Validity and reproducibility of mobile devices and applications to evaluate and monitor adult cardiorespiratory fitness: a systematic review
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Caderno de Educação Física e Esporte |
Texto Completo: | https://e-revista.unioeste.br/index.php/cadernoedfisica/article/view/27552 |
Resumo: | BACKGROUND: Traditionally, the assessment and monitoring of cardiorespiratory fitness is carried out indirectly, with few technological resources. Since the emergence and popularization of mobile electronic devices, this monitoring has also been carried out through these new resources. However, few portable devices are rigorously tested to identify their validity. OBJECTIVE: To develop a systematic review of the literature, seeking to identify the studies that carried out the validation and reproducibility of mobile devices and applications to assess and monitor cardiorespiratory fitness in adults. METHODS: Study of systematic literature review according to the methodological recommendations of The Cochrane Collaboration. The terms cardiorespiratory fitness, mobile devices, electronic device and adults were used to compose search syntaxes in the Web of Science, Scopus, LILACS – English; LILACS - Portuguese, SciELO, SciELO – Brazil and PubMed / MEDLINE databases, in languages portuguese, english and spanish. The temporal range of searches comprised the period from January 2015 to December 2019. RESULTS: A total of 3,396 studies were found from the initial searches. After applying the filters, 488 papers were selected for the reading of titles, of which 43 were included in the stage of reading abstracts. Nineteen studies were considered eligible for the full reading phase, of which, 09 were included in the present review. Regarding the validity of applications and devices, seven studies show satisfactory results regarding equipment data, indicating a high correlation between the results of the evaluated equipment and the comparative method, good accuracy of the equipment or validity of the generated data. On the other hand, two studies suggested prudence in the use of the equipment. CONCLUSION: The present review identified that there are few studies developed for the validation of mobile devices and applications aimed at monitoring cardiorespiratory fitness. Smartphone apps and smart clothes seem to be the most trusted resources to date. |
id |
UNIOESTE-3_7208c5efa07ecb17f8c492560fbd4915 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.e-revista.unioeste.br:article/27552 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIOESTE-3 |
network_name_str |
Caderno de Educação Física e Esporte |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Validity and reproducibility of mobile devices and applications to evaluate and monitor adult cardiorespiratory fitness: a systematic review Validade e reprodutibilidade de dispositivos e aplicativos móveis para avaliar e monitorar a aptidão cardiorrespiratória de adultos: uma revisão sistemáticaAptidão CardiorrespiratóriaDispositivos MóveisDispositivos AletrônicosAplicativosCardiorespiratory FitnessMobile DeviceElectronic DevicesApplicationsBACKGROUND: Traditionally, the assessment and monitoring of cardiorespiratory fitness is carried out indirectly, with few technological resources. Since the emergence and popularization of mobile electronic devices, this monitoring has also been carried out through these new resources. However, few portable devices are rigorously tested to identify their validity. OBJECTIVE: To develop a systematic review of the literature, seeking to identify the studies that carried out the validation and reproducibility of mobile devices and applications to assess and monitor cardiorespiratory fitness in adults. METHODS: Study of systematic literature review according to the methodological recommendations of The Cochrane Collaboration. The terms cardiorespiratory fitness, mobile devices, electronic device and adults were used to compose search syntaxes in the Web of Science, Scopus, LILACS – English; LILACS - Portuguese, SciELO, SciELO – Brazil and PubMed / MEDLINE databases, in languages portuguese, english and spanish. The temporal range of searches comprised the period from January 2015 to December 2019. RESULTS: A total of 3,396 studies were found from the initial searches. After applying the filters, 488 papers were selected for the reading of titles, of which 43 were included in the stage of reading abstracts. Nineteen studies were considered eligible for the full reading phase, of which, 09 were included in the present review. Regarding the validity of applications and devices, seven studies show satisfactory results regarding equipment data, indicating a high correlation between the results of the evaluated equipment and the comparative method, good accuracy of the equipment or validity of the generated data. On the other hand, two studies suggested prudence in the use of the equipment. CONCLUSION: The present review identified that there are few studies developed for the validation of mobile devices and applications aimed at