Relationship between citrus productivity and indicators of uniformity in trickle irrigation system
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2012 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo de conferência |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://elibrary.asabe.org/azdez.asp?JID=5&AID=41981&CID=dall2012&T=2 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/73935 |
Resumo: | In trickle irrigation systems, the design is based on the pre-established emission uniformity (EU) which is the combined result of the equipment characteristics and its hydraulic configuration. However, this desired value of the EU may not be confirmed by the final project (in field conditions) and neither by the yield uniformity. The hypotheses of this research were: a) the EU of a trickle irrigation system at field conditions is equal to the emission uniformity pre-established in the its design; b) EU has always the lowest value when compared with other indicators of uniformity; c) the discharge variation coefficient (VC) is not equal to production variation coefficient in the operational unit; d) the difference between the discharge variation coefficient and the productivity variation coefficient depends on the water depth applied. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between EU used in the irrigation system design and the final yield uniformity. The uniformity indicators evaluated were: EU, distribution uniformity (UD) and the index proposed by Barragan & Wu (2005). They were compared estimating the performance of a trickle irrigation system applied in a citrus orchard with dimensions of 400m x 600m. The design of the irrigation system was optimized by a Linear Programming model. The tree rows were leveled in the larger direction and the spacing adopted in the orchard was 7m x 4m. The manifold line was always operating on a slope condition. The sensitivity analysis involved different slopes, 0, 3, 6, 9 and 12%, and different values of emission uniformity, 60, 70, 75, 80, 85, 90 and 94%. The citrus yield uniformity was evaluated by the variation coefficient. The emission uniformity (EU) after design differed from the EU pre-established, more sharply in the initial values lower than 90%. Comparing the uniformity indexes, the EU always generated lower values when compared with the UD and with the index proposed by Barragan. The emitter variation coefficient was always lower than the productivity variation coefficient. To obtain uniformity of production, it is necessary to consider the irrigation system uniformity and mainly the water depth to be applied. |
id |
UNSP_04f6fbade4d4b6c4713f400ebe7b4bde |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/73935 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Relationship between citrus productivity and indicators of uniformity in trickle irrigation systemIrrigated citrusLinear programmingTrickle irrigationDifferent slopesDistribution uniformityEmission uniformityEquipment characteristicsField conditionsIn-fieldInitial valuesIrrigation system designIrrigation systemsLinear programming modelsOperational unitsProduction variationsVariation coefficientWater depthDesignHydraulic machineryOrchardsProductivityIrrigationIn trickle irrigation systems, the design is based on the pre-established emission uniformity (EU) which is the combined result of the equipment characteristics and its hydraulic configuration. However, this desired value of the EU may not be confirmed by the final project (in field conditions) and neither by the yield uniformity. The hypotheses of this research were: a) the EU of a trickle irrigation system at field conditions is equal to the emission uniformity pre-established in the its design; b) EU has always the lowest value when compared with other indicators of uniformity; c) the discharge variation coefficient (VC) is not equal to production variation coefficient in the operational unit; d) the difference between the discharge variation coefficient and the productivity variation coefficient depends on the water depth applied. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between EU used in the irrigation system design and the final yield uniformity. The uniformity indicators evaluated were: EU, distribution uniformity (UD) and the index proposed by Barragan & Wu (2005). They were compared estimating the performance of a trickle irrigation system applied in a citrus orchard with dimensions of 400m x 600m. The design of the irrigation system was optimized by a Linear Programming model. The tree rows were leveled in the larger direction and the spacing adopted in the orchard was 7m x 4m. The manifold line was always operating on a slope condition. The sensitivity analysis involved different slopes, 0, 3, 6, 9 and 12%, and different values of emission uniformity, 60, 70, 75, 80, 85, 90 and 94%. The citrus yield uniformity was evaluated by the variation coefficient. The emission uniformity (EU) after design differed from the EU pre-established, more sharply in the initial values lower than 90%. Comparing the uniformity indexes, the EU always generated lower values when compared with the UD and with the index proposed by Barragan. The emitter variation coefficient was always lower than the productivity variation coefficient. To obtain uniformity of production, it is necessary to consider the irrigation system uniformity and mainly the water depth to be applied.Faculdade de Ciências Agronômicas UNESP - Univ. Estadual Paulista, R. José Barbosa de Barros, 1780, 18610-307, Botucatu, SPFaculdade de Ciências Agronômicas UNESP - Univ. Estadual Paulista, R. José Barbosa de Barros, 1780, 18610-307, Botucatu, SPUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Saad, João Carlos Cury [UNESP]Da Silva Jr., Hélio Moreira [UNESP]2014-05-27T11:27:21Z2014-05-27T11:27:21Z2012-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject4621-4627application/pdfhttp://elibrary.asabe.org/azdez.asp?JID=5&AID=41981&CID=dall2012&T=2American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers Annual International Meeting 2012, v. 6, p. 4621-4627.http://hdl.handle.net/11449/739352-s2.0-848717684982-s2.0-84871768498.pdfScopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengAmerican Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers Annual International Meeting 2012info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-04-30T14:02:51Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/73935Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T14:16:14.786836Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Relationship between citrus productivity and indicators of uniformity in trickle irrigation system |
