observe how much the influence of Feuerbach's method and criticism of religion is decisive for the elaboration of the method and criticism developed by Marx, not only during his youth, but also in Capital (1867). 4) The structural analogy of capitalism with religion is an accurate diagnosis by Marx, which indicates the need for an adequate praxis, capable of facing the 'theological tricks and metaphysical subtleties' of capital. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2023-08-15 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2024-05-07T17:25:04Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis |
format |
doctoralThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv |
ARIZA, Péricles. As sutilezas metafísicas e manhas teológicas da economia política: contribuições da crítica feuerbachiana da religião para a crítica da economia e da política em Karl Marx. 2023. 218 f. Tese (Doutorado em Filosofia) - Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná, Toledo, 2023. |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://tede.unioeste.br/handle/tede/7187 |
identifier_str_mv |
ARIZA, Péricles. As sutilezas metafísicas e manhas teológicas da economia política: contribuições da crítica feuerbachiana da religião para a crítica da economia e da política em Karl Marx. 2023. 218 f. Tese (Doutorado em Filosofia) - Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná, Toledo, 2023. |
url |
https://tede.unioeste.br/handle/tede/7187 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.program.fl_str_mv |
-8305327606432166393 |
dc.relation.confidence.fl_str_mv |
600 600 600 600 |
dc.relation.department.fl_str_mv |
6640233372697234262 |
dc.relation.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
-672352020940167053 |
dc.relation.sponsorship.fl_str_mv |
2075167498588264571 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná Toledo |
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv |
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Filosofia |
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv |
UNIOESTE |
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv |
Brasil |
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv |
Centro de Ciências Humanas e Sociais |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná Toledo |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UNIOESTE instname:Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná (UNIOESTE) instacron:UNIOESTE |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná (UNIOESTE) |
instacron_str |
UNIOESTE |
institution |
UNIOESTE |
reponame_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UNIOESTE |
collection |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UNIOESTE |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
http://tede.unioeste.br:8080/tede/bitstream/tede/7187/2/Pericles_Ariza_2023.pdf http://tede.unioeste.br:8080/tede/bitstream/tede/7187/1/license.txt |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
f2c36473f5e4e4a839ad39d81d1fdf08 bd3efa91386c1718a7f26a329fdcb468 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UNIOESTE - Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná (UNIOESTE) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
biblioteca.repositorio@unioeste.br |
_version_ |
1811723484908224512 |