AUTOAVALIAÇÃO, AVALIAÇÃO POR PARES E POR PROFESSORES DE COMPETÊNCIAS TRANSVERSAIS DE ESTUDANTES DE ENGENHARIA: ESTUDO PILOTO
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Latin American Journal of Business Management |
Texto Completo: | https://www.lajbm.com.br/index.php/journal/article/view/706 |
Resumo: | Recent changes in the expected leaning outcomes of engineering graduates as an answer to evolution in society have challenged teachers and higher education institutions (HEIs) to develop and assess students' transferable skills. Competencies such as teamwork, communication, leadership, and problem solving are essential not only for engineers but also for managers in many fields. The assessment of transferable skills is a complex process; not yet properly investigated. As so, it lacks the development of adequate instruments for its application in research and on real practice in HEIs. The objective of this article is to present the development process and initial tests of the Questionnaires for the Assessment of Engineering Students’ Skills Competencies of Engineering Students (QuACT, in Portuguese) in the scales of self-assessment, peer and teacher assessment. The research method considered the procedures for constructing psychological instruments as a reference. The study was applied to a class of an Engineering program in a private HEI in Brazil, and involved a group of seven experts in the field. Preliminary results indicate that the proposed system has proved adequate for broadening the perception of soft skills, with the inclusion of students as assessment agents. Students were able to self-assess and assess their peers in transferable skills not assessed by the teacher. There were no significant differences between the medians of self and peer assessments’ results. Further research envisages the expansion of studies to ensure the psychometric quality of the instruments and their use for other courses and HEIs. |
id |
UNITAU-2_985c371cea09694b161ecf8bd821d664 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs2.lajbm.com.br:article/706 |
network_acronym_str |
UNITAU-2 |
network_name_str |
Latin American Journal of Business Management |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
AUTOAVALIAÇÃO, AVALIAÇÃO POR PARES E POR PROFESSORES DE COMPETÊNCIAS TRANSVERSAIS DE ESTUDANTES DE ENGENHARIA: ESTUDO PILOTORecent changes in the expected leaning outcomes of engineering graduates as an answer to evolution in society have challenged teachers and higher education institutions (HEIs) to develop and assess students' transferable skills. Competencies such as teamwork, communication, leadership, and problem solving are essential not only for engineers but also for managers in many fields. The assessment of transferable skills is a complex process; not yet properly investigated. As so, it lacks the development of adequate instruments for its application in research and on real practice in HEIs. The objective of this article is to present the development process and initial tests of the Questionnaires for the Assessment of Engineering Students’ Skills Competencies of Engineering Students (QuACT, in Portuguese) in the scales of self-assessment, peer and teacher assessment. The research method considered the procedures for constructing psychological instruments as a reference. The study was applied to a class of an Engineering program in a private HEI in Brazil, and involved a group of seven experts in the field. Preliminary results indicate that the proposed system has proved adequate for broadening the perception of soft skills, with the inclusion of students as assessment agents. Students were able to self-assess and assess their peers in transferable skills not assessed by the teacher. There were no significant differences between the medians of self and peer assessments’ results. Further research envisages the expansion of studies to ensure the psychometric quality of the instruments and their use for other courses and HEIs.Mudanças recentes no perfil do egresso de cursos de engenharia em consequência das transformações da sociedade trazem aos professores e às instituições de ensino superior (IES) o desafio de desenvolver e avaliar as competências transversais dos estudantes. Competências como trabalho em equipe, comunicação, liderança e resolução de problemas são essenciais não só para a atuação de engenheiros como também para gestores em diversas áreas. A avaliação destas competências é um processo complexo, pouco estudado por pesquisadores, carecendo do desenvolvimento de instrumentos adequados para sua aplicação na pesquisa e na prática das IES. O objetivo deste artigo é apresentar o processo de desenvolvimento e testes iniciais dos Questionários de Avaliação de Competências Transversais de Estudantes de Engenharia (QuACT) nas escalas de autoavaliação, avaliação por pares e por professores. O método de pesquisa considerou como referência os procedimentos para construção de instrumentos psicológicos. O estudo foi aplicado a uma turma de um curso de Engenharia em uma IES privada no Brasil, envolvendo também um grupo de sete especialistas no campo. Os resultados preliminares indicam que o sistema proposto se mostrou adequado para ampliar a percepção das competências transversais, com a inclusão dos estudantes como agentes avaliadores. Os estudantes conseguiram se autoavaliar e avaliar os pares em competências transversais não avaliadas pelo professor. Não se percebeu diferenças significativas entre as medianas das autoavaliações e das avaliações pelos pares. A evolução das pesquisas prevê a ampliação dos estudos para garantia da qualidade psicométrica dos instrumentos e sua utilização para outros cursos e IES.edUNITAU2022-12-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado