A RAZÃO COLONIAL EM INSTRUMENTOS DE POLÍTICA AMBIENTAL: USINAS HIDRELÉTRICAS NA AMAZÔNIA BRASILEIRA

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Lobato, Marília Gabriela Silva
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Castro, Edna Maria Ramos de
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
eng
Título da fonte: Revista brasileira de gestão e desenvolvimento regional
Texto Completo: https://www.rbgdr.net/revista/index.php/rbgdr/article/view/7287
Resumo: For decades, the Amazon has embodied a multitude of expropriated territories, which have undergone a historical process of spoliation in favor of a discourse centered on progress and development associated with the establishment of hydroelectric power plants. In this article, we analyze the dynamics of employing environmental policy tools within the context of the harm and disasters engendered by the construction of hydroelectric dams in the Brazilian Amazon. Our methodological approach commenced with documentary research encompassing economic feasibility studies, impact reports, basic environmental plans, and inspection reports issued by ANEEL (the National Electric Energy Agency). As our bibliographical analysis deepened, guided by a decolonial perspective, the primary aim of this article was to dissect the colonial rationality that normalized the suffering and social disasters caused by hydroelectric enterprises in the Brazilian Amazon. This rationale is the same that, through the invention of the development category, legitimizes the utilization of natural resources and territories by large capitalist enterprises, even at the expense of secular communities. In the Brazilian Amazon context, environmental policy tools, predominantly mitigation and compensation measures, are employed as tactics to endorse the licensing of hydroelectric power plants. Each instance of harm inflicted upon the territory is linked to the licensing process, which outlines ways to mitigate the disaster, as if aspects of life, culture, and food sovereignty could be quantified in the name of market logic.
id UNITAU-3_ada2bfb65903259a52f279bf4a03729a
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs2.rbgdr.net:article/7287
network_acronym_str UNITAU-3
network_name_str Revista brasileira de gestão e desenvolvimento regional
repository_id_str
spelling A RAZÃO COLONIAL EM INSTRUMENTOS DE POLÍTICA AMBIENTAL: USINAS HIDRELÉTRICAS NA AMAZÔNIA BRASILEIRA For decades, the Amazon has embodied a multitude of expropriated territories, which have undergone a historical process of spoliation in favor of a discourse centered on progress and development associated with the establishment of hydroelectric power plants. In this article, we analyze the dynamics of employing environmental policy tools within the context of the harm and disasters engendered by the construction of hydroelectric dams in the Brazilian Amazon. Our methodological approach commenced with documentary research encompassing economic feasibility studies, impact reports, basic environmental plans, and inspection reports issued by ANEEL (the National Electric Energy Agency). As our bibliographical analysis deepened, guided by a decolonial perspective, the primary aim of this article was to dissect the colonial rationality that normalized the suffering and social disasters caused by hydroelectric enterprises in the Brazilian Amazon. This rationale is the same that, through the invention of the development category, legitimizes the utilization of natural resources and territories by large capitalist enterprises, even at the expense of secular communities. In the Brazilian Amazon context, environmental policy tools, predominantly mitigation and compensation measures, are employed as tactics to endorse the licensing of hydroelectric power plants. Each instance of harm inflicted upon the territory is linked to the licensing process, which outlines ways to mitigate the disaster, as if aspects of life, culture, and food sovereignty could be quantified in the name of market logic.A Amazônia, há décadas, representa uma diversidade de territórios expropriados, que passaram por um processo histórico de espoliação em favor de um discurso sobre o progresso e o desenvolvimento que as usinas hidrelétricas poderiam implantar. No artigo, analisamos a dinâmica da utilização de instrumentos de política ambiental no contexto de danos e desastres provocados por usinas hidrelétricas na Amazônia brasileira. Os procedimentos metodológicos iniciaram com uma pesquisa documental em Estudos de viabilidade econômica, Estudos e relatórios de impacto ambiental, Plano Básico Ambiental e relatórios de fiscalização da ANEEL. Com o aprofundamento da análise bibliográfica, a partir de uma orientação decolonial, o objetivo deste artigo é analisar a racionalidade colonial que naturalizou o sofrimento social e os desastres provocados por empreendimentos hidrelétricos na Amazônia brasileira. Essa racionalidade é a mesma que, por intermédio da invenção da categoria desenvolvimento, legitima o uso das riquezas naturais e dos territórios pelos grandes empreendimentos capitalistas, mesmo diante da marginalização de comunidades seculares. Nessa conjuntura, na Amazônia brasileira, há instrumentos de política ambiental, principalmente mitigação e compensação, utilizados como objeto de manobra para referendar o licenciamento das usinas. A cada dano provocado no território, há práticas nos processos de licenciamentos que especificam as maneiras pelas quais os desastres poderiam ser minimizados, como se o modo de vida, a cultura, a soberania alimentar pudessem ser quantificados em nome da lógica de mercado.Universidade de