monitoring cardiorespiratory fitness. Smartphone apps and smart clothes seem to be the most trusted resources to date.INTRODUÇÃO: Tradicionalmente a avaliação e monitoramento da aptidão cardiorrespiratória é realizada de forma indireta, com poucos recursos tecnológicos. A partir do surgimento e popularização dos dispositivos eletrônicos móveis, este monitoramento passou a ser realizado também por meio destes novos recursos. Entretanto, poucos dispositivos portáteis são testados de forma rigorosa para identificar sua validade. OBJETIVO: Desenvolver uma revisão sistemática da literatura, buscando identificar os estudos que realizaram a validação e a reprodutibilidade de dispositivos e aplicativos móveis para avaliar e monitorar a aptidão cardiorrespiratória em adultos. MÉTODOS: Estudo de revisão sistemática da literatura em acordo com as recomendações metodológicas da The Cochrane Collaboration. Os termos cardiorespiratory fitness, mobile devices, electronic device e adults foram utilizados na composição das sintaxes de busca nas bases de dados Web of Science, Scopus, LILACS – Inglês; LILACS - Português, SciELO; SciELO Brasil e PubMed/MEDLINE, nos idiomas português, inglês e espanhol. O intervalo temporal das buscas compreendeu o período de janeiro de 2015 até dezembro de 2019. RESULTADOS: Um total de 3.396 estudos foram encontrados a partir das buscas iniciais. Após aplicados os filtros, 488 trabalhos foram selecionados para a leitura de títulos, dos quais, 43 foram incluídos na etapa de leitura de resumos. Foram considerados elegíveis para a fase de leitura na íntegra 19 estudos, dos quais, 09 foram incluídos na presente revisão. Em relação à validade dos aplicativos e dispositivos, sete estudos apresentam resultados satisfatórios referentes aos dados dos equipamentos, indicando alta correlação entre os resultados do equipamento avaliado e o método comparativo, boa precisão do equipamento ou validade dos dados gerados. Por outro lado, dois estudos sugeriram prudência no uso dos equipamentos. CONCLUSÃO: A presente revisão identificou que existem poucos estudos desenvolvidos para a validação dos dispositivos e aplicativos móveis voltados ao monitoramento da aptidão cardiorrespiratória. Os aplicativos de smartphones e as roupas inteligentes parecem ser os recursos mais confiáveis até o momento.Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná2022-07-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado pelos paresPesquisa de Revisão;application/pdfhttps://e-revista.unioeste.br/index.php/cadernoedfisica/article/view/2755210.36453/cefe.2022.27552Caderno de Educação Física e Esporte; Vol. 20 (2022): Caderno de Educação Física e Esporte; e-27552Caderno de Educação Física e Esporte; v. 20 (2022): Caderno de Educação Física e Esporte; e-275522318-50902318-5104reponame:Caderno de Educação Física e Esporteinstname:Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná (UNIOESTE)instacron:UNIOESTEporhttps://e-revista.unioeste.br/index.php/cadernoedfisica/article/view/27552/20716Copyright (c) 2022 Direitor Autorais Partilhadoshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFoschiera, Diogo BertellaLegnani, EltoGustave, Eva Luziane DenkewiczCiesielski-Junior, Darlan FrançaMiranda-Junior, Ciro RenatoAbreu, Sérgio Luiz deLegnani, Rosimeide Francisco Santos2023-07-13T17:26:22Zoai:ojs.e-revista.unioeste.br:article/27552Revistahttps://e-revista.unioeste.br/index.php/cadernoedfisica/indexPUBhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/intexto/oairevista.cefe@unioeste.br || projeto.saber@unioeste.br2318-50902318-5090opendoar:2023-07-13T17:26:22Caderno de Educação Física e Esporte - Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná (UNIOESTE)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Validity and reproducibility of mobile devices and applications to evaluate and monitor adult cardiorespiratory fitness: a systematic review Validade e reprodutibilidade de dispositivos e aplicativos móveis para avaliar e monitorar a aptidão cardiorrespiratória de adultos: uma revisão sistemática |
title |
Validity and reproducibility of mobile devices and applications to evaluate and monitor adult cardiorespiratory fitness: a systematic review |
spellingShingle |
Validity and reproducibility of mobile devices and applications to evaluate and monitor adult cardiorespiratory fitness: a systematic review Foschiera, Diogo Bertella Aptidão Cardiorrespiratória Dispositivos Móveis Dispositivos Aletrônicos Aplicativos Cardiorespiratory Fitness Mobile Device Electronic Devices Applications |
title_short |
Validity and reproducibility of mobile devices and applications to evaluate and monitor adult cardiorespiratory fitness: a systematic review |
title_full |
Validity and reproducibility of mobile devices and applications to evaluate and monitor adult cardiorespiratory fitness: a systematic review |
title_fullStr |
Validity and reproducibility of mobile devices and applications to evaluate and monitor adult cardiorespiratory fitness: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed |
