Rapid palatal expansion: a comparison of two appliances

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Rodrigues, Amanda do Prado
Data de Publicação: 2012
Outros Autores: Monini, Andre da Costa [UNESP], Gandini Júnior, Luiz Gonzaga [UNESP], dos Santos-Pinto, Ary [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
DOI: 10.1590/S1806-83242012000300010
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1806-83242012000300010
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/15772
Resumo: This study analyzed occlusal radiographs to compare the transverse changes produced in patients treated with rapid maxillary expansion using two types of appliances. The sample consisted of 31 children aged 7 to 10.6 years, of both genders, with posterior cross-bite. Fifteen children were treated with a tooth-borne expander and 16 were treated with a tooth-tissue-borne expander. Occlusal radiographs obtained at treatment onset and at the end of the retention period were digitized. The following variables were measured: intermolar distance (IMD), interapical distance (IApD), interbase distance (IBaD) and interarm distance (IArD). The results revealed increases in all measurements in both groups after rapid maxillary expansion. Comparison between groups revealed that the increases were greater in patients treated with the tooth-borne expander, except for the IArD measurement, which presented the same increase in both groups. Even though the IMD measurements differed between expanders, they were proportional to the activation of the appliances (IBaD). The increase in the IApD measurement was proportionally greater in the group treated with the tooth-borne expander (0.7:1.0) than in that treated with the tooth-tissue-borne expander (0.4:1.0). It was concluded that both appliances had similar effects, although the tooth-tissue-borne expander produced a lesser opening at the apical region of the incisors.
id UNSP_02a51a3c8304848c8dad2a2487b89445
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/15772
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Rapid palatal expansion: a comparison of two appliancesMalocclusionPalatal Expansion TechniqueRadiography, DentalDental ArchThis study analyzed occlusal radiographs to compare the transverse changes produced in patients treated with rapid maxillary expansion using two types of appliances. The sample consisted of 31 children aged 7 to 10.6 years, of both genders, with posterior cross-bite. Fifteen children were treated with a tooth-borne expander and 16 were treated with a tooth-tissue-borne expander. Occlusal radiographs obtained at treatment onset and at the end of the retention period were digitized. The following variables were measured: intermolar distance (IMD), interapical distance (IApD), interbase distance (IBaD) and interarm distance (IArD). The results revealed increases in all measurements in both groups after rapid maxillary expansion. Comparison between groups revealed that the increases were greater in patients treated with the tooth-borne expander, except for the IArD measurement, which presented the same increase in both groups. Even though the IMD measurements differed between expanders, they were proportional to the activation of the appliances (IBaD). The increase in the IApD measurement was proportionally greater in the group treated with the tooth-borne expander (0.7:1.0) than in that treated with the tooth-tissue-borne expander (0.4:1.0). It was concluded that both appliances had similar effects, although the tooth-tissue-borne expander produced a lesser opening at the apical region of the incisors.State Univ São Paulo UNESP, Araraquara Sch Dent, Dept Pediat Dent, Araraquara, SP, BrazilState Univ São Paulo UNESP, Araraquara Sch Dent, Dept Pediat Dent, Araraquara, SP, BrazilSociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Rodrigues, Amanda do PradoMonini, Andre da Costa [UNESP]Gandini Júnior, Luiz Gonzaga [UNESP]dos Santos-Pinto, Ary [UNESP]2013-09-30T18:31:27Z2014-05-20T13:44:56Z2013-09-30T18:31:27Z2014-05-20T13:44:56Z2012-05-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article242-248application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1806-83242012000300010Brazilian Oral Research. São Paulo: Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontologica, v. 26, n. 3, p. 242-248, 2012.1806-8324http://hdl.handle.net/11449/15772S1806-83242012000300010WOS:000311862500010S1806-83242012000300010.pdf6493049604923160Web of Sciencereponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengBrazilian Oral Researchinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-09-26T14:21:24Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/15772Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestrepositoriounesp@unesp.bropendoar:29462024-09-26T14:21:24Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Rapid palatal expansion: a comparison of two appliances
