Religious proselytism of the employee in the workplace: the search for a reasonable legal balance between gag and abusive speech

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Santos Junior, Aloisio Cristovam dos
Data de Publicação: 2020
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Espaço Jurídico/Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.unoesc.edu.br/espacojuridico/article/view/20080
Resumo: The purpose of this article is to investigate, from the point of view of the Brazilian constitutional order and the guiding principles of Labor Law, the limits to the exercise of religious proselytism by the employee in the workplace, safeguarding its importance to the construction and effectiveness of the fundamental right of religious freedom. It is maintained that it is not lawful for the employer to put a gag on his employee preventing him from expressing, at any time and in any circumstance, his religious beliefs, even if he does so for the purpose of obtaining adherents to a particular religion. However, it is accepted that the restrictions or even the prohibition of religious proselytism are legitimate and therefore exclude the employer's duty to tolerate or accommodate his practice when the employee expresses the abuse of rights in his exercise. In this case, the employee who practices abusive proselytizing is responsible for the damages caused by his actions and must suffer the proper legal sanctions.
id UNOESC-1_f9a2b1d9359a19cbff759cabbc859906
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.unoesc.edu.br:article/20080
network_acronym_str UNOESC-1
network_name_str Revista Espaço Jurídico/Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law
repository_id_str
spelling Religious proselytism of the employee in the workplace: the search for a reasonable legal balance between gag and abusive speech Proselitismo religioso do empregado no ambiente de trabalho: a busca por um justo equilíbrio entre a mordaça e o discurso abusivo Religious freedomReligious proselytismEmployeeWorkplaceLiberdade religiosaProselitismo religiosoEmpregadoAmbiente de TrabalhoThe purpose of this article is to investigate, from the point of view of the Brazilian constitutional order and the guiding principles of Labor Law, the limits to the exercise of religious proselytism by the employee in the workplace, safeguarding its importance to the construction and effectiveness of the fundamental right of religious freedom. It is maintained that it is not lawful for the employer to put a gag on his employee preventing him from expressing, at any time and in any circumstance, his religious beliefs, even if he does so for the purpose of obtaining adherents to a particular religion. However, it is accepted that the restrictions or even the prohibition of religious proselytism are legitimate and therefore exclude the employer's duty to tolerate or accommodate his practice when the employee expresses the abuse of rights in his exercise. In this case, the employee who practices abusive proselytizing is responsible for the damages caused by his actions and must suffer the proper legal sanctions.O objetivo do presente artigo é investigar, sob o prisma do ordenamento constitucional brasileiro e dos princípios norteadores do Direito do Trabalho, os limites ao exercício do proselitismo religioso pelo empregado no ambiente de trabalho, resguardando a sua importância para a construção e à máxima efetividade do direito fundamental de liberdade religiosa. Sustenta-se que não é lícito ao empregador colocar uma mordaça no seu empregado impedindo-o de expressar, em qualquer momento e em qualquer circunstância, as suas crenças religiosas, ainda quando este o faça com a finalidade de obter a conversão de outros frequentadores do ambiente de trabalho à sua religião. Admite-se, todavia, que as restrições ou até mesmo a vedação ao proselitismo religioso são legítimas e, portanto, afastam o dever patronal de tolerar ou acomodar a sua prática, quando manifesto o abuso de direito no seu exercício. Neste caso, o empregado que pratica o proselitismo abusivo é responsável pelos danos causados por suas ações e deve sofrer as sanções legais cabíveis.Universidade do Oeste de Santa Catarina, UNOESC2020-10-22info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado por Paresapplication/pdftext/htmlhttps://periodicos.unoesc.edu.br/espacojuridico/article/view/2008010.18593/ejjl.20080Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL]; Bd. 21 Nr. 2 (2020): Espaço Juridico Journal of Law [EJJL]; 523-550Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL]; Vol. 21 No. 2 (2020): Espaço Juridico Journal of Law [EJJL]; 523-550Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL]; Vol. 21 Núm. 2 (2020): Espaço Juridico Journal of Law [EJJL]; 523-550Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL]; Vol. 21 No. 2 (2020): Espaço Juridico Journal of Law [EJJL]; 523-550Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL]; v. 21 n. 2 (2020): Espaço Juridico Journal of Law [EJJL]; 523-5502179-79431519-5899reponame:Revista Espaço Jurídico/Espaço Jurídico Journal of Lawinstname:Universidade do Oeste de Santa Catarina (UNOESC)instacron:UNOESCporhttps://periodicos.unoesc.edu.br/espacojuridico/article/view/20080/15793https://periodicos.unoesc.edu.br/espacojuridico/article/view/20080/15794Copyright (c) 2020 Aloisio Cristovam dos Santos Juniorinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSantos Junior, Aloisio Cristovam dos2022-08-16T14:01:06Zoai:ojs.periodicos.unoesc.edu.br:article/20080Revistahttps://portalperiodicos.unoesc.edu.br/espacojuridico/indexhttp://editora.unoesc.edu.br/index.php/espacojuridico/oaieditora@unoesc.edu.br||ejjl@unoesc.edu.br2179-79431519-5899opendoar:2022-08-16T14:01:06Revista Espaço Jurídico/Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law - Universidade do Oeste de Santa Catarina (UNOESC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Religious proselytism of the employee in the workplace: the search for a reasonable legal balance between gag and abusive speech
