Effects of functional resistance training on muscle strength and musculoskeletal discomfort
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1980-5918.030.002.ao15 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/157638 |
Resumo: | AbstractIntroduction: Functional resistance training (FRT) is becoming increasingly popular to improve physical fitness of practitioners, however, yet there are gaps in knowledge about effectiveness of FRT in relation conventional resistance training (CRT) in several ambits, as musculoskeletal complaints.Objective: Compare the effect of FRT and CRT in the musculoskeletal discomfort and magnitude of gain in muscle strength in healthy women.Methods: 52 women was divided into three groups, FRT (n = 15; 22 ± 2.35 years): functional resistance training; CRT (n = 14; 22.5 ± 1.78 years): conventional resistance training and CG (n = 13; 20.6 ± 1.10 years): no type of intervention. The training was periodized in 30 sessions over 12 weeks with 3 sessions per week. For the muscle strength variable used the 1RM test and for the musculoskeletal discomfort variable, the Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire (NMQ). Regarding the statistical analysis, all results took into consideration a 5% level of significance.Results: Considerable gain in muscle strength was observed for all exercises in both training groups. In addition, there was a tendency in CRT to relate a more musculoskeletal discomfort; presented 27.3% more complaints compared FRT in the MNQ.Conclusion: The FRT was as effective as the CRT for improving muscle strength, furthermore, there was a tendency for FRT to cause less musculoskeletal discomfort. |
id |
UNSP_013de4f6af947c200c66394f7b431f09 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/157638 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Effects of functional resistance training on muscle strength and musculoskeletal discomfortEfeitos do treinamento resistido funcional na força muscular e desconforto musculoesqueléticoStrength TrainingExercise Movement TechniquesMusculoskeletal PainMuscle StrengthTreinamento de ResistênciaTécnicas de Exercício e de MovimentoDor MusculoesqueléticaForça MuscularAbstractIntroduction: Functional resistance training (FRT) is becoming increasingly popular to improve physical fitness of practitioners, however, yet there are gaps in knowledge about effectiveness of FRT in relation conventional resistance training (CRT) in several ambits, as musculoskeletal complaints.Objective: Compare the effect of FRT and CRT in the musculoskeletal discomfort and magnitude of gain in muscle strength in healthy women.Methods: 52 women was divided into three groups, FRT (n = 15; 22 ± 2.35 years): functional resistance training; CRT (n = 14; 22.5 ± 1.78 years): conventional resistance training and CG (n = 13; 20.6 ± 1.10 years): no type of intervention. The training was periodized in 30 sessions over 12 weeks with 3 sessions per week. For the muscle strength variable used the 1RM test and for the musculoskeletal discomfort variable, the Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire (NMQ). Regarding the statistical analysis, all results took into consideration a 5% level of significance.Results: Considerable gain in muscle strength was observed for all exercises in both training groups. In addition, there was a tendency in CRT to relate a more musculoskeletal discomfort; presented 27.3% more complaints compared FRT in the MNQ.Conclusion: The FRT was as effective as the CRT for improving muscle strength, furthermore, there was a tendency for FRT to cause less musculoskeletal discomfort.ResumoIntrodução: O treinamento resistido funcional (TRF) está se tornando cada vez mais popular para melhorar a aptidão física dos praticantes, entretanto, ainda não está totalmente esclarecido sobre a eficácia do TRF em relação ao treinamento resistido convencional (TRC) em diversos âmbitos, como queixas de desconforto osteomuscular.Objetivo: Comparar o TRF e TRC nas queixas de desconforto osteomuscular e na magnitude de ganho de força muscular em mulheres saudáveis.Métodos: O estudo foi composto por 52 mulheres divididas em três grupos: TRF (n = 15; 22 ± 2.35 anos): treinamento resistido funcional, TRC (n = 14; 22.5 ± 1.78 anos): treinamento resistido convencional e GC (n = 13; 20.6 ± 1.10 anos): nenhum tipo de intervenção. O treinamento foi periodizado em 30 sessões durante 12 semanas com três sessões semanais. Para a variável força muscular utilizou-se o teste de 1RM e para as queixas osteomusculares, o Questionário Nórdico de Sintomas Osteomusculares (QNSO). Em relação a análise estatística, todos os resultados levaram em consideração o nível de 5% de significância.Resultados: Notou-se ganho considerável de força muscular para todos os exercícios em ambos os grupos de treinamento. Além disso, observou-se uma tendência no TRC a relatar um maior número de queixas osteomusculares, apresentando 27,3% mais queixas comparadas ao TRF no QNSO.Conclusão: O TRF foi tão eficaz quanto o TRC para melhorar a força muscular, e, ainda, houve uma tendência de que o TRF provoque menores quantidades de desconfortos osteomusculares.Universidade Estadual PaulistaUniversidade Estadual PaulistaPontifícia Universidade Católica do ParanáUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Cassemiro, Bruna MontechiezeLemes, Ítalo RibeiroFigueiredo, Maria Paula Ferreira DeVanderlei, Franciele MarquesPastre, Carlos MarceloNetto Júnior, Jayme2018-11-12T17:26:17Z2018-11-12T17:26:17Z2017-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article347-356application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1980-5918.030.002.ao15Fisioterapia em Movimento. Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, v. 30, n. 2, p. 347-356, 2017.0103-5150http://hdl.handle.net/11449/15763810.1590/1980-5918.030.002.ao15S0103-51502017000200347S0103-51502017000200347.pdfSciELOreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengFisioterapia em Movimentoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-01-22T06:26:19Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/157638Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T23:41:59.889783Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Effects of functional resistance training on muscle strength and musculoskeletal discomfort Efeitos do treinamento resistido funcional na força muscular e desconforto musculoesquelético |
title |
Effects of functional resistance training on muscle strength and musculoskeletal discomfort |
spellingShingle |
Effects of functional resistance training on muscle strength and musculoskeletal discomfort Cassemiro, Bruna Montechieze Strength Training Exercise Movement Techniques Musculoskeletal Pain Muscle Strength Treinamento de Resistência Técnicas de Exercício e de Movimento Dor Musculoesquelética Força Muscular |
title_short |
Effects of functional resistance training on muscle strength and musculoskeletal discomfort |
title_full |
Effects of functional resistance training on muscle strength and musculoskeletal discomfort |
title_fullStr |
Effects of functional resistance training on muscle strength and musculoskeletal discomfort |
title_full_unstemmed |
Effects of functional resistance training on muscle strength and musculoskeletal discomfort |
title_sort |
Effects of functional resistance training on muscle strength and musculoskeletal discomfort |
author |
Cassemiro, Bruna Montechieze |
author_facet |
Cassemiro, Bruna Montechieze Lemes, Ítalo Ribeiro Figueiredo, Maria Paula Ferreira De Vanderlei, Franciele Marques Pastre, Carlos Marcelo Netto Júnior, Jayme |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Lemes, Ítalo Ribeiro Figueiredo, Maria Paula Ferreira De Vanderlei, Franciele Marques Pastre, Carlos Marcelo Netto Júnior, Jayme |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Cassemiro, Bruna Montechieze Lemes, Ítalo Ribeiro Figueiredo, Maria Paula Ferreira De Vanderlei, Franciele Marques Pastre, Carlos Marcelo Netto Júnior, Jayme |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Strength Training Exercise Movement Techniques Musculoskeletal Pain Muscle Strength Treinamento de Resistência Técnicas de Exercício e de Movimento Dor Musculoesquelética Força Muscular |
topic |
Strength Training Exercise Movement Techniques Musculoskeletal Pain Muscle Strength Treinamento de Resistência Técnicas de Exercício e de Movimento Dor Musculoesquelética Força Muscular |
description |
AbstractIntroduction: Functional resistance training (FRT) is becoming increasingly popular to improve physical fitness of practitioners, however, yet there are gaps in knowledge about effectiveness of FRT in relation conventional resistance training (CRT) in several ambits, as musculoskeletal complaints.Objective: Compare the effect of FRT and CRT in the musculoskeletal discomfort and magnitude of gain in muscle strength in healthy women.Methods: 52 women was divided into three groups, FRT (n = 15; 22 ± 2.35 years): functional resistance training; CRT (n = 14; 22.5 ± 1.78 years): conventional resistance training and CG (n = 13; 20.6 ± 1.10 years): no type of intervention. The training was periodized in 30 sessions over 12 weeks with 3 sessions per week. For the muscle strength variable used the 1RM test and for the musculoskeletal discomfort variable, the Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire (NMQ). Regarding the statistical analysis, all results took into consideration a 5% level of significance.Results: Considerable gain in muscle strength was observed for all exercises in both training groups. In addition, there was a tendency in CRT to relate a more musculoskeletal discomfort; presented 27.3% more complaints compared FRT in the MNQ.Conclusion: The FRT was as effective as the CRT for improving muscle strength, furthermore, there was a tendency for FRT to cause less musculoskeletal discomfort. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-04-01 2018-11-12T17:26:17Z 2018-11-12T17:26:17Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1980-5918.030.002.ao15 Fisioterapia em Movimento. Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, v. 30, n. 2, p. 347-356, 2017. 0103-5150 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/157638 10.1590/1980-5918.030.002.ao15 S0103-51502017000200347 S0103-51502017000200347.pdf |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1980-5918.030.002.ao15 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/157638 |
identifier_str_mv |
Fisioterapia em Movimento. Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, v. 30, n. 2, p. 347-356, 2017. 0103-5150 10.1590/1980-5918.030.002.ao15 S0103-51502017000200347 S0103-51502017000200347.pdf |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Fisioterapia em Movimento |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
347-356 application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
SciELO reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808129543976779776 |