Carcass yield and proximate composition of bullfrog (Lithobates catesbeianus)
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2015 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.4025/actascianimsci.v37i4.28196 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/212391 |
Resumo: | This work evaluated five classes of weight of bullfrog (Lithobates catesbeianus) seeking to define the ideal slaughter weight for the species. We used 79 bullfrogs, distributed in a completely randomized design (class 1 < 100 g (n = 10); class 2 from 101 to 150 g (n = 17); class 3 from 151 to 200 g (n = 24); class 4 from 201 to 250 g (n = 14); and class 5 >251 g (n = 14)), which were euthanized, weighted and gutted. For the carcass yield, we weighed the clean torso, thighs, liver, skin and head. The clean torso was subjected to chemical composition analysis. The carcass yield was, on average, 49% with no difference between weight classes (p > 0.05). The yield of posterior thighs was significantly higher for the lower weight class, which also presented higher percentage of paws (28.37 ± 0.63 and 9.33 ± 0.21, respectively) (p < 0.05). The percentages of visceral fat and skin showed a progressive increase along with the weight of the animals; the class with individuals weighing 201-250 grams showed the higher values (p < 0.05). The chemical composition indicated that individuals above 251 grams showed lower values of ether extract and higher values of crude protein (0.99 ± 0.14 and 15.80 ± 0.64, respectively) (p < 0.05). So, it is recommended the slaughter of bullfrogs weighing more than 201 grams, because of better yield and meat quality. |
id |
UNSP_059d189256c7aaf61f403c3e9f8be583 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/212391 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Carcass yield and proximate composition of bullfrog (Lithobates catesbeianus)Rendimento de carcaça e composição centesimal da rã-touro (Lithobates catesbeianus)exotic speciesmeat processing: ranicultureespécie exóticaprocessamento de carneraniculturaThis work evaluated five classes of weight of bullfrog (Lithobates catesbeianus) seeking to define the ideal slaughter weight for the species. We used 79 bullfrogs, distributed in a completely randomized design (class 1 < 100 g (n = 10); class 2 from 101 to 150 g (n = 17); class 3 from 151 to 200 g (n = 24); class 4 from 201 to 250 g (n = 14); and class 5 >251 g (n = 14)), which were euthanized, weighted and gutted. For the carcass yield, we weighed the clean torso, thighs, liver, skin and head. The clean torso was subjected to chemical composition analysis. The carcass yield was, on average, 49% with no difference between weight classes (p > 0.05). The yield of posterior thighs was significantly higher for the lower weight class, which also presented higher percentage of paws (28.37 ± 0.63 and 9.33 ± 0.21, respectively) (p < 0.05). The percentages of visceral fat and skin showed a progressive increase along with the weight of the animals; the class with individuals weighing 201-250 grams showed the higher values (p < 0.05). The chemical composition indicated that individuals above 251 grams showed lower values of ether extract and higher values of crude protein (0.99 ± 0.14 and 15.80 ± 0.64, respectively) (p < 0.05). So, it is recommended the slaughter of bullfrogs weighing more than 201 grams, because of better yield and meat quality.O objetivo do trabalho foi comparar cinco diferentes classes de peso de rã-touro (Lithobates catesbeianus), buscando definir o peso ideal de abate para a espécie. Foram utilizados 79 exemplares de rãs-touro, distribuídas em um delineamento inteiramente casualizado (classe 1 <100 g (n = 10); classe 2 de 101 a 150 g (n = 17); classe 3 de 151 a 200 g (n = 24); classe 4 de 200 a 250 g (n = 14), e classe 5 > 251 g (n = 14)), que foram eutanaziados, pesados e eviscerados. Para o rendimento da carcaça foram pesados: tronco limpo, coxas, fígado, patas, pele e cabeça. O tronco limpo foi submetido à análise de composição centesimal. O rendimento de corpo limpo foi em média 49%, sem diferença entre classes (p > 0,05). O rendimento das coxas posteriores foi significativamente maior para a menor classe de peso, e essa classe também apresentou maior porcentual de patas (28,37 ± 0,63 e 9,33 ± 0,21, respectivamente) (p < 0,05). As porcentagens de gordura visceral e pele apresentaram um aumento progressivo concomitante ao peso dos animais, sendo que a classe com indivíduos de 201 a 250 g apresentou os maiores índices (p < 0,05). Na composição centesimal observou-se que indivíduos acima de 251 g, apresentaram menores valores de extrato etéreo e maior valor de proteína (0,99 ± 0,14 e 15,80 ± 0,64, respectivamente) (p < 0,05). Para melhor aproveitamento é recomendado que rãs-touro sejam abatidas com peso superior a 201 g, pois apresentam melhores rendimentos e características da carne.Universidade Estadual do Oeste do ParanáUniversidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho, Centro de AquiculturaUniversidade Estadual de MaringáUniversidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho, Centro de AquiculturaEditora da Universidade Estadual de Maringá - EDUEMUniversidade Estadual do Oeste do ParanáUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Universidade Estadual de MaringáAyres, Athos Alexandre CesnikDamasceno, Danielle Zanerato [UNESP]Moro, Evandro BilhaMaccari, Glaucia Mara RoratoNervis, Juliana Alice