Educational crisis policy: cause or effect of worldwide authoritarianism and plutocractic rationality?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Crítica Cultural (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://portaldeperiodicos.animaeducacao.com.br/index.php/Critica_Cultural/article/view/8083 |
Resumo: | This article aims to promote the debate around the plutocratic strategies of commercialization of one of the fundamental public goods for the autonomous constitution of citizens and cultures, peoples and countries, education. But the logic of precariousness of education, if not of the commodification of education, characteristics of despotic, authoritarian governments at the service of the global financialized plutocracy implies the strategy of annihilation of the power of constitutive thinking of singularities committed to human rights, to the dignity of life. in its entirety and, especially with the defense of the public space, the common good, primordial conditions in the shaping of societies, and of a sufficiently humane and responsible world with future generations. The article suggests that it is an untransferable condition in a context of financial capital accumulation, controlled by the national and global plutocracy, promoter of the crisis as a determining technique of the forms of government, under the prerogative of a rule of law, operationalized by the permanent state of exception. the power of thought that historically found itself accepted and developed within the universities. Particularly in the circumstances of Brazilian society constituted under the ethos of slavery, public universities are constituted as locus par excellence of constitution of reflections, analyzes and questions that enable us to take ourselves as an object, understanding the limits, but especially the civilizing potentialities at our disposal. |
id |
UNISUL-2_60301d533eddc41412e64d78e69bf6d9 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:portaldeperiodicos.animaeducacao.com.br:article/8083 |
network_acronym_str |
UNISUL-2 |
network_name_str |
Crítica Cultural (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Educational crisis policy: cause or effect of worldwide authoritarianism and plutocractic rationality?Política da crise educacional: causa ou efeito da racionalidade autoritária e plutocrática mundial?EducationThoughtUniversitySubjectivationPlutocracyException.EducaçãoPensamentoUniversidadeSubjetivaçãoPlutocraciaExceçãoThis article aims to promote the debate around the plutocratic strategies of commercialization of one of the fundamental public goods for the autonomous constitution of citizens and cultures, peoples and countries, education. But the logic of precariousness of education, if not of the commodification of education, characteristics of despotic, authoritarian governments at the service of the global financialized plutocracy implies the strategy of annihilation of the power of constitutive thinking of singularities committed to human rights, to the dignity of life. in its entirety and, especially with the defense of the public space, the common good, primordial conditions in the shaping of societies, and of a sufficiently humane and responsible world with future generations. The article suggests that it is an untransferable condition in a context of financial capital accumulation, controlled by the national and global plutocracy, promoter of the crisis as a determining technique of the forms of government, under the prerogative of a rule of law, operationalized by the permanent state of exception. the power of thought that historically found itself accepted and developed within the universities. Particularly in the circumstances of Brazilian society constituted under the ethos of slavery, public universities are constituted as locus par excellence of constitution of reflections, analyzes and questions that enable us to take ourselves as an object, understanding the limits, but especially the civilizing potentialities at our disposal.O presente artigo tem como objetivo promover o debate em torno das estratégias plutocráticas de mercantilização de um dos bens públicos fundamentais para a constituição autônoma de cidadãos e de culturas, povos e países, a educação. Mas, a lógica de precarização da educação, senão da mercantilização da educação, características de governos despóticos, autoritários a serviço da plutocracia financeirizada global implica na estratégia de aniquilação da potência do pensamento constitutiva de singularidades comprometidas com os direitos humanos, com a dignidade da vida em sua totalidade e, sobretudo com a defesa do espaço público, do bem comum, condições primordiais na conformação de sociedades e, de um mundo suficientemente humano e responsável com as futuras gerações. O artigo sugere que é condição intransferível num contexto de acumulação do capital financeiro, controlado pela plutocracia nacional e global, promotor da crise como técnica determinante das formas de governo, sob a prerrogativa de um estado de direito, operacionalizado pelo permanente estado de exceção, manter atuante a potência do pensamento que historicamente encontrou acolhida e se desenvolveu no seio das universidades. Sobretudo nas circunstâncias da sociedade brasileira constituída sob o ethos da escravidão, as universidades públicas constituem-se como lócus par excellence de constituição de reflexões, análises e questionamentos que viabilizem nos tomarmos como objeto, compreendendo os limites, mas sobretudo as potencialidades civilizatórias a nossa disposição.Universidade do Sul de Santa Catarina2019-12-10info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://portaldeperiodicos.animaeducacao.com.br/index.php/Critica_Cultural/article/view/808310.19177/rcc.v14e22019161-181Revista Crítica Cultural; v. 14 n. 2 (2019); 161-1811980-64931980-6493reponame:Crítica