COSTS OF SOIL PREPARATION AND SUGARCANE PLANTING SYSTEMS: DIFFERENCES BETWEEN INDEPENDENT SUPPLIERS AND SUGAR MILLS

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: de Amorim, Fernando Rodrigues
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Patino, Marco Tulio Ospina
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Estudo & Debate
Texto Completo: https://www.univates.br/revistas/index.php/estudoedebate/article/view/3124
Resumo: Brazil is a reference in sugarcane production, especially the state of São Paulo, which is responsible for the largest volume of sugarcane production in the country. However, for sugarcane mills and suppliers to maintain this activity, there is a need to improve productivity per hectare and reduce production costs. Thus, the objective of this work is to analyze the costs of the combinations of soil preparation and planting types between sugarcane mills and suppliers. It is characterized as a quantitative study with a descriptive approach, carried out from primary data (survey of the average costs of research related to soil preparation and sugarcane planting) and secondary (cutting, loading, and transport cost and costs with cultural practices). The sample for this research comprised 31 mills and 42 sugarcane suppliers in the state of São Paulo, whose data were obtained through a survey provided data for the 2019/2020. The analysis was based on verifying the existence of a significant difference between the costs of soil preparation and planting evidenced by means of cumulative frequencies using Monte Carlo (MC) method. The results showed that, considering all possible combinations between tillage and planting systems, the lowest cost per ton was attained by suppliers with conventional tillage (CT) together with mechanized planting (MP) with variable rate for fertilizer application and also by using conventional tillage associated with planting pre-sprouted seedlings with fixed rate.
id UNIVATES-2_064dcb6a9591c4d76b88a81c9118a1a0
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.192.168.0.51:article/3124
network_acronym_str UNIVATES-2
network_name_str Revista Estudo & Debate
repository_id_str
spelling COSTS OF SOIL PREPARATION AND SUGARCANE PLANTING SYSTEMS: DIFFERENCES BETWEEN INDEPENDENT SUPPLIERS AND SUGAR MILLSsugarcane millssugarcane suppliersMonte Carlo methodflat ratevariable rateBrazil is a reference in sugarcane production, especially the state of São Paulo, which is responsible for the largest volume of sugarcane production in the country. However, for sugarcane mills and suppliers to maintain this activity, there is a need to improve productivity per hectare and reduce production costs. Thus, the objective of this work is to analyze the costs of the combinations of soil preparation and planting types between sugarcane mills and suppliers. It is characterized as a quantitative study with a descriptive approach, carried out from primary data (survey of the average costs of research related to soil preparation and sugarcane planting) and secondary (cutting, loading, and transport cost and costs with cultural practices). The sample for this research comprised 31 mills and 42 sugarcane suppliers in the state of São Paulo, whose data were obtained through a survey provided data for the 2019/2020. The analysis was based on verifying the existence of a significant difference between the costs of soil preparation and planting evidenced by means of cumulative frequencies using Monte Carlo (MC) method. The results showed that, considering all possible combinations between tillage and planting systems, the lowest cost per ton was attained by suppliers with conventional tillage (CT) together with mechanized planting (MP) with variable rate for fertilizer application and also by using conventional tillage associated with planting pre-sprouted seedlings with fixed rate.Editora Univates2022-12-21info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://www.univates.br/revistas/index.php/estudoedebate/article/view/312410.22410/issn.1983-036X.v29i4a2022.3124Revista Estudo & Debate; v. 29 n. 4 (2022)1983-036X10.22410/issn.1983-036X.v29i4a2022reponame:Revista Estudo & Debateinstname:Centro Universitário Univates (UNIVATES)instacron:UNIVATESporhttps://www.univates.br/revistas/index.php/estudoedebate/article/view/3124/2017https://www.univates.br/revistas/index.php/estudoedebate/article/view/3124/2255Copyright (c) 2022 Fernando Rodrigues de Amorim, Marco Tulio Ospina Patinohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessde Amorim, Fernando RodriguesPatino, Marco Tulio Ospina2024-04-22T20:50:23Zoai:ojs.192.168.0.51:article/3124Revistahttps://www.univates.br/revistas/index.php/estudoedebate/PRIhttp://www.univates.br/revistas/index.php/estudoedebate/oai||afeil@univates.br1983-036X0104-7132opendoar:2024-04-22T20:50:23Revista Estudo & Debate - Centro Universitário Univates (UNIVATES)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv COSTS OF SOIL PREPARATION AND SUGARCANE PLANTING SYSTEMS: DIFFERENCES BETWEEN INDEPENDENT SUPPLIERS AND SUGAR MILLS
