Rapid palatal expansion: a comparison of two appliances
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2012 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
DOI: | 10.1590/S1806-83242012000300010 |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1806-83242012000300010 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/15772 |
Resumo: | This study analyzed occlusal radiographs to compare the transverse changes produced in patients treated with rapid maxillary expansion using two types of appliances. The sample consisted of 31 children aged 7 to 10.6 years, of both genders, with posterior cross-bite. Fifteen children were treated with a tooth-borne expander and 16 were treated with a tooth-tissue-borne expander. Occlusal radiographs obtained at treatment onset and at the end of the retention period were digitized. The following variables were measured: intermolar distance (IMD), interapical distance (IApD), interbase distance (IBaD) and interarm distance (IArD). The results revealed increases in all measurements in both groups after rapid maxillary expansion. Comparison between groups revealed that the increases were greater in patients treated with the tooth-borne expander, except for the IArD measurement, which presented the same increase in both groups. Even though the IMD measurements differed between expanders, they were proportional to the activation of the appliances (IBaD). The increase in the IApD measurement was proportionally greater in the group treated with the tooth-borne expander (0.7:1.0) than in that treated with the tooth-tissue-borne expander (0.4:1.0). It was concluded that both appliances had similar effects, although the tooth-tissue-borne expander produced a lesser opening at the apical region of the incisors. |
id |
UNSP_02a51a3c8304848c8dad2a2487b89445 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/15772 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Rapid palatal expansion: a comparison of two appliancesMalocclusionPalatal Expansion TechniqueRadiography, DentalDental ArchThis study analyzed occlusal radiographs to compare the transverse changes produced in patients treated with rapid maxillary expansion using two types of appliances. The sample consisted of 31 children aged 7 to 10.6 years, of both genders, with posterior cross-bite. Fifteen children were treated with a tooth-borne expander and 16 were treated with a tooth-tissue-borne expander. Occlusal radiographs obtained at treatment onset and at the end of the retention period were digitized. The following variables were measured: intermolar distance (IMD), interapical distance (IApD), interbase distance (IBaD) and interarm distance (IArD). The results revealed increases in all measurements in both groups after rapid maxillary expansion. Comparison between groups revealed that the increases were greater in patients treated with the tooth-borne expander, except for the IArD measurement, which presented the same increase in both groups. Even though the IMD measurements differed between expanders, they were proportional to the activation of the appliances (IBaD). The increase in the IApD measurement was proportionally greater in the group treated with the tooth-borne expander (0.7:1.0) than in that treated with the tooth-tissue-borne expander (0.4:1.0). It was concluded that both appliances had similar effects, although the tooth-tissue-borne expander produced a lesser opening at the apical region of the incisors.State Univ São Paulo UNESP, Araraquara Sch Dent, Dept Pediat Dent, Araraquara, SP, BrazilState Univ São Paulo UNESP, Araraquara Sch Dent, Dept Pediat Dent, Araraquara, SP, BrazilSociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Rodrigues, Amanda do PradoMonini, Andre da Costa [UNESP]Gandini Júnior, Luiz Gonzaga [UNESP]dos Santos-Pinto, Ary [UNESP]2013-09-30T18:31:27Z2014-05-20T13:44:56Z2013-09-30T18:31:27Z2014-05-20T13:44:56Z2012-05-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article242-248application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1806-83242012000300010Brazilian Oral Research. São Paulo: Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontologica, v. 26, n. 3, p. 242-248, 2012.1806-8324http://hdl.handle.net/11449/15772S1806-83242012000300010WOS:000311862500010S1806-83242012000300010.pdf6493049604923160Web of Sciencereponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengBrazilian Oral Researchinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-09-26T14:21:24Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/15772Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestrepositoriounesp@unesp.bropendoar:29462024-09-26T14:21:24Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Rapid palatal expansion: a comparison of two appliances |
