Comparison of manual dexterity in individuals with distinct laterality

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Fernandes, Lidiane Aparecida
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Alves, Wallace Tadeu, Ribeiro, Simara Regina de Oliveira, Figueiredo, Lucas Savassi, Ambrósio, Natália Fontes Alves, Couto, Crislaine Rangel, Lage, Guilherme Menezes
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Caderno de Educação Física e Esporte
DOI: 10.36453/cefe.2021191.a26831
Texto Completo: https://e-revista.unioeste.br/index.php/cadernoedfisica/article/view/26831
Resumo: BACKGROUND: A manual dexterity can be defined as the skill and ease of using the hands, such as writing, strumming a musical instrument, throwing and catching. Laterality can be conceptualized as the preference of use by one of the members over the other and it is confirmed, for example, in right-handed and left-handed individuals, influencing the different performances of the hands. OBJECTIVE: To compare manual dexterity in right-handed and left-handed users by placing and removing pins in the Grooved Pegboard Test. METHODS: The sample consisted of 20 healthy volunteers, of both sexes, aged between 18 and 40 years, divided into two groups: 5 men and 5 women from the right population and 5 men and 5 women from the population left-handed. Regarding the lateral dominance index, right-handed individuals had an average index of 97% and left-handed individuals, 91%, in the Edinburgh Lateral Dominance Inventory.  RESULTS: In the condition of placing the pins, differences were observed between the right-handed [t(df=9)=-7.16; p=0.01] and left-handed [t(df =9)=4.80; p=0.01], where the use of the preferred hand showed better performance related to the use of the non-preferred hand. As for the condition of removing the pins, no difference was observed between the right and left hands for the right-handed [t(df=9)=-1.96; p=0.08] and neither for the left-handed [t(df=9)=1.27; p=0.23]. Regarding the asymmetry index, no differences were observed between the groups, although it seems that the asymmetries stand out in tasks where the cognitive demand is greater than the energy demand. CONCLUSION: The performance in the tasks of manual dexterity was different for the preferred hand for both right-handed and left-handed people, with the preferred hand presenting a better performance when compared to the non-preferred hand.
id UNIOESTE-3_a491c2520717820116238429358e5aac
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.e-revista.unioeste.br:article/26831
network_acronym_str UNIOESTE-3
network_name_str Caderno de Educação Física e Esporte
spelling Comparison of manual dexterity in individuals with distinct lateralityComparação da destreza manual em indivíduos com lateralidade distintaDestreza manualLateralidadeControle motor.Destreza manualLateralityMotor controlBACKGROUND: A manual dexterity can be defined as the skill and ease of using the hands, such as writing, strumming a musical instrument, throwing and catching. Laterality can be conceptualized as the preference of use by one of the members over the other and it is confirmed, for example, in right-handed and left-handed individuals, influencing the different performances of the hands. OBJECTIVE: To compare manual dexterity in right-handed and left-handed users by placing and removing pins in the Grooved Pegboard Test. METHODS: The sample consisted of 20 healthy volunteers, of both sexes, aged between 18 and 40 years, divided into two groups: 5 men and 5 women from the right population and 5 men and 5 women from the population left-handed. Regarding the lateral dominance index, right-handed individuals had an average index of 97% and left-handed individuals, 91%, in the Edinburgh Lateral Dominance Inventory.  