Effects of functional resistance training on muscle strength and musculoskeletal discomfort

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Cassemiro, Bruna Montechieze
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Lemes, Ítalo Ribeiro, Figueiredo, Maria Paula Ferreira De, Vanderlei, Franciele Marques, Pastre, Carlos Marcelo, Netto Júnior, Jayme
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1980-5918.030.002.ao15
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/157638
Resumo: AbstractIntroduction: Functional resistance training (FRT) is becoming increasingly popular to improve physical fitness of practitioners, however, yet there are gaps in knowledge about effectiveness of FRT in relation conventional resistance training (CRT) in several ambits, as musculoskeletal complaints.Objective: Compare the effect of FRT and CRT in the musculoskeletal discomfort and magnitude of gain in muscle strength in healthy women.Methods: 52 women was divided into three groups, FRT (n = 15; 22 ± 2.35 years): functional resistance training; CRT (n = 14; 22.5 ± 1.78 years): conventional resistance training and CG (n = 13; 20.6 ± 1.10 years): no type of intervention. The training was periodized in 30 sessions over 12 weeks with 3 sessions per week. For the muscle strength variable used the 1RM test and for the musculoskeletal discomfort variable, the Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire (NMQ). Regarding the statistical analysis, all results took into consideration a 5% level of significance.Results: Considerable gain in muscle strength was observed for all exercises in both training groups. In addition, there was a tendency in CRT to relate a more musculoskeletal discomfort; presented 27.3% more complaints compared FRT in the MNQ.Conclusion: The FRT was as effective as the CRT for improving muscle strength, furthermore, there was a tendency for FRT to cause less musculoskeletal discomfort.
id UNSP_013de4f6af947c200c66394f7b431f09
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/157638
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Effects of functional resistance training on muscle strength and musculoskeletal discomfortEfeitos do treinamento resistido funcional na força muscular e desconforto musculoesqueléticoStrength TrainingExercise Movement TechniquesMusculoskeletal PainMuscle StrengthTreinamento de ResistênciaTécnicas de Exercício e de MovimentoDor MusculoesqueléticaForça MuscularAbstractIntroduction: Functional resistance training (FRT) is becoming increasingly popular to improve physical fitness of practitioners, however, yet there are gaps in knowledge about effectiveness of FRT in relation conventional resistance training (CRT) in several ambits, as musculoskeletal complaints.Objective: Compare the effect of FRT and CRT in the musculoskeletal discomfort and magnitude of gain in muscle strength in healthy women.Methods: 52 women was divided into three groups, FRT (n = 15; 22 ± 2.35 years): functional resistance training; CRT (n = 14; 22.5 ± 1.78 years): conventional resistance training and CG (n = 13; 20.6 ± 1.10 years): no type of intervention. The training was periodized in 30 sessions over 12 weeks with 3 sessions per week. For the muscle strength variable used the 1RM test and for the musculoskeletal discomfort variable, the Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire (NMQ). Regarding the statistical analysis, all results took into consideration a 5% level of significance.Results: Considerable gain in muscle strength was observed for all exercises in both training groups. In addition, there was a tendency in CRT to relate a more musculoskeletal discomfort; presented 27.3% more complaints compared FRT in the MNQ.Conclusion: The FRT was as effective as the CRT for improving muscle strength, furthermore, there was a tendency for FRT to cause less musculoskeletal discomfort.ResumoIntrodução: O treinamento resistido funcional (TRF) está se tornando cada vez mais popular para melhorar a aptidão física dos praticantes, entretanto, ainda não está totalmente esclarecido sobre a eficácia do TRF em relação ao treinamento resistido convencional (TRC) em diversos âmbitos, como queixas de desconforto osteomuscular.Objetivo: Comparar o TRF e TRC nas queixas de desconforto osteomuscular e na magnitude de ganho de força muscular em mulheres saudáveis.Métodos: O estudo foi composto por 52 mulheres divididas em três grupos: TRF (n = 15; 22 ± 2.35 anos): treinamento resistido funcional, TRC (n = 14; 22.5 ± 1.78 anos): treinamento resistido convencional e GC (n = 13; 20.6 ± 1.10 anos): nenhum tipo de intervenção. O treinamento foi periodizado em 30 sessões durante 12 semanas com três sessões semanais. Para a variável força muscular utilizou-se o teste de 1RM e para as queixas osteomusculares, o Questionário Nórdico de Sintomas Osteomusculares (QNSO). Em relação a análise estatística, todos os resultados levaram em consideração o nível de 5% de significância.Resultados: Notou-se ganho considerável de força muscular para todos os exercícios em ambos os grupos de treinamento. Além disso, observou-se uma tendência no TRC a relatar um maior número de queixas osteomusculares, apresentando 27,3% mais queixas comparadas ao TRF no QNSO.Conclusão: O TRF foi tão eficaz quanto o TRC para melhorar a força muscular, e, ainda, houve uma tendência de que o TRF provoque menores quantidades de desconfortos osteomusculares.Universidade Estadual PaulistaUniversidade Estadual PaulistaPontifícia Universidade Católica do ParanáUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Cassemiro, Bruna MontechiezeLemes, Ítalo RibeiroFigueiredo, Maria Paula Ferreira DeVanderlei, Franciele MarquesPastre, Carlos MarceloNetto Júnior, Jayme2018-11-12T17:26:17Z2018-11-12T17:26:17Z2017-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article347-356application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1980-5918.030.002.ao15Fisioterapia em Movimento. Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, v. 30, n. 2, p. 347-356, 2017.0103-5150http://hdl.handle.net/11449/15763810.1590/1980-5918.030.002.ao15S0103-51502017000200347S0103-51502017000200347.pdfSciELOreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengFisioterapia em Movimentoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-01-22T06:26:19Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/157638Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T23:41:59.889783Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Effects of functional resistance training on muscle strength and musculoskeletal discomfort
Efeitos do treinamento resistido funcional na força muscular e desconforto musculoesquelético
title Effects of functional resistance training on muscle strength and musculoskeletal discomfort
spellingShingle Effects of functional resistance training on muscle strength and musculoskeletal discomfort
Cassemiro, Bruna Montechieze
Strength Training
Exercise Movement Techniques
Musculoskeletal Pain
Muscle Strength
Treinamento de Resistência
Técnicas de Exercício e de Movimento
Dor Musculoesquelética
Força Muscular
title_short Effects of functional resistance training on muscle strength and musculoskeletal discomfort
title_full Effects of functional resistance training on muscle strength and musculoskeletal discomfort
title_fullStr Effects of functional resistance training on muscle strength and musculoskeletal discomfort
title_full_unstemmed Effects of functional resistance training on muscle strength and musculoskeletal discomfort
title_sort Effects of functional resistance training on muscle strength and musculoskeletal discomfort
author Cassemiro, Bruna Montechieze
author_facet Cassemiro, Bruna Montechieze
Lemes, Ítalo Ribeiro
Figueiredo, Maria Paula Ferreira De
Vanderlei, Franciele Marques
Pastre, Carlos Marcelo
Netto Júnior, Jayme
author_role author
author2 Lemes, Ítalo Ribeiro
Figueiredo, Maria Paula Ferreira De
Vanderlei, Franciele Marques
Pastre, Carlos Marcelo
Netto Júnior, Jayme
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Cassemiro, Bruna Montechieze
Lemes, Ítalo Ribeiro
Figueiredo, Maria Paula Ferreira De
Vanderlei, Franciele Marques
Pastre, Carlos Marcelo
Netto Júnior, Jayme
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Strength Training
Exercise Movement Techniques
Musculoskeletal Pain
Muscle Strength
Treinamento de Resistência
Técnicas de Exercício e de Movimento
Dor Musculoesquelética
Força Muscular
topic Strength Training
Exercise Movement Techniques
Musculoskeletal Pain
Muscle Strength
Treinamento de Resistência
Técnicas de Exercício e de Movimento
Dor Musculoesquelética
Força Muscular
description AbstractIntroduction: Functional resistance training (FRT) is becoming increasingly popular to improve physical fitness of practitioners, however, yet there are gaps in knowledge about effectiveness of FRT in relation conventional resistance training (CRT) in several ambits, as musculoskeletal complaints.Objective: Compare the effect of FRT and CRT in the musculoskeletal discomfort and magnitude of gain in muscle strength in healthy women.Methods: 52 women was divided into three groups, FRT (n = 15; 22 ± 2.35 years): functional resistance training; CRT (n = 14; 22.5 ± 1.78 years): conventional resistance training and CG (n = 13; 20.6 ± 1.10 years): no type of intervention. The training was periodized in 30 sessions over 12 weeks with 3 sessions per week. For the muscle strength variable used the 1RM test and for the musculoskeletal discomfort variable, the Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire (NMQ). Regarding the statistical analysis, all results took into consideration a 5% level of significance.Results: Considerable gain in muscle strength was observed for all exercises in both training groups. In addition, there was a tendency in CRT to relate a more musculoskeletal discomfort; presented 27.3% more complaints compared FRT in the MNQ.Conclusion: The FRT was as effective as the CRT for improving muscle strength, furthermore, there was a tendency for FRT to cause less musculoskeletal discomfort.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-04-01
2018-11-12T17:26:17Z
2018-11-12T17:26:17Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1980-5918.030.002.ao15
Fisioterapia em Movimento. Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, v. 30, n. 2, p. 347-356, 2017.
0103-5150
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/157638
10.1590/1980-5918.030.002.ao15
S0103-51502017000200347
S0103-51502017000200347.pdf
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1980-5918.030.002.ao15
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/157638
identifier_str_mv Fisioterapia em Movimento. Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, v. 30, n. 2, p. 347-356, 2017.
0103-5150
10.1590/1980-5918.030.002.ao15
S0103-51502017000200347
S0103-51502017000200347.pdf
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Fisioterapia em Movimento
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 347-356
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv SciELO
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808129543976779776