Estado e valor ou o processo de circulação simples como forma aparencial do Estado

• Autor(a) principal: Melo, Ricardo Pereira de
• Data de Publicação: 2008
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UNIOESTE
• Texto Completo: http://tede.unioeste.br:8080/tede/handle/tede/2092
• topic: Exposição dialética de O Capital; Processo de circulação simples de merdadorias; Conceito de Estado; Estado; Dialética; Capital (Economia); Valor (Economia); Filosofia política; Teoria do Estado; Teoria política; Marx, Karl, 1818-1883; Exposition dialectic of The Capital; Process of simple circulation of commodities; concept of Stade; CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIA

The objective headquarters of this dissertation is to present how it is possible, through exposition dialectic, to think the category been since the beginning of the Capital. The great challenge that the Capital presents is to understand your exposition method that subjects the emergence of the concept since the beginning - not only in the beginning of the work, but the whole time - as totality. In the totality, already known by us , the State is there the whole time and during the whole exposition dialectic of the capital. In that way, I try to show that Marx thinks the category been as logical-historical presupposition in the beginning of the work, and like this, the State would be already present-absent in the first chapter of the Capital. Starting from the moment in that the categories go being put dialectically, the concept of State goes being built slowly through the dialectic of the exposition. For that work, only the first three chapters of the Capital were analyzed, contained in the Section I that corresponds to the process of simple circulation of commodities. In the process of simple circulation, while the purpose is the value of use of the commodities, the State he appears as the oasis of the alienable rights of the property and it seems to work just as auxiliary support of the ideal structure of the market. In the alienated conscience it is as if the State was, seemingly, be absent of the market. If the purpose of the change, however, it is the valorization of the value, then, the State is there the whole time (present for us ), but just showing the face that better it interests him. The movement of the exposition does with that the appearance neutrality of the State in the market is overcome turning visible the invisible. The legitimate and concentrated violence of the State also appears from I begin him of the exposition dialectic of the Capital, but just as presupposed, for in the end to be put with all your determinations. The State is there , but still non position, just presupposition, in the ambit of the simple circulation of commodities. The historical development is presupposed under each logical category that comes in the Capital. Same not appearing (explicitly) in the Capital, the State is always present while presupposition report of the violence of the fight of classes that is put by the way of exposition dialectic of that work. That theory is only possible to be thought inside of a theory of the negation of the negation, where the category been it is put and at the same time denied by your logical and historical presuppositions. The conflicting dimension of the capital and the extra-economical power of the State send, like this, to the rigorous subject of the exposition dialectic of the capital.