Neotropical Piper species: Are they all hermaphroditic?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Valentin-Silva, Adriano [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Batalha, Marco Antonio, Guimarães, Elza [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.flora.2018.05.002
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/171103
Resumo: Sexual expression has been used as a distinctive character among the clades of the genus Piper. Unisexual flowers are described for Paleotropical species, which are usually dioecious, whereas bisexual flowers are associated with Neotropical species, considered as hermaphroditic. However, the registration of an andromonoecious species in the Neotropics, associated with the morphological similarity of Piper flowers, suggests that the presence of functionally unisexual flowers may be more common than the one recorded so far. To investigate this possibility, we determined the sexual expression of 17 Neotropical Piper species, focusing on the functionality of the flowers along the anthesis in individuals of a semideciduous seasonal forest. We found 13 hermaphroditic species, one andromonoecious and three with variable combinations of hermaphroditic, andromonoecious and male individuals. The staminate flowers presented cryptic unisexuality. Species with more than one floral type presented sexual dimorphism, differing in length of their inflorescences and pistils of flowers. Although hermaphroditism is the predominant sexual expression among Neotropical Piper species, we observed variations of this expression in almost 25% of the species studied here, indicating that the unisexual flowers may have evolved independently in different clades of Neotropical and Paleotropical species.
id UNSP_03ca19b556b57c263d06558e397ea168
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/171103
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Neotropical Piper species: Are they all hermaphroditic?AndromonoecyCryptic unisexualityFloral functionalitySexual dimorphismSexual expression has been used as a distinctive character among the clades of the genus Piper. Unisexual flowers are described for Paleotropical species, which are usually dioecious, whereas bisexual flowers are associated with Neotropical species, considered as hermaphroditic. However, the registration of an andromonoecious species in the Neotropics, associated with the morphological similarity of Piper flowers, suggests that the presence of functionally unisexual flowers may be more common than the one recorded so far. To investigate this possibility, we determined the sexual expression of 17 Neotropical Piper species, focusing on the functionality of the flowers along the anthesis in individuals of a semideciduous seasonal forest. We found 13 hermaphroditic species, one andromonoecious and three with variable combinations of hermaphroditic, andromonoecious and male individuals. The staminate flowers presented cryptic unisexuality. Species with more than one floral type presented sexual dimorphism, differing in length of their inflorescences and pistils of flowers. Although hermaphroditism is the predominant sexual expression among Neotropical Piper species, we observed variations of this expression in almost 25% of the species studied here, indicating that the unisexual flowers may have evolved independently in different clades of Neotropical and Paleotropical species.Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)Graduate Program of Biological Sciences (Botany) Institute of Biosciences UNESP – São Paulo State University, Rua Prof. Dr. Antonio Celso Wagner Zanin, s/nºDepartment of Botany Federal University of São Carlos, PO Box 676Department of Botany Institute of Biosciences UNESP – São Paulo State University, Rua Prof. Dr. Antonio Celso Wagner Zanin, s/nºGraduate Program of Biological Sciences (Botany) Institute of Biosciences UNESP – São Paulo State University, Rua Prof. Dr. Antonio Celso Wagner Zanin, s/nºDepartment of Botany Institute of Biosciences UNESP – São Paulo State University, Rua Prof. Dr. Antonio Celso Wagner Zanin, s/nºUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCar)Valentin-Silva, Adriano [UNESP]Batalha, Marco AntonioGuimarães, Elza [UNESP]2018-12-11T16:53:54Z2018-12-11T16:53:54Z2018-07-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article8-14application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.flora.2018.05.002Flora: Morphology, Distribution, Functional Ecology of Plants, v. 244-245, p. 8-14.0367-2530http://hdl.handle.net/11449/17110310.1016/j.flora.2018.05.0022-s2.0-850485375382-s2.0-85048537538.pdfScopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengFlora: Morphology, Distribution, Functional Ecology of Plants0,570info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-11-22T06:12:34Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/171103Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462023-11-22T06:12:34Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Neotropical Piper species: Are they all hermaphroditic?
title Neotropical Piper species: Are they all hermaphroditic?
spellingShingle Neotropical Piper species: Are they all hermaphroditic?
Valentin-Silva, Adriano [UNESP]
Andromonoecy
Cryptic unisexuality
Floral functionality
Sexual dimorphism
title_short Neotropical Piper species: Are they all hermaphroditic?
title_full Neotropical Piper species: Are they all hermaphroditic?
title_fullStr Neotropical Piper species: Are they all hermaphroditic?
title_full_unstemmed Neotropical Piper species: Are they all hermaphroditic?
title_sort Neotropical Piper species: Are they all hermaphroditic?
author Valentin-Silva, Adriano [UNESP]
author_facet Valentin-Silva, Adriano [UNESP]
Batalha, Marco Antonio
Guimarães, Elza [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Batalha, Marco Antonio
Guimarães, Elza [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCar)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Valentin-Silva, Adriano [UNESP]
Batalha, Marco Antonio
Guimarães, Elza [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Andromonoecy
Cryptic unisexuality
Floral functionality
Sexual dimorphism
topic Andromonoecy
Cryptic unisexuality
Floral functionality
Sexual dimorphism
description Sexual expression has been used as a distinctive character among the clades of the genus Piper. Unisexual flowers are described for Paleotropical species, which are usually dioecious, whereas bisexual flowers are associated with Neotropical species, considered as hermaphroditic. However, the registration of an andromonoecious species in the Neotropics, associated with the morphological similarity of Piper flowers, suggests that the presence of functionally unisexual flowers may be more common than the one recorded so far. To investigate this possibility, we determined the sexual expression of 17 Neotropical Piper species, focusing on the functionality of the flowers along the anthesis in individuals of a semideciduous seasonal forest. We found 13 hermaphroditic species, one andromonoecious and three with variable combinations of hermaphroditic, andromonoecious and male individuals. The staminate flowers presented cryptic unisexuality. Species with more than one floral type presented sexual dimorphism, differing in length of their inflorescences and pistils of flowers. Although hermaphroditism is the predominant sexual expression among Neotropical Piper species, we observed variations of this expression in almost 25% of the species studied here, indicating that the unisexual flowers may have evolved independently in different clades of Neotropical and Paleotropical species.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-12-11T16:53:54Z
2018-12-11T16:53:54Z
2018-07-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.flora.2018.05.002
Flora: Morphology, Distribution, Functional Ecology of Plants, v. 244-245, p. 8-14.
0367-2530
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/171103
10.1016/j.flora.2018.05.002
2-s2.0-85048537538
2-s2.0-85048537538.pdf
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.flora.2018.05.002
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/171103
identifier_str_mv Flora: Morphology, Distribution, Functional Ecology of Plants, v. 244-245, p. 8-14.
0367-2530
10.1016/j.flora.2018.05.002
2-s2.0-85048537538
2-s2.0-85048537538.pdf
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Flora: Morphology, Distribution, Functional Ecology of Plants
0,570
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 8-14
application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1803046602212900864