Carcass yield and proximate composition of bullfrog (Lithobates catesbeianus)

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ayres, Athos Alexandre Cesnik
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Damasceno, Danielle Zanerato [UNESP], Moro, Evandro Bilha, Maccari, Glaucia Mara Rorato, Nervis, Juliana Alice Lösch, Bittencourt, Fábio
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.4025/actascianimsci.v37i4.28196
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/212391
Resumo: This work evaluated five classes of weight of bullfrog (Lithobates catesbeianus) seeking to define the ideal slaughter weight for the species. We used 79 bullfrogs, distributed in a completely randomized design (class 1 < 100 g (n = 10); class 2 from 101 to 150 g (n = 17); class 3 from 151 to 200 g (n = 24); class 4 from 201 to 250 g (n = 14); and class 5 >251 g (n = 14)), which were euthanized, weighted and gutted. For the carcass yield, we weighed the clean torso, thighs, liver, skin and head. The clean torso was subjected to chemical composition analysis. The carcass yield was, on average, 49% with no difference between weight classes (p > 0.05). The yield of posterior thighs was significantly higher for the lower weight class, which also presented higher percentage of paws (28.37 ± 0.63 and 9.33 ± 0.21, respectively) (p < 0.05). The percentages of visceral fat and skin showed a progressive increase along with the weight of the animals; the class with individuals weighing 201-250 grams showed the higher values (p < 0.05). The chemical composition indicated that individuals above 251 grams showed lower values of ether extract and higher values of crude protein (0.99 ± 0.14 and 15.80 ± 0.64, respectively) (p < 0.05). So, it is recommended the slaughter of bullfrogs weighing more than 201 grams, because of better yield and meat quality.
id UNSP_059d189256c7aaf61f403c3e9f8be583
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/212391
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Carcass yield and proximate composition of bullfrog (Lithobates catesbeianus)Rendimento de carcaça e composição centesimal da rã-touro (Lithobates catesbeianus)exotic speciesmeat processing: ranicultureespécie exóticaprocessamento de carneraniculturaThis work evaluated five classes of weight of bullfrog (Lithobates catesbeianus) seeking to define the ideal slaughter weight for the species. We used 79 bullfrogs, distributed in a completely randomized design (class 1 < 100 g (n = 10); class 2 from 101 to 150 g (n = 17); class 3 from 151 to 200 g (n = 24); class 4 from 201 to 250 g (n = 14); and class 5 >251 g (n = 14)), which were euthanized, weighted and gutted. For the carcass yield, we weighed the clean torso, thighs, liver, skin and head. The clean torso was subjected to chemical composition analysis. The carcass yield was, on average, 49% with no difference between weight classes (p > 0.05). The yield of posterior thighs was significantly higher for the lower weight class, which also presented higher percentage of paws (28.37 ± 0.63 and 9.33 ± 0.21, respectively) (p < 0.05). The percentages of visceral fat and skin showed a progressive increase along with the weight of the animals; the class with individuals weighing 201-250 grams showed the higher values (p < 0.05). The chemical composition indicated that individuals above 251 grams showed lower values of ether extract and higher values of crude protein (0.99 ± 0.14 and 15.80 ± 0.64, respectively) (p < 0.05). So, it is recommended the slaughter of bullfrogs weighing more than 201 grams, because of better yield and meat quality.O objetivo do trabalho foi comparar cinco diferentes classes de peso de rã-touro (Lithobates catesbeianus), buscando definir o peso ideal de abate para a espécie. Foram utilizados 79 exemplares de rãs-touro, distribuídas em um delineamento inteiramente casualizado (classe 1 <100 g (n = 10); classe 2 de 101 a 150 g (n = 17); classe 3 de 151 a 200 g (n = 24); classe 4 de 200 a 250 g (n = 14), e classe 5 > 251 g (n = 14)), que foram eutanaziados, pesados e eviscerados. Para o rendimento da carcaça foram pesados: tronco limpo, coxas, fígado, patas, pele e cabeça. O tronco limpo foi submetido à análise de composição centesimal. O rendimento de corpo limpo foi em média 49%, sem diferença entre classes (p > 0,05). O rendimento das coxas posteriores foi significativamente maior para a menor classe de peso, e essa classe também apresentou maior porcentual de patas (28,37 ± 0,63 e 9,33 ± 0,21, respectivamente) (p < 0,05). As porcentagens de gordura visceral e pele apresentaram um aumento progressivo concomitante ao peso dos animais, sendo que a classe com indivíduos de 201 a 250 g apresentou os maiores índices (p < 0,05). Na composição centesimal observou-se que indivíduos acima de 251 g, apresentaram menores valores de extrato etéreo e maior valor de proteína (0,99 ± 0,14 e 15,80 ± 0,64, respectivamente) (p < 0,05). Para melhor aproveitamento é recomendado que rãs-touro sejam abatidas com peso superior a 201 g, pois apresentam melhores rendimentos e características da carne.Universidade Estadual do Oeste do ParanáUniversidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho, Centro de AquiculturaUniversidade Estadual de MaringáUniversidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho, Centro de AquiculturaEditora da Universidade Estadual de Maringá - EDUEMUniversidade Estadual do Oeste do ParanáUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Universidade