Comparison of safer and metric-based actual evapotranspiration models in a subtropical area of Brazil

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: SILVA, César de Oliveira Ferreira [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Manzione, Rodrigo Lilla [UNESP], Filho, José Luiz Albuquerque
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.15809/irriga.2019v1n1p48-55
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/221396
Resumo: Remote sensing algorithms are well known to estimate surface energy fluxes in regional to global scales with low cost. The remote sensing approach has an advantage of estimating evapotranspiration (ET) on larger spatiotemporal scales when compared with traditional methods. This study compared the result of ET estimates from the “Simple Algorithm for Evapotranspiration Retrieving” (SAFER) and “Mapping Evapotranspiration at high Resolution with Internal Calibration” (METRIC) models on varied land uses of a subtropical area located in Southeast Brazil by using a image from the sensor OLI of LANDSAT-8. The results showed similarity of ET estimate from both models, although slight deviation especially at high ET values. It happened due differences as the need of anchor pixel in METRIC, which requires two points with extrem thermohydrological conditions in the same area. Minimum ground data requirement is the major advantage of the METRIC over the SAFER model. The maximum value, the sum and ET range by METRIC was higher than SAFER. This study has considered both models feasible for estimation of ET from satellite data in the study area.
id UNSP_098908ce21f1c5d85c3db8e3912c50c6
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/221396
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Comparison of safer and metric-based actual evapotranspiration models in a subtropical area of BrazilComparação de modelos de evapotranspiração real safer e metric em uma área subtropical do BrasilAgriwaterLandsat-8ModellingRemote sensingSuperficial temperatureRemote sensing algorithms are well known to estimate surface energy fluxes in regional to global scales with low cost. The remote sensing approach has an advantage of estimating evapotranspiration (ET) on larger spatiotemporal scales when compared with traditional methods. This study compared the result of ET estimates from the “Simple Algorithm for Evapotranspiration Retrieving” (SAFER) and “Mapping Evapotranspiration at high Resolution with Internal Calibration” (METRIC) models on varied land uses of a subtropical area located in Southeast Brazil by using a image from the sensor OLI of LANDSAT-8. The results showed similarity of ET estimate from both models, although slight deviation especially at high ET values. It happened due differences as the need of anchor pixel in METRIC, which requires two points with extrem thermohydrological conditions in the same area. Minimum ground data requirement is the major advantage of the METRIC over the SAFER model. The maximum value, the sum and ET range by METRIC was higher than SAFER. This study has considered both models feasible for estimation of ET from satellite data in the study area.Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)Agronomical Sciences Faculty Universidade Estadual Paulista, Av. Universitária, 3780, Altos do ParaísoSchool of Sciences and Engineering Universidade Estadual Paulista, Rua Domingos da Costa Lopes,780, Jd. ItaipuDepartment of Hydrogeology Institute of Technological Research (IPT), Av. Prof. Almeida Prado, 532, Cid. Universitária – ButantãAgronomical Sciences Faculty Universidade Estadual Paulista, Av. Universitária, 3780, Altos do ParaísoSchool of Sciences and Engineering Universidade Estadual Paulista, Rua Domingos da Costa Lopes,780, Jd. ItaipuFAPESP: 2014/04524-7FAPESP: 2016/09737-4Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Institute of Technological Research (IPT)SILVA, César de Oliveira Ferreira [UNESP]Manzione, Rodrigo Lilla [UNESP]Filho, José Luiz Albuquerque2022-04-28T19:28:07Z2022-04-28T19:28:07Z2019-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article48-55http://dx.doi.org/10.15809/irriga.2019v1n1p48-55IRRIGA, v. 1, n. 1InovagriSpecialEdition, p. 48-55, 2019.1808-37651413-7895http://hdl.handle.net/11449/22139610.15809/irriga.2019v1n1p48-552-s2.0-85074877995Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengIRRIGAinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-04-28T19:28:07Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/221396Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T17:05:40.937479Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparison of safer and metric-based actual evapotranspiration models in a subtropical area of Brazil
Comparação de modelos de evapotranspiração real safer e metric em uma área subtropical do Brasil
title Comparison of safer and metric-based actual evapotranspiration models in a subtropical area of Brazil
spellingShingle Comparison of safer and metric-based actual evapotranspiration models in a subtropical area of Brazil
SILVA, César de Oliveira Ferreira [UNESP]
Agriwater
Landsat-8
Modelling
Remote sensing
Superficial temperature
title_short Comparison of safer and metric-based actual evapotranspiration models in a subtropical area of Brazil
title_full Comparison of safer and metric-based actual evapotranspiration models in a subtropical area of Brazil
title_fullStr Comparison of safer and metric-based actual evapotranspiration models in a subtropical area of Brazil
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of safer and metric-based actual evapotranspiration models in a subtropical area of Brazil
title_sort Comparison of safer and metric-based actual evapotranspiration models in a subtropical area of Brazil
author SILVA, César de Oliveira Ferreira [UNESP]
author_facet SILVA, César de Oliveira Ferreira [UNESP]
Manzione, Rodrigo Lilla [UNESP]
Filho, José Luiz Albuquerque
author_role author
author2 Manzione, Rodrigo Lilla [UNESP]
Filho, José Luiz Albuquerque
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
Institute of Technological Research (IPT)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv SILVA, César de Oliveira Ferreira [UNESP]
Manzione, Rodrigo Lilla [UNESP]
Filho, José Luiz Albuquerque
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Agriwater
Landsat-8
Modelling
Remote sensing
Superficial temperature
topic Agriwater
Landsat-8
Modelling
Remote sensing
Superficial temperature
description Remote sensing algorithms are well known to estimate surface energy fluxes in regional to global scales with low cost. The remote sensing approach has an advantage of estimating evapotranspiration (ET) on larger spatiotemporal scales when compared with traditional methods. This study compared the result of ET estimates from the “Simple Algorithm for Evapotranspiration Retrieving” (SAFER) and “Mapping Evapotranspiration at high Resolution with Internal Calibration” (METRIC) models on varied land uses of a subtropical area located in Southeast Brazil by using a image from the sensor OLI of LANDSAT-8. The results showed similarity of ET estimate from both models, although slight deviation especially at high ET values. It happened due differences as the need of anchor pixel in METRIC, which requires two points with extrem thermohydrological conditions in the same area. Minimum ground data requirement is the major advantage of the METRIC over the SAFER model. The maximum value, the sum and ET range by METRIC was higher than SAFER. This study has considered both models feasible for estimation of ET from satellite data in the study area.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-01-01
2022-04-28T19:28:07Z
2022-04-28T19:28:07Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.15809/irriga.2019v1n1p48-55
IRRIGA, v. 1, n. 1InovagriSpecialEdition, p. 48-55, 2019.
1808-3765
1413-7895
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/221396
10.15809/irriga.2019v1n1p48-55
2-s2.0-85074877995
url http://dx.doi.org/10.15809/irriga.2019v1n1p48-55
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/221396
identifier_str_mv IRRIGA, v. 1, n. 1InovagriSpecialEdition, p. 48-55, 2019.
1808-3765
1413-7895
10.15809/irriga.2019v1n1p48-55
2-s2.0-85074877995
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv IRRIGA
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 48-55
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808128754705235968