Dynamics of social interface and public intervention: the case of the rural extension of Rio Grande do Sul
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2012 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Redes (Santa Cruz do Sul. Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/redes/article/view/1866 |
Resumo: | This article is about the social dynamics in the work of intervention of the public rural extension in Big Rio of the South. Those dynamics represent the relationship/encounter established among the agents involved in the process of rural development. EMATER/RS-ASCAR is the oficial Agency of rural extension and its actions and practices are accomplished by extensionists that are constituted as development agents. Through the notion of social interface it is possible to verify as it public-puts it it is involved in the projects of the extensionists and as this public he/she reacts and it works strategic forms of negotiation and of maneuver, looking for to legitimate its interests. It is used of a qualitative methodology to understand the intervention process for the rural development starting from the theoretical notions of social interface and of human agency, obtained in the Guided Perspective to the Actor developed by Long (2001; 2007a) and Long and Ploeg (1989; 1994). so much Para, divided the article in four sections. The first is about the relationship between rural extension and intervention for the development and it approaches the Agency of rural extension quickly: EMATER/RS-ASCAR. The three following they specifically negotiate on the dynamics of social interface established among the Agency, extensionists and public-put it. It was ended that the intervention process for the rural development presents negotiations of objectives and of demands, could send the conflict situations, in that so much farmer as technician presents maneuver margins. The encounters of social interface between extensionists and farmers happen daily and in some situations the interface relationship settles down and he/she manifests the hybrid knowledge (interaction of the knowledge contextual and scientific). In another situations the social interface doesn't settle down and the worlds of life of the extensionist and of the farmer they are reaffirmed and they stay to the part. |
id |
UNISC-6_38ebbb5a6b6f66e3987ff642d0c251ae |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.online.unisc.br:article/1866 |
network_acronym_str |
UNISC-6 |
network_name_str |
Redes (Santa Cruz do Sul. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Dynamics of social interface and public intervention: the case of the rural extension of Rio Grande do SulDinâmicas de interface social e intervenção pública: o caso da extensão rural do Rio Grande do SulRural development. Social interface. Human agency. Public rural extension.desenvolvimento ruralinterface socialagência humanaextensão rural públicaThis article is about the social dynamics in the work of intervention of the public rural extension in Big Rio of the South. Those dynamics represent the relationship/encounter established among the agents involved in the process of rural development. EMATER/RS-ASCAR is the oficial Agency of rural extension and its actions and practices are accomplished by extensionists that are constituted as development agents. Through the notion of social interface it is possible to verify as it public-puts it it is involved in the projects of the extensionists and as this public he/she reacts and it works strategic forms of negotiation and of maneuver, looking for to legitimate its interests. It is used of a qualitative methodology to understand the intervention process for the rural development starting from the theoretical notions of social interface and of human agency, obtained in the Guided Perspective to the Actor developed by Long (2001; 2007a) and Long and Ploeg (1989; 1994). so much Para, divided the article in four sections. The first is about the relationship between rural extension and intervention for the development and it approaches the Agency of rural extension quickly: EMATER/RS-ASCAR. The three following they specifically negotiate on the dynamics of social interface established among the Agency, extensionists and public-put it. It was ended that the intervention process for the rural development presents negotiations of objectives and of demands, could send the conflict situations, in that so much farmer as technician presents maneuver margins. The encounters of social interface between extensionists and farmers happen daily and in some situations the interface relationship settles down and he/she manifests the hybrid knowledge (interaction of the knowledge contextual and scientific). In another situations the social interface doesn't settle down and the worlds of life of the extensionist and of the farmer they are reaffirmed and they stay to the part.Este artigo trata das dinâmicas sociais no trabalho de intervenção da extensão rural pública no Rio Grande do Sul. Essas dinâmicas representam a/o relação/encontro estabelecida/o entre os agentes envolvidos no processo de desenvolvimento rural. A EMATER/RS-ASCAR é a Agência oficial de extensão rural e as suas ações e práticas são realizadas por extensionistas que se constituem como agentes de desenvolvimento. Através da noção de interface social é possível verificar como o público-meta é envolvido nos projetos dos extensionistas e como esse público reage e aciona formas estratégicas de negociação e de manobra, buscando legitimar seus interesses. Utiliza-se de uma metodologia qualitativa para compreender o processo de intervenção para o desenvolvimento rural a partir das noções teóricas de interface social e de agência humana, obtida na Perspectiva Orientada ao Ator desenvolvida por Long (2001; 2007a) e Long e Ploeg (1989; 1994). Para tanto, dividiu-se o artigo em quatro seções. A primeira trata da relação entre extensão rural e intervenção para o desenvolvimento e aborda rapidamente a Agência de extensão rural: EMATER/RS-ASCAR. As três seguintes tratam especificamente sobre as dinâmicas de interface social estabelecidas entre a Agência, extensionistas e o público-meta. Concluiu-se que o processo de intervenção para o desenvolvimento rural apresenta negociações de objetivos e de demandas, podendo remeter a situações de conflito, em que tanto agricultor quanto técnico apresentam margens de manobra. Os encontros de interface social entre extensionistas e agricultores ocorrem diariamente e em algumas situações a relação de interface se estabelece e manifesta