Can the deliberation qualify policies for rural areas? an analysis of the participation of rural subjects in the agricultural mechanization of public policy in Viçosa-MG

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Santos, Anna Cláudia Campos e
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Mafra, Rennan Lanna Martins
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Redes (Santa Cruz do Sul. Online)
Texto Completo: https://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/redes/article/view/7649
Resumo: This article aims to investigate the use of deliberative democratic mechanisms with public policies marked by the participation of rural subjects. As investigative empirical horizon was taken Agricultural Mechanization of Public Policy implemented and evaluated in Viçosa-MG, from deliberative processes engendered in Municipal Council for Sustainable Rural Development. Thus, it wonders whether the public deliberation can qualify public policy for rural areas from formal processes of political participation, marked by the public and systematic dialogue between rural individuals and institutions. The theoretical framework consists of approaches about deliberative democracy notions and evaluation of formal decision-making processes. The main approach was inspired by the theory of Archon Fung (2006) that indicates three major criteria to evaluate participation: participant selection; communication and decision; authority and power. As regards the methods, were interviews and non-participant observation in the arena of CMDRS, Viçosa-MG. The main results show that there are embryonic deliberative processes triggered by rural subjects in the implementation and evaluation of public policy highlighted as there are concrete consideration by the executive by speeches and complaints from them. However, there is not the public development of preferences, not leading to debate and creating agendas together, or expansion of public controversy in CMDRS arena with regard to the experiences of rural subjects.
id UNISC-6_1c3e4458a5e3b3f3972d699a499b546e
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.online.unisc.br:article/7649
network_acronym_str UNISC-6
network_name_str Redes (Santa Cruz do Sul. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Can the deliberation qualify policies for rural areas? an analysis of the participation of rural subjects in the agricultural mechanization of public policy in Viçosa-MGPode a deliberação qualificar políticas públicas para o meio rural? uma análise da participação de sujeitos rurais na política pública de mecanização agrícola em Viçosa-MGDeliberação. Política pública. Participação. Meio rural.Deliberation. Policy. Participation. Rural.This article aims to investigate the use of deliberative democratic mechanisms with public policies marked by the participation of rural subjects. As investigative empirical horizon was taken Agricultural Mechanization of Public Policy implemented and evaluated in Viçosa-MG, from deliberative processes engendered in Municipal Council for Sustainable Rural Development. Thus, it wonders whether the public deliberation can qualify public policy for rural areas from formal processes of political participation, marked by the public and systematic dialogue between rural individuals and institutions. The theoretical framework consists of approaches about deliberative democracy notions and evaluation of formal decision-making processes. The main approach was inspired by the theory of Archon Fung (2006) that indicates three major criteria to evaluate participation: participant selection; communication and decision; authority and power. As regards the methods, were interviews and non-participant observation in the arena of CMDRS, Viçosa-MG. The main results show that there are embryonic deliberative processes triggered by rural subjects in the implementation and evaluation of public policy highlighted as there are concrete consideration by the executive by speeches and complaints from them. However, there is not the public development of preferences, not leading to debate and creating agendas together, or expansion of public controversy in CMDRS arena with regard to the experiences of rural subjects.Este artigo objetiva investigar o uso de mecanismos deliberativos democráticos junto a políticas públicas marcadas pela participação de sujeitos rurais. Como horizonte empírico investigativo, foi tomada a Política Pública de Mecanização Agrícola implementada e avaliada no Município de Viçosa-MG, a partir de processos deliberativos engendrados em seu Conselho Municipal de Desenvolvimento Rural Sustentável - CMDRS. Sendo assim, questiona-se se pode a deliberação pública qualificar as políticas públicas para o meio rural a partir de processos formais de participação política, marcados pelo diálogo público e sistemático entre sujeitos rurais e instituições. A fundamentação teórica é composta por abordagens acerca das noções de democracia deliberativa e avaliação de processos deliberativos formais. A abordagem principal foi inspirada na teoria de Archon Fung (2006), que indica três grandes critérios para avaliar a participação: seleção participante; modos de comunicação e decisão; autoridade e poder. No que se refere aos métodos, foram realizadas entrevistas e observação não participante na arena do CMDRS de Viçosa-MG. Os principais resultados apontam que existem processos deliberativos embrionários deflagrados por sujeitos rurais na implementação e avaliação da política pública destacada, pois há concreta consideração por parte do executivo pelas falas e reclamações dos mesmos. No entanto, não há o desenvolvimento público de preferências, não levando ao debate e à criação de pautas em conjunto, nem à ampliação das controvérsias públicas na arena do CMDRS no que se refere às experiências dos sujeitos rurais.Edunisc - Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul2016-09-10info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/redes/article/view/764910.17058/redes.v21i3.7649Redes ; Vol. 21 No. 3 (2016): Agricultura Familiar: processos e práticas - Parte 2; 335-357Redes; Vol. 21 Núm. 3 (2016): Agricultura Familiar: processos e práticas - Parte 2; 335-357Redes; Vol. 21 No. 3 (2016): Agricultura Familiar: processos e práticas - Parte 2; 335-357Redes; v. 21 n. 3 (2016): Agricultura Familiar: processos e práticas - Parte 2; 335-3571982-6745reponame:Redes (Santa Cruz do Sul. Online)instname:Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul (UNISC)instacron:UNISCporhttps://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/redes/article/view/7649/pdfCopyright (c) 2016 Redesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSantos, Anna Cláudia Campos eMafra, Rennan Lanna Martins2019-10-03T17:40:13Zoai:ojs.online.unisc.br:article/7649Revistahttp://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/redeshttp://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/redes/oairedes_unisc_maff@terra.com.br||etges@unisc.br1982-67451414-7106opendoar:2019-10-03T17:40:13Redes (Santa Cruz do Sul. Online) - Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul (UNISC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Can the deliberation qualify policies for rural areas? an analysis of the participation of rural subjects in the agricultural mechanization of public policy in Viçosa-MG
Pode a deliberação qualificar políticas públicas para o meio rural? uma análise da participação de sujeitos rurais na política pública de mecanização agrícola em Viçosa-MG
title Can the deliberation qualify policies for rural areas? an analysis of the participation of rural subjects in the agricultural mechanization of public policy in Viçosa-MG
spellingShingle Can the deliberation qualify policies for rural areas? an analysis of the participation of rural subjects in the agricultural mechanization of public policy in Viçosa-MG
Santos, Anna Cláudia Campos e
Deliberação. Política pública. Participação. Meio rural.
