Criminal enforcement and mental health: criticism of the security measure and fundamental rights from the dual guarantee regime

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Cacicedo, Patrick
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Santos, Thiago Pedro Pagliuca dos
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Espaço Jurídico/Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.unoesc.edu.br/espacojuridico/article/view/30593
Resumo: The article deals with the legal regime applicable to people with mental disorders in the criminal execution phase. In order to do so, it explores the existing contradictions between the legal regime of the Penal Code and the Anti-Asylum Law and their respective logics that are radically opposed in terms of foundations and practices. Due to the persistence of security measures in the material reality of the criminal justice system, the article seeks to find concrete legal answers to make them compatible with the anti-asylum paradigm and its consequent realization of the freedom and fundamental rights of people with mental disorders. The article adopts the dual guarantee regime, according to which security measures must respect all criminal and procedural criminal rights and guarantees in order to prevent the treatment given to the non-attributable from being more severe than that of the imputable or semi-attributable, at the same time that, as they are applied to especially vulnerable people, the norms provided for in the legislation that protect people with disabilities and mental disorders should also apply to them. Based on this regime, the main controversies regarding the implementation of security measures are faced and solutions are proposed for the minimum period of hospitalization, hospitalization for non-compliance with outpatient treatment and the incidence of rights of the progressive system.
id UNOESC-1_898cf1b3a21a76d9110060915f85ba16
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.unoesc.edu.br:article/30593
network_acronym_str UNOESC-1
network_name_str Revista Espaço Jurídico/Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law
repository_id_str
spelling Criminal enforcement and mental health: criticism of the security measure and fundamental rights from the dual guarantee regimeExecução penal e saúde mental: crítica da medida de segurança e direitos fundamentais a partir do regime de dupla garantiasaúde mentalMedida de segurançaantimanicomialDireitos fundamentais.execução penalmental healthsecurity measureanti-asylumfundamental rightspenal executionThe article deals with the legal regime applicable to people with mental disorders in the criminal execution phase. In order to do so, it explores the existing contradictions between the legal regime of the Penal Code and the Anti-Asylum Law and their respective logics that are radically opposed in terms of foundations and practices. Due to the persistence of security measures in the material reality of the criminal justice system, the article seeks to find concrete legal answers to make them compatible with the anti-asylum paradigm and its consequent realization of the freedom and fundamental rights of people with mental disorders. The article adopts the dual guarantee regime, according to which security measures must respect all criminal and procedural criminal rights and guarantees in order to prevent the treatment given to the non-attributable from being more severe than that of the imputable or semi-attributable, at the same time that, as they are applied to especially vulnerable people, the norms provided for in the legislation that protect people with disabilities and mental disorders should also apply to them. Based on this regime, the main controversies regarding the implementation of security measures are faced and solutions are proposed for the minimum period of hospitalization, hospitalization for non-compliance with outpatient treatment and the incidence of rights of the progressive system.O artigo tem por objeto o regime jurídico aplicável às pessoas com transtorno mental na fase de execução penal. Para tanto, explora as contradições existentes entre o regime jurídico do Código Penal e da Lei Antimanicomial e suas respectivas lógicas que se opõem radicalmente em termos de fundamentos e práticas. Em razão da persistência das medidas de segurança na realidade material do sistema de justiça criminal, o artigo procura encontrar respostas jurídicas concretas para compatibilizá-las ao paradigma antimanicomial e sua consequente efetivação da liberdade e dos direitos fundamentais das pessoas com transtorno mental. O artigo adota o regime da dupla garantia, segundo o qual as medidas de segurança devem respeitar todos os direitos e garantias penais e processuais penais de modo a impedir que o tratamento dado ao inimputável seja mais severo do que o do imputável ou semi-imputável, ao mesmo tempo em que, por serem aplicadas a pessoas especialmente vulneráveis, devem incidir sobre elas também as normas previstas na legislação que protege as pessoas com deficiências e transtornos mentais. Com base em tal regime, as principais controvérsias da execução de medidas de segurança são enfrentadas e propõe-se soluções para o prazo mínimo de internação, a internação por descumprimento do tratamento ambulatorial e a incidência dos direitos do sistema progressivo.Universidade do Oeste de Santa Catarina, UNOESC2022-10-25info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado por Paresapplication/pdftext/htmlhttps://periodicos.unoesc.edu.br/espacojuridico/article/view/3059310.18593/ejjl.30593Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL]; Bd. 23 Nr. 2 (2022): Espaço Juridico Journal of Law [EJJL]; 321-338Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL]; Vol. 23 No. 2 (2022): Espaço Juridico Journal of Law [EJJL]; 321-338Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL]; Vol. 23 Núm. 2 (2022): Espaço Juridico Journal of Law [EJJL]; 321-338Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL]; Vol. 23 No. 2 (2022): Espaço Juridico Journal of Law [EJJL]; 321-338Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL]; v. 23 n. 2 (2022): Espaço Juridico Journal of Law [EJJL]; 321-3382179-79431519-5899reponame:Revista Espaço Jurídico/Espaço Jurídico Journal of Lawinstname:Universidade do Oeste de Santa Catarina (UNOESC)instacron:UNOESCporhttps://periodicos.unoesc.edu.br/espacojuridico/article/view/30593/18289https://periodicos.unoesc.edu.br/espacojuridico/article/view/30593/18290Copyright (c) 2022 PATRICK CACICEDO, THIAGO PEDRO PAGLIUCA DOS SANTOShttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCacicedo, PatrickSantos, Thiago Pedro Pagliuca dos2023-02-06T11:41:47Zoai:ojs.periodicos.unoesc.edu.br:article/30593Revistahttps://portalperiodicos.unoesc.edu.br/espacojuridico/indexhttp://editora.unoesc.edu.br/index.php/espacojuridico/oaieditora@unoesc.edu.br||ejjl@unoesc.edu.br2179-79431519-5899opendoar:2023-02-06T11:41:47Revista Espaço Jurídico/Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law - Universidade do Oeste de Santa Catarina (UNOESC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Criminal enforcement and mental health: criticism of the security measure and fundamental rights from the dual guarantee regime
Execução penal e saúde mental: crítica da medida de segurança e direitos fundamentais a partir do regime de dupla garantia
title Criminal enforcement and mental health: criticism of the security measure and fundamental rights from the dual guarantee regime
spellingShingle Criminal enforcement and mental health: criticism of the security measure and fundamental rights from the dual guarantee regime
Cacicedo, Patrick
saúde mental
Medida de segurança
antimanicomial
Direitos fundamentais.
