Religious proselytism of the employee in the workplace: the search for a reasonable legal balance between gag and abusive speech
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Espaço Jurídico/Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.unoesc.edu.br/espacojuridico/article/view/20080 |
Resumo: | The purpose of this article is to investigate, from the point of view of the Brazilian constitutional order and the guiding principles of Labor Law, the limits to the exercise of religious proselytism by the employee in the workplace, safeguarding its importance to the construction and effectiveness of the fundamental right of religious freedom. It is maintained that it is not lawful for the employer to put a gag on his employee preventing him from expressing, at any time and in any circumstance, his religious beliefs, even if he does so for the purpose of obtaining adherents to a particular religion. However, it is accepted that the restrictions or even the prohibition of religious proselytism are legitimate and therefore exclude the employer's duty to tolerate or accommodate his practice when the employee expresses the abuse of rights in his exercise. In this case, the employee who practices abusive proselytizing is responsible for the damages caused by his actions and must suffer the proper legal sanctions. |
id |
UNOESC-1_f9a2b1d9359a19cbff759cabbc859906 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.unoesc.edu.br:article/20080 |
network_acronym_str |
UNOESC-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista Espaço Jurídico/Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Religious proselytism of the employee in the workplace: the search for a reasonable legal balance between gag and abusive speech Proselitismo religioso do empregado no ambiente de trabalho: a busca por um justo equilíbrio entre a mordaça e o discurso abusivo Religious freedomReligious proselytismEmployeeWorkplaceLiberdade religiosaProselitismo religiosoEmpregadoAmbiente de TrabalhoThe purpose of this article is to investigate, from the point of view of the Brazilian constitutional order and the guiding principles of Labor Law, the limits to the exercise of religious proselytism by the employee in the workplace, safeguarding its importance to the construction and effectiveness of the fundamental right of religious freedom. It is maintained that it is not lawful for the employer to put a gag on his employee preventing him from expressing, at any time and in any circumstance, his religious beliefs, even if he does so for the purpose of obtaining adherents to a particular religion. However, it is accepted that the restrictions or even the prohibition of religious proselytism are legitimate and therefore exclude the employer's duty to tolerate or accommodate his practice when the employee expresses the abuse of rights in his exercise. In this case, the employee who practices abusive proselytizing is responsible for the damages caused by his actions and must suffer the proper legal sanctions.O objetivo do presente artigo é investigar, sob o prisma do ordenamento constitucional brasileiro e dos princípios norteadores do Direito do Trabalho, os limites ao exercício do proselitismo religioso pelo empregado no ambiente de trabalho, resguardando a sua importância para a construção e à máxima efetividade do direito fundamental de liberdade religiosa. Sustenta-se que não é lícito ao empregador colocar uma mordaça no seu empregado impedindo-o de expressar, em qualquer momento e em qualquer circunstância, as suas crenças religiosas, ainda quando este o faça com a finalidade de obter a conversão de outros frequentadores do ambiente de trabalho à sua religião. Admite-se, todavia, que as restrições ou até mesmo a vedação ao proselitismo religioso são legítimas e, portanto, afastam o dever patronal de tolerar ou acomodar a sua prática, quando manifesto o abuso de direito no seu exercício. Neste caso, o empregado que pratica o proselitismo abusivo é responsável pelos danos causados por suas ações e deve sofrer as sanções legais cabíveis.Universidade do Oeste de Santa Catarina, UNOESC2020-10-22info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado por Paresapplication/pdftext/htmlhttps://periodicos.unoesc.edu.br/espacojuridico/article/view/2008010.18593/ejjl.20080Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL]; Bd. 21 Nr. 2 (2020): Espaço Juridico Journal of Law [EJJL]; 523-550Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL]; Vol. 21 No. 2 (2020): Espaço Juridico Journal of Law [EJJL]; 523-550Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL]; Vol. 21 Núm. 2 (2020): Espaço Juridico Journal of Law [EJJL]; 523-550Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL]; Vol. 21 No. 2 (2020): Espaço Juridico Journal of Law [EJJL]; 523-550Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL]; v. 21 n. 2 (2020): Espaço Juridico Journal of Law [EJJL]; 523-5502179-79431519-5899reponame:Revista Espaço Jurídico/Espaço Jurídico Journal of Lawinstname:Universidade do Oeste de Santa Catarina (UNOESC)instacron:UNOESCporhttps://periodicos.unoesc.edu.br/espacojuridico/article/view/20080/15793https://periodicos.unoesc.edu.br/espacojuridico/article/view/20080/15794Copyright (c) 2020 Aloisio Cristovam dos Santos Juniorinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSantos Junior, Aloisio Cristovam dos2022-08-16T14:01:06Zoai:ojs.periodicos.unoesc.edu.br:article/20080Revistahttps://portalperiodicos.unoesc.edu.br/espacojuridico/indexhttp://editora.unoesc.edu.br/index.php/espacojuridico/oaieditora@unoesc.edu.br||ejjl@unoesc.edu.br2179-79431519-5899opendoar:2022-08-16T14:01:06Revista Espaço Jurídico/Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law - Universidade do Oeste de Santa Catarina (UNOESC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Religious proselytism of the employee in the workplace: the search for a reasonable legal balance between gag and abusive speech Proselitismo religioso do empregado no ambiente de trabalho: a busca por um justo equilíbrio entre a mordaça e o discurso abusivo |
