Legal Norm of Maria da Penha Law in Action:Cognitive-Pragmatic Analysis

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Rauen, Fábio José
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Ribeiro, Ana Claudia Souza
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Signo (Santa Cruz do Sul. Online)
Texto Completo: https://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/signo/article/view/7916
Resumo: Guided by the theoretical notion of goal conciliation (RAUEN, 2014), we analyze how one deals with the legal norm of Maria da Penha Law in a case of offering representation against an aggressor and requesting protective measures to the victim. Accordingly, we present brief notes on goal conciliation theory, analyze the legal norm of the Maria da Penha Law, and verify how this legal norm rules an argument in an initial petitioning. The analysis suggests that the lawyer organizes the text around the legal norm, qualifying the represented as a transgressor of the default norm in the section of facts, outlining penalties for transgression in the section of rights, and requesting protective measures in the section of petitions following those premises. The analysis also suggests the text acts as enabling antefactual abductive hypothesis, allowing the judge to make similar inferences and to defer the protective measures by the logical force of the conjunction of facts with the text of the Law.
id UNISC-3_4ef2092419f215b96fe8ddc52d7fa4b9
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.online.unisc.br:article/7916
network_acronym_str UNISC-3
network_name_str Signo (Santa Cruz do Sul. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Legal Norm of Maria da Penha Law in Action:Cognitive-Pragmatic AnalysisNorma jurídica da LEI MARIA DA PENHA EM AÇÃO: análise pragmático-cognitivaPragmática Cognitiva. Teoria de Conciliação de Metas. Norma Jurídica.Cognitive Pragmatics. Goal Conciliation Theory. Legal Norm.Guided by the theoretical notion of goal conciliation (RAUEN, 2014), we analyze how one deals with the legal norm of Maria da Penha Law in a case of offering representation against an aggressor and requesting protective measures to the victim. Accordingly, we present brief notes on goal conciliation theory, analyze the legal norm of the Maria da Penha Law, and verify how this legal norm rules an argument in an initial petitioning. The analysis suggests that the lawyer organizes the text around the legal norm, qualifying the represented as a transgressor of the default norm in the section of facts, outlining penalties for transgression in the section of rights, and requesting protective measures in the section of petitions following those premises. The analysis also suggests the text acts as enabling antefactual abductive hypothesis, allowing the judge to make similar inferences and to defer the protective measures by the logical force of the conjunction of facts with the text of the Law.Neste artigo, guiados pela noção teórica de conciliação de metas de Rauen (2014), analisamos como a norma jurídica da Lei Maria da Penha é acionada em um caso de oferecimento de representação contra um agressor e solicitação de medidas protetivas à vítima. A análise sugere que a petição inicial se organizada em torno da norma jurídica, pois a seção de fatos qualifica o representado como transgressor da norma dispositiva, a seção de direitos destaca sanções para a transgressão, e a seção de pedidos decorre destas premissas. Os dados indicam que o texto funciona como hipótese abdutiva antefactual habilitadora, ao viabilizar que o juiz faça inferências similares e defira as medidas pela força lógica da conjunção dos fatos com o texto da Lei.Edunisc2017-02-10info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/signo/article/view/791610.17058/signo.v42i73.7916Signo; v. 42 n. 73 (2017); 184-1991982-2014reponame:Signo (Santa Cruz do Sul. Online)instname:Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul (UNISC)instacron:UNISCporhttps://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/signo/article/view/7916/pdfCopyright (c) 2017 Signoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRauen, Fábio JoséRibeiro, Ana Claudia Souza2018-07-26T17:31:58Zoai:ojs.online.unisc.br:article/7916Revistahttp://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/signohttp://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/signo/oairgabriel@unisc.br||revistasigno.unisc@gmail.com1982-20140101-1812opendoar:2018-07-26T17:31:58Signo (Santa Cruz do Sul. Online) - Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul (UNISC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Legal Norm of Maria da Penha Law in Action:Cognitive-Pragmatic Analysis
Norma jurídica da LEI MARIA DA PENHA EM AÇÃO: análise pragmático-cognitiva
title Legal Norm of Maria da Penha Law in Action:Cognitive-Pragmatic Analysis
spellingShingle Legal Norm of Maria da Penha Law in Action:Cognitive-Pragmatic Analysis
Rauen, Fábio José
Pragmática Cognitiva. Teoria de Conciliação de Metas. Norma Jurídica.
Cognitive Pragmatics. Goal Conciliation Theory. Legal Norm.
title_short Legal Norm of Maria da Penha Law in Action:Cognitive-Pragmatic Analysis
title_full Legal Norm of Maria da Penha Law in Action:Cognitive-Pragmatic Analysis
title_fullStr Legal Norm of Maria da Penha Law in Action:Cognitive-Pragmatic Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Legal Norm of Maria da Penha Law in Action:Cognitive-Pragmatic Analysis
title_sort Legal Norm of Maria da Penha Law in Action:Cognitive-Pragmatic Analysis
author Rauen, Fábio José
author_facet Rauen, Fábio José
Ribeiro, Ana Claudia Souza
author_role author
author2 Ribeiro, Ana Claudia Souza
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Rauen, Fábio José
Ribeiro, Ana Claudia Souza
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Pragmática Cognitiva. Teoria de Conciliação de Metas. Norma Jurídica.
Cognitive Pragmatics. Goal Conciliation Theory. Legal Norm.
topic Pragmática Cognitiva. Teoria de Conciliação de Metas. Norma Jurídica.
Cognitive Pragmatics. Goal Conciliation Theory. Legal Norm.
description Guided by the theoretical notion of goal conciliation (RAUEN, 2014), we analyze how one deals with the legal norm of Maria da Penha Law in a case of offering representation against an aggressor and requesting protective measures to the victim. Accordingly, we present brief notes on goal conciliation theory, analyze the legal norm of the Maria da Penha Law, and verify how this legal norm rules an argument in an initial petitioning. The analysis suggests that the lawyer organizes the text around the legal norm, qualifying the represented as a transgressor of the default norm in the section of facts, outlining penalties for transgression in the section of rights, and requesting protective measures in the section of petitions following those premises. The analysis also suggests the text acts as enabling antefactual abductive hypothesis, allowing the judge to make similar inferences and to defer the protective measures by the logical force of the conjunction of facts with the text of the Law.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-02-10
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/signo/article/view/7916
10.17058/signo.v42i73.7916
url https://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/signo/article/view/7916
identifier_str_mv 10.17058/signo.v42i73.7916
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/signo/article/view/7916/pdf
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Signo
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Signo
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Edunisc
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Edunisc
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Signo; v. 42 n. 73 (2017); 184-199
1982-2014
reponame:Signo (Santa Cruz do Sul. Online)
instname:Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul (UNISC)
instacron:UNISC
instname_str Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul (UNISC)
instacron_str UNISC
institution UNISC
reponame_str Signo (Santa Cruz do Sul. Online)
collection Signo (Santa Cruz do Sul. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Signo (Santa Cruz do Sul. Online) - Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul (UNISC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rgabriel@unisc.br||revistasigno.unisc@gmail.com
_version_ 1800218790835781632

Registros relacionados