Surgical risk index and surgical site infection in postpartum women submitted to cesarean section.

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Chianca, Luana Machado
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Romanelli, Roberta Maia de Castro, Souza, Tais Marina de, Oliveira, Werlley Meira de, Wakabayashi, Eduarda Almeida, Rodrigues, Lucas Vieira, Ramos, Stella D'Ávila de Souza, Fernandes, Renata Paixão Pio, Carvalho, Letícia Maria de Oliveira Aleixo, Paula, André Tunes de, Rosado, Viviane, Leite, Henrique Vitor, Aguiar, Regina Amelia Lopes Pessoa de, Coimbra, Bruna Barbosa, Clemente, Wanessa Trindade
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
por
Título da fonte: Revista de Epidemiologia e Controle de Infecção
Texto Completo: https://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/epidemiologia/article/view/4898
Resumo: Backgound and Objectives: Considering the use of active surveillance assists in infection identification and the need for studies that use Surgical Risk Index (SRI) for assessment of Surgical Site Infection (SSI) in cesareans, this study aims to determine the incidence of SSI and analyze the applicability of SRI in the prediction of SSI in women in the postpartum period after being submitted to a cesarean section at a university hospital between April 2012 and March of 2013. Methods: Prospective cohort study. Information notifying SSI by active surveillance was collected daily from the medical records. After hospital discharge, the mothers were contacted through telephone calls to identify infection criteria within 30 days after the cesarean. Descriptive and comparative analyses were performed. The chi-square test was used to compare groups. Results: 737 cesareans were performed. Telephone contact was achieved with 507 (68.8%) women up to 30 days postpartum, with loss of follow-up of 230 cases (31.2%). The medical consultation in the post-partum period occurred with 188 (37.08%) women, with whom telephone contact was obtained, on average, 17.28 days (SD=8.39) after delivery. It was verified that 21 patients met the criteria for SSI, with a 4.14% rate. A total of 12 cases (57.1%) were classified as superficial SSI, 5 (23.8%) as deep and 4 (19.1%) as infection of organs and cavities. The SRI and its risk variables were not associated with SSI in patients submitted to cesarean sections. Conclusion: The SRI and the risk variables included in this index were not associated to SSI in patients submitted to cesarean sections. KEYWORDS: Cesarean Section; Surgical Wound Infection; Epidemiological Surveillance; Infection Control; Risk Index; Disease Notification.
id UNISC-4_7601d4f30ab8139d71313249e20ce6c3
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.online.unisc.br:article/4898
network_acronym_str UNISC-4
network_name_str Revista de Epidemiologia e Controle de Infecção
repository_id_str
spelling Surgical risk index and surgical site infection in postpartum women submitted to cesarean section.Índice de risco cirúrgico e infecção de ferida operatória em puérperas submetidas a cesarianas.Backgound and Objectives: Considering the use of active surveillance assists in infection identification and the need for studies that use Surgical Risk Index (SRI) for assessment of Surgical Site Infection (SSI) in cesareans, this study aims to determine the incidence of SSI and analyze the applicability of SRI in the prediction of SSI in women in the postpartum period after being submitted to a cesarean section at a university hospital between April 2012 and March of 2013. Methods: Prospective cohort study. Information notifying SSI by active surveillance was collected daily from the medical records. After hospital discharge, the mothers were contacted through telephone calls to identify infection criteria within 30 days after the cesarean. Descriptive and comparative analyses were performed. The chi-square test was used to compare groups. Results: 737 cesareans were performed. Telephone contact was achieved with 507 (68.8%) women up to 30 days postpartum, with loss of follow-up of 230 cases (31.2%). The medical consultation in the post-partum period occurred with 188 (37.08%) women, with whom telephone contact was obtained, on average, 17.28 days (SD=8.39) after delivery. It was verified that 21 patients met the