title Rapid palatal expansion: a comparison of two appliances
spellingShingle Rapid palatal expansion: a comparison of two appliances
Rapid palatal expansion: a comparison of two appliances
Rodrigues, Amanda do Prado
Malocclusion
Palatal Expansion Technique
Radiography, Dental
Dental Arch
Rodrigues, Amanda do Prado
Malocclusion
Palatal Expansion Technique
Radiography, Dental
Dental Arch
title_short Rapid palatal expansion: a comparison of two appliances
title_full Rapid palatal expansion: a comparison of two appliances
title_fullStr Rapid palatal expansion: a comparison of two appliances
Rapid palatal expansion: a comparison of two appliances
title_full_unstemmed Rapid palatal expansion: a comparison of two appliances
Rapid palatal expansion: a comparison of two appliances
title_sort Rapid palatal expansion: a comparison of two appliances
author Rodrigues, Amanda do Prado
author_facet Rodrigues, Amanda do Prado
Rodrigues, Amanda do Prado
Monini, Andre da Costa [UNESP]
Gandini Júnior, Luiz Gonzaga [UNESP]
dos Santos-Pinto, Ary [UNESP]
Monini, Andre da Costa [UNESP]
Gandini Júnior, Luiz Gonzaga [UNESP]
dos Santos-Pinto, Ary [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Monini, Andre da Costa [UNESP]
Gandini Júnior, Luiz Gonzaga [UNESP]
dos Santos-Pinto, Ary [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Rodrigues, Amanda do Prado
Monini, Andre da Costa [UNESP]
Gandini Júnior, Luiz Gonzaga [UNESP]
dos Santos-Pinto, Ary [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Malocclusion
Palatal Expansion Technique
Radiography, Dental
Dental Arch
topic Malocclusion
Palatal Expansion Technique
Radiography, Dental
Dental Arch
description This study analyzed occlusal radiographs to compare the transverse changes produced in patients treated with rapid maxillary expansion using two types of appliances. The sample consisted of 31 children aged 7 to 10.6 years, of both genders, with posterior cross-bite. Fifteen children were treated with a tooth-borne expander and 16 were treated with a tooth-tissue-borne expander. Occlusal radiographs obtained at treatment onset and at the end of the retention period were digitized. The following variables were measured: intermolar distance (IMD), interapical distance (IApD), interbase distance (IBaD) and interarm distance (IArD). The results revealed increases in all measurements in both groups after rapid maxillary expansion. Comparison between groups revealed that the increases were greater in patients treated with the tooth-borne expander, except for the IArD measurement, which presented the same increase in both groups. Even though the IMD measurements differed between expanders, they were proportional to the activation of the appliances (IBaD). The increase in the IApD measurement was proportionally greater in the group treated with the tooth-borne expander (0.7:1.0) than in that treated with the tooth-tissue-borne expander (0.4:1.0). It was concluded that both appliances had similar effects, although the tooth-tissue-borne expander produced a lesser opening at the apical region of the incisors.
publishDate 2012
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2012-05-01
2013-09-30T18:31:27Z
2013-09-30T18:31:27Z
2014-05-20T13:44:56Z
2014-05-20T13:44:56Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1806-83242012000300010
Brazilian Oral Research. São Paulo: Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontologica, v. 26, n. 3, p. 242-248, 2012.
1806-8324
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/15772
S1806-83242012000300010
WOS:000311862500010
S1806-83242012000300010.pdf
6493049604923160
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1806-83242012000300010
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/15772
identifier_str_mv Brazilian Oral Research. São Paulo: Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontologica, v. 26, n. 3, p. 242-248, 2012.
1806-8324
S1806-83242012000300010
WOS:000311862500010
S1806-83242012000300010.pdf
6493049604923160
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Oral Research
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 242-248
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Web of Science
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositoriounesp@unesp.br
_version_ 1822183860234878976
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S1806-83242012000300010