COSTS OF SOIL PREPARATION AND SUGARCANE PLANTING SYSTEMS: DIFFERENCES BETWEEN INDEPENDENT SUPPLIERS AND SUGAR MILLS
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Estudo & Debate |
Texto Completo: | https://www.univates.br/revistas/index.php/estudoedebate/article/view/3124 |
Resumo: | Brazil is a reference in sugarcane production, especially the state of São Paulo, which is responsible for the largest volume of sugarcane production in the country. However, for sugarcane mills and suppliers to maintain this activity, there is a need to improve productivity per hectare and reduce production costs. Thus, the objective of this work is to analyze the costs of the combinations of soil preparation and planting types between sugarcane mills and suppliers. It is characterized as a quantitative study with a descriptive approach, carried out from primary data (survey of the average costs of research related to soil preparation and sugarcane planting) and secondary (cutting, loading, and transport cost and costs with cultural practices). The sample for this research comprised 31 mills and 42 sugarcane suppliers in the state of São Paulo, whose data were obtained through a survey provided data for the 2019/2020. The analysis was based on verifying the existence of a significant difference between the costs of soil preparation and planting evidenced by means of cumulative frequencies using Monte Carlo (MC) method. The results showed that, considering all possible combinations between tillage and planting systems, the lowest cost per ton was attained by suppliers with conventional tillage (CT) together with mechanized planting (MP) with variable rate for fertilizer application and also by using conventional tillage associated with planting pre-sprouted seedlings with fixed rate. |
id |
UNIVATES-2_064dcb6a9591c4d76b88a81c9118a1a0 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.192.168.0.51:article/3124 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIVATES-2 |
network_name_str |
Revista Estudo & Debate |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
COSTS OF SOIL PREPARATION AND SUGARCANE PLANTING SYSTEMS: DIFFERENCES BETWEEN INDEPENDENT SUPPLIERS AND SUGAR MILLSsugarcane millssugarcane suppliersMonte Carlo methodflat ratevariable rateBrazil is a reference in sugarcane production, especially the state of São Paulo, which is responsible for the largest volume of sugarcane production in the country. However, for sugarcane mills and suppliers to maintain this activity, there is a need to improve productivity per hectare and reduce production costs. Thus, the objective of this work is to analyze the costs of the combinations of soil preparation and planting types between sugarcane mills and suppliers. It is characterized as a quantitative study with a descriptive approach, carried out from primary data (survey of the average costs of research related to soil preparation and sugarcane planting) and secondary (cutting, loading, and transport cost and costs with cultural practices). The sample for this research comprised 31 mills and 42 sugarcane suppliers in the state of São Paulo, whose data were obtained through a survey provided data for the 2019/2020. The analysis was based on verifying the existence of a significant difference between the costs of soil preparation and planting evidenced by means of cumulative frequencies using Monte Carlo (MC) method. The results showed that, considering all possible combinations between tillage and planting systems, the lowest cost per ton was attained by suppliers with conventional tillage (CT) together with mechanized planting (MP) with variable rate for fertilizer application and also by using conventional tillage associated with planting pre-sprouted seedlings with fixed rate.Editora Univates2022-12-21info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://www.univates.br/revistas/index.php/estudoedebate/article/view/312410.22410/issn.1983-036X.v29i4a2022.3124Revista Estudo & Debate; v. 29 n. 4 (2022)1983-036X10.22410/issn.1983-036X.v29i4a2022reponame:Revista Estudo & Debateinstname:Centro Universitário Univates (UNIVATES)instacron:UNIVATESporhttps://www.univates.br/revistas/index.php/estudoedebate/article/view/3124/2017https://www.univates.br/revistas/index.php/estudoedebate/article/view/3124/2255Copyright (c) 2022 Fernando Rodrigues de Amorim, Marco Tulio Ospina Patinohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessde Amorim, Fernando RodriguesPatino, Marco Tulio Ospina2024-04-22T20:50:23Zoai:ojs.192.168.0.51:article/3124Revistahttps://www.univates.br/revistas/index.php/estudoedebate/PRIhttp://www.univates.br/revistas/index.php/estudoedebate/oai||afeil@univates.br1983-036X0104-7132opendoar:2024-04-22T20:50:23Revista Estudo & Debate - Centro Universitário Univates (UNIVATES)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