criteria for SSI, with a 4.14% rate. A total of 12 cases (57.1%) were classified as superficial SSI, 5 (23.8%) as deep and 4 (19.1%) as infection of organs and cavities. The SRI and its risk variables were not associated with SSI in patients submitted to cesarean sections. Conclusion: The SRI and the risk variables included in this index were not associated to SSI in patients submitted to cesarean sections. KEYWORDS: Cesarean Section; Surgical Wound Infection; Epidemiological Surveillance; Infection Control; Risk Index; Disease Notification.Justificativa e Objetivos: Tendo em vista que o emprego de vigilância ativa colabora na identificação de infecção e a necessidade de estudos que utilizem o Índice de Risco Cirúrgico (IRC) para avaliação de Infecção de Ferida Cirúrgica (IFC) em cesarianas este estudo objetiva determinar a incidência de IFC e analisar a aplicabilidade do IRC na predição das IFC em puérperas submetidas à cesariana em hospital universitário entre abril de 2012 e março de 2013. Métodos: Estudo de coorte prospectivo concorrente. Informações de notificação das IFC por vigilância ativa foram coletadas diariamente nos prontuários. Após alta hospitalar, as puérperas eram contatadas por ligações telefônicas para identificação de critérios de infecção até 30 dias após a cesariana. Análises descritivas e comparativas foram conduzidas. Para comparação dos grupos foi utilizado teste de Qui-quadrado. Resultados: Foram realizadas 737 cesarianas. Contato telefônico foi conseguido com 507 (68,8%) puérperas até 30 dias pós-parto, com perda de seguimento de 230 casos (31,2%). A consulta médica no puerpério ocorreu em 188 (37,08%) mulheres com quem foi obtido contato telefônico, em média, 17,28 dias (± 8,39) após o parto. Verificou-se que 21 casos preencheram critérios para IFC, taxa de 4,14%. Classificou-se 12 (57,1%) casos como infecção de ferida cirúrgica superficial, 5 (23,8%) como profunda e 4 (19,1%) de órgãos e cavidades. O IRC e suas variáveis de risco não foram associados à IFC em pacientes submetidas a cesarianas. Conclusão: O IRC e as variáveis de risco incluídas nesse índice não foram associados à IFC em pacientes submetidas a cesarianas. DESCRITORES: Cesárea; Infecção da Ferida Operatória; Vigilância epidemiológica; Controle de Infecções; Índice de Risco; Notificação de doenças.Unisc2015-01-04info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/epidemiologia/article/view/489810.17058/reci.v5i1.4898Revista de Epidemiologia e Controle de Infecção; Vol. 5 No. 1 (2015); 17-22Revista de Epidemiologia e Controle de Infecção; v. 5 n. 1 (2015); 17-222238-3360reponame:Revista de Epidemiologia e Controle de Infecçãoinstname:Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul (UNISC)instacron:UNISCengporhttps://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/epidemiologia/article/view/4898/4233https://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/epidemiologia/article/view/4898/4123Chianca, Luana MachadoRomanelli, Roberta Maia de CastroSouza, Tais Marina deOliveira, Werlley Meira deWakabayashi, Eduarda AlmeidaRodrigues, Lucas VieiraRamos, Stella D'Ávila de SouzaFernandes, Renata Paixão PioCarvalho, Letícia Maria de Oliveira AleixoPaula, André Tunes deRosado, VivianeLeite, Henrique VitorAguiar, Regina Amelia Lopes Pessoa deCoimbra, Bruna BarbosaClemente, Wanessa Trindadeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2019-01-21T12:55:36Zoai:ojs.online.unisc.br:article/4898Revistahttps://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/epidemiologia/indexONGhttp://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/epidemiologia/oai||liapossuelo@unisc.br|| julia.kern@hotmail.com||reci.unisc@gmail.com2238-33602238-3360opendoar:2019-01-21T12:55:36Revista de Epidemiologia e Controle de Infecção - Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul (UNISC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Surgical risk index and surgical site infection in postpartum women submitted to cesarean section.
Índice de risco cirúrgico e infecção de ferida operatória em puérperas submetidas a cesarianas.
title Surgical risk index and surgical site infection in postpartum women submitted to cesarean section.
spellingShingle Surgical risk index and surgical site infection in postpartum women submitted to cesarean section.
