RIGHTS, RULES, AND DEMOCRACY
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2012 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Espaço Jurídico/Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.unoesc.edu.br/espacojuridico/article/view/2011 |
Resumo: | Abstract: Democracy require protection of certain fundamental rights, but can we expect courts to follow rules? There seems little escape from the proposition that substantive constitutional review by an unelected judiciary is a presumptive abridgement of democratic decision-making. Once we have accepted the proposition that there exist human rights that ought to be protected, this should hardly surprise us. No one thinks courts are perfect translators of the rules invoked before them on every occasion. But it is equally clear that rules sometimes do decide cases. In modern legal systems the relative roles of courts and legislators with respect to the rules of the system is a commonplace. Legislatures make rules. Courts apply them in particular disputes. When we are talking about human rights, however, that assumption must be clarified in at least one way. The defense of the practice of constitutional review in this article assumes courts can and do enforce rules. This article also makes clear what is the meaning of “following rules”. Preference for judicial over legislative interpretation of rights, therefore, seems to hang on the question of whether or not judges are capable of subordinating their own judgment to that incorporated in the rules by their makers. This article maintains that, in general, entrenched constitutional rules (and not just constitutional courts) can and do constrain public conduct and protect human rights. The article concludes that the value judgments will depend on our estimate of the benefits we derive from the process of representative self-government. Against those benefits we will have to measure the importance we place on being able to live our lives with the security created by a regime of human rights protected by the rule of law. Keywords: Democracy. Human Rights. Rules. Judicial Review. |
id |
UNOESC-1_aa2f513d61506a3017fc3f5eff3913cc |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.unoesc.edu.br:article/2011 |
network_acronym_str |
UNOESC-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista Espaço Jurídico/Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
RIGHTS, RULES, AND DEMOCRACYAbstract: Democracy require protection of certain fundamental rights, but can we expect courts to follow rules? There seems little escape from the proposition that substantive constitutional review by an unelected judiciary is a presumptive abridgement of democratic decision-making. Once we have accepted the proposition that there exist human rights that ought to be protected, this should hardly surprise us. No one thinks courts are perfect translators of the rules invoked before them on every occasion. But it is equally clear that rules sometimes do decide cases. In modern legal systems the relative roles of courts and legislators with respect to the rules of the system is a commonplace. Legislatures make rules. Courts apply them in particular disputes. When we are talking about human rights, however, that assumption must be clarified in at least one way. The defense of the practice of constitutional review in this article assumes courts can and do enforce rules. This article also makes clear what is the meaning of “following rules”. Preference for judicial over legislative interpretation of rights, therefore, seems to hang on the question of whether or not judges are capable of subordinating their own judgment to that incorporated in the rules by their makers. This article maintains that, in general, entrenched constitutional rules (and not just constitutional courts) can and do constrain public conduct and protect human rights. The article concludes that the value judgments will depend on our estimate of the benefits we derive from the process of representative self-government. Against those benefits we will have to measure the importance we place on being able to live our lives with the security created by a regime of human rights protected by the rule of law. Keywords: Democracy. Human Rights. Rules. Judicial Review.Universidade do Oeste de Santa Catarina, UNOESC2012-11-09info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado pelos paresapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.unoesc.edu.br/espacojuridico/article/view/2011Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL]; Bd. 13 (2012): ESPAÇO JURÍDICO JOURNAL OF LAW [EJJL] Edição Especial Estados Unidos; 151-167Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL]; Vol. 13 (2012): ESPAÇO JURÍDICO JOURNAL OF LAW [EJJL] Edição Especial Estados Unidos; 151-167Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL]; Vol. 13 (2012): ESPAÇO JURÍDICO JOURNAL OF LAW [EJJL] Edição Especial Estados Unidos; 151-167Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL]; Vol. 13 (2012): ESPAÇO JURÍDICO JOURNAL OF LAW [EJJL] Edição Especial Estados Unidos; 151-167Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL]; v. 13 (2012): ESPAÇO JURÍDICO JOURNAL OF LAW [EJJL] Edição Especial Estados Unidos; 151-1672179-79431519-5899reponame:Revista Espaço Jurídico/Espaço Jurídico Journal of Lawinstname:Universidade do Oeste de Santa Catarina (UNOESC)instacron:UNOESCporhttps://periodicos.unoesc.edu.br/espacojuridico/article/view/2011/1256Kay, University of Connecticut-School of Law, Estados Unidos, Richard S.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2020-10-16T20:33:02Zoai:ojs.periodicos.unoesc.edu.br:article/2011Revistahttps://portalperiodicos.unoesc.edu.br/espacojuridico/indexhttp://editora.unoesc.edu.br/index.php/espacojuridico/oaieditora@unoesc.edu.br||ejjl@unoesc.edu.br2179-79431519-5899opendoar:2020-10-16T20:33:02Revista Espaço Jurídico/Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law - Universidade do Oeste de Santa Catarina (UNOESC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
