A RAZÃO COLONIAL EM INSTRUMENTOS DE POLÍTICA AMBIENTAL: USINAS HIDRELÉTRICAS NA AMAZÔNIA BRASILEIRA
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista brasileira de gestão e desenvolvimento regional |
Texto Completo: | https://www.rbgdr.net/revista/index.php/rbgdr/article/view/7287 |
Resumo: | For decades, the Amazon has embodied a multitude of expropriated territories, which have undergone a historical process of spoliation in favor of a discourse centered on progress and development associated with the establishment of hydroelectric power plants. In this article, we analyze the dynamics of employing environmental policy tools within the context of the harm and disasters engendered by the construction of hydroelectric dams in the Brazilian Amazon. Our methodological approach commenced with documentary research encompassing economic feasibility studies, impact reports, basic environmental plans, and inspection reports issued by ANEEL (the National Electric Energy Agency). As our bibliographical analysis deepened, guided by a decolonial perspective, the primary aim of this article was to dissect the colonial rationality that normalized the suffering and social disasters caused by hydroelectric enterprises in the Brazilian Amazon. This rationale is the same that, through the invention of the development category, legitimizes the utilization of natural resources and territories by large capitalist enterprises, even at the expense of secular communities. In the Brazilian Amazon context, environmental policy tools, predominantly mitigation and compensation measures, are employed as tactics to endorse the licensing of hydroelectric power plants. Each instance of harm inflicted upon the territory is linked to the licensing process, which outlines ways to mitigate the disaster, as if aspects of life, culture, and food sovereignty could be quantified in the name of market logic. |
id |
UNITAU-3_ada2bfb65903259a52f279bf4a03729a |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs2.rbgdr.net:article/7287 |
network_acronym_str |
UNITAU-3 |
network_name_str |
Revista brasileira de gestão e desenvolvimento regional |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
A RAZÃO COLONIAL EM INSTRUMENTOS DE POLÍTICA AMBIENTAL: USINAS HIDRELÉTRICAS NA AMAZÔNIA BRASILEIRA For decades, the Amazon has embodied a multitude of expropriated territories, which have undergone a historical process of spoliation in favor of a discourse centered on progress and development associated with the establishment of hydroelectric power plants. In this article, we analyze the dynamics of employing environmental policy tools within the context of the harm and disasters engendered by the construction of hydroelectric dams in the Brazilian Amazon. Our methodological approach commenced with documentary research encompassing economic feasibility studies, impact reports, basic environmental plans, and inspection reports issued by ANEEL (the National Electric Energy Agency). As our bibliographical analysis deepened, guided by a decolonial perspective, the primary aim of this article was to dissect the colonial rationality that normalized the suffering and social disasters caused by hydroelectric enterprises in the Brazilian Amazon. This rationale is the same that, through the invention of the development category, legitimizes the utilization of natural resources and territories by large capitalist enterprises, even at the expense of secular communities. In the Brazilian Amazon context, environmental policy tools, predominantly mitigation and compensation measures, are employed as tactics to endorse the licensing of hydroelectric power plants. Each instance of harm inflicted upon the territory is linked to the licensing process, which outlines ways to mitigate the disaster, as if aspects of life, culture, and food sovereignty could be quantified in the name of market logic.A Amazônia, há décadas, representa uma diversidade de territórios expropriados, que passaram por um processo histórico de espoliação em favor de um discurso sobre o progresso e o desenvolvimento que as usinas hidrelétricas poderiam implantar. No artigo, analisamos a dinâmica da utilização de instrumentos de política ambiental no contexto de danos e desastres provocados por usinas hidrelétricas na Amazônia brasileira. Os procedimentos metodológicos iniciaram com uma pesquisa documental em Estudos de viabilidade econômica, Estudos e relatórios de impacto ambiental, Plano Básico Ambiental e relatórios de fiscalização da ANEEL. Com o aprofundamento da análise bibliográfica, a partir de uma orientação decolonial, o objetivo deste artigo é analisar a racionalidade colonial que naturalizou o sofrimento social e os desastres provocados por empreendimentos hidrelétricos na Amazônia brasileira. Essa racionalidade é a mesma que, por intermédio da invenção da categoria desenvolvimento, legitima o uso das riquezas naturais e dos territórios pelos grandes empreendimentos capitalistas, mesmo diante da marginalização de comunidades seculares. Nessa conjuntura, na Amazônia brasileira, há instrumentos de política ambiental, principalmente mitigação e compensação, utilizados como objeto de manobra para referendar o licenciamento das usinas. A cada dano provocado no território, há práticas nos processos de licenciamentos que especificam as maneiras pelas quais os desastres poderiam ser minimizados, como se o modo de vida, a cultura, a soberania alimentar pudessem ser quantificados em nome da lógica de mercado.Universidade de Taubaté2023-10-10info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://www.rbgdr.net/revista/index.php/rbgdr/article/view/728710.54399/rbgdr.v19i3.7287Revista Brasileira de Gestão e Desenvolvimento