Environmental geography’s approach as Aufhebung: Rejecting dualism, embracing dialectics: Environmental geography’s approach as Aufhebung: Rejecting dualism, embracing dialectics

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Lopes de Souza, Marcelo
Data de Publicação: 2021
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Ambientes (Francisco Beltrão)
Texto Completo: https://e-revista.unioeste.br/index.php/ambientes/article/view/27691
Resumo: The ‘epistemological contract’ that was in force for more than a century in geography was based on the conviction that this discipline is neither a pure natural science nor a pure social science, but an epistemologically hybrid knowledge, leaving geographers to find ways of cooperation and fruitful coexistence, despite any thematic specialisations. In the 1970s and 1980s, however, the aforementioned ‘contract’ was broken: both ‘human’ and ‘physical’ geographers explicitly advocated or implicitly supported a separation, as they saw advantages in it. After almost five decades, what seemed promising then appears today, at least in part, as an illusion: ironically, it was precisely from the 1970s – when ‘human’ and ‘physical’ geographers tremendously accelerated the movement of disdaining the idea of a discipline that would be a ‘bridge’ between the knowledge of nature and that of society – that the world started, with increasing speed, to pay attention to problems and challenges that unequivocally demand an articulation of both types of knowledge.   Fortunately, antidotes have been sought, the most relevant of which is the approach known as environmental geography. However, much epistemological, theoretical and methodological work is still needed to consolidate it. In order to contribute to this effort, this article interprets the approach of environmental geography as corresponding to an Aufhebung, that is, to a dialectical sublation. The concept of Aufhebung, however, in its original Hegelian tradition, carries some intrinsic limitations. It is therefore necessary to try to reconfigure it, making it more complex and robust – what is undertaken here with the help of the logical and ontological contributions of Graeco-French philosopher Cornelius Castoriadis. Keywords: environmental geography; epistemology; Aufhebung; dialectic.
id UNIOESTE-4_a85b74384661e2a90b1541bbb16d4a7d
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.e-revista.unioeste.br:article/27691
network_acronym_str UNIOESTE-4
network_name_str Ambientes (Francisco Beltrão)
repository_id_str
spelling Environmental geography’s approach as Aufhebung: Rejecting dualism, embracing dialectics: Environmental geography’s approach as Aufhebung: Rejecting dualism, embracing dialecticsO enfoque da Geografia Ambiental como Aufhebung: Rejeitando o dualismo, abraçando a dialética: Environmental geography’s approach as Aufhebung: Rejecting dualism, embracing dialecticsGeografia AmbientalepistemologiaAufhebungdialéticaThe ‘epistemological contract’ that was in force for more than a century in geography was based on the conviction that this discipline is neither a pure natural science nor a pure social science, but an epistemologically hybrid knowledge, leaving geographers to find ways of cooperation and fruitful coexistence, despite any thematic specialisations. In the 1970s and 1980s, however, the aforementioned ‘contract’ was broken: both ‘human’ and ‘physical’ geographers explicitly advocated or implicitly supported a separation, as they saw advantages in it. After almost five decades, what seemed promising then appears today, at least in part, as an illusion: ironically, it was precisely from the 1970s – when ‘human’ and ‘physical’ geographers tremendously accelerated the movement of disdaining the idea of a discipline that would be a ‘bridge’ between the knowledge of nature and that of society – that the world started, with increasing speed, to pay attention to problems and challenges that unequivocally demand an articulation of both types of knowledge.   