RIGHTS, RULES, AND DEMOCRACY |
title |
RIGHTS, RULES, AND DEMOCRACY |
spellingShingle |
RIGHTS, RULES, AND DEMOCRACY Kay, University of Connecticut-School of Law, Estados Unidos, Richard S. |
title_short |
RIGHTS, RULES, AND DEMOCRACY |
title_full |
RIGHTS, RULES, AND DEMOCRACY |
title_fullStr |
RIGHTS, RULES, AND DEMOCRACY |
title_full_unstemmed |
RIGHTS, RULES, AND DEMOCRACY |
title_sort |
RIGHTS, RULES, AND DEMOCRACY |
author |
Kay, University of Connecticut-School of Law, Estados Unidos, Richard S. |
author_facet |
Kay, University of Connecticut-School of Law, Estados Unidos, Richard S. |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Kay, University of Connecticut-School of Law, Estados Unidos, Richard S. |
description |
Abstract: Democracy require protection of certain fundamental rights, but can we expect courts to follow rules? There seems little escape from the proposition that substantive constitutional review by an unelected judiciary is a presumptive abridgement of democratic decision-making. Once we have accepted the proposition that there exist human rights that ought to be protected, this should hardly surprise us. No one thinks courts are perfect translators of the rules invoked before them on every occasion. But it is equally clear that rules sometimes do decide cases. In modern legal systems the relative roles of courts and legislators with respect to the rules of the system is a commonplace. Legislatures make rules. Courts apply them in particular disputes. When we are talking about human rights, however, that assumption must be clarified in at least one way. The defense of the practice of constitutional review in this article assumes courts can and do enforce rules. This article also makes clear what is the meaning of “following rules”. Preference for judicial over legislative interpretation of rights, therefore, seems to hang on the question of whether or not judges are capable of subordinating their own judgment to that incorporated in the rules by their makers. This article maintains that, in general, entrenched constitutional rules (and not just constitutional courts) can and do constrain public conduct and protect human rights. The article concludes that the value judgments will depend on our estimate of the benefits we derive from the process of representative self-government. Against those benefits we will have to measure the importance we place on being able to live our lives with the security created by a regime of human rights protected by the rule of law. Keywords: Democracy. Human Rights. Rules. Judicial Review. |
publishDate |
2012 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2012-11-09 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Avaliado pelos pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.unoesc.edu.br/espacojuridico/article/view/2011 |
url |
https://periodicos.unoesc.edu.br/espacojuridico/article/view/2011 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.unoesc.edu.br/espacojuridico/article/view/2011/1256 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade do Oeste de Santa Catarina, UNOESC |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade do Oeste de Santa Catarina, UNOESC |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL]; Bd. 13 (2012): ESPAÇO JURÍDICO JOURNAL OF LAW [EJJL] Edição Especial Estados Unidos; 151-167 Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL]; Vol. 13 (2012): ESPAÇO JURÍDICO JOURNAL OF LAW [EJJL] Edição Especial Estados Unidos; 151-167 Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL]; Vol. 13 (2012): ESPAÇO JURÍDICO JOURNAL OF LAW [EJJL] Edição Especial Estados Unidos; 151-167 Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL]; Vol. 13 (2012): ESPAÇO JURÍDICO JOURNAL OF LAW [EJJL] Edição Especial Estados Unidos; 151-167 Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL]; v. 13 (2012): ESPAÇO JURÍDICO JOURNAL OF LAW [EJJL] Edição Especial Estados Unidos; 151-167 2179-7943 1519-5899 reponame:Revista Espaço Jurídico/Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law instname:Universidade do Oeste de Santa Catarina (UNOESC) instacron:UNOESC |
instname_str |
Universidade do Oeste de Santa Catarina (UNOESC) |
instacron_str |
UNOESC |
institution |
UNOESC |
reponame_str |
Revista Espaço Jurídico/Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law |
collection |
Revista Espaço Jurídico/Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Espaço Jurídico/Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law - Universidade do Oeste de Santa Catarina (UNOESC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
editora@unoesc.edu.br||ejjl@unoesc.edu.br |
_version_ |
1814256226279620608 |