Protection of personality in the digital environment: an analysis in the light of the case of the so-called Right to be Forgotten in Brazil

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Sarlet, Ingo Wolfgang
Data de Publicação: 2018
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Espaço Jurídico/Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.unoesc.edu.br/espacojuridico/article/view/17557
Resumo: Personality rights are particularly vulnerable within the context of the so-called digital age, mostly because of the impact of increasingly sophisticated information technologies. At the same time, the Law has been submitted to probation as a regulatory framework, more and more challenged in its capacity to provide answers with necessary efficacy and speed. One of the most significant concern, also in the Brazilian case, is how to deal with the traditional (but still relevant) clash between fundamental freedom of speech and information in face of personality rights, with outstanding importance to the controversy regarding the recognition of the so-called right to be forgotten. Based on the premise that the right to be forgotten might be justified as an implicit fundamental right in the Brazilian constitutional order, this paper aims, through a critical analysis of the Superior Court’s rulings, to discuss and assess the most significant aspects related to the content and limits of the right to be forgotten on the internet as well as the criteria adopted to apply such right in practical cases.
id UNOESC-1_0ece586e37bdd7a32be2b825fea3dc7b
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.unoesc.edu.br:article/17557
network_acronym_str UNOESC-1
network_name_str Revista Espaço Jurídico/Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law
repository_id_str
spelling Protection of personality in the digital environment: an analysis in the light of the case of the so-called Right to be Forgotten in BrazilProteção da personalidade no ambiente digital: uma análise à luz do caso do assim chamado Direito ao Esquecimento no BrasilPersonality rightsInternetRight to be forgottenBrazilian Superior CourtsDireitos de personalidadeInternetDireito ao esquecimentoTribunais superiores brasileirosPersonality rights are particularly vulnerable within the context of the so-called digital age, mostly because of the impact of increasingly sophisticated information technologies. At the same time, the Law has been submitted to probation as a regulatory framework, more and more challenged in its capacity to provide answers with necessary efficacy and speed. One of the most significant concern, also in the Brazilian case, is how to deal with the traditional (but still relevant) clash between fundamental freedom of speech and information in face of personality rights, with outstanding importance to the controversy regarding the recognition of the so-called right to be forgotten. Based on the premise that the right to be forgotten might be justified as an implicit fundamental right in the Brazilian constitutional order, this paper aims, through a critical analysis of the Superior Court’s rulings, to discuss and assess the most significant aspects related to the content and limits of the right to be forgotten on the internet as well as the criteria adopted to apply such right in practical cases.Tendo em conta que os direitos da personalidade são particularmente vulneráveis no contexto da assim chamada era digital, designadamente em face do impacto das cada vez mais sofisticadas tecnologias de informação, e que a capacidade do Direito, na condição de estrutura normativo-regulatória, de fornecer respostas com a necessária rapidez e um mínimo de eficácia, também está cada vez mais colocada à prova. Um dos problemas que tem sido, também no caso brasileiro, de particular atualidade e relevância, diz respeito ao conflito entre as liberdades de expressão e de informação e os direitos de personalidade, assumindo aqui destaque a controvérsia em torno do reconhecimento do assim chamado direito ao esquecimento. Nessa perspectiva, partindo da premissa de que tal direito encontra fundamento na ordem jurídica brasileira na condição de um direito fundamental implícito, com o presente texto visa-se, mediante uma análise crítica das principais decisões dos Tribunais Superiores brasileiros, discutir e avaliar os aspectos mais relevantes concernentes ao conteúdo e limites do direito ao esquecimento na internet e dos critérios utilizados para a sua aplicação em casos concretos.Universidade do Oeste de Santa Catarina, UNOESC2018-08-16info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado por Paresapplication/pdftext/htmlhttps://periodicos.unoesc.edu.br/espacojuridico/article/view/1755710.18593/ejjl.v19i2.17557Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL]; Bd. 19 Nr. 2 (2018): Espaço Juridico Journal of Law [EJJL]; 491-530Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL]; Vol. 19 No. 2 (2018): Espaço Juridico Journal of Law [EJJL]; 491-530Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL]; Vol. 19 Núm. 2 (2018): Espaço Juridico Journal of Law [EJJL]; 491-530Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL]; Vol. 19 No. 2 (2018): Espaço Juridico Journal of Law [EJJL]; 491-530Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL]; v. 19 n. 2 (2018): Espaço Juridico Journal of Law [EJJL]; 491-5302179-79431519-5899reponame:Revista Espaço Jurídico/Espaço Jurídico Journal of Lawinstname:Universidade do Oeste de Santa Catarina (UNOESC)instacron:UNOESCporhttps://periodicos.unoesc.edu.br/espacojuridico/article/view/17557/pdfhttps://periodicos.unoesc.edu.br/espacojuridico/article/view/17557/14112Copyright (c) 2018 Ingo Wolfgang Sarlet Doutorinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSarlet, Ingo Wolfgang2020-10-16T20:19:09Zoai:ojs.periodicos.unoesc.edu.br:article/17557Revistahttps://portalperiodicos.unoesc.edu.br/espacojuridico/indexhttp://editora.unoesc.edu.br/index.php/espacojuridico/oaieditora@unoesc.edu.br||ejjl@unoesc.edu.br2179-79431519-5899opendoar:2020-10-16T20:19:09Revista Espaço Jurídico/Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law - Universidade do Oeste de Santa Catarina (UNOESC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Protection of personality in the digital environment: an analysis in the light of the case of the so-called Right to be Forgotten in Brazil