title COSTS OF SOIL PREPARATION AND SUGARCANE PLANTING SYSTEMS: DIFFERENCES BETWEEN INDEPENDENT SUPPLIERS AND SUGAR MILLS
spellingShingle COSTS OF SOIL PREPARATION AND SUGARCANE PLANTING SYSTEMS: DIFFERENCES BETWEEN INDEPENDENT SUPPLIERS AND SUGAR MILLS
de Amorim, Fernando Rodrigues
sugarcane mills
sugarcane suppliers
Monte Carlo method
flat rate
variable rate
title_short COSTS OF SOIL PREPARATION AND SUGARCANE PLANTING SYSTEMS: DIFFERENCES BETWEEN INDEPENDENT SUPPLIERS AND SUGAR MILLS
title_full COSTS OF SOIL PREPARATION AND SUGARCANE PLANTING SYSTEMS: DIFFERENCES BETWEEN INDEPENDENT SUPPLIERS AND SUGAR MILLS
title_fullStr COSTS OF SOIL PREPARATION AND SUGARCANE PLANTING SYSTEMS: DIFFERENCES BETWEEN INDEPENDENT SUPPLIERS AND SUGAR MILLS
title_full_unstemmed COSTS OF SOIL PREPARATION AND SUGARCANE PLANTING SYSTEMS: DIFFERENCES BETWEEN INDEPENDENT SUPPLIERS AND SUGAR MILLS
title_sort COSTS OF SOIL PREPARATION AND SUGARCANE PLANTING SYSTEMS: DIFFERENCES BETWEEN INDEPENDENT SUPPLIERS AND SUGAR MILLS
author de Amorim, Fernando Rodrigues
author_facet de Amorim, Fernando Rodrigues
Patino, Marco Tulio Ospina
author_role author
author2 Patino, Marco Tulio Ospina
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv de Amorim, Fernando Rodrigues
Patino, Marco Tulio Ospina
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv sugarcane mills
sugarcane suppliers
Monte Carlo method
flat rate
variable rate
topic sugarcane mills
sugarcane suppliers
Monte Carlo method
flat rate
variable rate
description Brazil is a reference in sugarcane production, especially the state of São Paulo, which is responsible for the largest volume of sugarcane production in the country. However, for sugarcane mills and suppliers to maintain this activity, there is a need to improve productivity per hectare and reduce production costs. Thus, the objective of this work is to analyze the costs of the combinations of soil preparation and planting types between sugarcane mills and suppliers. It is characterized as a quantitative study with a descriptive approach, carried out from primary data (survey of the average costs of research related to soil preparation and sugarcane planting) and secondary (cutting, loading, and transport cost and costs with cultural practices). The sample for this research comprised 31 mills and 42 sugarcane suppliers in the state of São Paulo, whose data were obtained through a survey provided data for the 2019/2020. The analysis was based on verifying the existence of a significant difference between the costs of soil preparation and planting evidenced by means of cumulative frequencies using Monte Carlo (MC) method. The results showed that, considering all possible combinations between tillage and planting systems, the lowest cost per ton was attained by suppliers with conventional tillage (CT) together with mechanized planting (MP) with variable rate for fertilizer application and also by using conventional tillage associated with planting pre-sprouted seedlings with fixed rate.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-12-21
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.univates.br/revistas/index.php/estudoedebate/article/view/3124
10.22410/issn.1983-036X.v29i4a2022.3124
url https://www.univates.br/revistas/index.php/estudoedebate/article/view/3124
identifier_str_mv 10.22410/issn.1983-036X.v29i4a2022.3124
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.univates.br/revistas/index.php/estudoedebate/article/view/3124/2017
https://www.univates.br/revistas/index.php/estudoedebate/article/view/3124/2255
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Fernando Rodrigues de Amorim, Marco Tulio Ospina Patino
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Fernando Rodrigues de Amorim, Marco Tulio Ospina Patino
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora Univates
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora Univates
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Estudo & Debate; v. 29 n. 4 (2022)
1983-036X
10.22410/issn.1983-036X.v29i4a2022
reponame:Revista Estudo & Debate
instname:Centro Universitário Univates (UNIVATES)
instacron:UNIVATES
instname_str Centro Universitário Univates (UNIVATES)
instacron_str UNIVATES
institution UNIVATES
reponame_str Revista Estudo & Debate
collection Revista Estudo & Debate
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Estudo & Debate - Centro Universitário Univates (UNIVATES)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||afeil@univates.br
_version_ 1809730684492709888