Regional; Vol. 19 No. 3 (2023)RBGDR; Vol. 19 Núm. 3 (2023)Revista Brasileira de Gestão e Desenvolvimento Regional; v. 19 n. 3 (2023)1809-239X10.54399/rbgdr.v19i3reponame:Revista brasileira de gestão e desenvolvimento regionalinstname:Universidade de Taubaté (UNITAU)instacron:UNITAUporenghttps://www.rbgdr.net/revista/index.php/rbgdr/article/view/7287/1345https://www.rbgdr.net/revista/index.php/rbgdr/article/view/7287/1346Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Brasileira de Gestão e Desenvolvimento Regionalhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLobato, Marília Gabriela SilvaCastro, Edna Maria Ramos de2024-02-02T13:46:19Zoai:ojs2.rbgdr.net:article/7287Revistahttps://www.rbgdr.net/revista/index.php/rbgdrPUBhttps://www.rbgdr.net/revista/index.php/rbgdr/oai||monicafcarniello@gmail.com1809-239X1809-239Xopendoar:2024-02-02T13:46:19Revista brasileira de gestão e desenvolvimento regional - Universidade de Taubaté (UNITAU)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
A RAZÃO COLONIAL EM INSTRUMENTOS DE POLÍTICA AMBIENTAL: USINAS HIDRELÉTRICAS NA AMAZÔNIA BRASILEIRA |
title |
A RAZÃO COLONIAL EM INSTRUMENTOS DE POLÍTICA AMBIENTAL: USINAS HIDRELÉTRICAS NA AMAZÔNIA BRASILEIRA |
spellingShingle |
A RAZÃO COLONIAL EM INSTRUMENTOS DE POLÍTICA AMBIENTAL: USINAS HIDRELÉTRICAS NA AMAZÔNIA BRASILEIRA Lobato, Marília Gabriela Silva |
title_short |
A RAZÃO COLONIAL EM INSTRUMENTOS DE POLÍTICA AMBIENTAL: USINAS HIDRELÉTRICAS NA AMAZÔNIA BRASILEIRA |
title_full |
A RAZÃO COLONIAL EM INSTRUMENTOS DE POLÍTICA AMBIENTAL: USINAS HIDRELÉTRICAS NA AMAZÔNIA BRASILEIRA |
title_fullStr |
A RAZÃO COLONIAL EM INSTRUMENTOS DE POLÍTICA AMBIENTAL: USINAS HIDRELÉTRICAS NA AMAZÔNIA BRASILEIRA |
title_full_unstemmed |
A RAZÃO COLONIAL EM INSTRUMENTOS DE POLÍTICA AMBIENTAL: USINAS HIDRELÉTRICAS NA AMAZÔNIA BRASILEIRA |
title_sort |
A RAZÃO COLONIAL EM INSTRUMENTOS DE POLÍTICA AMBIENTAL: USINAS HIDRELÉTRICAS NA AMAZÔNIA BRASILEIRA |
author |
Lobato, Marília Gabriela Silva |
author_facet |
Lobato, Marília Gabriela Silva Castro, Edna Maria Ramos de |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Castro, Edna Maria Ramos de |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Lobato, Marília Gabriela Silva Castro, Edna Maria Ramos de |
description |
For decades, the Amazon has embodied a multitude of expropriated territories, which have undergone a historical process of spoliation in favor of a discourse centered on progress and development associated with the establishment of hydroelectric power plants. In this article, we analyze the dynamics of employing environmental policy tools within the context of the harm and disasters engendered by the construction of hydroelectric dams in the Brazilian Amazon. Our methodological approach commenced with documentary research encompassing economic feasibility studies, impact reports, basic environmental plans, and inspection reports issued by ANEEL (the National Electric Energy Agency). As our bibliographical analysis deepened, guided by a decolonial perspective, the primary aim of this article was to dissect the colonial rationality that normalized the suffering and social disasters caused by hydroelectric enterprises in the Brazilian Amazon. This rationale is the same that, through the invention of the development category, legitimizes the utilization of natural resources and territories by large capitalist enterprises, even at the expense of secular communities. In the Brazilian Amazon context, environmental policy tools, predominantly mitigation and compensation measures, are employed as tactics to endorse the licensing of hydroelectric power plants. Each instance of harm inflicted upon the territory is linked to the licensing process, which outlines ways to mitigate the disaster, as if aspects of life, culture, and food sovereignty could be quantified in the name of market logic. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-10-10 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.rbgdr.net/revista/index.php/rbgdr/article/view/7287 10.54399/rbgdr.v19i3.7287 |
url |
https://www.rbgdr.net/revista/index.php/rbgdr/article/view/7287 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.54399/rbgdr.v19i3.7287 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por eng |
language |
por eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.rbgdr.net/revista/index.php/rbgdr/article/view/7287/1345 https://www.rbgdr.net/revista/index.php/rbgdr/article/view/7287/1346 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Brasileira de Gestão e Desenvolvimento Regional https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Brasileira de Gestão e Desenvolvimento Regional https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de Taubaté |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de Taubaté |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Gestão e Desenvolvimento Regional; Vol. 19 No. 3 (2023) RBGDR; Vol. 19 Núm. 3 (2023) Revista Brasileira de Gestão e Desenvolvimento Regional; v. 19 n. 3 (2023) 1809-239X 10.54399/rbgdr.v19i3 reponame:Revista brasileira de gestão e desenvolvimento regional instname:Universidade de Taubaté (UNITAU) instacron:UNITAU |
instname_str |
Universidade de Taubaté (UNITAU) |
instacron_str |
UNITAU |
institution |
UNITAU |
reponame_str |
Revista brasileira de gestão e desenvolvimento regional |
collection |
Revista brasileira de gestão e desenvolvimento regional |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista brasileira de gestão e desenvolvimento regional - Universidade de Taubaté (UNITAU) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||monicafcarniello@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1800220466429820928 |