RESULTS: In the condition of placing the pins, differences were observed between the right-handed [t(df=9)=-7.16; p=0.01] and left-handed [t(df =9)=4.80; p=0.01], where the use of the preferred hand showed better performance related to the use of the non-preferred hand. As for the condition of removing the pins, no difference was observed between the right and left hands for the right-handed [t(df=9)=-1.96; p=0.08] and neither for the left-handed [t(df=9)=1.27; p=0.23]. Regarding the asymmetry index, no differences were observed between the groups, although it seems that the asymmetries stand out in tasks where the cognitive demand is greater than the energy demand. CONCLUSION: The performance in the tasks of manual dexterity was different for the preferred hand for both right-handed and left-handed people, with the preferred hand presenting a better performance when compared to the non-preferred hand.INTRODUÇÃO: A destreza manual pode ser definida como a habilidade e a facilidade na utilização das mãos, como escrever, dedilhar um instrumento musical, lançar e apanhar. A lateralidade pode ser conceituada como a preferência de utilização por um dos membros em detrimento ao outro e se confirma, por exemplo, em indivíduos destros e canhotos, influenciando nos distintos desempenhos das mãos. OBJETIVO: Comparar a destreza manual em destros e canhotos através da tarefa de colocar e retirar pinos no Grooved Pegboard Test.  MÉTODOS: A amostra foi composta por 20 voluntários saudáveis, de ambos os sexos, com idade entre 18 e 40 anos, dividida em dois grupos, sendo:  5 homens e 5 mulheres de população destra e 5 homens e 5 mulheres de população canhota. Referente ao índice de dominância lateral, os indivíduos destros apresentaram índice médio de 97% e os indivíduos canhotos de 91% no Inventário de Dominância Lateral de Edimburgo. RESULTADOS: Na condição de colocar os pinos foram observadas diferenças entre as mãos dos destros [t(df=9)=-7,16; p=0,01] e dos canhotos [t(df=9)=4,80; p=0,01], o uso da mão preferida apresentou melhor desempenho relacionado ao uso da mão não preferida. Já para a condição de retirar os pinos não foram observadas diferenças entre as mãos direita e esquerda para os destros [t(df=9)=-1,96; p=0,08] e nem para os canhotos [t(df=9)=1,27; p=0,23]. Em relação ao índice de assimetria não foram observadas diferenças entre os grupos, apesar de parecer que as assimetrias se destacam em tarefas nas quais a demanda cognitiva é maior do que a demanda energética. CONCLUSÃO: O desempenho nas tarefas de destreza manual foi diferente para a mão preferida tanto para destros quanto para canhotos, sendo que a mão preferida apresentou melhor desempenho quando comparada à mão não preferida.Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná2021-04-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado pelos paresapplication/pdfhttps://e-revista.unioeste.br/index.php/cadernoedfisica/article/view/2683110.36453/cefe.2021191.a26831Caderno de Educação Física e Esporte; Vol. 19 No. 1 (2021): Caderno de Educação Física e Esporte; 41-47Caderno de Educação Física e Esporte; v. 19 n. 1 (2021): Caderno de Educação Física e Esporte; 41-472318-50902318-5104reponame:Caderno de Educação Física e Esporteinstname:Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná (UNIOESTE)instacron:UNIOESTEporhttps://e-revista.unioeste.br/index.php/cadernoedfisica/article/view/26831/17315Copyright (c) 2021 Direitor Autorais Partilhadoshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFernandes, Lidiane AparecidaAlves, Wallace TadeuRibeiro, Simara Regina de OliveiraFigueiredo, Lucas SavassiAmbrósio, Natália Fontes AlvesCouto, Crislaine RangelLage, Guilherme Menezes2023-11-06T14:04:05Zoai:ojs.e-revista.unioeste.br:article/26831Revistahttps://e-revista.unioeste.br/index.php/cadernoedfisica/indexPUBhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/intexto/oairevista.cefe@unioeste.br || projeto.saber@unioeste.br2318-50902318-5090opendoar:2023-11-06T14:04:05Caderno de Educação Física e Esporte - Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná (UNIOESTE)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparison of manual dexterity in individuals with distinct laterality
Comparação da destreza manual em indivíduos com lateralidade distinta
title Comparison of manual dexterity in individuals with distinct laterality
spellingShingle Comparison of manual dexterity in individuals with distinct laterality
Comparison of manual dexterity in individuals with distinct laterality
Fernandes, Lidiane Aparecida
Destreza manual
Lateralidade
Controle motor.
Destreza manual
Laterality
Motor control
Fernandes, Lidiane Aparecida
Destreza manual
Lateralidade
Controle motor.