Fortunately, antidotes have been sought, the most relevant of which is the approach known as environmental geography. However, much epistemological, theoretical and methodological work is still needed to consolidate it. In order to contribute to this effort, this article interprets the approach of environmental geography as corresponding to an Aufhebung, that is, to a dialectical sublation. The concept of Aufhebung, however, in its original Hegelian tradition, carries some intrinsic limitations. It is therefore necessary to try to reconfigure it, making it more complex and robust – what is undertaken here with the help of the logical and ontological contributions of Graeco-French philosopher Cornelius Castoriadis. Keywords: environmental geography; epistemology; Aufhebung; dialectic.O “contrato epistemológico” que vigorou durante mais de um século na Geografia baseou-se na convic­ção de que essa disciplina não é nem apenas uma ciência natural nem meramente uma ciência social, mas sim um conhecimento epistemologicamente híbrido, cabendo aos geógrafos encontrar formas de coo­peração e convivência frutífera a despeito das inevitáveis especializações temáticas. Nas décadas de 1970 e 1980, porém, o referido “contrato” foi rompido: “Geografia Humana” e “Geografia Física” apostaram, explícita ou implicitamente, em uma separação, por verem vantagens nisso. Transcorridas quase cinco décadas, o que então parecia promissor se mostra, hoje, ao menos em parte, como um equívoco: ironica­mente, foi justamente a partir da década de 1970 – quando geógrafos “humanos” e “físicos” aceleraram tremendamente o movimento de afastamento recíproco, desdenhando a ideia de um saber que fosse uma “ponte” entre o conhecimento da natureza e o da sociedade – que o mundo passou, com uma velo­cidade crescente, a dar atenção a problemas e desafios que, indiscutivelmente, exigem uma articulação desses conhecimentos. Felizmente, antídotos vêm sendo buscados, e o mais relevante deles é o enfoque conhecido como Geo­grafia Ambiental. Entretanto, ainda se faz necessário muito trabalho de fundamentação epistemológica, teórica e metodológica para consolidá-lo. A fim de contribuir com esse esforço, o presente artigo investe na interpretação do enfoque da Geografia Ambiental como correspondendo a uma Aufhebung, isto é, a uma superação dialética. O conceito de Aufhebung, porém, em sua tradição original, hegeliana, carrega algumas limitações intrínsecas. Cabe, assim, tentar reconfigurá-lo, tornando-o mais complexo e robusto – o que é aqui empreendido com o auxílio das contribuições lógicas e ontológicas do filósofo greco-fran­cês Cornelius Castoriadis. Palavras-chave: Geografia Ambiental; epistemologia; Aufhebung; dialética.   Abstract The ‘epistemological contract’ that was in force for more than a century in geography was based on the conviction that this discipline is neither a pure natural science nor a pure social science, but an epistemologically hybrid knowledge, leaving geographers to find ways of cooperation and fruitful coexistence, despite any thematic specialisations. In the 1970s and 1980s, however, the aforementioned ‘contract’ was broken: both ‘human’ and ‘physical’ geographers explicitly advocated or implicitly supported a separation, as they saw advantages in it. After almost five decades, what seemed promising then appears today, at least in part, as an illusion: ironically, it was precisely from the 1970s – when ‘human’ and ‘physical’ geographers tremendously accelerated the movement of disdaining the idea of a discipline that would be a ‘bridge’ between the knowledge of nature and that of society – that the world started, with increasing speed, to pay attention to problems and challenges that unequivocally demand an articulation of both types of knowledge. Fortunately, antidotes have been sought, the most relevant of which is the approach known as environmental geography. However, much epistemological, theoretical and methodological work is still needed to consolidate it. In order to contribute to this effort, this article interprets the approach of environmental geography as corresponding to an Aufhebung, that is, to a dialectical sublation. The concept of Aufhebung, however, in its original Hegelian tradition, carries some intrinsic limitations. It is therefore necessary to try to reconfigure it, making it more complex and robust – what is undertaken here with the help of the logical and ontological contributions of Graeco-French philosopher Cornelius Castoriadis. Keywords: environmental geography; epistemology; Aufhebung; dialectic.   