Outcomes of two surgical techniques for major trichiasis treatment

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ferraz, Lucieni C. B. [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Meneghim, Roberta L. R. S. [UNESP], Galindo-Ferreiro, Alicia, Wanzeler, Ana C. V. [UNESP], Saruwatari, Michelli M. [UNESP], Satto, Larissa H. [UNESP], Padovani, Carlos R. [UNESP], Schellini, Silvana A. [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01676830.2017.1353108
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/166120
Resumo: The purpose of this article is to analyze the outcomes of two surgical techniques to treat major trichiasis. A retrospective chart review of 67 patients (89 eyelids) with major trichiasis was performed who underwent surgical treatment using one of two techniques: intermarginal split lamella with graft (ISLG group) or lid lamella resection (LLR group). There were 30 lids in the ISLG group with mean patient age of 71.8 years and 63.3% were females. There were 59 lids in the LLR group with mean patient age of 72.5 years and 52.5% were female. The minimum postoperative follow up was six months. Statistical analysis included descriptive measures, Goodman association test for contrasts between and within multinomial populations and nonparametric Mann-Whitney test for comparison between groups. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The underlying causes of trichiasis were blepharitis (37.07%), chronic meibomitis (21.3%), multiple causes (20.2%), ectropion (11.2%), actinic keratosis (6.7%), or prior ocular surgery (3.3%). Postoperatively, in the ISLG group, there were 20% lids with complete success, 50% underwent laser or electrolysis, 16.7% required further surgery, and 13.3% were unsuccessful. Postoperatively, in the LLR group, there were 47.5% eyelids with complete success, 46.7% underwent laser or electrolysis, 6.8% required further surgery, and 5.1% were unsuccessful. There was a higher statistical chance of complete success with LLR (P < 0.05). LLR is superior to ISLG surgery for the treatment of major trichiasis. There is a greater chance of success with LLR and it is technically simpler.
id UNSP_0403151ecebe07236250038496ecb4a4
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/166120
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Outcomes of two surgical techniques for major trichiasis treatmentIntermarginal split lamella with graftlid lamella resectionmajor trichiasistreatment of trichiasisThe purpose of this article is to analyze the outcomes of two surgical techniques to treat major trichiasis. A retrospective chart review of 67 patients (89 eyelids) with major trichiasis was performed who underwent surgical treatment using one of two techniques: intermarginal split lamella with graft (ISLG group) or lid lamella resection (LLR group). There were 30 lids in the ISLG group with mean patient age of 71.8 years and 63.3% were females. There were 59 lids in the LLR group with mean patient age of 72.5 years and 52.5% were female. The minimum postoperative follow up was six months. Statistical analysis included descriptive measures, Goodman association test for contrasts between and within multinomial populations and nonparametric Mann-Whitney test for comparison between groups. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The underlying causes of trichiasis were blepharitis (37.07%), chronic meibomitis (21.3%), multiple causes (20.2%), ectropion (11.2%), actinic keratosis (6.7%), or prior ocular surgery (3.3%). Postoperatively, in the ISLG group, there were 20% lids with complete success, 50% underwent laser or electrolysis, 16.7% required further surgery, and 13.3% were unsuccessful. Postoperatively, in the LLR group, there were 47.5% eyelids with complete success, 46.7% underwent laser or electrolysis, 6.8% required further surgery, and 5.1% were unsuccessful. There was a higher statistical chance of complete success with LLR (P < 0.05). LLR is superior to ISLG surgery for the treatment of major trichiasis. There is a greater chance of success with LLR and it is technically simpler.Univ Estadual Paulista, Fac Med Botucatu, Botucatu, SP, BrazilKing Khalid Eye Specialist Hosp, Arouba St,POB 7191, Riyadh, Saudi ArabiaUniv Estadual Paulista, Inst Biociencias, Botucatu, SP, BrazilUniv Estadual Paulista, Fac Med Botucatu, Botucatu, SP, BrazilUniv Estadual Paulista, Inst Biociencias, Botucatu, SP, BrazilTaylor & Francis IncUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)King Khalid Eye Specialist HospFerraz, Lucieni C. B. [UNESP]Meneghim, Roberta L. R. S. [UNESP]Galindo-Ferreiro, AliciaWanzeler, Ana C. V. [UNESP]Saruwatari, Michelli M. [UNESP]Satto, Larissa H. [UNESP]Padovani, Carlos R. [UNESP]Schellini, Silvana A. [UNESP]2018-11-29T13:28:32Z2018-11-29T13:28:32Z2018-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article36-40http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01676830.2017.1353108Orbit-an International Journal On Orbital Disorders And Facial Reconstructive Surgery. Philadelphia: Taylor & Francis Inc, v. 37, n. 1, p. 36-40, 2018.0167-6830http://hdl.handle.net/11449/16612010.1080/01676830.2017.1353108WOS:000431136400010Web of Sciencereponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengOrbit-an International Journal On Orbital Disorders And Facial Reconstructive Surgeryinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-10-23T16:08:38Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/166120Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T20:35:53.036716Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Outcomes of two surgical techniques for major trichiasis treatment