Chianca, Luana Machado
title_short Surgical risk index and surgical site infection in postpartum women submitted to cesarean section.
title_full Surgical risk index and surgical site infection in postpartum women submitted to cesarean section.
title_fullStr Surgical risk index and surgical site infection in postpartum women submitted to cesarean section.
title_full_unstemmed Surgical risk index and surgical site infection in postpartum women submitted to cesarean section.
title_sort Surgical risk index and surgical site infection in postpartum women submitted to cesarean section.
author Chianca, Luana Machado
author_facet Chianca, Luana Machado
Romanelli, Roberta Maia de Castro
Souza, Tais Marina de
Oliveira, Werlley Meira de
Wakabayashi, Eduarda Almeida
Rodrigues, Lucas Vieira
Ramos, Stella D'Ávila de Souza
Fernandes, Renata Paixão Pio
Carvalho, Letícia Maria de Oliveira Aleixo
Paula, André Tunes de
Rosado, Viviane
Leite, Henrique Vitor
Aguiar, Regina Amelia Lopes Pessoa de
Coimbra, Bruna Barbosa
Clemente, Wanessa Trindade
author_role author
author2 Romanelli, Roberta Maia de Castro
Souza, Tais Marina de
Oliveira, Werlley Meira de
Wakabayashi, Eduarda Almeida
Rodrigues, Lucas Vieira
Ramos, Stella D'Ávila de Souza
Fernandes, Renata Paixão Pio
Carvalho, Letícia Maria de Oliveira Aleixo
Paula, André Tunes de
Rosado, Viviane
Leite, Henrique Vitor
Aguiar, Regina Amelia Lopes Pessoa de
Coimbra, Bruna Barbosa
Clemente, Wanessa Trindade
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Chianca, Luana Machado
Romanelli, Roberta Maia de Castro
Souza, Tais Marina de
Oliveira, Werlley Meira de
Wakabayashi, Eduarda Almeida
Rodrigues, Lucas Vieira
Ramos, Stella D'Ávila de Souza
Fernandes, Renata Paixão Pio
Carvalho, Letícia Maria de Oliveira Aleixo
Paula, André Tunes de
Rosado, Viviane
Leite, Henrique Vitor
Aguiar, Regina Amelia Lopes Pessoa de
Coimbra, Bruna Barbosa
Clemente, Wanessa Trindade
description Backgound and Objectives: Considering the use of active surveillance assists in infection identification and the need for studies that use Surgical Risk Index (SRI) for assessment of Surgical Site Infection (SSI) in cesareans, this study aims to determine the incidence of SSI and analyze the applicability of SRI in the prediction of SSI in women in the postpartum period after being submitted to a cesarean section at a university hospital between April 2012 and March of 2013. Methods: Prospective cohort study. Information notifying SSI by active surveillance was collected daily from the medical records. After hospital discharge, the mothers were contacted through telephone calls to identify infection criteria within 30 days after the cesarean. Descriptive and comparative analyses were performed. The chi-square test was used to compare groups. Results: 737 cesareans were performed. Telephone contact was achieved with 507 (68.8%) women up to 30 days postpartum, with loss of follow-up of 230 cases (31.2%). The medical consultation in the post-partum period occurred with 188 (37.08%) women, with whom telephone contact was obtained, on average, 17.28 days (SD=8.39) after delivery. It was verified that 21 patients met the criteria for SSI, with a 4.14% rate. A total of 12 cases (57.1%) were classified as superficial SSI, 5 (23.8%) as deep and 4 (19.1%) as infection of organs and cavities. The SRI and its risk variables were not associated with SSI in patients submitted to cesarean sections. Conclusion: The SRI and the risk variables included in this index were not associated to SSI in patients submitted to cesarean sections. KEYWORDS: Cesarean Section; Surgical Wound Infection; Epidemiological Surveillance; Infection Control; Risk Index; Disease Notification.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-01-04
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/epidemiologia/article/view/4898
10.17058/reci.v5i1.4898
url https://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/epidemiologia/article/view/4898
identifier_str_mv 10.17058/reci.v5i1.4898
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
por
language eng
por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/epidemiologia/article/view/4898/4233
https://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/epidemiologia/article/view/4898/4123
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Unisc
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Unisc
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista de Epidemiologia e Controle de Infecção; Vol. 5 No. 1 (2015); 17-22
Revista de Epidemiologia e Controle de Infecção; v. 5 n. 1 (2015); 17-22
2238-3360
reponame:Revista de Epidemiologia e Controle de Infecção
instname:Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul (UNISC)
instacron:UNISC
instname_str Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul (UNISC)
instacron_str UNISC
institution UNISC
reponame_str Revista de Epidemiologia e Controle de Infecção
collection Revista de Epidemiologia e Controle de Infecção
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Epidemiologia e Controle de Infecção - Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul (UNISC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||liapossuelo@unisc.br|| julia.kern@hotmail.com||reci.unisc@gmail.com
_version_ 1800218810018430976