El enfoque de la geografía ambiental como Aufhebung: Rechazando el dualismo, abrazando la dialéctica   Resumen El “contrato epistemológico” que estuvo vigente durante más de un siglo en la Geografía se basó en la convicción de que esta disciplina no es solo una ciencia natural ni una simple ciencia social, sino un cono­cimiento epistemológicamente híbrido, dejando a los geógrafos para encontrar formas de cooperación y fructífera convivencia a pesar de las inevitables especializaciones temáticas. En los años setenta y ochenta, sin embargo, se rompió el mencionado “contrato”: “geografía humana” y “geografía física” apostaron, explícita o implícitamente, a una separación, ya que veían ventajas en ello. Después de casi cinco décadas, lo que parecía prometedor entonces aparece hoy, al menos en parte, como un equívoco: irónicamente, fue precisamente a partir de la década de 1970 – cuando los geógrafos “humanos” y “físi­cos” aceleraron tremendamente el alejamiento recíproco, desdeñando la idea de un conocimiento que sería un “puente” entre el conocimiento de la naturaleza y el de la sociedad – que el mundo comenzó, con una velocidad creciente, a prestar atención a problemas y desafíos que, sin duda, exigen una articu­lación de estos dos tipos de conocimiento. Afortunadamente, se han buscado antídotos, el más relevante de los cuales es el enfoque conocido como Geografía Ambiental. Sin embargo, aún es necesario trabajar mucho en los fundamentos epistemológicos, teóricos y metodológicos para consolidarlo. Para contribuir a este esfuerzo, este artículo interpreta el enfoque de la geografía ambiental como correspondiente a una Aufhebung, es decir, a una superación dialéctica. El concepto de Aufhebung, sin embargo, en su tradición hegeliana original, presenta algunas limitaciones intrínsecas. Por lo tanto, es necesario intentar reconfigurarlo, haciéndolo más complejo y robusto, lo que aquí se emprende con la ayuda de las aportaciones lógicas y ontológicas del filósofo greco-francés Cornelius Castoriadis. Palabras clave: geografía ambiental; epistemología; Aufhebung; dialécticaEDUNIOESTE (Editora da UNIOESTE)2021-06-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://e-revista.unioeste.br/index.php/ambientes/article/view/2769110.48075/amb.v3i1.27691AMBIENTES: Revista de Geografia e Ecologia Política; v. 3 n. 1 (2021): Primeiro Semestre; 09-822674-6816reponame:Ambientes (Francisco Beltrão)instname:Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná (UNIOESTE)instacron:UNIOESTEporhttps://e-revista.unioeste.br/index.php/ambientes/article/view/27691/17632Copyright (c) 2021 AMBIENTES: Revista de Geografia e Ecologia Políticahttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLopes de Souza, Marcelo2023-07-07T20:05:49Zoai:ojs.e-revista.unioeste.br:article/27691Revistahttps://e-revista.unioeste.br/index.php/ambientesPUBhttps://e-revista.unioeste.br/index.php/ambientes/oairevista.ambientes@unioeste.br2674-68162674-6816opendoar:2023-07-07T20:05:49Ambientes (Francisco Beltrão) - Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná (UNIOESTE)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Environmental geography’s approach as Aufhebung: Rejecting dualism, embracing dialectics: Environmental geography’s approach as Aufhebung: Rejecting dualism, embracing dialectics
O enfoque da Geografia Ambiental como Aufhebung: Rejeitando o dualismo, abraçando a dialética: Environmental geography’s approach as Aufhebung: Rejecting dualism, embracing dialectics
title Environmental geography’s approach as Aufhebung: Rejecting dualism, embracing dialectics: Environmental geography’s approach as Aufhebung: Rejecting dualism, embracing dialectics
spellingShingle Environmental geography’s approach as Aufhebung: Rejecting dualism, embracing dialectics: Environmental geography’s approach as Aufhebung: Rejecting dualism, embracing dialectics
Lopes de Souza, Marcelo
Geografia Ambiental
epistemologia
Aufhebung
dialética
title_short Environmental geography’s approach as Aufhebung: Rejecting dualism, embracing dialectics: Environmental geography’s approach as Aufhebung: Rejecting dualism, embracing dialectics
title_full Environmental geography’s approach as Aufhebung: Rejecting dualism, embracing dialectics: Environmental geography’s approach as Aufhebung: Rejecting dualism, embracing dialectics
