Ceticismo e Montaigne: uma apologia dos costumes
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UNIOESTE |
Texto Completo: | http://tede.unioeste.br/handle/tede/3937 |
Resumo: | The following research deals with the investigation of one of the most important questions concerning skeptical doctrine: the possibility of conciliation between the teaching pronounced in school and practical life. By refusing all dogmatic doctrines, due to the skeptical conclusion that they invalidate each other, since each supposes to have reached a truth that opposes the other, the skepticism prescribes the epoché, or suspension of judgment. In this sense, the skeptics take effort, then, to construct a discourse of opposition to all other schools, showing the fragility of each and every position in any subject. Due to the residual indecision after the suspension of the judgment, skeptics are accused of not being able to act because the epoché prevents them from making any decision, however simple it may be. However, skeptics make some recommendations on this, deviating the suspension from this scope and suggesting a maintenance of the common customs of the people to which they belong. We seek to understand, therefore, how these two apparently paradoxical aspects of the skeptical doctrine harmonize: at one side, the consequences of a corrosive discourse, always willing to highlight the present contradictions between the dogmatic affirmations; on the other, the advice of admitting and preserving their own customs and laws, even knowing them to be relative and incomplete. For that, this research covers a series of elements, ranging from the early skeptics, Greeks and Romans, to the Renaissance, Montaigne in particular, as well as a study on the main authors who raised criticisms focused on this specific problem. |
id |
UNIOESTE-1_ecbf72fe7cba7b19de41ce7b454dcbbc |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:tede.unioeste.br:tede/3937 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIOESTE-1 |
network_name_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UNIOESTE |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Heuser, Ester Maria Dreherhttp://lattes.cnpq.br/5548908138476554Heuser, Ester Maria Dreherhttp://lattes.cnpq.br/5548908138476554Eva, Luiz Antonio Alveshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/7081637340185391Battisti, Cesar Augustohttp://lattes.cnpq.br/7201289101949593Busellato, Stefanohttp://lattes.cnpq.br/2233119960100863http://lattes.cnpq.br/8025927813942141Zanelato, Henrique2018-09-13T18:45:11Z2018-06-12ZANELATO, Henrique. Ceticismo e Montaigne: uma apologia dos costumes. 2018. 96 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Filosofia) - Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná, Toledo, 2018.http://tede.unioeste.br/handle/tede/3937The following research deals with the investigation of one of the most important questions concerning skeptical doctrine: the possibility of conciliation between the teaching pronounced in school and practical life. By refusing all dogmatic doctrines, due to the skeptical conclusion that they invalidate each other, since each supposes to have reached a truth that opposes the other, the skepticism prescribes the epoché, or suspension of judgment. In this sense, the skeptics take effort, then, to construct a discourse of opposition to all other schools, showing the fragility of each and every position in any subject. Due to the residual indecision after the suspension of the judgment, skeptics are accused of not being able to act because the epoché prevents them from making any decision, however simple it may be. However, skeptics make some recommendations on this, deviating the suspension from this scope and suggesting a maintenance of the common customs of the people to which they belong. We seek to understand, therefore, how these two apparently paradoxical aspects of the skeptical doctrine harmonize: at one side, the consequences of a corrosive discourse, always willing to highlight the present contradictions between the dogmatic affirmations; on the other, the advice of admitting and preserving their own customs and laws, even knowing them to be relative and incomplete. For that, this research covers a series of elements, ranging from the early skeptics, Greeks and Romans, to the Renaissance, Montaigne in particular, as well as a study on the main authors who raised criticisms focused on this specific problem.A pesquisa a seguir trata da investigação de uma das mais importantes questões referentes à doutrina cética: a possibilidade ou não de conciliação entre o ensinamento proferido pela escola e a vida prática. Por recusar todas as doutrinas chamadas dogmáticas, devido à conclusão cética de que elas se invalidam entre si, já que cada uma supõe ter alcançado uma verdade que opõe a de outra, o ceticismo prescreve a epoché, ou suspensão do juízo. Nesse sentido, os céticos