AUTOAVALIAÇÃO, AVALIAÇÃO POR PARES E POR PROFESSORES DE COMPETÊNCIAS TRANSVERSAIS DE ESTUDANTES DE ENGENHARIA: ESTUDO PILOTO

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Gesteira de Almeida Ferraz, Tatiana
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: de Sousa Pereira-Guizzo, Camila
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Latin American Journal of Business Management
Texto Completo: https://www.lajbm.com.br/index.php/journal/article/view/706
Resumo: Recent changes in the expected leaning outcomes of engineering graduates as an answer to evolution in society have challenged teachers and higher education institutions (HEIs) to develop and assess students' transferable skills. Competencies such as teamwork, communication, leadership, and problem solving are essential not only for engineers but also for managers in many fields. The assessment of transferable skills is a complex process; not yet properly investigated. As so, it lacks the development of adequate instruments for its application in research and on real practice in HEIs. The objective of this article is to present the development process and initial tests of the Questionnaires for the Assessment of Engineering Students’ Skills Competencies of Engineering Students (QuACT, in Portuguese) in the scales of self-assessment, peer and teacher assessment. The research method considered the procedures for constructing psychological instruments as a reference. The study was applied to a class of an Engineering program in a private HEI in Brazil, and involved a group of seven experts in the field. Preliminary results indicate that the proposed system has proved adequate for broadening the perception of soft skills, with the inclusion of students as assessment agents. Students were able to self-assess and assess their peers in transferable skills not assessed by the teacher. There were no significant differences between the medians of self and peer assessments’ results. Further research envisages the expansion of studies to ensure the psychometric quality of the instruments and their use for other courses and HEIs.
id UNITAU-2_985c371cea09694b161ecf8bd821d664
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs2.lajbm.com.br:article/706
network_acronym_str UNITAU-2
network_name_str Latin American Journal of Business Management
repository_id_str
spelling AUTOAVALIAÇÃO, AVALIAÇÃO POR PARES E POR PROFESSORES DE COMPETÊNCIAS TRANSVERSAIS DE ESTUDANTES DE ENGENHARIA: ESTUDO PILOTORecent changes in the expected leaning outcomes of engineering graduates as an answer to evolution in society have challenged teachers and higher education institutions (HEIs) to develop and assess students' transferable skills. Competencies such as teamwork, communication, leadership, and problem solving are essential not only for engineers but also for managers in many fields. The assessment of transferable skills is a complex process; not yet properly investigated. As so, it lacks the development of adequate instruments for its application in research and on real practice in HEIs. The objective of this article is to present the development process and initial tests of the Questionnaires for the Assessment of Engineering Students’ Skills Competencies of Engineering Students (QuACT, in Portuguese) in the scales of self-assessment, peer and teacher assessment. The research method considered the procedures for constructing psychological instruments as a reference. The study was applied to a class of an Engineering program in a private HEI in Brazil, and involved a group of seven experts in the field. Preliminary results indicate that the proposed system has proved adequate for broadening the perception of soft skills, with the inclusion of students as assessment agents. Students were able to self-assess and assess their peers in transferable skills not assessed by the teacher. There were no significant differences between the medians of self and peer assessments’ results. Further research envisages the expansion of studies to ensure the psychometric quality of the instruments and their use for other courses and HEIs.Mudanças recentes no perfil do egresso de cursos de engenharia em consequência das transformações da sociedade trazem aos professores e às instituições de ensino superior (IES) o desafio de desenvolver e avaliar as competências transversais dos estudantes. Competências como trabalho em equipe, comunicação, liderança e resolução de problemas são essenciais não só para a atuação de engenheiros como também para gestores em diversas áreas. A avaliação destas competências é um processo complexo, pouco estudado por pesquisadores, carecendo do desenvolvimento de instrumentos adequados para sua aplicação na pesquisa e na prática das IES. O objetivo deste artigo é apresentar o processo de desenvolvimento e testes iniciais dos Questionários de Avaliação de Competências Transversais de Estudantes de Engenharia (QuACT) nas escalas de autoavaliação, avaliação por pares e por professores. O método de pesquisa considerou como referência os procedimentos para construção de instrumentos psicológicos. O estudo foi aplicado a uma turma de um curso de Engenharia em uma IES privada no Brasil, envolvendo também um grupo de sete especialistas no campo. Os resultados preliminares indicam que o sistema proposto se mostrou adequado para ampliar a percepção das competências transversais, com a inclusão dos estudantes como agentes avaliadores. Os estudantes conseguiram se autoavaliar e avaliar os pares em competências transversais não avaliadas pelo professor. Não se percebeu diferenças significativas entre as medianas das autoavaliações e das avaliações pelos pares. A evolução das pesquisas prevê a ampliação dos estudos para garantia da