LöschBittencourt, Fábio2021-07-14T10:39:12Z2021-07-14T10:39:12Z2015-10info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article329-333application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.4025/actascianimsci.v37i4.28196Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences. Editora da Universidade Estadual de Maringá - EDUEM, v. 37, n. 4, p. 329-333, 2015.1807-8672http://hdl.handle.net/11449/21239110.4025/actascianimsci.v37i4.28196S1807-86722015000400329S1807-86722015000400329.pdfSciELOreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengActa Scientiarum. Animal Sciencesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-04-09T15:43:44Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/212391Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-06T00:04:58.835606Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Carcass yield and proximate composition of bullfrog (Lithobates catesbeianus) Rendimento de carcaça e composição centesimal da rã-touro (Lithobates catesbeianus) |
title |
Carcass yield and proximate composition of bullfrog (Lithobates catesbeianus) |
spellingShingle |
Carcass yield and proximate composition of bullfrog (Lithobates catesbeianus) Ayres, Athos Alexandre Cesnik exotic species meat processing: raniculture espécie exótica processamento de carne ranicultura |
title_short |
Carcass yield and proximate composition of bullfrog (Lithobates catesbeianus) |
title_full |
Carcass yield and proximate composition of bullfrog (Lithobates catesbeianus) |
title_fullStr |
Carcass yield and proximate composition of bullfrog (Lithobates catesbeianus) |
title_full_unstemmed |
Carcass yield and proximate composition of bullfrog (Lithobates catesbeianus) |
title_sort |
Carcass yield and proximate composition of bullfrog (Lithobates catesbeianus) |
author |
Ayres, Athos Alexandre Cesnik |
author_facet |
Ayres, Athos Alexandre Cesnik Damasceno, Danielle Zanerato [UNESP] Moro, Evandro Bilha Maccari, Glaucia Mara Rorato Nervis, Juliana Alice Lösch Bittencourt, Fábio |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Damasceno, Danielle Zanerato [UNESP] Moro, Evandro Bilha Maccari, Glaucia Mara Rorato Nervis, Juliana Alice Lösch Bittencourt, Fábio |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) Universidade Estadual de Maringá |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Ayres, Athos Alexandre Cesnik Damasceno, Danielle Zanerato [UNESP] Moro, Evandro Bilha Maccari, Glaucia Mara Rorato Nervis, Juliana Alice Lösch Bittencourt, Fábio |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
exotic species meat processing: raniculture espécie exótica processamento de carne ranicultura |
topic |
exotic species meat processing: raniculture espécie exótica processamento de carne ranicultura |
description |
This work evaluated five classes of weight of bullfrog (Lithobates catesbeianus) seeking to define the ideal slaughter weight for the species. We used 79 bullfrogs, distributed in a completely randomized design (class 1 < 100 g (n = 10); class 2 from 101 to 150 g (n = 17); class 3 from 151 to 200 g (n = 24); class 4 from 201 to 250 g (n = 14); and class 5 >251 g (n = 14)), which were euthanized, weighted and gutted. For the carcass yield, we weighed the clean torso, thighs, liver, skin and head. The clean torso was subjected to chemical composition analysis. The carcass yield was, on average, 49% with no difference between weight classes (p > 0.05). The yield of posterior thighs was significantly higher for the lower weight class, which also presented higher percentage of paws (28.37 ± 0.63 and 9.33 ± 0.21, respectively) (p < 0.05). The percentages of visceral fat and skin showed a progressive increase along with the weight of the animals; the class with individuals weighing 201-250 grams showed the higher values (p < 0.05). The chemical composition indicated that individuals above 251 grams showed lower values of ether extract and higher values of crude protein (0.99 ± 0.14 and 15.80 ± 0.64, respectively) (p < 0.05). So, it is recommended the slaughter of bullfrogs weighing more than 201 grams, because of better yield and meat quality. |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-10 2021-07-14T10:39:12Z 2021-07-14T10:39:12Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.4025/actascianimsci.v37i4.28196 Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences. Editora da Universidade Estadual de Maringá - EDUEM, v. 37, n. 4, p. 329-333, 2015. 1807-8672 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/212391 10.4025/actascianimsci.v37i4.28196 S1807-86722015000400329 S1807-86722015000400329.pdf |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.4025/actascianimsci.v37i4.28196 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/212391 |
identifier_str_mv |
Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences. Editora da Universidade Estadual de Maringá - EDUEM, v. 37, n. 4, p. 329-333, 2015. 1807-8672 10.4025/actascianimsci.v37i4.28196 S1807-86722015000400329 S1807-86722015000400329.pdf |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
329-333 application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora da Universidade Estadual de Maringá - EDUEM |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora da Universidade Estadual de Maringá - EDUEM |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
SciELO reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808129581267288064 |