Validity and reproducibility of mobile devices and applications to evaluate and monitor adult cardiorespiratory fitness: a systematic review |
title_sort |
Validity and reproducibility of mobile devices and applications to evaluate and monitor adult cardiorespiratory fitness: a systematic review |
author |
Foschiera, Diogo Bertella |
author_facet |
Foschiera, Diogo Bertella Legnani, Elto Gustave, Eva Luziane Denkewicz Ciesielski-Junior, Darlan França Miranda-Junior, Ciro Renato Abreu, Sérgio Luiz de Legnani, Rosimeide Francisco Santos |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Legnani, Elto Gustave, Eva Luziane Denkewicz Ciesielski-Junior, Darlan França Miranda-Junior, Ciro Renato Abreu, Sérgio Luiz de Legnani, Rosimeide Francisco Santos |
author2_role |
author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Foschiera, Diogo Bertella Legnani, Elto Gustave, Eva Luziane Denkewicz Ciesielski-Junior, Darlan França Miranda-Junior, Ciro Renato Abreu, Sérgio Luiz de Legnani, Rosimeide Francisco Santos |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Aptidão Cardiorrespiratória Dispositivos Móveis Dispositivos Aletrônicos Aplicativos Cardiorespiratory Fitness Mobile Device Electronic Devices Applications |
topic |
Aptidão Cardiorrespiratória Dispositivos Móveis Dispositivos Aletrônicos Aplicativos Cardiorespiratory Fitness Mobile Device Electronic Devices Applications |
description |
BACKGROUND: Traditionally, the assessment and monitoring of cardiorespiratory fitness is carried out indirectly, with few technological resources. Since the emergence and popularization of mobile electronic devices, this monitoring has also been carried out through these new resources. However, few portable devices are rigorously tested to identify their validity. OBJECTIVE: To develop a systematic review of the literature, seeking to identify the studies that carried out the validation and reproducibility of mobile devices and applications to assess and monitor cardiorespiratory fitness in adults. METHODS: Study of systematic literature review according to the methodological recommendations of The Cochrane Collaboration. The terms cardiorespiratory fitness, mobile devices, electronic device and adults were used to compose search syntaxes in the Web of Science, Scopus, LILACS – English; LILACS - Portuguese, SciELO, SciELO – Brazil and PubMed / MEDLINE databases, in languages portuguese, english and spanish. The temporal range of searches comprised the period from January 2015 to December 2019. RESULTS: A total of 3,396 studies were found from the initial searches. After applying the filters, 488 papers were selected for the reading of titles, of which 43 were included in the stage of reading abstracts. Nineteen studies were considered eligible for the full reading phase, of which, 09 were included in the present review. Regarding the validity of applications and devices, seven studies show satisfactory results regarding equipment data, indicating a high correlation between the results of the evaluated equipment and the comparative method, good accuracy of the equipment or validity of the generated data. On the other hand, two studies suggested prudence in the use of the equipment. CONCLUSION: The present review identified that there are few studies developed for the validation of mobile devices and applications aimed at monitoring cardiorespiratory fitness. Smartphone apps and smart clothes seem to be the most trusted resources to date. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-07-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Avaliado pelos pares Pesquisa de Revisão; |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://e-revista.unioeste.br/index.php/cadernoedfisica/article/view/27552 10.36453/cefe.2022.27552 |
url |
https://e-revista.unioeste.br/index.php/cadernoedfisica/article/view/27552 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.36453/cefe.2022.27552 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://e-revista.unioeste.br/index.php/cadernoedfisica/article/view/27552/20716 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Direitor Autorais Partilhados https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Direitor Autorais Partilhados https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Caderno de Educação Física e Esporte; Vol. 20 (2022): Caderno de Educação Física e Esporte; e-27552 Caderno de Educação Física e Esporte; v. 20 (2022): Caderno de Educação Física e Esporte; e-27552 2318-5090 2318-5104 reponame:Caderno de Educação Física e Esporte instname:Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná (UNIOESTE) instacron:UNIOESTE |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná (UNIOESTE) |
instacron_str |
UNIOESTE |
institution |
UNIOESTE |
reponame_str |
Caderno de Educação Física e Esporte |
collection |
Caderno de Educação Física e Esporte |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Caderno de Educação Física e Esporte - Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná (UNIOESTE) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revista.cefe@unioeste.br || projeto.saber@unioeste.br |
_version_ |
1798313411710287872 |