qualidade psicométrica dos instrumentos e sua utilização para outros cursos e IES.edUNITAU2022-12-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado por paresapplication/pdfhttps://www.lajbm.com.br/index.php/journal/article/view/706Latin American Journal of Business Management; Vol. 13 No. 2 (2022)Latin American Journal of Business Management; Vol. 13 Núm. 2 (2022)Latin American Journal of Business Management; v. 13 n. 2 (2022)2178-4833reponame:Latin American Journal of Business Managementinstname:Universidade de Taubaté (UNITAU)instacron:UNITAUporhttps://www.lajbm.com.br/index.php/journal/article/view/706/343Copyright (c) 2022 Latin American Journal of Business Managementinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGesteira de Almeida Ferraz, Tatianade Sousa Pereira-Guizzo, Camila 2023-07-11T18:27:28Zoai:ojs2.lajbm.com.br:article/706Revistahttps://www.lajbm.com.br/index.php/journal/indexPUBhttp://www.lajbm.net/index.php/journal/oaimarcela.moraes@unitau.com.br||editor@lajbm.net2178-48332178-4833opendoar:2023-07-11T18:27:28Latin American Journal of Business Management - Universidade de Taubaté (UNITAU)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv AUTOAVALIAÇÃO, AVALIAÇÃO POR PARES E POR PROFESSORES DE COMPETÊNCIAS TRANSVERSAIS DE ESTUDANTES DE ENGENHARIA: ESTUDO PILOTO
title AUTOAVALIAÇÃO, AVALIAÇÃO POR PARES E POR PROFESSORES DE COMPETÊNCIAS TRANSVERSAIS DE ESTUDANTES DE ENGENHARIA: ESTUDO PILOTO
spellingShingle AUTOAVALIAÇÃO, AVALIAÇÃO POR PARES E POR PROFESSORES DE COMPETÊNCIAS TRANSVERSAIS DE ESTUDANTES DE ENGENHARIA: ESTUDO PILOTO
Gesteira de Almeida Ferraz, Tatiana
title_short AUTOAVALIAÇÃO, AVALIAÇÃO POR PARES E POR PROFESSORES DE COMPETÊNCIAS TRANSVERSAIS DE ESTUDANTES DE ENGENHARIA: ESTUDO PILOTO
title_full AUTOAVALIAÇÃO, AVALIAÇÃO POR PARES E POR PROFESSORES DE COMPETÊNCIAS TRANSVERSAIS DE ESTUDANTES DE ENGENHARIA: ESTUDO PILOTO
title_fullStr AUTOAVALIAÇÃO, AVALIAÇÃO POR PARES E POR PROFESSORES DE COMPETÊNCIAS TRANSVERSAIS DE ESTUDANTES DE ENGENHARIA: ESTUDO PILOTO
title_full_unstemmed AUTOAVALIAÇÃO, AVALIAÇÃO POR PARES E POR PROFESSORES DE COMPETÊNCIAS TRANSVERSAIS DE ESTUDANTES DE ENGENHARIA: ESTUDO PILOTO
title_sort AUTOAVALIAÇÃO, AVALIAÇÃO POR PARES E POR PROFESSORES DE COMPETÊNCIAS TRANSVERSAIS DE ESTUDANTES DE ENGENHARIA: ESTUDO PILOTO
author Gesteira de Almeida Ferraz, Tatiana
author_facet Gesteira de Almeida Ferraz, Tatiana
de Sousa Pereira-Guizzo, Camila
author_role author
author2 de Sousa Pereira-Guizzo, Camila
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Gesteira de Almeida Ferraz, Tatiana
de Sousa Pereira-Guizzo, Camila
description Recent changes in the expected leaning outcomes of engineering graduates as an answer to evolution in society have challenged teachers and higher education institutions (HEIs) to develop and assess students' transferable skills. Competencies such as teamwork, communication, leadership, and problem solving are essential not only for engineers but also for managers in many fields. The assessment of transferable skills is a complex process; not yet properly investigated. As so, it lacks the development of adequate instruments for its application in research and on real practice in HEIs. The objective of this article is to present the development process and initial tests of the Questionnaires for the Assessment of Engineering Students’ Skills Competencies of Engineering Students (QuACT, in Portuguese) in the scales of self-assessment, peer and teacher assessment. The research method considered the procedures for constructing psychological instruments as a reference. The study was applied to a class of an Engineering program in a private HEI in Brazil, and involved a group of seven experts in the field. Preliminary results indicate that the proposed system has proved adequate for broadening the perception of soft skills, with the inclusion of students as assessment agents. Students were able to self-assess and assess their peers in transferable skills not assessed by the teacher. There were no significant differences between the medians of self and peer assessments’ results. Further research envisages the expansion of studies to ensure the psychometric quality of the instruments and their use for other courses and HEIs.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-12-30
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Avaliado por pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.lajbm.com.br/index.php/journal/article/view/706
url https://www.lajbm.com.br/index.php/journal/article/view/706
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.lajbm.com.br/index.php/journal/article/view/706/343
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Latin American Journal of Business Management
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Latin American Journal of Business Management
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv edUNITAU
publisher.none.fl_str_mv edUNITAU
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Latin American Journal of Business Management; Vol. 13 No. 2 (2022)
Latin American Journal of Business Management; Vol. 13 Núm. 2 (2022)
Latin American Journal of Business Management; v. 13 n. 2 (2022)
2178-4833
reponame:Latin American Journal of Business Management
instname:Universidade de Taubaté (UNITAU)
instacron:UNITAU
instname_str Universidade de Taubaté (UNITAU)
instacron_str UNITAU
institution UNITAU
reponame_str Latin American Journal of Business Management
collection Latin American Journal of Business Management
repository.name.fl_str_mv Latin American Journal of Business Management - Universidade de Taubaté (UNITAU)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv marcela.moraes@unitau.com.br||editor@lajbm.net
_version_ 1809281664640090112