State duties of fauna protection and freedom of worship: Extraordinary Appeal 494.601 in the full bench of the Federal Supreme Court
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Espaço Jurídico/Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.unoesc.edu.br/espacojuridico/article/view/20076 |
Resumo: | Two votes given in Extraordinary Appeal 494,601, whose judgment is pending in the Federal Supreme Court, are examined critically. The objective is to point out the interpretative and argumentative misunderstandings in the constitutional examination of a state legal norm that excepted the cults and liturgies of African origin from the prohibition of cruel treatment against animals. It is concluded that there is no constitutional and legal norm that prohibits the sacrificial of animals in religious cults, however, it is forbidden cruel treatment against animals for all, including in the exercise of worship. |
id |
UNOESC-1_7cdd526ae51af85cecec93907aa62905 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.unoesc.edu.br:article/20076 |
network_acronym_str |
UNOESC-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista Espaço Jurídico/Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
State duties of fauna protection and freedom of worship: Extraordinary Appeal 494.601 in the full bench of the Federal Supreme CourtDeveres estatais de proteção da fauna e direito fundamental de livre exercício de culto: o caso do Recurso Extraordinário 494.601FaunaCruel treatment of animalsSacrifice of animalsFreedom of worshipFaunaTratamento cruel contra animaisSacrifício de animaisLiberdade de cultoTwo votes given in Extraordinary Appeal 494,601, whose judgment is pending in the Federal Supreme Court, are examined critically. The objective is to point out the interpretative and argumentative misunderstandings in the constitutional examination of a state legal norm that excepted the cults and liturgies of African origin from the prohibition of cruel treatment against animals. It is concluded that there is no constitutional and legal norm that prohibits the sacrificial of animals in religious cults, however, it is forbidden cruel treatment against animals for all, including in the exercise of worship.Examinam-se criticamente dois votos proferidos no Recurso Extraordinário 494.601, cujo julgamento está em andamento no Supremo Tribunal Federal. O objetivo é apontar os equívocos interpretativos e argumentativos no exame de constitucionalidade de norma legal estadual que excepcionou os cultos e liturgias de origem africana da proibição de tratamento cruel contra animais. Conclui-se que não há norma constitucional e legal que proíbe o sacrífico de animais em cultos religiosos, contudo é vedado o tratamento cruel contra animais para todos, inclusive no exercício de culto.Universidade do Oeste de Santa Catarina, UNOESC2019-06-24info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado por Paresapplication/pdftext/htmlhttps://periodicos.unoesc.edu.br/espacojuridico/article/view/2007610.18593/ejjl.20076Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL]; Bd. 19 Nr. 3 (2018): Espaço Juridico Journal of Law [EJJL]; 813-822Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL]; Vol. 19 No. 3 (2018): Espaço Juridico Journal of Law [EJJL]; 813-822Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL]; Vol. 19 Núm. 3 (2018): Espaço Juridico Journal of Law [EJJL]; 813-822Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL]; Vol. 19 No. 3 (2018): Espaço Juridico Journal of Law [EJJL]; 813-822Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL]; v. 19 n. 3 (2018): Espaço Juridico Journal of Law [EJJL]; 813-8222179-79431519-5899reponame:Revista Espaço Jurídico/Espaço Jurídico Journal of Lawinstname:Universidade do Oeste de Santa Catarina (UNOESC)instacron:UNOESCporhttps://periodicos.unoesc.edu.br/espacojuridico/article/view/20076/pdfhttps://periodicos.unoesc.edu.br/espacojuridico/article/view/20076/14100Copyright (c) 2019 Wilson Steinmetz, Doutor, Professor UCS (RS) e UNOESC (SC)info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSteinmetz, Wilson2020-10-16T20:19:05Zoai:ojs.periodicos.unoesc.edu.br:article/20076Revistahttps://portalperiodicos.unoesc.edu.br/espacojuridico/indexhttp://editora.unoesc.edu.br/index.php/espacojuridico/oaieditora@unoesc.edu.br||ejjl@unoesc.edu.br2179-79431519-5899opendoar:2020-10-16T20:19:05Revista Espaço Jurídico/Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law - Universidade do Oeste de Santa Catarina (UNOESC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
State duties of fauna protection and freedom of worship: Extraordinary Appeal 494.601 in the full bench of the Federal Supreme Court Deveres estatais de proteção da fauna e direito fundamental de livre exercício de culto: o caso do Recurso Extraordinário 494.601 |