title |
Relationship between citrus productivity and indicators of uniformity in trickle irrigation system |
spellingShingle |
Relationship between citrus productivity and indicators of uniformity in trickle irrigation system Saad, João Carlos Cury [UNESP] Irrigated citrus Linear programming Trickle irrigation Different slopes Distribution uniformity Emission uniformity Equipment characteristics Field conditions In-field Initial values Irrigation system design Irrigation systems Linear programming models Operational units Production variations Variation coefficient Water depth Design Hydraulic machinery Orchards Productivity Irrigation |
title_short |
Relationship between citrus productivity and indicators of uniformity in trickle irrigation system |
title_full |
Relationship between citrus productivity and indicators of uniformity in trickle irrigation system |
title_fullStr |
Relationship between citrus productivity and indicators of uniformity in trickle irrigation system |
title_full_unstemmed |
Relationship between citrus productivity and indicators of uniformity in trickle irrigation system |
title_sort |
Relationship between citrus productivity and indicators of uniformity in trickle irrigation system |
author |
Saad, João Carlos Cury [UNESP] |
author_facet |
Saad, João Carlos Cury [UNESP] Da Silva Jr., Hélio Moreira [UNESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Da Silva Jr., Hélio Moreira [UNESP] |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Saad, João Carlos Cury [UNESP] Da Silva Jr., Hélio Moreira [UNESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Irrigated citrus Linear programming Trickle irrigation Different slopes Distribution uniformity Emission uniformity Equipment characteristics Field conditions In-field Initial values Irrigation system design Irrigation systems Linear programming models Operational units Production variations Variation coefficient Water depth Design Hydraulic machinery Orchards Productivity Irrigation |
topic |
Irrigated citrus Linear programming Trickle irrigation Different slopes Distribution uniformity Emission uniformity Equipment characteristics Field conditions In-field Initial values Irrigation system design Irrigation systems Linear programming models Operational units Production variations Variation coefficient Water depth Design Hydraulic machinery Orchards Productivity Irrigation |
description |
In trickle irrigation systems, the design is based on the pre-established emission uniformity (EU) which is the combined result of the equipment characteristics and its hydraulic configuration. However, this desired value of the EU may not be confirmed by the final project (in field conditions) and neither by the yield uniformity. The hypotheses of this research were: a) the EU of a trickle irrigation system at field conditions is equal to the emission uniformity pre-established in the its design; b) EU has always the lowest value when compared with other indicators of uniformity; c) the discharge variation coefficient (VC) is not equal to production variation coefficient in the operational unit; d) the difference between the discharge variation coefficient and the productivity variation coefficient depends on the water depth applied. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between EU used in the irrigation system design and the final yield uniformity. The uniformity indicators evaluated were: EU, distribution uniformity (UD) and the index proposed by Barragan & Wu (2005). They were compared estimating the performance of a trickle irrigation system applied in a citrus orchard with dimensions of 400m x 600m. The design of the irrigation system was optimized by a Linear Programming model. The tree rows were leveled in the larger direction and the spacing adopted in the orchard was 7m x 4m. The manifold line was always operating on a slope condition. The sensitivity analysis involved different slopes, 0, 3, 6, 9 and 12%, and different values of emission uniformity, 60, 70, 75, 80, 85, 90 and 94%. The citrus yield uniformity was evaluated by the variation coefficient. The emission uniformity (EU) after design differed from the EU pre-established, more sharply in the initial values lower than 90%. Comparing the uniformity indexes, the EU always generated lower values when compared with the UD and with the index proposed by Barragan. The emitter variation coefficient was always lower than the productivity variation coefficient. To obtain uniformity of production, it is necessary to consider the irrigation system uniformity and mainly the water depth to be applied. |
publishDate |
2012 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2012-12-01 2014-05-27T11:27:21Z 2014-05-27T11:27:21Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject |
format |
conferenceObject |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://elibrary.asabe.org/azdez.asp?JID=5&AID=41981&CID=dall2012&T=2 American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers Annual International Meeting 2012, v. 6, p. 4621-4627. http://hdl.handle.net/11449/73935 2-s2.0-84871768498 2-s2.0-84871768498.pdf |
url |
http://elibrary.asabe.org/azdez.asp?JID=5&AID=41981&CID=dall2012&T=2 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/73935 |
identifier_str_mv |
American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers Annual International Meeting 2012, v. 6, p. 4621-4627. 2-s2.0-84871768498 2-s2.0-84871768498.pdf |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers Annual International Meeting 2012 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
4621-4627 application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808128338341920768 |