Environmental geography’s approach as Aufhebung: Rejecting dualism, embracing dialectics: Environmental geography’s approach as Aufhebung: Rejecting dualism, embracing dialectics
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Ambientes (Francisco Beltrão) |
Texto Completo: | https://e-revista.unioeste.br/index.php/ambientes/article/view/27691 |
Resumo: | The ‘epistemological contract’ that was in force for more than a century in geography was based on the conviction that this discipline is neither a pure natural science nor a pure social science, but an epistemologically hybrid knowledge, leaving geographers to find ways of cooperation and fruitful coexistence, despite any thematic specialisations. In the 1970s and 1980s, however, the aforementioned ‘contract’ was broken: both ‘human’ and ‘physical’ geographers explicitly advocated or implicitly supported a separation, as they saw advantages in it. After almost five decades, what seemed promising then appears today, at least in part, as an illusion: ironically, it was precisely from the 1970s – when ‘human’ and ‘physical’ geographers tremendously accelerated the movement of disdaining the idea of a discipline that would be a ‘bridge’ between the knowledge of nature and that of society – that the world started, with increasing speed, to pay attention to problems and challenges that unequivocally demand an articulation of both types of knowledge. Fortunately, antidotes have been sought, the most relevant of which is the approach known as environmental geography. However, much epistemological, theoretical and methodological work is still needed to consolidate it. In order to contribute to this effort, this article interprets the approach of environmental geography as corresponding to an Aufhebung, that is, to a dialectical sublation. The concept of Aufhebung, however, in its original Hegelian tradition, carries some intrinsic limitations. It is therefore necessary to try to reconfigure it, making it more complex and robust – what is undertaken here with the help of the logical and ontological contributions of Graeco-French philosopher Cornelius Castoriadis. Keywords: environmental geography; epistemology; Aufhebung; dialectic. |
id |
UNIOESTE-4_a85b74384661e2a90b1541bbb16d4a7d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.e-revista.unioeste.br:article/27691 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIOESTE-4 |
network_name_str |
Ambientes (Francisco Beltrão) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Environmental geography’s approach as Aufhebung: Rejecting dualism, embracing dialectics: Environmental geography’s approach as Aufhebung: Rejecting dualism, embracing dialecticsO enfoque da Geografia Ambiental como Aufhebung: Rejeitando o dualismo, abraçando a dialética: Environmental geography’s approach as Aufhebung: Rejecting dualism, embracing dialecticsGeografia AmbientalepistemologiaAufhebungdialéticaThe ‘epistemological contract’ that was in force for more than a century in geography was based on the conviction that this discipline is neither a pure natural science nor a pure social science, but an epistemologically hybrid knowledge, leaving geographers to find ways of cooperation and fruitful coexistence, despite any thematic specialisations. In the 1970s and 1980s, however, the aforementioned ‘contract’ was broken: both ‘human’ and ‘physical’ geographers explicitly advocated or implicitly supported a separation, as they saw advantages in it. After almost five decades, what seemed promising then appears today, at least in part, as an illusion: ironically, it was precisely from the 1970s – when ‘human’ and ‘physical’ geographers tremendously accelerated the movement of disdaining the idea of a discipline that would be a ‘bridge’ between the knowledge of nature and that of society – that the world started, with increasing speed, to pay attention to problems and challenges that unequivocally demand an articulation of both types of knowledge. Fortunately, antidotes have been sought, the most relevant of which is the approach known as environmental geography. However, much epistemological, theoretical and methodological work is still needed to consolidate it. In order to contribute to this effort, this article interprets the approach of environmental geography as corresponding to an