Taubaté2023-10-10info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://www.rbgdr.net/revista/index.php/rbgdr/article/view/728710.54399/rbgdr.v19i3.7287Revista Brasileira de Gestão e Desenvolvimento Regional; Vol. 19 No. 3 (2023)RBGDR; Vol. 19 Núm. 3 (2023)Revista Brasileira de Gestão e Desenvolvimento Regional; v. 19 n. 3 (2023)1809-239X10.54399/rbgdr.v19i3reponame:Revista brasileira de gestão e desenvolvimento regionalinstname:Universidade de Taubaté (UNITAU)instacron:UNITAUporenghttps://www.rbgdr.net/revista/index.php/rbgdr/article/view/7287/1345https://www.rbgdr.net/revista/index.php/rbgdr/article/view/7287/1346Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Brasileira de Gestão e Desenvolvimento Regionalhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLobato, Marília Gabriela SilvaCastro, Edna Maria Ramos de2024-02-02T13:46:19Zoai:ojs2.rbgdr.net:article/7287Revistahttps://www.rbgdr.net/revista/index.php/rbgdrPUBhttps://www.rbgdr.net/revista/index.php/rbgdr/oai||monicafcarniello@gmail.com1809-239X1809-239Xopendoar:2024-02-02T13:46:19Revista brasileira de gestão e desenvolvimento regional - Universidade de Taubaté (UNITAU)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv A RAZÃO COLONIAL EM INSTRUMENTOS DE POLÍTICA AMBIENTAL: USINAS HIDRELÉTRICAS NA AMAZÔNIA BRASILEIRA
title A RAZÃO COLONIAL EM INSTRUMENTOS DE POLÍTICA AMBIENTAL: USINAS HIDRELÉTRICAS NA AMAZÔNIA BRASILEIRA
spellingShingle A RAZÃO COLONIAL EM INSTRUMENTOS DE POLÍTICA AMBIENTAL: USINAS HIDRELÉTRICAS NA AMAZÔNIA BRASILEIRA
Lobato, Marília Gabriela Silva
title_short A RAZÃO COLONIAL EM INSTRUMENTOS DE POLÍTICA AMBIENTAL: USINAS HIDRELÉTRICAS NA AMAZÔNIA BRASILEIRA
title_full A RAZÃO COLONIAL EM INSTRUMENTOS DE POLÍTICA AMBIENTAL: USINAS HIDRELÉTRICAS NA AMAZÔNIA BRASILEIRA
title_fullStr A RAZÃO COLONIAL EM INSTRUMENTOS DE POLÍTICA AMBIENTAL: USINAS HIDRELÉTRICAS NA AMAZÔNIA BRASILEIRA
title_full_unstemmed A RAZÃO COLONIAL EM INSTRUMENTOS DE POLÍTICA AMBIENTAL: USINAS HIDRELÉTRICAS NA AMAZÔNIA BRASILEIRA
title_sort A RAZÃO COLONIAL EM INSTRUMENTOS DE POLÍTICA AMBIENTAL: USINAS HIDRELÉTRICAS NA AMAZÔNIA BRASILEIRA
author Lobato, Marília Gabriela Silva
author_facet Lobato, Marília Gabriela Silva
Castro, Edna Maria Ramos de
author_role author
author2 Castro, Edna Maria Ramos de
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Lobato, Marília Gabriela Silva
Castro, Edna Maria Ramos de
description For decades, the Amazon has embodied a multitude of expropriated territories, which have undergone a historical process of spoliation in favor of a discourse centered on progress and development associated with the establishment of hydroelectric power plants. In this article, we analyze the dynamics of employing environmental policy tools within the context of the harm and disasters engendered by the construction of hydroelectric dams in the Brazilian Amazon. Our methodological approach commenced with documentary research encompassing economic feasibility studies, impact reports, basic environmental plans, and inspection reports issued by ANEEL (the National Electric Energy Agency). As our bibliographical analysis deepened, guided by a decolonial perspective, the primary aim of this article was to dissect the colonial rationality that normalized the suffering and social disasters caused by hydroelectric enterprises in the Brazilian Amazon. This rationale is the same that, through the invention of the development category, legitimizes the utilization of natural resources and territories by large capitalist enterprises, even at the expense of secular communities. In the Brazilian Amazon context, environmental policy tools, predominantly mitigation and compensation measures, are employed as tactics to endorse the licensing of hydroelectric power plants. Each instance of harm inflicted upon the territory is linked to the licensing process, which outlines ways to mitigate the disaster, as if aspects of life, culture, and food sovereignty could be quantified in the name of market logic.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-10-10
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.rbgdr.net/revista/index.php/rbgdr/article/view/7287
10.54399/rbgdr.v19i3.7287
url https://www.rbgdr.net/revista/index.php/rbgdr/article/view/7287
identifier_str_mv 10.54399/rbgdr.v19i3.7287
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
eng
language por
eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.rbgdr.net/revista/index.php/rbgdr/article/view/7287/1345
https://www.rbgdr.net/revista/index.php/rbgdr/article/view/7287/1346
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Brasileira de Gestão e Desenvolvimento Regional
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Brasileira de Gestão e Desenvolvimento Regional
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de Taubaté
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de Taubaté
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Gestão e Desenvolvimento Regional; Vol. 19 No. 3 (2023)
RBGDR; Vol. 19 Núm. 3 (2023)
Revista Brasileira de Gestão e Desenvolvimento Regional; v. 19 n. 3 (2023)
1809-239X
10.54399/rbgdr.v19i3
reponame:Revista brasileira de gestão e desenvolvimento regional
instname:Universidade de Taubaté (UNITAU)
instacron:UNITAU
instname_str Universidade de Taubaté (UNITAU)
instacron_str UNITAU
institution UNITAU
reponame_str Revista brasileira de gestão e desenvolvimento regional
collection Revista brasileira de gestão e desenvolvimento regional
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista brasileira de gestão e desenvolvimento regional - Universidade de Taubaté (UNITAU)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||monicafcarniello@gmail.com
_version_ 1800220466429820928