por paresapplication/pdfhttps://www.lajbm.com.br/index.php/journal/article/view/706Latin American Journal of Business Management; Vol. 13 No. 2 (2022)Latin American Journal of Business Management; Vol. 13 Núm. 2 (2022)Latin American Journal of Business Management; v. 13 n. 2 (2022)2178-4833reponame:Latin American Journal of Business Managementinstname:Universidade de Taubaté (UNITAU)instacron:UNITAUporhttps://www.lajbm.com.br/index.php/journal/article/view/706/343Copyright (c) 2022 Latin American Journal of Business Managementinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGesteira de Almeida Ferraz, Tatianade Sousa Pereira-Guizzo, Camila 2023-07-11T18:27:28Zoai:ojs2.lajbm.com.br:article/706Revistahttps://www.lajbm.com.br/index.php/journal/indexPUBhttp://www.lajbm.net/index.php/journal/oaimarcela.moraes@unitau.com.br||editor@lajbm.net2178-48332178-4833opendoar:2023-07-11T18:27:28Latin American Journal of Business Management - Universidade de Taubaté (UNITAU)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
AUTOAVALIAÇÃO, AVALIAÇÃO POR PARES E POR PROFESSORES DE COMPETÊNCIAS TRANSVERSAIS DE ESTUDANTES DE ENGENHARIA: ESTUDO PILOTO |
title |
AUTOAVALIAÇÃO, AVALIAÇÃO POR PARES E POR PROFESSORES DE COMPETÊNCIAS TRANSVERSAIS DE ESTUDANTES DE ENGENHARIA: ESTUDO PILOTO |
spellingShingle |
AUTOAVALIAÇÃO, AVALIAÇÃO POR PARES E POR PROFESSORES DE COMPETÊNCIAS TRANSVERSAIS DE ESTUDANTES DE ENGENHARIA: ESTUDO PILOTO Gesteira de Almeida Ferraz, Tatiana |
title_short |
AUTOAVALIAÇÃO, AVALIAÇÃO POR PARES E POR PROFESSORES DE COMPETÊNCIAS TRANSVERSAIS DE ESTUDANTES DE ENGENHARIA: ESTUDO PILOTO |
title_full |
AUTOAVALIAÇÃO, AVALIAÇÃO POR PARES E POR PROFESSORES DE COMPETÊNCIAS TRANSVERSAIS DE ESTUDANTES DE ENGENHARIA: ESTUDO PILOTO |
title_fullStr |
AUTOAVALIAÇÃO, AVALIAÇÃO POR PARES E POR PROFESSORES DE COMPETÊNCIAS TRANSVERSAIS DE ESTUDANTES DE ENGENHARIA: ESTUDO PILOTO |
title_full_unstemmed |
AUTOAVALIAÇÃO, AVALIAÇÃO POR PARES E POR PROFESSORES DE COMPETÊNCIAS TRANSVERSAIS DE ESTUDANTES DE ENGENHARIA: ESTUDO PILOTO |
title_sort |
AUTOAVALIAÇÃO, AVALIAÇÃO POR PARES E POR PROFESSORES DE COMPETÊNCIAS TRANSVERSAIS DE ESTUDANTES DE ENGENHARIA: ESTUDO PILOTO |
author |
Gesteira de Almeida Ferraz, Tatiana |
author_facet |
Gesteira de Almeida Ferraz, Tatiana de Sousa Pereira-Guizzo, Camila |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
de Sousa Pereira-Guizzo, Camila |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Gesteira de Almeida Ferraz, Tatiana de Sousa Pereira-Guizzo, Camila |
description |
Recent changes in the expected leaning outcomes of engineering graduates as an answer to evolution in society have challenged teachers and higher education institutions (HEIs) to develop and assess students' transferable skills. Competencies such as teamwork, communication, leadership, and problem solving are essential not only for engineers but also for managers in many fields. The assessment of transferable skills is a complex process; not yet properly investigated. As so, it lacks the development of adequate instruments for its application in research and on real practice in HEIs. The objective of this article is to present the development process and initial tests of the Questionnaires for the Assessment of Engineering Students’ Skills Competencies of Engineering Students (QuACT, in Portuguese) in the scales of self-assessment, peer and teacher assessment. The research method considered the procedures for constructing psychological instruments as a reference. The study was applied to a class of an Engineering program in a private HEI in Brazil, and involved a group of seven experts in the field. Preliminary results indicate that the proposed system has proved adequate for broadening the perception of soft skills, with the inclusion of students as assessment agents. Students were able to self-assess and assess their peers in transferable skills not assessed by the teacher. There were no significant differences between the medians of self and peer assessments’ results. Further research envisages the expansion of studies to ensure the psychometric quality of the instruments and their use for other courses and HEIs. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-12-30 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Avaliado por pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.lajbm.com.br/index.php/journal/article/view/706 |
url |
https://www.lajbm.com.br/index.php/journal/article/view/706 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.lajbm.com.br/index.php/journal/article/view/706/343 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Latin American Journal of Business Management info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Latin American Journal of Business Management |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
edUNITAU |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
edUNITAU |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Latin American Journal of Business Management; Vol. 13 No. 2 (2022) Latin American Journal of Business Management; Vol. 13 Núm. 2 (2022) Latin American Journal of Business Management; v. 13 n. 2 (2022) 2178-4833 reponame:Latin American Journal of Business Management instname:Universidade de Taubaté (UNITAU) instacron:UNITAU |
instname_str |
Universidade de Taubaté (UNITAU) |
instacron_str |
UNITAU |
institution |
UNITAU |
reponame_str |
Latin American Journal of Business Management |
collection |
Latin American Journal of Business Management |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Latin American Journal of Business Management - Universidade de Taubaté (UNITAU) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
marcela.moraes@unitau.com.br||editor@lajbm.net |
_version_ |
1809281664640090112 |