Aufhebung, that is, to a dialectical sublation. The concept of Aufhebung, however, in its original Hegelian tradition, carries some intrinsic limitations. It is therefore necessary to try to reconfigure it, making it more complex and robust – what is undertaken here with the help of the logical and ontological contributions of Graeco-French philosopher Cornelius Castoriadis. Keywords: environmental geography; epistemology; Aufhebung; dialectic.O “contrato epistemológico” que vigorou durante mais de um século na Geografia baseou-se na convicção de que essa disciplina não é nem apenas uma ciência natural nem meramente uma ciência social, mas sim um conhecimento epistemologicamente híbrido, cabendo aos geógrafos encontrar formas de cooperação e convivência frutífera a despeito das inevitáveis especializações temáticas. Nas décadas de 1970 e 1980, porém, o referido “contrato” foi rompido: “Geografia Humana” e “Geografia Física” apostaram, explícita ou implicitamente, em uma separação, por verem vantagens nisso. Transcorridas quase cinco décadas, o que então parecia promissor se mostra, hoje, ao menos em parte, como um equívoco: ironicamente, foi justamente a partir da década de 1970 – quando geógrafos “humanos” e “físicos” aceleraram tremendamente o movimento de afastamento recíproco, desdenhando a ideia de um saber que fosse uma “ponte” entre o conhecimento da natureza e o da sociedade – que o mundo passou, com uma velocidade crescente, a dar atenção a problemas e desafios que, indiscutivelmente, exigem uma articulação desses conhecimentos. Felizmente, antídotos vêm sendo buscados, e o mais relevante deles é o enfoque conhecido como Geografia Ambiental. Entretanto, ainda se faz necessário muito trabalho de fundamentação epistemológica, teórica e metodológica para consolidá-lo. A fim de contribuir com esse esforço, o presente artigo investe na interpretação do enfoque da Geografia Ambiental como correspondendo a uma Aufhebung, isto é, a uma superação dialética. O conceito de Aufhebung, porém, em sua tradição original, hegeliana, carrega algumas limitações intrínsecas. Cabe, assim, tentar reconfigurá-lo, tornando-o mais complexo e robusto – o que é aqui empreendido com o auxílio das contribuições lógicas e ontológicas do filósofo greco-francês Cornelius Castoriadis. Palavras-chave: Geografia Ambiental; epistemologia; Aufhebung; dialética. Abstract The ‘epistemological contract’ that was in force for more than a century in geography was based on the conviction that this discipline is neither a pure natural science nor a pure social science, but an epistemologically hybrid knowledge, leaving geographers to find ways of cooperation and fruitful coexistence, despite any thematic specialisations. In the 1970s and 1980s, however, the aforementioned ‘contract’ was broken: both ‘human’ and ‘physical’ geographers explicitly advocated or implicitly supported a separation, as they saw advantages in it. After almost five decades, what seemed promising then appears today, at least in part, as an illusion: ironically, it was precisely from the 1970s – when ‘human’ and ‘physical’ geographers tremendously accelerated the movement of disdaining the idea of a discipline that would be a ‘bridge’ between the knowledge of nature and that of society – that the world started, with increasing speed, to pay attention to problems and challenges that unequivocally demand an articulation of both types of knowledge. Fortunately, antidotes have been sought, the most relevant of which is the approach known as environmental geography. However, much epistemological, theoretical and methodological work is still needed to consolidate it. In order to contribute to this effort, this article interprets the approach of environmental geography as corresponding to an Aufhebung, that is, to a dialectical sublation. The concept of Aufhebung, however, in its original Hegelian tradition, carries some intrinsic limitations. It is therefore necessary to try to reconfigure it, making it more complex and robust – what is undertaken here with the help of the logical and ontological contributions of Graeco-French philosopher Cornelius Castoriadis. Keywords: environmental geography; epistemology; Aufhebung; dialectic. El enfoque de la geografía ambiental como Aufhebung: Rechazando el dualismo, abrazando la dialéctica