title |
State duties of fauna protection and freedom of worship: Extraordinary Appeal 494.601 in the full bench of the Federal Supreme Court |
spellingShingle |
State duties of fauna protection and freedom of worship: Extraordinary Appeal 494.601 in the full bench of the Federal Supreme Court Steinmetz, Wilson Fauna Cruel treatment of animals Sacrifice of animals Freedom of worship Fauna Tratamento cruel contra animais Sacrifício de animais Liberdade de culto |
title_short |
State duties of fauna protection and freedom of worship: Extraordinary Appeal 494.601 in the full bench of the Federal Supreme Court |
title_full |
State duties of fauna protection and freedom of worship: Extraordinary Appeal 494.601 in the full bench of the Federal Supreme Court |
title_fullStr |
State duties of fauna protection and freedom of worship: Extraordinary Appeal 494.601 in the full bench of the Federal Supreme Court |
title_full_unstemmed |
State duties of fauna protection and freedom of worship: Extraordinary Appeal 494.601 in the full bench of the Federal Supreme Court |
title_sort |
State duties of fauna protection and freedom of worship: Extraordinary Appeal 494.601 in the full bench of the Federal Supreme Court |
author |
Steinmetz, Wilson |
author_facet |
Steinmetz, Wilson |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Steinmetz, Wilson |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Fauna Cruel treatment of animals Sacrifice of animals Freedom of worship Fauna Tratamento cruel contra animais Sacrifício de animais Liberdade de culto |
topic |
Fauna Cruel treatment of animals Sacrifice of animals Freedom of worship Fauna Tratamento cruel contra animais Sacrifício de animais Liberdade de culto |
description |
Two votes given in Extraordinary Appeal 494,601, whose judgment is pending in the Federal Supreme Court, are examined critically. The objective is to point out the interpretative and argumentative misunderstandings in the constitutional examination of a state legal norm that excepted the cults and liturgies of African origin from the prohibition of cruel treatment against animals. It is concluded that there is no constitutional and legal norm that prohibits the sacrificial of animals in religious cults, however, it is forbidden cruel treatment against animals for all, including in the exercise of worship. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-06-24 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Avaliado por Pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.unoesc.edu.br/espacojuridico/article/view/20076 10.18593/ejjl.20076 |
url |
https://periodicos.unoesc.edu.br/espacojuridico/article/view/20076 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.18593/ejjl.20076 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.unoesc.edu.br/espacojuridico/article/view/20076/pdf https://periodicos.unoesc.edu.br/espacojuridico/article/view/20076/14100 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Wilson Steinmetz, Doutor, Professor UCS (RS) e UNOESC (SC) info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Wilson Steinmetz, Doutor, Professor UCS (RS) e UNOESC (SC) |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade do Oeste de Santa Catarina, UNOESC |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade do Oeste de Santa Catarina, UNOESC |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL]; Bd. 19 Nr. 3 (2018): Espaço Juridico Journal of Law [EJJL]; 813-822 Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL]; Vol. 19 No. 3 (2018): Espaço Juridico Journal of Law [EJJL]; 813-822 Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL]; Vol. 19 Núm. 3 (2018): Espaço Juridico Journal of Law [EJJL]; 813-822 Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL]; Vol. 19 No. 3 (2018): Espaço Juridico Journal of Law [EJJL]; 813-822 Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL]; v. 19 n. 3 (2018): Espaço Juridico Journal of Law [EJJL]; 813-822 2179-7943 1519-5899 reponame:Revista Espaço Jurídico/Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law instname:Universidade do Oeste de Santa Catarina (UNOESC) instacron:UNOESC |
instname_str |
Universidade do Oeste de Santa Catarina (UNOESC) |
instacron_str |
UNOESC |
institution |
UNOESC |
reponame_str |
Revista Espaço Jurídico/Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law |
collection |
Revista Espaço Jurídico/Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Espaço Jurídico/Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law - Universidade do Oeste de Santa Catarina (UNOESC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
editora@unoesc.edu.br||ejjl@unoesc.edu.br |
_version_ |
1800220447148605440 |