COSTS OF SOIL PREPARATION AND SUGARCANE PLANTING SYSTEMS: DIFFERENCES BETWEEN INDEPENDENT SUPPLIERS AND SUGAR MILLS |
title |
COSTS OF SOIL PREPARATION AND SUGARCANE PLANTING SYSTEMS: DIFFERENCES BETWEEN INDEPENDENT SUPPLIERS AND SUGAR MILLS |
spellingShingle |
COSTS OF SOIL PREPARATION AND SUGARCANE PLANTING SYSTEMS: DIFFERENCES BETWEEN INDEPENDENT SUPPLIERS AND SUGAR MILLS de Amorim, Fernando Rodrigues sugarcane mills sugarcane suppliers Monte Carlo method flat rate variable rate |
title_short |
COSTS OF SOIL PREPARATION AND SUGARCANE PLANTING SYSTEMS: DIFFERENCES BETWEEN INDEPENDENT SUPPLIERS AND SUGAR MILLS |
title_full |
COSTS OF SOIL PREPARATION AND SUGARCANE PLANTING SYSTEMS: DIFFERENCES BETWEEN INDEPENDENT SUPPLIERS AND SUGAR MILLS |
title_fullStr |
COSTS OF SOIL PREPARATION AND SUGARCANE PLANTING SYSTEMS: DIFFERENCES BETWEEN INDEPENDENT SUPPLIERS AND SUGAR MILLS |
title_full_unstemmed |
COSTS OF SOIL PREPARATION AND SUGARCANE PLANTING SYSTEMS: DIFFERENCES BETWEEN INDEPENDENT SUPPLIERS AND SUGAR MILLS |
title_sort |
COSTS OF SOIL PREPARATION AND SUGARCANE PLANTING SYSTEMS: DIFFERENCES BETWEEN INDEPENDENT SUPPLIERS AND SUGAR MILLS |
author |
de Amorim, Fernando Rodrigues |
author_facet |
de Amorim, Fernando Rodrigues Patino, Marco Tulio Ospina |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Patino, Marco Tulio Ospina |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
de Amorim, Fernando Rodrigues Patino, Marco Tulio Ospina |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
sugarcane mills sugarcane suppliers Monte Carlo method flat rate variable rate |
topic |
sugarcane mills sugarcane suppliers Monte Carlo method flat rate variable rate |
description |
Brazil is a reference in sugarcane production, especially the state of São Paulo, which is responsible for the largest volume of sugarcane production in the country. However, for sugarcane mills and suppliers to maintain this activity, there is a need to improve productivity per hectare and reduce production costs. Thus, the objective of this work is to analyze the costs of the combinations of soil preparation and planting types between sugarcane mills and suppliers. It is characterized as a quantitative study with a descriptive approach, carried out from primary data (survey of the average costs of research related to soil preparation and sugarcane planting) and secondary (cutting, loading, and transport cost and costs with cultural practices). The sample for this research comprised 31 mills and 42 sugarcane suppliers in the state of São Paulo, whose data were obtained through a survey provided data for the 2019/2020. The analysis was based on verifying the existence of a significant difference between the costs of soil preparation and planting evidenced by means of cumulative frequencies using Monte Carlo (MC) method. The results showed that, considering all possible combinations between tillage and planting systems, the lowest cost per ton was attained by suppliers with conventional tillage (CT) together with mechanized planting (MP) with variable rate for fertilizer application and also by using conventional tillage associated with planting pre-sprouted seedlings with fixed rate. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-12-21 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.univates.br/revistas/index.php/estudoedebate/article/view/3124 10.22410/issn.1983-036X.v29i4a2022.3124 |
url |
https://www.univates.br/revistas/index.php/estudoedebate/article/view/3124 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.22410/issn.1983-036X.v29i4a2022.3124 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.univates.br/revistas/index.php/estudoedebate/article/view/3124/2017 https://www.univates.br/revistas/index.php/estudoedebate/article/view/3124/2255 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Fernando Rodrigues de Amorim, Marco Tulio Ospina Patino https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Fernando Rodrigues de Amorim, Marco Tulio Ospina Patino https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora Univates |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora Univates |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Estudo & Debate; v. 29 n. 4 (2022) 1983-036X 10.22410/issn.1983-036X.v29i4a2022 reponame:Revista Estudo & Debate instname:Centro Universitário Univates (UNIVATES) instacron:UNIVATES |
instname_str |
Centro Universitário Univates (UNIVATES) |
instacron_str |
UNIVATES |
institution |
UNIVATES |
reponame_str |
Revista Estudo & Debate |
collection |
Revista Estudo & Debate |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Estudo & Debate - Centro Universitário Univates (UNIVATES) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||afeil@univates.br |
_version_ |
1809730684492709888 |