Relationship between citrus productivity and indicators of uniformity in trickle irrigation system

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Saad, João Carlos Cury [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2012
Outros Autores: Da Silva Jr., Hélio Moreira [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo de conferência
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://elibrary.asabe.org/azdez.asp?JID=5&AID=41981&CID=dall2012&T=2
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/73935
Resumo: In trickle irrigation systems, the design is based on the pre-established emission uniformity (EU) which is the combined result of the equipment characteristics and its hydraulic configuration. However, this desired value of the EU may not be confirmed by the final project (in field conditions) and neither by the yield uniformity. The hypotheses of this research were: a) the EU of a trickle irrigation system at field conditions is equal to the emission uniformity pre-established in the its design; b) EU has always the lowest value when compared with other indicators of uniformity; c) the discharge variation coefficient (VC) is not equal to production variation coefficient in the operational unit; d) the difference between the discharge variation coefficient and the productivity variation coefficient depends on the water depth applied. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between EU used in the irrigation system design and the final yield uniformity. The uniformity indicators evaluated were: EU, distribution uniformity (UD) and the index proposed by Barragan & Wu (2005). They were compared estimating the performance of a trickle irrigation system applied in a citrus orchard with dimensions of 400m x 600m. The design of the irrigation system was optimized by a Linear Programming model. The tree rows were leveled in the larger direction and the spacing adopted in the orchard was 7m x 4m. The manifold line was always operating on a slope condition. The sensitivity analysis involved different slopes, 0, 3, 6, 9 and 12%, and different values of emission uniformity, 60, 70, 75, 80, 85, 90 and 94%. The citrus yield uniformity was evaluated by the variation coefficient. The emission uniformity (EU) after design differed from the EU pre-established, more sharply in the initial values lower than 90%. Comparing the uniformity indexes, the EU always generated lower values when compared with the UD and with the index proposed by Barragan. The emitter variation coefficient was always lower than the productivity variation coefficient. To obtain uniformity of production, it is necessary to consider the irrigation system uniformity and mainly the water depth to be applied.
id UNSP_04f6fbade4d4b6c4713f400ebe7b4bde
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/73935
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Relationship between citrus productivity and indicators of uniformity in trickle irrigation systemIrrigated citrusLinear programmingTrickle irrigationDifferent slopesDistribution uniformityEmission uniformityEquipment characteristicsField conditionsIn-fieldInitial valuesIrrigation system designIrrigation systemsLinear programming modelsOperational unitsProduction variationsVariation coefficientWater depthDesignHydraulic machineryOrchardsProductivityIrrigationIn trickle irrigation systems, the design is based on the pre-established emission uniformity (EU) which is the combined result of the equipment characteristics and its hydraulic configuration. However, this desired value of the EU may not be confirmed by the final project (in field conditions) and neither by the yield uniformity. The hypotheses of this research were: a) the EU of a trickle irrigation system at field conditions is equal to the emission uniformity pre-established in the its design; b) EU has always the lowest value when compared with other indicators of uniformity; c) the discharge variation coefficient (VC) is not equal to production variation coefficient in the operational unit; d) the difference between the discharge variation coefficient and the productivity variation coefficient depends on the water depth applied. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between EU used in the irrigation system design and the final yield uniformity. The uniformity indicators evaluated were: EU, distribution uniformity (UD) and the index proposed by Barragan & Wu (2005). They were compared estimating the performance of a trickle irrigation system applied in a citrus orchard with dimensions of 400m x 600m. The design of the irrigation system was optimized by a Linear Programming model. The tree rows were leveled in the larger direction and the spacing adopted in the orchard was 7m x 4m. The manifold line was always operating on a slope condition. The sensitivity analysis involved different slopes, 0, 3, 6, 9 and 12%, and different values of emission uniformity, 60, 70, 75, 80, 85, 90 and 94%. The citrus yield uniformity was evaluated by the variation coefficient. The emission uniformity (EU) after design differed from the EU pre-established, more sharply in the initial values lower than 90%. Comparing the uniformity indexes, the EU always generated lower values when compared with the UD and with the index proposed by Barragan. The emitter variation coefficient was always lower than the productivity variation coefficient. To obtain uniformity of production, it is necessary to consider the irrigation system uniformity and mainly the water depth to be applied.Faculdade de Ciências Agronômicas UNESP - Univ. Estadual Paulista, R. José Barbosa de Barros, 1780, 18610-307, Botucatu, SPFaculdade de Ciências Agronômicas UNESP - Univ. Estadual Paulista, R. José Barbosa de Barros, 1780, 18610-307, Botucatu, SPUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Saad, João Carlos Cury [UNESP]Da Silva Jr., Hélio Moreira [UNESP]2014-05-27T11:27:21Z2014-05-27T11:27:21Z2012-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject4621-4627application/pdfhttp://elibrary.asabe.org/azdez.asp?JID=5&AID=41981&CID=dall2012&T=2American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers Annual International Meeting 2012, v. 6, p. 4621-4627.http://hdl.handle.net/11449/739352-s2.0-848717684982-s2.0-84871768498.pdfScopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengAmerican Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers Annual International Meeting 2012info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-04-30T14:02:51Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/73935Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T14:16:14.786836Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Relationship between citrus productivity and indicators of uniformity in trickle irrigation system