Resumen El “contrato epistemológico” que estuvo vigente durante más de un siglo en la Geografía se basó en la convicción de que esta disciplina no es solo una ciencia natural ni una simple ciencia social, sino un conocimiento epistemológicamente híbrido, dejando a los geógrafos para encontrar formas de cooperación y fructífera convivencia a pesar de las inevitables especializaciones temáticas. En los años setenta y ochenta, sin embargo, se rompió el mencionado “contrato”: “geografía humana” y “geografía física” apostaron, explícita o implícitamente, a una separación, ya que veían ventajas en ello. Después de casi cinco décadas, lo que parecía prometedor entonces aparece hoy, al menos en parte, como un equívoco: irónicamente, fue precisamente a partir de la década de 1970 – cuando los geógrafos “humanos” y “físicos” aceleraron tremendamente el alejamiento recíproco, desdeñando la idea de un conocimiento que sería un “puente” entre el conocimiento de la naturaleza y el de la sociedad – que el mundo comenzó, con una velocidad creciente, a prestar atención a problemas y desafíos que, sin duda, exigen una articulación de estos dos tipos de conocimiento. Afortunadamente, se han buscado antídotos, el más relevante de los cuales es el enfoque conocido como Geografía Ambiental. Sin embargo, aún es necesario trabajar mucho en los fundamentos epistemológicos, teóricos y metodológicos para consolidarlo. Para contribuir a este esfuerzo, este artículo interpreta el enfoque de la geografía ambiental como correspondiente a una Aufhebung, es decir, a una superación dialéctica. El concepto de Aufhebung, sin embargo, en su tradición hegeliana original, presenta algunas limitaciones intrínsecas. Por lo tanto, es necesario intentar reconfigurarlo, haciéndolo más complejo y robusto, lo que aquí se emprende con la ayuda de las aportaciones lógicas y ontológicas del filósofo greco-francés Cornelius Castoriadis. Palabras clave: geografía ambiental; epistemología; Aufhebung; dialécticaEDUNIOESTE (Editora da UNIOESTE)2021-06-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://e-revista.unioeste.br/index.php/ambientes/article/view/2769110.48075/amb.v3i1.27691AMBIENTES: Revista de Geografia e Ecologia Política; v. 3 n. 1 (2021): Primeiro Semestre; 09-822674-6816reponame:Ambientes (Francisco Beltrão)instname:Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná (UNIOESTE)instacron:UNIOESTEporhttps://e-revista.unioeste.br/index.php/ambientes/article/view/27691/17632Copyright (c) 2021 AMBIENTES: Revista de Geografia e Ecologia Políticahttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLopes de Souza, Marcelo2023-07-07T20:05:49Zoai:ojs.e-revista.unioeste.br:article/27691Revistahttps://e-revista.unioeste.br/index.php/ambientesPUBhttps://e-revista.unioeste.br/index.php/ambientes/oairevista.ambientes@unioeste.br2674-68162674-6816opendoar:2023-07-07T20:05:49Ambientes (Francisco Beltrão) - Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná (UNIOESTE)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Environmental geography’s approach as Aufhebung: Rejecting dualism, embracing dialectics: Environmental geography’s approach as Aufhebung: Rejecting dualism, embracing dialectics O enfoque da Geografia Ambiental como Aufhebung: Rejeitando o dualismo, abraçando a dialética: Environmental geography’s approach as Aufhebung: Rejecting dualism, embracing dialectics |
title |
Environmental geography’s approach as Aufhebung: Rejecting dualism, embracing dialectics: Environmental geography’s approach as Aufhebung: Rejecting dualism, embracing dialectics |
spellingShingle |
Environmental geography’s approach as Aufhebung: Rejecting dualism, embracing dialectics: Environmental geography’s approach as Aufhebung: Rejecting dualism, embracing dialectics Lopes de Souza, Marcelo Geografia Ambiental epistemologia Aufhebung dialética |
title_short |
Environmental geography’s approach as Aufhebung: Rejecting dualism, embracing dialectics: Environmental geography’s approach as Aufhebung: Rejecting dualism, embracing dialectics |
title_full |
Environmental geography’s approach as Aufhebung: Rejecting dualism, embracing dialectics: Environmental geography’s approach as Aufhebung: Rejecting dualism, embracing dialectics |
title_fullStr |
