The dance of social security numbers Revisiting the 2014 Court of Accounts' Audit: Revisitando a auditoria do TCU de 2017

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Strapazzon, Carlos Luiz
Data de Publicação: 2019
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Espaço Jurídico/Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.unoesc.edu.br/espacojuridico/article/view/12749
Resumo: This paper is a revised, updated and expanded version of another work already published in the EJJL. In this version, the study of the Audit Report carried out by the Brazilian Court of Accounts (TCU) in the Brazilian Social Security accounts (Judgment No. 1295/2017 (TC 001.040 / 2017-0)) is considered. The 10-year accounts, reaching the period from 2007 to 2016. All the so-called "social security regimes" administered by the Federal Government and that integrate the concept of Social Security in Brazil have been audited. The paper offers a descriptive and also critical assessment of the outcomes, which are extremely significant for the discussions on social security reform in Brazil, as well as they qualify the public discussion upon the existence or not of financial imbalances and upon the type of deficits that exist. Distortions, inaccuracies, errors, negligence, inequalities, inconsistencies are also highlighted, after all, enrich the diagnosis of this intriguing issue. Ever since the TCU Report 2017 was published such a debate can not be reduced to a simplistic discussion upon Brazil's fiscal policy, deficit and longevity.
id UNOESC-1_5289d9e021c7cd650bb5e783fee7b7ff
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.unoesc.edu.br:article/12749
network_acronym_str UNOESC-1
network_name_str Revista Espaço Jurídico/Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law
repository_id_str
spelling The dance of social security numbers Revisiting the 2014 Court of Accounts' Audit: Revisitando a auditoria do TCU de 2017A dança dos números da previdência social Revisitando a auditoria do TCU de 2017: Revisitando a auditoria do TCU de 2017Reform of Social InsuranceSocial SecurityPublic AccountsReforma da PrevidênciaSeguridade SocialSegurança SocialSeguro SocialContas PúblicasThis paper is a revised, updated and expanded version of another work already published in the EJJL. In this version, the study of the Audit Report carried out by the Brazilian Court of Accounts (TCU) in the Brazilian Social Security accounts (Judgment No. 1295/2017 (TC 001.040 / 2017-0)) is considered. The 10-year accounts, reaching the period from 2007 to 2016. All the so-called "social security regimes" administered by the Federal Government and that integrate the concept of Social Security in Brazil have been audited. The paper offers a descriptive and also critical assessment of the outcomes, which are extremely significant for the discussions on social security reform in Brazil, as well as they qualify the public discussion upon the existence or not of financial imbalances and upon the type of deficits that exist. Distortions, inaccuracies, errors, negligence, inequalities, inconsistencies are also highlighted, after all, enrich the diagnosis of this intriguing issue. Ever since the TCU Report 2017 was published such a debate can not be reduced to a simplistic discussion upon Brazil's fiscal policy, deficit and longevity.Este trabalho é uma versão revisada, atualizada e ampliada de outro trabalho já publicado na EJJL. Nesta versão, aprofunda-se o estudo do Relatório de Auditoria realizada pelo Tribunal de Contas da União (TCU) nas contas da Seguridade Social do Brasil (Acórdão nº 1295/2017 (TC 001.040/2017-0). A Auditoria tomou em consideração as contas de 10 anos, alcançando o período que vai de 2007 a 2016. Todos os chamados “regimes previdenciários” administrados pela União Federal e que integram o conceito de Seguridade Social no Brasil foram auditados. Este estudo oferece uma análise descritiva e também crítica dos resultados apontados no documento do TCU. Os resultados do trabalho do TCU são extremamente importantes para as discussões da reforma da previdência social no Brasil. Qualificam o debate público sobre a existência, ou não, de desequilíbrios financeiros e sobre o tipo de déficits existentes. Mais que isso, revelam distorções, imprecisões, erros, negligências, desigualdades, inconsistências que, afinal, enriquecem o diagnóstico desse tema intrigante. Depois do Relatório do TCU a reforma da Previdência não pode ser reduzida a uma discussão simplista sobre política fiscal, déficit e longevidade dos brasileiros.Universidade do Oeste de Santa Catarina, UNOESC2019-06-28info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado por Paresapplication/pdftext/htmlhttps://periodicos.unoesc.edu.br/espacojuridico/article/view/1274910.18593/ejjl.12749Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL]; Bd. 20 Nr. 1 (2019): Espaço Juridico Journal of Law [EJJL]; 137-172Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL]; Vol. 20 No. 1 (2019): Espaço Juridico Journal of Law [EJJL]; 137-172Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL]; Vol. 20 Núm. 1 (2019): Espaço Juridico Journal of Law [EJJL]; 137-172Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL]; Vol. 20 No. 1 (2019): Espaço Juridico Journal of Law [EJJL]; 137-172Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL]; v. 20 n. 1 (2019): Espaço Juridico Journal of Law [EJJL]; 137-1722179-79431519-5899reponame:Revista Espaço Jurídico/Espaço Jurídico Journal of Lawinstname:Universidade do Oeste de Santa Catarina (UNOESC)instacron:UNOESCporhttps://periodicos.unoesc.edu.br/espacojuridico/article/view/12749/12495https://periodicos.unoesc.edu.br/espacojuridico/article/view/12749/14091Copyright (c) 2019 Carlos Luiz Strapazzon, Doutor, Professor Unoesc, Brasilinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessStrapazzon, Carlos Luiz2020-10-16T20:19:02Zoai:ojs.periodicos.unoesc.edu.br:article/12749Revistahttps://portalperiodicos.unoesc.edu.br/espacojuridico/indexhttp://editora.unoesc.edu.br/index.php/espacojuridico/oaieditora@unoesc.edu.br||ejjl@unoesc.edu.br2179-79431519-5899opendoar:2020-10-16T20:19:02Revista Espaço Jurídico/Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law - Universidade do Oeste de Santa Catarina (UNOESC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The dance of social security numbers Revisiting the 2014 Court of Accounts' Audit: Revisitando a auditoria do TCU de 2017