Destreza manual
Laterality
Motor control
title_short Comparison of manual dexterity in individuals with distinct laterality
title_full Comparison of manual dexterity in individuals with distinct laterality
title_fullStr Comparison of manual dexterity in individuals with distinct laterality
Comparison of manual dexterity in individuals with distinct laterality
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of manual dexterity in individuals with distinct laterality
Comparison of manual dexterity in individuals with distinct laterality
title_sort Comparison of manual dexterity in individuals with distinct laterality
author Fernandes, Lidiane Aparecida
author_facet Fernandes, Lidiane Aparecida
Fernandes, Lidiane Aparecida
Alves, Wallace Tadeu
Ribeiro, Simara Regina de Oliveira
Figueiredo, Lucas Savassi
Ambrósio, Natália Fontes Alves
Couto, Crislaine Rangel
Lage, Guilherme Menezes
Alves, Wallace Tadeu
Ribeiro, Simara Regina de Oliveira
Figueiredo, Lucas Savassi
Ambrósio, Natália Fontes Alves
Couto, Crislaine Rangel
Lage, Guilherme Menezes
author_role author
author2 Alves, Wallace Tadeu
Ribeiro, Simara Regina de Oliveira
Figueiredo, Lucas Savassi
Ambrósio, Natália Fontes Alves
Couto, Crislaine Rangel
Lage, Guilherme Menezes
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Fernandes, Lidiane Aparecida
Alves, Wallace Tadeu
Ribeiro, Simara Regina de Oliveira
Figueiredo, Lucas Savassi
Ambrósio, Natália Fontes Alves
Couto, Crislaine Rangel
Lage, Guilherme Menezes
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Destreza manual
Lateralidade
Controle motor.
Destreza manual
Laterality
Motor control
topic Destreza manual
Lateralidade
Controle motor.
Destreza manual
Laterality
Motor control
description BACKGROUND: A manual dexterity can be defined as the skill and ease of using the hands, such as writing, strumming a musical instrument, throwing and catching. Laterality can be conceptualized as the preference of use by one of the members over the other and it is confirmed, for example, in right-handed and left-handed individuals, influencing the different performances of the hands. OBJECTIVE: To compare manual dexterity in right-handed and left-handed users by placing and removing pins in the Grooved Pegboard Test. METHODS: The sample consisted of 20 healthy volunteers, of both sexes, aged between 18 and 40 years, divided into two groups: 5 men and 5 women from the right population and 5 men and 5 women from the population left-handed. Regarding the lateral dominance index, right-handed individuals had an average index of 97% and left-handed individuals, 91%, in the Edinburgh Lateral Dominance Inventory.  RESULTS: In the condition of placing the pins, differences were observed between the right-handed [t(df=9)=-7.16; p=0.01] and left-handed [t(df =9)=4.80; p=0.01], where the use of the preferred hand showed better performance related to the use of the non-preferred hand. As for the condition of removing the pins, no difference was observed between the right and left hands for the right-handed [t(df=9)=-1.96; p=0.08] and neither for the left-handed [t(df=9)=1.27; p=0.23]. Regarding the asymmetry index, no differences were observed between the groups, although it seems that the asymmetries stand out in tasks where the cognitive demand is greater than the energy demand. CONCLUSION: The performance in the tasks of manual dexterity was different for the preferred hand for both right-handed and left-handed people, with the preferred hand presenting a better performance when compared to the non-preferred hand.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-04-29
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Avaliado pelos pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://e-revista.unioeste.br/index.php/cadernoedfisica/article/view/26831
10.36453/cefe.2021191.a26831
url https://e-revista.unioeste.br/index.php/cadernoedfisica/article/view/26831
identifier_str_mv 10.36453/cefe.2021191.a26831
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://e-revista.unioeste.br/index.php/cadernoedfisica/article/view/26831/17315
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Direitor Autorais Partilhados
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Direitor Autorais Partilhados
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Caderno de Educação Física e Esporte; Vol. 19 No. 1 (2021): Caderno de Educação Física e Esporte; 41-47
Caderno de Educação Física e Esporte; v. 19 n. 1 (2021): Caderno de Educação Física e Esporte; 41-47
2318-5090
2318-5104
reponame:Caderno de Educação Física e Esporte
instname:Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná (UNIOESTE)
instacron:UNIOESTE
instname_str Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná (UNIOESTE)
instacron_str UNIOESTE
institution UNIOESTE
reponame_str Caderno de Educação Física e Esporte
collection Caderno de Educação Física e Esporte
repository.name.fl_str_mv Caderno de Educação Física e Esporte - Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná (UNIOESTE)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revista.cefe@unioeste.br || projeto.saber@unioeste.br
_version_ 1822181210256834560
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv 10.36453/cefe.2021191.a26831