Environmental geography’s approach as Aufhebung: Rejecting dualism, embracing dialectics: Environmental geography’s approach as Aufhebung: Rejecting dualism, embracing dialectics |
title_full_unstemmed |
Environmental geography’s approach as Aufhebung: Rejecting dualism, embracing dialectics: Environmental geography’s approach as Aufhebung: Rejecting dualism, embracing dialectics |
title_sort |
Environmental geography’s approach as Aufhebung: Rejecting dualism, embracing dialectics: Environmental geography’s approach as Aufhebung: Rejecting dualism, embracing dialectics |
author |
Lopes de Souza, Marcelo |
author_facet |
Lopes de Souza, Marcelo |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Lopes de Souza, Marcelo |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Geografia Ambiental epistemologia Aufhebung dialética |
topic |
Geografia Ambiental epistemologia Aufhebung dialética |
description |
The ‘epistemological contract’ that was in force for more than a century in geography was based on the conviction that this discipline is neither a pure natural science nor a pure social science, but an epistemologically hybrid knowledge, leaving geographers to find ways of cooperation and fruitful coexistence, despite any thematic specialisations. In the 1970s and 1980s, however, the aforementioned ‘contract’ was broken: both ‘human’ and ‘physical’ geographers explicitly advocated or implicitly supported a separation, as they saw advantages in it. After almost five decades, what seemed promising then appears today, at least in part, as an illusion: ironically, it was precisely from the 1970s – when ‘human’ and ‘physical’ geographers tremendously accelerated the movement of disdaining the idea of a discipline that would be a ‘bridge’ between the knowledge of nature and that of society – that the world started, with increasing speed, to pay attention to problems and challenges that unequivocally demand an articulation of both types of knowledge. Fortunately, antidotes have been sought, the most relevant of which is the approach known as environmental geography. However, much epistemological, theoretical and methodological work is still needed to consolidate it. In order to contribute to this effort, this article interprets the approach of environmental geography as corresponding to an Aufhebung, that is, to a dialectical sublation. The concept of Aufhebung, however, in its original Hegelian tradition, carries some intrinsic limitations. It is therefore necessary to try to reconfigure it, making it more complex and robust – what is undertaken here with the help of the logical and ontological contributions of Graeco-French philosopher Cornelius Castoriadis. Keywords: environmental geography; epistemology; Aufhebung; dialectic. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-06-29 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://e-revista.unioeste.br/index.php/ambientes/article/view/27691 10.48075/amb.v3i1.27691 |
url |
https://e-revista.unioeste.br/index.php/ambientes/article/view/27691 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.48075/amb.v3i1.27691 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://e-revista.unioeste.br/index.php/ambientes/article/view/27691/17632 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 AMBIENTES: Revista de Geografia e Ecologia Política http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 AMBIENTES: Revista de Geografia e Ecologia Política http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
EDUNIOESTE (Editora da UNIOESTE) |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
EDUNIOESTE (Editora da UNIOESTE) |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
AMBIENTES: Revista de Geografia e Ecologia Política; v. 3 n. 1 (2021): Primeiro Semestre; 09-82 2674-6816 reponame:Ambientes (Francisco Beltrão) instname:Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná (UNIOESTE) instacron:UNIOESTE |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná (UNIOESTE) |
instacron_str |
UNIOESTE |
institution |
UNIOESTE |
reponame_str |
Ambientes (Francisco Beltrão) |
collection |
Ambientes (Francisco Beltrão) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Ambientes (Francisco Beltrão) - Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná (UNIOESTE) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revista.ambientes@unioeste.br |
_version_ |
1797047768587436032 |