A política de avaliação do PROEJA no Estado do Paraná (2008-2010).

• Autor(a) principal: Blum, Márcia Sabina Rosa
• Data de Publicação: 2011
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UNIOESTE
• Texto Completo: http://tede.unioeste.br:8080/tede/handle/tede/926
• topic: PROEJA; Ensino Médio Integrado; Avaliação; PROEJA; Integrated secondary school; Evaluation; CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::EDUCACAO

Our goal with this project was to analyze how the assessment has been made by PROEJA as Welfare politic in the State of Parana. We assumed that the implementation of this program is linked to the reform of the basic education in the 90 s. When we presented the hypothesis to joint PROEJA to all the reforms of the 1990s, our interest was to understand the extent to which an educational policy that results from the clash between competing interests for the articulation between high school and professional education and converges and/or diverges from the assumptions underlying the so-called centrality of basic education outlined in the 90 years of the 20th century. We studied, in particular, the assessment due to the strong emphasis on the control results in this decade and we try to check which aspects such assessment ,or diverges and converges with the assessments of the 1990s. The work was organized into four chapters. At first we present the political, economic, educational and organizational work on which PROEJA is formulated. In the second, in order to build theoretical basis analyzing the policy assessment PROEJA that has constituted the State of Paraná, we present a discussion about the assessment category. The third chapter is devoted to analyze the reform of basic education and secondary education and policy assessment implemented in the 1990s. The purpose of this chapter was to identify the main aspects that make up these reforms in order to feed the research about the possible convergence of PROEJA with which the present framework of guidance in the educational field in the 1990s. Finally, on the fourth chapter, we treat the evaluation process PROEJA in Parana State considering set out in the previous chapters. From these elements we found that the assessment of PROEJA converges with the evaluations had been implemented since the 1990s by focusing on results and be centered. Diverge, for example, the present concern with qualitative information related to the teaching-learning process and for not having the purpose of classifying the schools and students.