execução penal
mental health
security measure
anti-asylum
fundamental rights
penal execution
title_short Criminal enforcement and mental health: criticism of the security measure and fundamental rights from the dual guarantee regime
title_full Criminal enforcement and mental health: criticism of the security measure and fundamental rights from the dual guarantee regime
title_fullStr Criminal enforcement and mental health: criticism of the security measure and fundamental rights from the dual guarantee regime
title_full_unstemmed Criminal enforcement and mental health: criticism of the security measure and fundamental rights from the dual guarantee regime
title_sort Criminal enforcement and mental health: criticism of the security measure and fundamental rights from the dual guarantee regime
author Cacicedo, Patrick
author_facet Cacicedo, Patrick
Santos, Thiago Pedro Pagliuca dos
author_role author
author2 Santos, Thiago Pedro Pagliuca dos
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Cacicedo, Patrick
Santos, Thiago Pedro Pagliuca dos
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv saúde mental
Medida de segurança
antimanicomial
Direitos fundamentais.
execução penal
mental health
security measure
anti-asylum
fundamental rights
penal execution
topic saúde mental
Medida de segurança
antimanicomial
Direitos fundamentais.
execução penal
mental health
security measure
anti-asylum
fundamental rights
penal execution
description The article deals with the legal regime applicable to people with mental disorders in the criminal execution phase. In order to do so, it explores the existing contradictions between the legal regime of the Penal Code and the Anti-Asylum Law and their respective logics that are radically opposed in terms of foundations and practices. Due to the persistence of security measures in the material reality of the criminal justice system, the article seeks to find concrete legal answers to make them compatible with the anti-asylum paradigm and its consequent realization of the freedom and fundamental rights of people with mental disorders. The article adopts the dual guarantee regime, according to which security measures must respect all criminal and procedural criminal rights and guarantees in order to prevent the treatment given to the non-attributable from being more severe than that of the imputable or semi-attributable, at the same time that, as they are applied to especially vulnerable people, the norms provided for in the legislation that protect people with disabilities and mental disorders should also apply to them. Based on this regime, the main controversies regarding the implementation of security measures are faced and solutions are proposed for the minimum period of hospitalization, hospitalization for non-compliance with outpatient treatment and the incidence of rights of the progressive system.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-10-25
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Avaliado por Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.unoesc.edu.br/espacojuridico/article/view/30593
10.18593/ejjl.30593
url https://periodicos.unoesc.edu.br/espacojuridico/article/view/30593
identifier_str_mv 10.18593/ejjl.30593
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.unoesc.edu.br/espacojuridico/article/view/30593/18289
https://periodicos.unoesc.edu.br/espacojuridico/article/view/30593/18290
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 PATRICK CACICEDO, THIAGO PEDRO PAGLIUCA DOS SANTOS
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 PATRICK CACICEDO, THIAGO PEDRO PAGLIUCA DOS SANTOS
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade do Oeste de Santa Catarina, UNOESC
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade do Oeste de Santa Catarina, UNOESC
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL]; Bd. 23 Nr. 2 (2022): Espaço Juridico Journal of Law [EJJL]; 321-338
Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL]; Vol. 23 No. 2 (2022): Espaço Juridico Journal of Law [EJJL]; 321-338
Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL]; Vol. 23 Núm. 2 (2022): Espaço Juridico Journal of Law [EJJL]; 321-338
Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL]; Vol. 23 No. 2 (2022): Espaço Juridico Journal of Law [EJJL]; 321-338
Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL]; v. 23 n. 2 (2022): Espaço Juridico Journal of Law [EJJL]; 321-338
2179-7943
1519-5899
reponame:Revista Espaço Jurídico/Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law
instname:Universidade do Oeste de Santa Catarina (UNOESC)
instacron:UNOESC
instname_str Universidade do Oeste de Santa Catarina (UNOESC)
instacron_str UNOESC
institution UNOESC
reponame_str Revista Espaço Jurídico/Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law
collection Revista Espaço Jurídico/Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Espaço Jurídico/Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law - Universidade do Oeste de Santa Catarina (UNOESC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv editora@unoesc.edu.br||ejjl@unoesc.edu.br
_version_ 1800220447548112896

Registros relacionados