Deliberation. Policy. Participation. Rural.
title_short Can the deliberation qualify policies for rural areas? an analysis of the participation of rural subjects in the agricultural mechanization of public policy in Viçosa-MG
title_full Can the deliberation qualify policies for rural areas? an analysis of the participation of rural subjects in the agricultural mechanization of public policy in Viçosa-MG
title_fullStr Can the deliberation qualify policies for rural areas? an analysis of the participation of rural subjects in the agricultural mechanization of public policy in Viçosa-MG
title_full_unstemmed Can the deliberation qualify policies for rural areas? an analysis of the participation of rural subjects in the agricultural mechanization of public policy in Viçosa-MG
title_sort Can the deliberation qualify policies for rural areas? an analysis of the participation of rural subjects in the agricultural mechanization of public policy in Viçosa-MG
author Santos, Anna Cláudia Campos e
author_facet Santos, Anna Cláudia Campos e
Mafra, Rennan Lanna Martins
author_role author
author2 Mafra, Rennan Lanna Martins
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Santos, Anna Cláudia Campos e
Mafra, Rennan Lanna Martins
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Deliberação. Política pública. Participação. Meio rural.
Deliberation. Policy. Participation. Rural.
topic Deliberação. Política pública. Participação. Meio rural.
Deliberation. Policy. Participation. Rural.
description This article aims to investigate the use of deliberative democratic mechanisms with public policies marked by the participation of rural subjects. As investigative empirical horizon was taken Agricultural Mechanization of Public Policy implemented and evaluated in Viçosa-MG, from deliberative processes engendered in Municipal Council for Sustainable Rural Development. Thus, it wonders whether the public deliberation can qualify public policy for rural areas from formal processes of political participation, marked by the public and systematic dialogue between rural individuals and institutions. The theoretical framework consists of approaches about deliberative democracy notions and evaluation of formal decision-making processes. The main approach was inspired by the theory of Archon Fung (2006) that indicates three major criteria to evaluate participation: participant selection; communication and decision; authority and power. As regards the methods, were interviews and non-participant observation in the arena of CMDRS, Viçosa-MG. The main results show that there are embryonic deliberative processes triggered by rural subjects in the implementation and evaluation of public policy highlighted as there are concrete consideration by the executive by speeches and complaints from them. However, there is not the public development of preferences, not leading to debate and creating agendas together, or expansion of public controversy in CMDRS arena with regard to the experiences of rural subjects.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-09-10
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/redes/article/view/7649
10.17058/redes.v21i3.7649
url https://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/redes/article/view/7649
identifier_str_mv 10.17058/redes.v21i3.7649
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/redes/article/view/7649/pdf
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 Redes
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 Redes
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Edunisc - Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Edunisc - Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Redes ; Vol. 21 No. 3 (2016): Agricultura Familiar: processos e práticas - Parte 2; 335-357
Redes; Vol. 21 Núm. 3 (2016): Agricultura Familiar: processos e práticas - Parte 2; 335-357
Redes; Vol. 21 No. 3 (2016): Agricultura Familiar: processos e práticas - Parte 2; 335-357
Redes; v. 21 n. 3 (2016): Agricultura Familiar: processos e práticas - Parte 2; 335-357
1982-6745
reponame:Redes (Santa Cruz do Sul. Online)
instname:Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul (UNISC)
instacron:UNISC
instname_str Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul (UNISC)
instacron_str UNISC
institution UNISC
reponame_str Redes (Santa Cruz do Sul. Online)
collection Redes (Santa Cruz do Sul. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Redes (Santa Cruz do Sul. Online) - Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul (UNISC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv redes_unisc_maff@terra.com.br||etges@unisc.br
_version_ 1787894835056738304