title Relationship between citrus productivity and indicators of uniformity in trickle irrigation system
spellingShingle Relationship between citrus productivity and indicators of uniformity in trickle irrigation system
Saad, João Carlos Cury [UNESP]
Irrigated citrus
Linear programming
Trickle irrigation
Different slopes
Distribution uniformity
Emission uniformity
Equipment characteristics
Field conditions
In-field
Initial values
Irrigation system design
Irrigation systems
Linear programming models
Operational units
Production variations
Variation coefficient
Water depth
Design
Hydraulic machinery
Orchards
Productivity
Irrigation
title_short Relationship between citrus productivity and indicators of uniformity in trickle irrigation system
title_full Relationship between citrus productivity and indicators of uniformity in trickle irrigation system
title_fullStr Relationship between citrus productivity and indicators of uniformity in trickle irrigation system
title_full_unstemmed Relationship between citrus productivity and indicators of uniformity in trickle irrigation system
title_sort Relationship between citrus productivity and indicators of uniformity in trickle irrigation system
author Saad, João Carlos Cury [UNESP]
author_facet Saad, João Carlos Cury [UNESP]
Da Silva Jr., Hélio Moreira [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Da Silva Jr., Hélio Moreira [UNESP]
author2_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Saad, João Carlos Cury [UNESP]
Da Silva Jr., Hélio Moreira [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Irrigated citrus
Linear programming
Trickle irrigation
Different slopes
Distribution uniformity
Emission uniformity
Equipment characteristics
Field conditions
In-field
Initial values
Irrigation system design
Irrigation systems
Linear programming models
Operational units
Production variations
Variation coefficient
Water depth
Design
Hydraulic machinery
Orchards
Productivity
Irrigation
topic Irrigated citrus
Linear programming
Trickle irrigation
Different slopes
Distribution uniformity
Emission uniformity
Equipment characteristics
Field conditions
In-field
Initial values
Irrigation system design
Irrigation systems
Linear programming models
Operational units
Production variations
Variation coefficient
Water depth
Design
Hydraulic machinery
Orchards
Productivity
Irrigation
description In trickle irrigation systems, the design is based on the pre-established emission uniformity (EU) which is the combined result of the equipment characteristics and its hydraulic configuration. However, this desired value of the EU may not be confirmed by the final project (in field conditions) and neither by the yield uniformity. The hypotheses of this research were: a) the EU of a trickle irrigation system at field conditions is equal to the emission uniformity pre-established in the its design; b) EU has always the lowest value when compared with other indicators of uniformity; c) the discharge variation coefficient (VC) is not equal to production variation coefficient in the operational unit; d) the difference between the discharge variation coefficient and the productivity variation coefficient depends on the water depth applied. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between EU used in the irrigation system design and the final yield uniformity. The uniformity indicators evaluated were: EU, distribution uniformity (UD) and the index proposed by Barragan & Wu (2005). They were compared estimating the performance of a trickle irrigation system applied in a citrus orchard with dimensions of 400m x 600m. The design of the irrigation system was optimized by a Linear Programming model. The tree rows were leveled in the larger direction and the spacing adopted in the orchard was 7m x 4m. The manifold line was always operating on a slope condition. The sensitivity analysis involved different slopes, 0, 3, 6, 9 and 12%, and different values of emission uniformity, 60, 70, 75, 80, 85, 90 and 94%. The citrus yield uniformity was evaluated by the variation coefficient. The emission uniformity (EU) after design differed from the EU pre-established, more sharply in the initial values lower than 90%. Comparing the uniformity indexes, the EU always generated lower values when compared with the UD and with the index proposed by Barragan. The emitter variation coefficient was always lower than the productivity variation coefficient. To obtain uniformity of production, it is necessary to consider the irrigation system uniformity and mainly the water depth to be applied.
publishDate 2012
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2012-12-01
2014-05-27T11:27:21Z
2014-05-27T11:27:21Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject
format conferenceObject
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://elibrary.asabe.org/azdez.asp?JID=5&AID=41981&CID=dall2012&T=2
American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers Annual International Meeting 2012, v. 6, p. 4621-4627.
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/73935
2-s2.0-84871768498
2-s2.0-84871768498.pdf
url http://elibrary.asabe.org/azdez.asp?JID=5&AID=41981&CID=dall2012&T=2
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/73935
identifier_str_mv American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers Annual International Meeting 2012, v. 6, p. 4621-4627.
2-s2.0-84871768498
2-s2.0-84871768498.pdf
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers Annual International Meeting 2012
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 4621-4627
application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808128338341920768