Physical quality of an oxisol cultivated with maize submited to cover crops in the pre-cropping period

• Autor(a) principal: Pereira, Fabiana de Souza [UNESP]
• Data de Publicação: 2010
• Outros Autores: Andrioli, Itamar [UNESP], Beutler, Amauri Nelson, de Almeida, Cinara Xavier [UNESP], Pereira, Faber de Souza
• Tipo de documento: Conjunto de dados
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP (dados de pesquisa)
• Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0100-06832010000100021; http://hdl.handle.net/11449/225857
• topic: Least limiting water range; Management systems; Physical attributes

The intensive use of land alters the distribution of the pore size which imparts consequences on the soil physical quality. The Least Limiting Water Range (LLWR) allows for the visualization of the effects of management systems upon either the improvement or the degradation of the soil physical quality. The objective of this study was to evaluate the physical quality of a Red Latosol (Oxisol) submited to cover crops in the period prior to the maize crop in a no-tillage and conventional tillage system, using porosity, soil bulk density and the LLWR as attributes. The treatments were: conventional tillage (CT) and a no-tillage system with the following cover crops: sunn hemp (Crotalaria juncea L.) (NS), pearl millet (Pennisetum americanum (L.) Leeke) (NP) and lablab (Dolichos lablab L.) (NL). The experimental design was randomized blocks in subdivided plots with six replications, with the plots being constituted by the treatments and the subplots by the layers analyzed. The no-tillage systems showed higher total porosity and soil organic matter at the 0-0.5 m layer for the CT. The CT did not differ from the NL or NS in relation to macroporosity. The NP showed the greater porosity, while CT and NS presented lower soil bulk density. No ≤ 10% airing porosity was found for the treatments evaluated, and value for water content where soil aeration is critical (θPA) was found above estimated water content at field capacity (θFC) for all densities. Critical soil bulk density was of 1.36 and 1.43 Mg m-3 for NP and CT, respectively. The LLWR in the no-tillage systems was limited in the upper part by the θFC, and in the bottom part, by the water content from which soil resistance to penetration is limiting (θPR). By means of LLWR it was observed that the soil presented good physical quality.