title |
Religious proselytism of the employee in the workplace: the search for a reasonable legal balance between gag and abusive speech |
spellingShingle |
Religious proselytism of the employee in the workplace: the search for a reasonable legal balance between gag and abusive speech Santos Junior, Aloisio Cristovam dos Religious freedom Religious proselytism Employee Workplace Liberdade religiosa Proselitismo religioso Empregado Ambiente de Trabalho |
title_short |
Religious proselytism of the employee in the workplace: the search for a reasonable legal balance between gag and abusive speech |
title_full |
Religious proselytism of the employee in the workplace: the search for a reasonable legal balance between gag and abusive speech |
title_fullStr |
Religious proselytism of the employee in the workplace: the search for a reasonable legal balance between gag and abusive speech |
title_full_unstemmed |
Religious proselytism of the employee in the workplace: the search for a reasonable legal balance between gag and abusive speech |
title_sort |
Religious proselytism of the employee in the workplace: the search for a reasonable legal balance between gag and abusive speech |
author |
Santos Junior, Aloisio Cristovam dos |
author_facet |
Santos Junior, Aloisio Cristovam dos |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Santos Junior, Aloisio Cristovam dos |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Religious freedom Religious proselytism Employee Workplace Liberdade religiosa Proselitismo religioso Empregado Ambiente de Trabalho |
topic |
Religious freedom Religious proselytism Employee Workplace Liberdade religiosa Proselitismo religioso Empregado Ambiente de Trabalho |
description |
The purpose of this article is to investigate, from the point of view of the Brazilian constitutional order and the guiding principles of Labor Law, the limits to the exercise of religious proselytism by the employee in the workplace, safeguarding its importance to the construction and effectiveness of the fundamental right of religious freedom. It is maintained that it is not lawful for the employer to put a gag on his employee preventing him from expressing, at any time and in any circumstance, his religious beliefs, even if he does so for the purpose of obtaining adherents to a particular religion. However, it is accepted that the restrictions or even the prohibition of religious proselytism are legitimate and therefore exclude the employer's duty to tolerate or accommodate his practice when the employee expresses the abuse of rights in his exercise. In this case, the employee who practices abusive proselytizing is responsible for the damages caused by his actions and must suffer the proper legal sanctions. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-10-22 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Avaliado por Pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.unoesc.edu.br/espacojuridico/article/view/20080 10.18593/ejjl.20080 |
url |
https://periodicos.unoesc.edu.br/espacojuridico/article/view/20080 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.18593/ejjl.20080 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.unoesc.edu.br/espacojuridico/article/view/20080/15793 https://periodicos.unoesc.edu.br/espacojuridico/article/view/20080/15794 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Aloisio Cristovam dos Santos Junior info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Aloisio Cristovam dos Santos Junior |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade do Oeste de Santa Catarina, UNOESC |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade do Oeste de Santa Catarina, UNOESC |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL]; Bd. 21 Nr. 2 (2020): Espaço Juridico Journal of Law [EJJL]; 523-550 Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL]; Vol. 21 No. 2 (2020): Espaço Juridico Journal of Law [EJJL]; 523-550 Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL]; Vol. 21 Núm. 2 (2020): Espaço Juridico Journal of Law [EJJL]; 523-550 Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL]; Vol. 21 No. 2 (2020): Espaço Juridico Journal of Law [EJJL]; 523-550 Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL]; v. 21 n. 2 (2020): Espaço Juridico Journal of Law [EJJL]; 523-550 2179-7943 1519-5899 reponame:Revista Espaço Jurídico/Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law instname:Universidade do Oeste de Santa Catarina (UNOESC) instacron:UNOESC |
instname_str |
Universidade do Oeste de Santa Catarina (UNOESC) |
instacron_str |
UNOESC |
institution |
UNOESC |
reponame_str |
Revista Espaço Jurídico/Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law |
collection |
Revista Espaço Jurídico/Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Espaço Jurídico/Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law - Universidade do Oeste de Santa Catarina (UNOESC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
editora@unoesc.edu.br||ejjl@unoesc.edu.br |
_version_ |
1814256229933907968 |