Proteção da personalidade no ambiente digital: uma análise à luz do caso do assim chamado Direito ao Esquecimento no Brasil
title Protection of personality in the digital environment: an analysis in the light of the case of the so-called Right to be Forgotten in Brazil
spellingShingle Protection of personality in the digital environment: an analysis in the light of the case of the so-called Right to be Forgotten in Brazil
Sarlet, Ingo Wolfgang
Personality rights
Internet
Right to be forgotten
Brazilian Superior Courts
Direitos de personalidade
Internet
Direito ao esquecimento
Tribunais superiores brasileiros
title_short Protection of personality in the digital environment: an analysis in the light of the case of the so-called Right to be Forgotten in Brazil
title_full Protection of personality in the digital environment: an analysis in the light of the case of the so-called Right to be Forgotten in Brazil
title_fullStr Protection of personality in the digital environment: an analysis in the light of the case of the so-called Right to be Forgotten in Brazil
title_full_unstemmed Protection of personality in the digital environment: an analysis in the light of the case of the so-called Right to be Forgotten in Brazil
title_sort Protection of personality in the digital environment: an analysis in the light of the case of the so-called Right to be Forgotten in Brazil
author Sarlet, Ingo Wolfgang
author_facet Sarlet, Ingo Wolfgang
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Sarlet, Ingo Wolfgang
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Personality rights
Internet
Right to be forgotten
Brazilian Superior Courts
Direitos de personalidade
Internet
Direito ao esquecimento
Tribunais superiores brasileiros
topic Personality rights
Internet
Right to be forgotten
Brazilian Superior Courts
Direitos de personalidade
Internet
Direito ao esquecimento
Tribunais superiores brasileiros
description Personality rights are particularly vulnerable within the context of the so-called digital age, mostly because of the impact of increasingly sophisticated information technologies. At the same time, the Law has been submitted to probation as a regulatory framework, more and more challenged in its capacity to provide answers with necessary efficacy and speed. One of the most significant concern, also in the Brazilian case, is how to deal with the traditional (but still relevant) clash between fundamental freedom of speech and information in face of personality rights, with outstanding importance to the controversy regarding the recognition of the so-called right to be forgotten. Based on the premise that the right to be forgotten might be justified as an implicit fundamental right in the Brazilian constitutional order, this paper aims, through a critical analysis of the Superior Court’s rulings, to discuss and assess the most significant aspects related to the content and limits of the right to be forgotten on the internet as well as the criteria adopted to apply such right in practical cases.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-08-16
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Avaliado por Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.unoesc.edu.br/espacojuridico/article/view/17557
10.18593/ejjl.v19i2.17557
url https://periodicos.unoesc.edu.br/espacojuridico/article/view/17557
identifier_str_mv 10.18593/ejjl.v19i2.17557
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.unoesc.edu.br/espacojuridico/article/view/17557/pdf
https://periodicos.unoesc.edu.br/espacojuridico/article/view/17557/14112
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Ingo Wolfgang Sarlet Doutor
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Ingo Wolfgang Sarlet Doutor
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade do Oeste de Santa Catarina, UNOESC
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade do Oeste de Santa Catarina, UNOESC
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL]; Bd. 19 Nr. 2 (2018): Espaço Juridico Journal of Law [EJJL]; 491-530
Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL]; Vol. 19 No. 2 (2018): Espaço Juridico Journal of Law [EJJL]; 491-530
Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL]; Vol. 19 Núm. 2 (2018): Espaço Juridico Journal of Law [EJJL]; 491-530
Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL]; Vol. 19 No. 2 (2018): Espaço Juridico Journal of Law [EJJL]; 491-530
Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL]; v. 19 n. 2 (2018): Espaço Juridico Journal of Law [EJJL]; 491-530
2179-7943
1519-5899
reponame:Revista Espaço Jurídico/Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law
instname:Universidade do Oeste de Santa Catarina (UNOESC)
instacron:UNOESC
instname_str Universidade do Oeste de Santa Catarina (UNOESC)
instacron_str UNOESC
institution UNOESC
reponame_str Revista Espaço Jurídico/Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law
collection Revista Espaço Jurídico/Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Espaço Jurídico/Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law - Universidade do Oeste de Santa Catarina (UNOESC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv editora@unoesc.edu.br||ejjl@unoesc.edu.br
_version_ 1814256229884624896