title Outcomes of two surgical techniques for major trichiasis treatment
spellingShingle Outcomes of two surgical techniques for major trichiasis treatment
Ferraz, Lucieni C. B. [UNESP]
Intermarginal split lamella with graft
lid lamella resection
major trichiasis
treatment of trichiasis
title_short Outcomes of two surgical techniques for major trichiasis treatment
title_full Outcomes of two surgical techniques for major trichiasis treatment
title_fullStr Outcomes of two surgical techniques for major trichiasis treatment
title_full_unstemmed Outcomes of two surgical techniques for major trichiasis treatment
title_sort Outcomes of two surgical techniques for major trichiasis treatment
author Ferraz, Lucieni C. B. [UNESP]
author_facet Ferraz, Lucieni C. B. [UNESP]
Meneghim, Roberta L. R. S. [UNESP]
Galindo-Ferreiro, Alicia
Wanzeler, Ana C. V. [UNESP]
Saruwatari, Michelli M. [UNESP]
Satto, Larissa H. [UNESP]
Padovani, Carlos R. [UNESP]
Schellini, Silvana A. [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Meneghim, Roberta L. R. S. [UNESP]
Galindo-Ferreiro, Alicia
Wanzeler, Ana C. V. [UNESP]
Saruwatari, Michelli M. [UNESP]
Satto, Larissa H. [UNESP]
Padovani, Carlos R. [UNESP]
Schellini, Silvana A. [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
King Khalid Eye Specialist Hosp
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ferraz, Lucieni C. B. [UNESP]
Meneghim, Roberta L. R. S. [UNESP]
Galindo-Ferreiro, Alicia
Wanzeler, Ana C. V. [UNESP]
Saruwatari, Michelli M. [UNESP]
Satto, Larissa H. [UNESP]
Padovani, Carlos R. [UNESP]
Schellini, Silvana A. [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Intermarginal split lamella with graft
lid lamella resection
major trichiasis
treatment of trichiasis
topic Intermarginal split lamella with graft
lid lamella resection
major trichiasis
treatment of trichiasis
description The purpose of this article is to analyze the outcomes of two surgical techniques to treat major trichiasis. A retrospective chart review of 67 patients (89 eyelids) with major trichiasis was performed who underwent surgical treatment using one of two techniques: intermarginal split lamella with graft (ISLG group) or lid lamella resection (LLR group). There were 30 lids in the ISLG group with mean patient age of 71.8 years and 63.3% were females. There were 59 lids in the LLR group with mean patient age of 72.5 years and 52.5% were female. The minimum postoperative follow up was six months. Statistical analysis included descriptive measures, Goodman association test for contrasts between and within multinomial populations and nonparametric Mann-Whitney test for comparison between groups. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The underlying causes of trichiasis were blepharitis (37.07%), chronic meibomitis (21.3%), multiple causes (20.2%), ectropion (11.2%), actinic keratosis (6.7%), or prior ocular surgery (3.3%). Postoperatively, in the ISLG group, there were 20% lids with complete success, 50% underwent laser or electrolysis, 16.7% required further surgery, and 13.3% were unsuccessful. Postoperatively, in the LLR group, there were 47.5% eyelids with complete success, 46.7% underwent laser or electrolysis, 6.8% required further surgery, and 5.1% were unsuccessful. There was a higher statistical chance of complete success with LLR (P < 0.05). LLR is superior to ISLG surgery for the treatment of major trichiasis. There is a greater chance of success with LLR and it is technically simpler.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-11-29T13:28:32Z
2018-11-29T13:28:32Z
2018-01-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01676830.2017.1353108
Orbit-an International Journal On Orbital Disorders And Facial Reconstructive Surgery. Philadelphia: Taylor & Francis Inc, v. 37, n. 1, p. 36-40, 2018.
0167-6830
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/166120
10.1080/01676830.2017.1353108
WOS:000431136400010
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01676830.2017.1353108
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/166120
identifier_str_mv Orbit-an International Journal On Orbital Disorders And Facial Reconstructive Surgery. Philadelphia: Taylor & Francis Inc, v. 37, n. 1, p. 36-40, 2018.
0167-6830
10.1080/01676830.2017.1353108
WOS:000431136400010
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Orbit-an International Journal On Orbital Disorders And Facial Reconstructive Surgery
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 36-40
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Taylor & Francis Inc
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Taylor & Francis Inc
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Web of Science
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808129225028272128