title_fullStr Environmental geography’s approach as Aufhebung: Rejecting dualism, embracing dialectics: Environmental geography’s approach as Aufhebung: Rejecting dualism, embracing dialectics
title_full_unstemmed Environmental geography’s approach as Aufhebung: Rejecting dualism, embracing dialectics: Environmental geography’s approach as Aufhebung: Rejecting dualism, embracing dialectics
title_sort Environmental geography’s approach as Aufhebung: Rejecting dualism, embracing dialectics: Environmental geography’s approach as Aufhebung: Rejecting dualism, embracing dialectics
author Lopes de Souza, Marcelo
author_facet Lopes de Souza, Marcelo
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Lopes de Souza, Marcelo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Geografia Ambiental
epistemologia
Aufhebung
dialética
topic Geografia Ambiental
epistemologia
Aufhebung
dialética
description The ‘epistemological contract’ that was in force for more than a century in geography was based on the conviction that this discipline is neither a pure natural science nor a pure social science, but an epistemologically hybrid knowledge, leaving geographers to find ways of cooperation and fruitful coexistence, despite any thematic specialisations. In the 1970s and 1980s, however, the aforementioned ‘contract’ was broken: both ‘human’ and ‘physical’ geographers explicitly advocated or implicitly supported a separation, as they saw advantages in it. After almost five decades, what seemed promising then appears today, at least in part, as an illusion: ironically, it was precisely from the 1970s – when ‘human’ and ‘physical’ geographers tremendously accelerated the movement of disdaining the idea of a discipline that would be a ‘bridge’ between the knowledge of nature and that of society – that the world started, with increasing speed, to pay attention to problems and challenges that unequivocally demand an articulation of both types of knowledge.   Fortunately, antidotes have been sought, the most relevant of which is the approach known as environmental geography. However, much epistemological, theoretical and methodological work is still needed to consolidate it. In order to contribute to this effort, this article interprets the approach of environmental geography as corresponding to an Aufhebung, that is, to a dialectical sublation. The concept of Aufhebung, however, in its original Hegelian tradition, carries some intrinsic limitations. It is therefore necessary to try to reconfigure it, making it more complex and robust – what is undertaken here with the help of the logical and ontological contributions of Graeco-French philosopher Cornelius Castoriadis. Keywords: environmental geography; epistemology; Aufhebung; dialectic.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-06-29
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://e-revista.unioeste.br/index.php/ambientes/article/view/27691
10.48075/amb.v3i1.27691
url https://e-revista.unioeste.br/index.php/ambientes/article/view/27691
identifier_str_mv 10.48075/amb.v3i1.27691
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://e-revista.unioeste.br/index.php/ambientes/article/view/27691/17632
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 AMBIENTES: Revista de Geografia e Ecologia Política
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 AMBIENTES: Revista de Geografia e Ecologia Política
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv EDUNIOESTE (Editora da UNIOESTE)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv EDUNIOESTE (Editora da UNIOESTE)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv AMBIENTES: Revista de Geografia e Ecologia Política; v. 3 n. 1 (2021): Primeiro Semestre; 09-82
2674-6816
reponame:Ambientes (Francisco Beltrão)
instname:Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná (UNIOESTE)
instacron:UNIOESTE
instname_str Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná (UNIOESTE)
instacron_str UNIOESTE
institution UNIOESTE
reponame_str Ambientes (Francisco Beltrão)
collection Ambientes (Francisco Beltrão)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Ambientes (Francisco Beltrão) - Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná (UNIOESTE)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revista.ambientes@unioeste.br
_version_ 1797047768587436032