Quality of life of bachelor professionals in physical education

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Martini Silva, Ana Carolina
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Segabinazi Peserico, Cecília
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Caderno de Educação Física e Esporte
Texto Completo: https://e-revista.unioeste.br/index.php/cadernoedfisica/article/view/29566
Resumo: OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to verify the quality of life of Physical Education (PE) professionals working in different contexts, in addition to comparing the quality of life according to gender, age, professional work experience and weekly workload.METHODS: Fifty-eight PE professionals participated in the study (25 men and 33 women) with a mean of 29.8±6.7 years. It was applied an anamnesis interview and an abbreviated version of the questionnaire World Health Quality of Life (WHOQOL-bref) to the participants. Data normality was verified using the Kolmogorov Smirnov test. To compare the quality of life scores between the different groups, the Mann-Whitney test was used for non-normal data and Student’s t test for independent samples. Moreover, the Friedman test was performed for the comparison between the four quality of life domains. The significance level adopted was p<0.05.RESULTS: Concerning the results, the quality of life of the PE professionals was satisfactory, in which the highest score was for the social domain (73.3±14.6), while the lowest was for the environmental domain (62.9±12.9). In addition, no significant differences were found for the quality of life scores between men and women, as well as among the groups divided according age, to their weekly workload and their professional work experience.CONCLUSION: Therefore, we conclude that the scores of quality of life of PE professionals were high, and that gender, age, professional work experience and weekly workload did not influence the scores of the quality of life domains.
id UNIOESTE-3_0966c40ec4f7393c9e5c7a27edeadcc7
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.e-revista.unioeste.br:article/29566
network_acronym_str UNIOESTE-3
network_name_str Caderno de Educação Física e Esporte
repository_id_str
spelling Quality of life of bachelor professionals in physical education Qualidade de vida de profissionais bacharéis em educação físicaqualidade de vidaeducação físicaquestionárioQuality of LifeQuestionnaire.Physical EducationOBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to verify the quality of life of Physical Education (PE) professionals working in different contexts, in addition to comparing the quality of life according to gender, age, professional work experience and weekly workload.METHODS: Fifty-eight PE professionals participated in the study (25 men and 33 women) with a mean of 29.8±6.7 years. It was applied an anamnesis interview and an abbreviated version of the questionnaire World Health Quality of Life (WHOQOL-bref) to the participants. Data normality was verified using the Kolmogorov Smirnov test. To compare the quality of life scores between the different groups, the Mann-Whitney test was used for non-normal data and Student’s t test for independent samples. Moreover, the Friedman test was performed for the comparison between the four quality of life domains. The significance level adopted was p<0.05.RESULTS: Concerning the results, the quality of life of the PE professionals was satisfactory, in which the highest score was for the social domain (73.3±14.6), while the lowest was for the environmental domain (62.9±12.9). In addition, no significant differences were found for the quality of life scores between men and women, as well as among the groups divided according age, to their weekly workload and their professional work experience.CONCLUSION: Therefore, we conclude that the scores of quality of life of PE professionals were high, and that gender, age, professional work experience and weekly workload did not influence the scores of the quality of life domains.OBJETIVO: O objetivo do estudo foi verificar a qualidade de vida de profissionais bacharéis em Educação Física (EF) atuantes em diferentes contextos, além de comparar a qualidade de vida de acordo com o sexo, faixa etária, tempo de atuação e carga horária semanal de trabalho.MÉTODOS: Participaram do estudo 58 profissionais de EF (25 homens e 33 mulheres) com média de idade de 29,8±6,7 anos. Foi aplicado uma ficha de anamnese e o questionário World Health Quality of Life versão abreviada (WHOQOL-bref). A normalidade dos dados foi verificada pelo teste de Kolmogorov Smirnov. Para a comparação dos escores de qualidade de vida entre os diferentes grupos foram utilizados o teste de Mann-Whitney para os dados não normais e o teste t de Student para amostras independentes. Além disso, o teste de Friedman foi realizado para a comparação entre os quatro domínios de qualidade de vida. O nível de significância adotado foi de p<0,05.RESULTADOS: Em relação aos resultados, a qualidade de vida dos profissionais de EF foi satisfatória, no qual o maior escore foi para o domínio social (73,3±14,6), enquanto o menor foi para domínio meio ambiente (62,9±12,9). Além disso, não foram encontradas diferenças significantes para os escores de qualidade de vida entre homens e mulheres, bem como entre os grupos divididos de acordo com a faixa etária, carga horária semanal e o tempo de atuação dos indivíduos.CONCLUSÃO: Portanto, conclui-se que os escores de qualidade de vida dos profissionais de EF foram elevados e que o sexo, faixa etária, o tempo de atuação e a carga horária semanal não interferiram nos escores dos domínios de qualidade de vida.Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná2022-10-03info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado pelos paresapplication/pdfhttps://e-revista.unioeste.br/index.php/cadernoedfisica/article/view/2956610.36453/cefe.2022.29566Caderno de Educação Física e Esporte; Vol. 20 (2022): Caderno de Educação Física e Esporte; e-29566Caderno de Educação Física e Esporte; v. 20 (2022): Caderno de Educação Física e Esporte; e-295662318-50902318-5104reponame:Caderno de Educação Física e Esporteinstname:Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná (UNIOESTE)instacron:UNIOESTEporhttps://e-revista.unioeste.br/index.php/cadernoedfisica/article/view/29566/20968Copyright (c) 2022 Direitos Autorais Partilhadoshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMartini Silva, Ana Carolina Segabinazi Peserico, Cecília2023-07-13T17:26:22Zoai:ojs.e-revista.unioeste.br:article/29566Revistahttps://e-revista.unioeste.br/index.php/cadernoedfisica/indexPUBhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/intexto/oairevista.cefe@unioeste.br || projeto.saber@unioeste.br2318-50902318-5090opendoar:2023-07-13T17:26:22Caderno de Educação Física e Esporte - Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná (UNIOESTE)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Quality of life of bachelor professionals in physical education
Qualidade de vida de profissionais bacharéis em educação física
title Quality of life of bachelor professionals in physical education
spellingShingle Quality of life of bachelor professionals in physical education
Martini Silva, Ana Carolina
qualidade de vida
educação física
questionário
Quality of Life
Questionnaire.
Physical Education
title_short Quality of life of bachelor professionals in physical education
title_full Quality of life of bachelor professionals in physical education
title_fullStr Quality of life of bachelor professionals in physical education
title_full_unstemmed Quality of life of bachelor professionals in physical education
title_sort Quality of life of bachelor professionals in physical education
author Martini Silva, Ana Carolina
author_facet Martini Silva, Ana Carolina
Segabinazi Peserico, Cecília
author_role author
author2 Segabinazi Peserico, Cecília
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Martini Silva, Ana Carolina
Segabinazi Peserico, Cecília
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv qualidade de vida
educação física
questionário
Quality of Life
Questionnaire.
Physical Education
topic qualidade de vida
educação física
questionário
Quality of Life
Questionnaire.
Physical Education
description OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to verify the quality of life of Physical Education (PE) professionals working in different contexts, in addition to comparing the quality of life according to gender, age, professional work experience and weekly workload.METHODS: Fifty-eight PE professionals participated in the study (25 men and 33 women) with a mean of 29.8±6.7 years. It was applied an anamnesis interview and an abbreviated version of the questionnaire World Health Quality of Life (WHOQOL-bref) to the participants. Data normality was verified using the Kolmogorov Smirnov test. To compare the quality of life scores between the different groups, the Mann-Whitney test was used for non-normal data and Student’s t test for independent samples. Moreover, the Friedman test was performed for the comparison between the four quality of life domains. The significance level adopted was p<0.05.RESULTS: Concerning the results, the quality of life of the PE professionals was satisfactory, in which the highest score was for the social domain (73.3±14.6), while the lowest was for the environmental domain (62.9±12.9). In addition, no significant differences were found for the quality of life scores between men and women, as well as among the groups divided according age, to their weekly workload and their professional work experience.CONCLUSION: Therefore, we conclude that the scores of quality of life of PE professionals were high, and that gender, age, professional work experience and weekly workload did not influence the scores of the quality of life domains.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-10-03
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Avaliado pelos pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://e-revista.unioeste.br/index.php/cadernoedfisica/article/view/29566
10.36453/cefe.2022.29566
url https://e-revista.unioeste.br/index.php/cadernoedfisica/article/view/29566
identifier_str_mv 10.36453/cefe.2022.29566
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://e-revista.unioeste.br/index.php/cadernoedfisica/article/view/29566/20968
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Direitos Autorais Partilhados
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Direitos Autorais Partilhados
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Caderno de Educação Física e Esporte; Vol. 20 (2022): Caderno de Educação Física e Esporte; e-29566
Caderno de Educação Física e Esporte; v. 20 (2022): Caderno de Educação Física e Esporte; e-29566
2318-5090
2318-5104
reponame:Caderno de Educação Física e Esporte
instname:Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná (UNIOESTE)
instacron:UNIOESTE
instname_str Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná (UNIOESTE)
instacron_str UNIOESTE
institution UNIOESTE
reponame_str Caderno de Educação Física e Esporte
collection Caderno de Educação Física e Esporte
repository.name.fl_str_mv Caderno de Educação Física e Esporte - Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná (UNIOESTE)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revista.cefe@unioeste.br || projeto.saber@unioeste.br
_version_ 1798313412230381568

Registros relacionados