title |
Rapid palatal expansion: a comparison of two appliances |
spellingShingle |
Rapid palatal expansion: a comparison of two appliances Rapid palatal expansion: a comparison of two appliances Rodrigues, Amanda do Prado Malocclusion Palatal Expansion Technique Radiography, Dental Dental Arch Rodrigues, Amanda do Prado Malocclusion Palatal Expansion Technique Radiography, Dental Dental Arch |
title_short |
Rapid palatal expansion: a comparison of two appliances |
title_full |
Rapid palatal expansion: a comparison of two appliances |
title_fullStr |
Rapid palatal expansion: a comparison of two appliances Rapid palatal expansion: a comparison of two appliances |
title_full_unstemmed |
Rapid palatal expansion: a comparison of two appliances Rapid palatal expansion: a comparison of two appliances |
title_sort |
Rapid palatal expansion: a comparison of two appliances |
author |
Rodrigues, Amanda do Prado |
author_facet |
Rodrigues, Amanda do Prado Rodrigues, Amanda do Prado Monini, Andre da Costa [UNESP] Gandini Júnior, Luiz Gonzaga [UNESP] dos Santos-Pinto, Ary [UNESP] Monini, Andre da Costa [UNESP] Gandini Júnior, Luiz Gonzaga [UNESP] dos Santos-Pinto, Ary [UNESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Monini, Andre da Costa [UNESP] Gandini Júnior, Luiz Gonzaga [UNESP] dos Santos-Pinto, Ary [UNESP] |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Rodrigues, Amanda do Prado Monini, Andre da Costa [UNESP] Gandini Júnior, Luiz Gonzaga [UNESP] dos Santos-Pinto, Ary [UNESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Malocclusion Palatal Expansion Technique Radiography, Dental Dental Arch |
topic |
Malocclusion Palatal Expansion Technique Radiography, Dental Dental Arch |
description |
This study analyzed occlusal radiographs to compare the transverse changes produced in patients treated with rapid maxillary expansion using two types of appliances. The sample consisted of 31 children aged 7 to 10.6 years, of both genders, with posterior cross-bite. Fifteen children were treated with a tooth-borne expander and 16 were treated with a tooth-tissue-borne expander. Occlusal radiographs obtained at treatment onset and at the end of the retention period were digitized. The following variables were measured: intermolar distance (IMD), interapical distance (IApD), interbase distance (IBaD) and interarm distance (IArD). The results revealed increases in all measurements in both groups after rapid maxillary expansion. Comparison between groups revealed that the increases were greater in patients treated with the tooth-borne expander, except for the IArD measurement, which presented the same increase in both groups. Even though the IMD measurements differed between expanders, they were proportional to the activation of the appliances (IBaD). The increase in the IApD measurement was proportionally greater in the group treated with the tooth-borne expander (0.7:1.0) than in that treated with the tooth-tissue-borne expander (0.4:1.0). It was concluded that both appliances had similar effects, although the tooth-tissue-borne expander produced a lesser opening at the apical region of the incisors. |
publishDate |
2012 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2012-05-01 2013-09-30T18:31:27Z 2013-09-30T18:31:27Z 2014-05-20T13:44:56Z 2014-05-20T13:44:56Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1806-83242012000300010 Brazilian Oral Research. São Paulo: Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontologica, v. 26, n. 3, p. 242-248, 2012. 1806-8324 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/15772 S1806-83242012000300010 WOS:000311862500010 S1806-83242012000300010.pdf 6493049604923160 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1806-83242012000300010 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/15772 |
identifier_str_mv |
Brazilian Oral Research. São Paulo: Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontologica, v. 26, n. 3, p. 242-248, 2012. 1806-8324 S1806-83242012000300010 WOS:000311862500010 S1806-83242012000300010.pdf 6493049604923160 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Oral Research |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
242-248 application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO) |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO) |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Web of Science reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositoriounesp@unesp.br |
_version_ |
1822183860234878976 |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/S1806-83242012000300010 |