A dança dos números da previdência social Revisitando a auditoria do TCU de 2017: Revisitando a auditoria do TCU de 2017
title The dance of social security numbers Revisiting the 2014 Court of Accounts' Audit: Revisitando a auditoria do TCU de 2017
spellingShingle The dance of social security numbers Revisiting the 2014 Court of Accounts' Audit: Revisitando a auditoria do TCU de 2017
Strapazzon, Carlos Luiz
Reform of Social Insurance
Social Security
Public Accounts
Reforma da Previdência
Seguridade Social
Segurança Social
Seguro Social
Contas Públicas
title_short The dance of social security numbers Revisiting the 2014 Court of Accounts' Audit: Revisitando a auditoria do TCU de 2017
title_full The dance of social security numbers Revisiting the 2014 Court of Accounts' Audit: Revisitando a auditoria do TCU de 2017
title_fullStr The dance of social security numbers Revisiting the 2014 Court of Accounts' Audit: Revisitando a auditoria do TCU de 2017
title_full_unstemmed The dance of social security numbers Revisiting the 2014 Court of Accounts' Audit: Revisitando a auditoria do TCU de 2017
title_sort The dance of social security numbers Revisiting the 2014 Court of Accounts' Audit: Revisitando a auditoria do TCU de 2017
author Strapazzon, Carlos Luiz
author_facet Strapazzon, Carlos Luiz
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Strapazzon, Carlos Luiz
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Reform of Social Insurance
Social Security
Public Accounts
Reforma da Previdência
Seguridade Social
Segurança Social
Seguro Social
Contas Públicas
topic Reform of Social Insurance
Social Security
Public Accounts
Reforma da Previdência
Seguridade Social
Segurança Social
Seguro Social
Contas Públicas
description This paper is a revised, updated and expanded version of another work already published in the EJJL. In this version, the study of the Audit Report carried out by the Brazilian Court of Accounts (TCU) in the Brazilian Social Security accounts (Judgment No. 1295/2017 (TC 001.040 / 2017-0)) is considered. The 10-year accounts, reaching the period from 2007 to 2016. All the so-called "social security regimes" administered by the Federal Government and that integrate the concept of Social Security in Brazil have been audited. The paper offers a descriptive and also critical assessment of the outcomes, which are extremely significant for the discussions on social security reform in Brazil, as well as they qualify the public discussion upon the existence or not of financial imbalances and upon the type of deficits that exist. Distortions, inaccuracies, errors, negligence, inequalities, inconsistencies are also highlighted, after all, enrich the diagnosis of this intriguing issue. Ever since the TCU Report 2017 was published such a debate can not be reduced to a simplistic discussion upon Brazil's fiscal policy, deficit and longevity.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-06-28
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Avaliado por Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.unoesc.edu.br/espacojuridico/article/view/12749
10.18593/ejjl.12749
url https://periodicos.unoesc.edu.br/espacojuridico/article/view/12749
identifier_str_mv 10.18593/ejjl.12749
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.unoesc.edu.br/espacojuridico/article/view/12749/12495
https://periodicos.unoesc.edu.br/espacojuridico/article/view/12749/14091
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Carlos Luiz Strapazzon, Doutor, Professor Unoesc, Brasil
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Carlos Luiz Strapazzon, Doutor, Professor Unoesc, Brasil
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade do Oeste de Santa Catarina, UNOESC
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade do Oeste de Santa Catarina, UNOESC
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL]; Bd. 20 Nr. 1 (2019): Espaço Juridico Journal of Law [EJJL]; 137-172
Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL]; Vol. 20 No. 1 (2019): Espaço Juridico Journal of Law [EJJL]; 137-172
Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL]; Vol. 20 Núm. 1 (2019): Espaço Juridico Journal of Law [EJJL]; 137-172
Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL]; Vol. 20 No. 1 (2019): Espaço Juridico Journal of Law [EJJL]; 137-172
Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL]; v. 20 n. 1 (2019): Espaço Juridico Journal of Law [EJJL]; 137-172
2179-7943
1519-5899
reponame:Revista Espaço Jurídico/Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law
instname:Universidade do Oeste de Santa Catarina (UNOESC)
instacron:UNOESC
instname_str Universidade do Oeste de Santa Catarina (UNOESC)
instacron_str UNOESC
institution UNOESC
reponame_str Revista Espaço Jurídico/Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law
collection Revista Espaço Jurídico/Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Espaço Jurídico/Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law - Universidade do Oeste de Santa Catarina (UNOESC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv editora@unoesc.edu.br||ejjl@unoesc.edu.br
_version_ 1800220446579228672