se esforçaram, então, em construir um discurso de oposição a todas as outras escolas, mostrando a fragilidade de toda e qualquer posição, em qualquer assunto. Devido à indecisão restante após a suspensão do juízo, os céticos são acusados de não poderem agir porque a epoché os impede de tomar qualquer decisão, por mais simples que seja. No entanto, os céticos fazem algumas recomendações quanto a isso, afastando a suspensão desse âmbito e sugerindo a manutenção dos costumes comuns do povo ao qual pertencem. Buscamos compreender, portanto, como se harmonizam esses dois aspectos aparentemente paradoxais, próprios à doutrina cética: por um lado, as consequências de um discurso corrosivo, sempre disposto a destacar as contradições presentes entre as afirmações dogmáticas; por outro, o conselho de admitir e conservar os próprios costumes e leis, mesmo sabendo-os relativos e incompletos. Para isso, a pesquisa abrange uma série de elementos, que vai desde os primeiros céticos, gregos e romanos, até os renascentistas, Montaigne em especial, bem como um estudo sobre os principais autores que levantaram críticas focadas nesse problema específico.Submitted by Marilene Donadel (marilene.donadel@unioeste.br) on 2018-09-13T18:45:11Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Henrique_Zanelato_2018.pdf: 966050 bytes, checksum: c45242d719cfbd0cf89a2fc1bb5be4d8 (MD5)Made available in DSpace on 2018-09-13T18:45:11Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Henrique_Zanelato_2018.pdf: 966050 bytes, checksum: c45242d719cfbd0cf89a2fc1bb5be4d8 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2018-06-12Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - CAPESapplication/pdfpor-2624803687637593200500Universidade Estadual do Oeste do ParanáToledoPrograma de Pós-Graduação em FilosofiaUNIOESTEBrasilCentro de Ciências Humanas e SociaisCeticismoCostumeSuspensão do juízoSkepticismCustomSuspension of judgementCIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIACeticismo e Montaigne: uma apologia dos costumesSkepticism and Montaigne: an apology to customsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis-83053276064321663936006006006006640233372697234262-6723520209401670532075167498588264571info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UNIOESTEinstname:Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná (UNIOESTE)instacron:UNIOESTEORIGINALHenrique_Zanelato_2018.pdfHenrique_Zanelato_2018.pdfapplication/pdf966050http://tede.unioeste.br:8080/tede/bitstream/tede/3937/2/Henrique_Zanelato_2018.pdfc45242d719cfbd0cf89a2fc1bb5be4d8MD52LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-82165http://tede.unioeste.br:8080/tede/bitstream/tede/3937/1/license.txtbd3efa91386c1718a7f26a329fdcb468MD51tede/39372018-09-13 15:45:11.53oai:tede.unioeste.br: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Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttp://tede.unioeste.br/PUBhttp://tede.unioeste.br/oai/requestbiblioteca.repositorio@unioeste.bropendoar:2018-09-13T18:45:11Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UNIOESTE - Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná (UNIOESTE)false |
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv |
Ceticismo e Montaigne: uma apologia dos costumes |
dc.title.alternative.eng.fl_str_mv |
Skepticism and Montaigne: an apology to customs |
title |
Ceticismo e Montaigne: uma apologia dos costumes |
spellingShingle |
Ceticismo e Montaigne: uma apologia dos costumes Zanelato, Henrique Ceticismo Costume Suspensão do juízo Skepticism Custom Suspension of judgement CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIA |
title_short |
Ceticismo e Montaigne: uma apologia dos costumes |
title_full |
Ceticismo e Montaigne: uma apologia dos costumes |
title_fullStr |
Ceticismo e Montaigne: uma apologia dos costumes |
title_full_unstemmed |
Ceticismo e Montaigne: uma apologia dos costumes |
title_sort |
Ceticismo e Montaigne: uma apologia dos costumes |
author |
Zanelato, Henrique |
author_facet |
Zanelato, Henrique |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv |
Heuser, Ester Maria Dreher |
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/5548908138476554 |
dc.contributor.referee1.fl_str_mv |
Heuser, Ester Maria Dreher |
dc.contributor.referee1Lattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/5548908138476554 |
dc.contributor.referee2.fl_str_mv |
Eva, Luiz Antonio Alves |
dc.contributor.referee2Lattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/7081637340185391 |
dc.contributor.referee3.fl_str_mv |
Battisti, Cesar Augusto |
dc.contributor.referee3Lattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/7201289101949593 |
dc.contributor.referee4.fl_str_mv |
Busellato, Stefano |
dc.contributor.referee4Lattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/2233119960100863 |
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/8025927813942141 |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Zanelato, Henrique |