Proselitismo religioso do empregado no ambiente de trabalho: a busca por um justo equilíbrio entre a mordaça e o discurso abusivo
title Religious proselytism of the employee in the workplace: the search for a reasonable legal balance between gag and abusive speech
spellingShingle Religious proselytism of the employee in the workplace: the search for a reasonable legal balance between gag and abusive speech
Santos Junior, Aloisio Cristovam dos
Religious freedom
Religious proselytism
Employee
Workplace
Liberdade religiosa
Proselitismo religioso
Empregado
Ambiente de Trabalho
title_short Religious proselytism of the employee in the workplace: the search for a reasonable legal balance between gag and abusive speech
title_full Religious proselytism of the employee in the workplace: the search for a reasonable legal balance between gag and abusive speech
title_fullStr Religious proselytism of the employee in the workplace: the search for a reasonable legal balance between gag and abusive speech
title_full_unstemmed Religious proselytism of the employee in the workplace: the search for a reasonable legal balance between gag and abusive speech
title_sort Religious proselytism of the employee in the workplace: the search for a reasonable legal balance between gag and abusive speech
author Santos Junior, Aloisio Cristovam dos
author_facet Santos Junior, Aloisio Cristovam dos
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Santos Junior, Aloisio Cristovam dos
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Religious freedom
Religious proselytism
Employee
Workplace
Liberdade religiosa
Proselitismo religioso
Empregado
Ambiente de Trabalho
topic Religious freedom
Religious proselytism
Employee
Workplace
Liberdade religiosa
Proselitismo religioso
Empregado
Ambiente de Trabalho
description The purpose of this article is to investigate, from the point of view of the Brazilian constitutional order and the guiding principles of Labor Law, the limits to the exercise of religious proselytism by the employee in the workplace, safeguarding its importance to the construction and effectiveness of the fundamental right of religious freedom. It is maintained that it is not lawful for the employer to put a gag on his employee preventing him from expressing, at any time and in any circumstance, his religious beliefs, even if he does so for the purpose of obtaining adherents to a particular religion. However, it is accepted that the restrictions or even the prohibition of religious proselytism are legitimate and therefore exclude the employer's duty to tolerate or accommodate his practice when the employee expresses the abuse of rights in his exercise. In this case, the employee who practices abusive proselytizing is responsible for the damages caused by his actions and must suffer the proper legal sanctions.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-10-22
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Avaliado por Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.unoesc.edu.br/espacojuridico/article/view/20080
10.18593/ejjl.20080
url https://periodicos.unoesc.edu.br/espacojuridico/article/view/20080
identifier_str_mv 10.18593/ejjl.20080
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.unoesc.edu.br/espacojuridico/article/view/20080/15793
https://periodicos.unoesc.edu.br/espacojuridico/article/view/20080/15794
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Aloisio Cristovam dos Santos Junior
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Aloisio Cristovam dos Santos Junior
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade do Oeste de Santa Catarina, UNOESC
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade do Oeste de Santa Catarina, UNOESC
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL]; Bd. 21 Nr. 2 (2020): Espaço Juridico Journal of Law [EJJL]; 523-550
Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL]; Vol. 21 No. 2 (2020): Espaço Juridico Journal of Law [EJJL]; 523-550
Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL]; Vol. 21 Núm. 2 (2020): Espaço Juridico Journal of Law [EJJL]; 523-550
Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL]; Vol. 21 No. 2 (2020): Espaço Juridico Journal of Law [EJJL]; 523-550
Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL]; v. 21 n. 2 (2020): Espaço Juridico Journal of Law [EJJL]; 523-550
2179-7943
1519-5899
reponame:Revista Espaço Jurídico/Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law
instname:Universidade do Oeste de Santa Catarina (UNOESC)
instacron:UNOESC
instname_str Universidade do Oeste de Santa Catarina (UNOESC)
instacron_str UNOESC
institution UNOESC
reponame_str Revista Espaço Jurídico/Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law
collection Revista Espaço Jurídico/Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Espaço Jurídico/Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law - Universidade do Oeste de Santa Catarina (UNOESC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv editora@unoesc.edu.br||ejjl@unoesc.edu.br
_version_ 1800220447150702592