Estadual de MaringáAyres, Athos Alexandre CesnikDamasceno, Danielle Zanerato [UNESP]Moro, Evandro BilhaMaccari, Glaucia Mara RoratoNervis, Juliana Alice LöschBittencourt, Fábio2021-07-14T10:39:12Z2021-07-14T10:39:12Z2015-10info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article329-333application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.4025/actascianimsci.v37i4.28196Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences. Editora da Universidade Estadual de Maringá - EDUEM, v. 37, n. 4, p. 329-333, 2015.1807-8672http://hdl.handle.net/11449/21239110.4025/actascianimsci.v37i4.28196S1807-86722015000400329S1807-86722015000400329.pdfSciELOreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengActa Scientiarum. Animal Sciencesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-04-09T15:43:44Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/212391Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-06T00:04:58.835606Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Carcass yield and proximate composition of bullfrog (Lithobates catesbeianus)
Rendimento de carcaça e composição centesimal da rã-touro (Lithobates catesbeianus)
title Carcass yield and proximate composition of bullfrog (Lithobates catesbeianus)
spellingShingle Carcass yield and proximate composition of bullfrog (Lithobates catesbeianus)
Ayres, Athos Alexandre Cesnik
exotic species
meat processing: raniculture
espécie exótica
processamento de carne
ranicultura
title_short Carcass yield and proximate composition of bullfrog (Lithobates catesbeianus)
title_full Carcass yield and proximate composition of bullfrog (Lithobates catesbeianus)
title_fullStr Carcass yield and proximate composition of bullfrog (Lithobates catesbeianus)
title_full_unstemmed Carcass yield and proximate composition of bullfrog (Lithobates catesbeianus)
title_sort Carcass yield and proximate composition of bullfrog (Lithobates catesbeianus)
author Ayres, Athos Alexandre Cesnik
author_facet Ayres, Athos Alexandre Cesnik
Damasceno, Danielle Zanerato [UNESP]
Moro, Evandro Bilha
Maccari, Glaucia Mara Rorato
Nervis, Juliana Alice Lösch
Bittencourt, Fábio
author_role author
author2 Damasceno, Danielle Zanerato [UNESP]
Moro, Evandro Bilha
Maccari, Glaucia Mara Rorato
Nervis, Juliana Alice Lösch
Bittencourt, Fábio
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
Universidade Estadual de Maringá
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ayres, Athos Alexandre Cesnik
Damasceno, Danielle Zanerato [UNESP]
Moro, Evandro Bilha
Maccari, Glaucia Mara Rorato
Nervis, Juliana Alice Lösch
Bittencourt, Fábio
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv exotic species
meat processing: raniculture
espécie exótica
processamento de carne
ranicultura
topic exotic species
meat processing: raniculture
espécie exótica
processamento de carne
ranicultura
description This work evaluated five classes of weight of bullfrog (Lithobates catesbeianus) seeking to define the ideal slaughter weight for the species. We used 79 bullfrogs, distributed in a completely randomized design (class 1 < 100 g (n = 10); class 2 from 101 to 150 g (n = 17); class 3 from 151 to 200 g (n = 24); class 4 from 201 to 250 g (n = 14); and class 5 >251 g (n = 14)), which were euthanized, weighted and gutted. For the carcass yield, we weighed the clean torso, thighs, liver, skin and head. The clean torso was subjected to chemical composition analysis. The carcass yield was, on average, 49% with no difference between weight classes (p > 0.05). The yield of posterior thighs was significantly higher for the lower weight class, which also presented higher percentage of paws (28.37 ± 0.63 and 9.33 ± 0.21, respectively) (p < 0.05). The percentages of visceral fat and skin showed a progressive increase along with the weight of the animals; the class with individuals weighing 201-250 grams showed the higher values (p < 0.05). The chemical composition indicated that individuals above 251 grams showed lower values of ether extract and higher values of crude protein (0.99 ± 0.14 and 15.80 ± 0.64, respectively) (p < 0.05). So, it is recommended the slaughter of bullfrogs weighing more than 201 grams, because of better yield and meat quality.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-10
2021-07-14T10:39:12Z
2021-07-14T10:39:12Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.4025/actascianimsci.v37i4.28196
Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences. Editora da Universidade Estadual de Maringá - EDUEM, v. 37, n. 4, p. 329-333, 2015.
1807-8672
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/212391
10.4025/actascianimsci.v37i4.28196
S1807-86722015000400329
S1807-86722015000400329.pdf
url http://dx.doi.org/10.4025/actascianimsci.v37i4.28196
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/212391
identifier_str_mv Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences. Editora da Universidade Estadual de Maringá - EDUEM, v. 37, n. 4, p. 329-333, 2015.
1807-8672
10.4025/actascianimsci.v37i4.28196
S1807-86722015000400329
S1807-86722015000400329.pdf
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 329-333
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora da Universidade Estadual de Maringá - EDUEM
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora da Universidade Estadual de Maringá - EDUEM
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv SciELO
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808129581267288064