contributor_str_mv |
Heuser, Ester Maria Dreher Heuser, Ester Maria Dreher Eva, Luiz Antonio Alves Battisti, Cesar Augusto Busellato, Stefano |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Ceticismo Costume |
topic |
Ceticismo Costume Suspensão do juízo Skepticism Custom Suspension of judgement CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIA |
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Suspensão do juízo Skepticism Custom Suspension of judgement |
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIA |
description |
The following research deals with the investigation of one of the most important questions concerning skeptical doctrine: the possibility of conciliation between the teaching pronounced in school and practical life. By refusing all dogmatic doctrines, due to the skeptical conclusion that they invalidate each other, since each supposes to have reached a truth that opposes the other, the skepticism prescribes the epoché, or suspension of judgment. In this sense, the skeptics take effort, then, to construct a discourse of opposition to all other schools, showing the fragility of each and every position in any subject. Due to the residual indecision after the suspension of the judgment, skeptics are accused of not being able to act because the epoché prevents them from making any decision, however simple it may be. However, skeptics make some recommendations on this, deviating the suspension from this scope and suggesting a maintenance of the common customs of the people to which they belong. We seek to understand, therefore, how these two apparently paradoxical aspects of the skeptical doctrine harmonize: at one side, the consequences of a corrosive discourse, always willing to highlight the present contradictions between the dogmatic affirmations; on the other, the advice of admitting and preserving their own customs and laws, even knowing them to be relative and incomplete. For that, this research covers a series of elements, ranging from the early skeptics, Greeks and Romans, to the Renaissance, Montaigne in particular, as well as a study on the main authors who raised criticisms focused on this specific problem. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2018-09-13T18:45:11Z |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2018-06-12 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
format |
masterThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv |
ZANELATO, Henrique. Ceticismo e Montaigne: uma apologia dos costumes. 2018. 96 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Filosofia) - Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná, Toledo, 2018. |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://tede.unioeste.br/handle/tede/3937 |
identifier_str_mv |
ZANELATO, Henrique. Ceticismo e Montaigne: uma apologia dos costumes. 2018. 96 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Filosofia) - Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná, Toledo, 2018. |
url |
http://tede.unioeste.br/handle/tede/3937 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.program.fl_str_mv |
-8305327606432166393 |
dc.relation.confidence.fl_str_mv |
600 600 600 600 |
dc.relation.department.fl_str_mv |
6640233372697234262 |
dc.relation.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
-672352020940167053 |
dc.relation.sponsorship.fl_str_mv |
2075167498588264571 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná Toledo |
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv |
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Filosofia |
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv |
UNIOESTE |
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv |
Brasil |
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv |
Centro de Ciências Humanas e Sociais |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná Toledo |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UNIOESTE instname:Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná (UNIOESTE) instacron:UNIOESTE |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná (UNIOESTE) |
instacron_str |
UNIOESTE |
institution |
UNIOESTE |
reponame_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UNIOESTE |
collection |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UNIOESTE |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
http://tede.unioeste.br:8080/tede/bitstream/tede/3937/2/Henrique_Zanelato_2018.pdf http://tede.unioeste.br:8080/tede/bitstream/tede/3937/1/license.txt |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
c45242d719cfbd0cf89a2fc1bb5be4d8 bd3efa91386c1718a7f26a329fdcb468 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UNIOESTE - Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná (UNIOESTE) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
biblioteca.repositorio@unioeste.br |
_version_ |
1801124554238590976 |