Cultural (Online)instname:Universidade do Sul de Santa Catarina (UNISUL)instacron:UNISULporhttps://portaldeperiodicos.animaeducacao.com.br/index.php/Critica_Cultural/article/view/8083/pdfCopyright (c) 2019 Revista Crítica Culturalinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBazzanella, Sandro LuizAlbuquerque, Camila Leonardo NandiCani, Luiz Eduardo2019-12-10T20:39:10Zoai:portaldeperiodicos.animaeducacao.com.br:article/8083Revistahttps://portaldeperiodicos.animaeducacao.com.br/index.php/Critica_CulturalPRIhttps://portaldeperiodicos.animaeducacao.com.br/index.php/Critica_Cultural/oairamayana.lira@gmail.com1980-64931980-6493opendoar:2019-12-10T20:39:10Crítica Cultural (Online) - Universidade do Sul de Santa Catarina (UNISUL)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Educational crisis policy: cause or effect of worldwide authoritarianism and plutocractic rationality? Política da crise educacional: causa ou efeito da racionalidade autoritária e plutocrática mundial? |
title |
Educational crisis policy: cause or effect of worldwide authoritarianism and plutocractic rationality? |
spellingShingle |
Educational crisis policy: cause or effect of worldwide authoritarianism and plutocractic rationality? Bazzanella, Sandro Luiz Education Thought University Subjectivation Plutocracy Exception. Educação Pensamento Universidade Subjetivação Plutocracia Exceção |
title_short |
Educational crisis policy: cause or effect of worldwide authoritarianism and plutocractic rationality? |
title_full |
Educational crisis policy: cause or effect of worldwide authoritarianism and plutocractic rationality? |
title_fullStr |
Educational crisis policy: cause or effect of worldwide authoritarianism and plutocractic rationality? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Educational crisis policy: cause or effect of worldwide authoritarianism and plutocractic rationality? |
title_sort |
Educational crisis policy: cause or effect of worldwide authoritarianism and plutocractic rationality? |
author |
Bazzanella, Sandro Luiz |
author_facet |
Bazzanella, Sandro Luiz Albuquerque, Camila Leonardo Nandi Cani, Luiz Eduardo |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Albuquerque, Camila Leonardo Nandi Cani, Luiz Eduardo |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Bazzanella, Sandro Luiz Albuquerque, Camila Leonardo Nandi Cani, Luiz Eduardo |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Education Thought University Subjectivation Plutocracy Exception. Educação Pensamento Universidade Subjetivação Plutocracia Exceção |
topic |
Education Thought University Subjectivation Plutocracy Exception. Educação Pensamento Universidade Subjetivação Plutocracia Exceção |
description |
This article aims to promote the debate around the plutocratic strategies of commercialization of one of the fundamental public goods for the autonomous constitution of citizens and cultures, peoples and countries, education. But the logic of precariousness of education, if not of the commodification of education, characteristics of despotic, authoritarian governments at the service of the global financialized plutocracy implies the strategy of annihilation of the power of constitutive thinking of singularities committed to human rights, to the dignity of life. in its entirety and, especially with the defense of the public space, the common good, primordial conditions in the shaping of societies, and of a sufficiently humane and responsible world with future generations. The article suggests that it is an untransferable condition in a context of financial capital accumulation, controlled by the national and global plutocracy, promoter of the crisis as a determining technique of the forms of government, under the prerogative of a rule of law, operationalized by the permanent state of exception. the power of thought that historically found itself accepted and developed within the universities. Particularly in the circumstances of Brazilian society constituted under the ethos of slavery, public universities are constituted as locus par excellence of constitution of reflections, analyzes and questions that enable us to take ourselves as an object, understanding the limits, but especially the civilizing potentialities at our disposal. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-12-10 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://portaldeperiodicos.animaeducacao.com.br/index.php/Critica_Cultural/article/view/8083 10.19177/rcc.v14e22019161-181 |
url |
https://portaldeperiodicos.animaeducacao.com.br/index.php/Critica_Cultural/article/view/8083 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.19177/rcc.v14e22019161-181 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://portaldeperiodicos.animaeducacao.com.br/index.php/Critica_Cultural/article/view/8083/pdf |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Revista Crítica Cultural info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Revista Crítica Cultural |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade do Sul de Santa Catarina |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade do Sul de Santa Catarina |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Crítica Cultural; v. 14 n. 2 (2019); 161-181 1980-6493 1980-6493 reponame:Crítica Cultural (Online) instname:Universidade do Sul de Santa Catarina (UNISUL) instacron:UNISUL |
instname_str |
Universidade do Sul de Santa Catarina (UNISUL) |
instacron_str |
UNISUL |
institution |
UNISUL |
reponame_str |
Crítica Cultural (Online) |
collection |
Crítica Cultural (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Crítica Cultural (Online) - Universidade do Sul de Santa Catarina (UNISUL) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
ramayana.lira@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1800220553261350912 |