o conhecimento híbrido (interação do conhecimento contextual e científico). Em outras situações a interface social não se estabelece e os mundos de vida do extensionista e do agricultor reafirmam-se e mantêm-se à parte.Edunisc - Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul2012-05-02info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/redes/article/view/186610.17058/redes.v17i2.1866Redes ; Vol. 17 No. 2 (2012); 195-214Redes; Vol. 17 Núm. 2 (2012); 195-214Redes; Vol. 17 No. 2 (2012); 195-214Redes; v. 17 n. 2 (2012); 195-2141982-6745reponame:Redes (Santa Cruz do Sul. Online)instname:Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul (UNISC)instacron:UNISCporhttps://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/redes/article/view/1866/2179Deponti, Cidonea MachadoAlmeida, Jalcioneinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2019-10-03T17:48:00Zoai:ojs.online.unisc.br:article/1866Revistahttp://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/redeshttp://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/redes/oairedes_unisc_maff@terra.com.br||etges@unisc.br1982-67451414-7106opendoar:2019-10-03T17:48Redes (Santa Cruz do Sul. Online) - Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul (UNISC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Dynamics of social interface and public intervention: the case of the rural extension of Rio Grande do Sul Dinâmicas de interface social e intervenção pública: o caso da extensão rural do Rio Grande do Sul |
title |
Dynamics of social interface and public intervention: the case of the rural extension of Rio Grande do Sul |
spellingShingle |
Dynamics of social interface and public intervention: the case of the rural extension of Rio Grande do Sul Deponti, Cidonea Machado Rural development. Social interface. Human agency. Public rural extension. desenvolvimento rural interface social agência humana extensão rural pública |
title_short |
Dynamics of social interface and public intervention: the case of the rural extension of Rio Grande do Sul |
title_full |
Dynamics of social interface and public intervention: the case of the rural extension of Rio Grande do Sul |
title_fullStr |
Dynamics of social interface and public intervention: the case of the rural extension of Rio Grande do Sul |
title_full_unstemmed |
Dynamics of social interface and public intervention: the case of the rural extension of Rio Grande do Sul |
title_sort |
Dynamics of social interface and public intervention: the case of the rural extension of Rio Grande do Sul |
author |
Deponti, Cidonea Machado |
author_facet |
Deponti, Cidonea Machado Almeida, Jalcione |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Almeida, Jalcione |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Deponti, Cidonea Machado Almeida, Jalcione |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Rural development. Social interface. Human agency. Public rural extension. desenvolvimento rural interface social agência humana extensão rural pública |
topic |
Rural development. Social interface. Human agency. Public rural extension. desenvolvimento rural interface social agência humana extensão rural pública |
description |
This article is about the social dynamics in the work of intervention of the public rural extension in Big Rio of the South. Those dynamics represent the relationship/encounter established among the agents involved in the process of rural development. EMATER/RS-ASCAR is the oficial Agency of rural extension and its actions and practices are accomplished by extensionists that are constituted as development agents. Through the notion of social interface it is possible to verify as it public-puts it it is involved in the projects of the extensionists and as this public he/she reacts and it works strategic forms of negotiation and of maneuver, looking for to legitimate its interests. It is used of a qualitative methodology to understand the intervention process for the rural development starting from the theoretical notions of social interface and of human agency, obtained in the Guided Perspective to the Actor developed by Long (2001; 2007a) and Long and Ploeg (1989; 1994). so much Para, divided the article in four sections. The first is about the relationship between rural extension and intervention for the development and it approaches the Agency of rural extension quickly: EMATER/RS-ASCAR. The three following they specifically negotiate on the dynamics of social interface established among the Agency, extensionists and public-put it. It was ended that the intervention process for the rural development presents negotiations of objectives and of demands, could send the conflict situations, in that so much farmer as technician presents maneuver margins. The encounters of social interface between extensionists and farmers happen daily and in some situations the interface relationship settles down and he/she manifests the hybrid knowledge (interaction of the knowledge contextual and scientific). In another situations the social interface doesn't settle down and the worlds of life of the extensionist and of the farmer they are reaffirmed and they stay to the part. |
publishDate |
2012 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2012-05-02 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/redes/article/view/1866 10.17058/redes.v17i2.1866 |
url |
https://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/redes/article/view/1866 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.17058/redes.v17i2.1866 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/redes/article/view/1866/2179 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Edunisc - Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Edunisc - Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Redes ; Vol. 17 No. 2 (2012); 195-214 Redes; Vol. 17 Núm. 2 (2012); 195-214 Redes; Vol. 17 No. 2 (2012); 195-214 Redes; v. 17 n. 2 (2012); 195-214 1982-6745 reponame:Redes (Santa Cruz do Sul. Online) instname:Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul (UNISC) instacron:UNISC |
instname_str |
Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul (UNISC) |
instacron_str |
UNISC |
institution |
UNISC |
reponame_str |
Redes (Santa Cruz do Sul. Online) |
collection |
Redes (Santa Cruz do Sul. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Redes (Santa Cruz do Sul. Online) - Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul (UNISC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
redes_unisc_maff@terra.com.br||etges@unisc.br |
_version_ |
1800218768519987200 |