Quality of reporting of outcomes in trials of therapeutic interventions for pressure ulcers in adults: a protocol for a systematic survey

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Miranda, Jessica Steffany [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Fernandes Abbade, Luciana Patricia [UNESP], Deonizio, Arthur Pollo [UNESP], Abbade, Joelcio Francisco [UNESP], Mbuagbaw, Lawrence, Thabane, Lehana
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024633
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/185798
Resumo: Pressure ulcers (PUs) have a high incidence, especially in hospital units. Randomised clinical trials (RCTs) of therapeutic interventions for PU should include a clear description of the outcomes and results to enhance transparency and replicability. Objectives The primary objective of this study is to assess the completeness of the descriptions of the outcomes of therapeutic interventions in RCTs in adult patients with PU. The secondary objectives are to evaluate the types of reported primary outcomes, measurement methods or tools used to evaluate the outcomes and the results of reported outcomes. Methods We will conduct a systematic survey of RCTs published from January 2006 to April 2018. The selection process of the studies will be done in two stages of screening: title and abstract, and full text revision, always by two researchers independently. The completeness of the outcome will be assessed according to five criteria: domain (outcome title), specific measurement or technique/ instrument used, specific metric or format of the outcome data that will be used for analysis, method of aggregation (how data from each group will be summarised) and time-points that will be used for analysis. The quality of the results of the outcome will be classified as either complete, incomplete or unreported. We will conduct a descriptive analysis of the number, type and degrees of outcome specification in the included RCTs. The frequency of categories in each domain of the outcomes will also be reported. The median and IQR will be estimated for each element of the specified outcome (out of five). Ethics and dissemination This will be the first systematic assessment of the outcomes of therapeutic interventions used for pressure ulcers. After completion, this review will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journals.
id UNSP_0b149b5d498f63c8f2d9a07092590bd5
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/185798
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Quality of reporting of outcomes in trials of therapeutic interventions for pressure ulcers in adults: a protocol for a systematic surveyPressure ulcers (PUs) have a high incidence, especially in hospital units. Randomised clinical trials (RCTs) of therapeutic interventions for PU should include a clear description of the outcomes and results to enhance transparency and replicability. Objectives The primary objective of this study is to assess the completeness of the descriptions of the outcomes of therapeutic interventions in RCTs in adult patients with PU. The secondary objectives are to evaluate the types of reported primary outcomes, measurement methods or tools used to evaluate the outcomes and the results of reported outcomes. Methods We will conduct a systematic survey of RCTs published from January 2006 to April 2018. The selection process of the studies will be done in two stages of screening: title and abstract, and full text revision, always by two researchers independently. The completeness of the outcome will be assessed according to five criteria: domain (outcome title), specific measurement or technique/ instrument used, specific metric or format of the outcome data that will be used for analysis, method of aggregation (how data from each group will be summarised) and time-points that will be used for analysis. The quality of the results of the outcome will be classified as either complete, incomplete or unreported. We will conduct a descriptive analysis of the number, type and degrees of outcome specification in the included RCTs. The frequency of categories in each domain of the outcomes will also be reported. The median and IQR will be estimated for each element of the specified outcome (out of five). Ethics and dissemination This will be the first systematic assessment of the outcomes of therapeutic interventions used for pressure ulcers. After completion, this review will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journals.Sao Paulo State Univ Julio de Mesquita Filho, Dept Nursing, Botucatu, SP, BrazilSao Paulo State Univ Julio de Mesquita Filho, Dept Dermatol & Radiotherapy, Botucatu, SP, BrazilSao Paulo State Univ Julio de Mesquita Filho, Med, Botucatu, SP, BrazilSao Paulo State Univ Julio de Mesquita Filho, Dept Gynecol & Obstet, Botucatu, SP, BrazilMcMaster Univ, Dept Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, Hamilton, ON, CanadaSao Paulo State Univ Julio de Mesquita Filho, Dept Nursing, Botucatu, SP, BrazilSao Paulo State Univ Julio de Mesquita Filho, Dept Dermatol & Radiotherapy, Botucatu, SP, BrazilSao Paulo State Univ Julio de Mesquita Filho, Med, Botucatu, SP, BrazilSao Paulo State Univ Julio de Mesquita Filho, Dept Gynecol & Obstet, Botucatu, SP, BrazilBmj Publishing GroupUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)McMaster UnivMiranda, Jessica Steffany [UNESP]Fernandes Abbade, Luciana Patricia [UNESP]Deonizio, Arthur Pollo [UNESP]Abbade, Joelcio Francisco [UNESP]Mbuagbaw, LawrenceThabane, Lehana2019-10-04T12:38:42Z2019-10-04T12:38:42Z2019-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article6http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024633Bmj Open. London: Bmj Publishing Group, v. 9, n. 2, 6 p., 2019.2044-6055http://hdl.handle.net/11449/18579810.1136/bmjopen-2018-024633WOS:000471124600160Web of Sciencereponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengBmj Openinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-08-16T14:07:21Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/185798Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-16T14:07:21Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Quality of reporting of outcomes in trials of therapeutic interventions for pressure ulcers in adults: a protocol for a systematic survey
title Quality of reporting of outcomes in trials of therapeutic interventions for pressure ulcers in adults: a protocol for a systematic survey
spellingShingle Quality of reporting of outcomes in trials of therapeutic interventions for pressure ulcers in adults: a protocol for a systematic survey
Miranda, Jessica Steffany [UNESP]
title_short Quality of reporting of outcomes in trials of therapeutic interventions for pressure ulcers in adults: a protocol for a systematic survey
title_full Quality of reporting of outcomes in trials of therapeutic interventions for pressure ulcers in adults: a protocol for a systematic survey
title_fullStr Quality of reporting of outcomes in trials of therapeutic interventions for pressure ulcers in adults: a protocol for a systematic survey
title_full_unstemmed Quality of reporting of outcomes in trials of therapeutic interventions for pressure ulcers in adults: a protocol for a systematic survey
title_sort Quality of reporting of outcomes in trials of therapeutic interventions for pressure ulcers in adults: a protocol for a systematic survey
author Miranda, Jessica Steffany [UNESP]
author_facet Miranda, Jessica Steffany [UNESP]
Fernandes Abbade, Luciana Patricia [UNESP]
Deonizio, Arthur Pollo [UNESP]
Abbade, Joelcio Francisco [UNESP]
Mbuagbaw, Lawrence
Thabane, Lehana
author_role author
author2 Fernandes Abbade, Luciana Patricia [UNESP]
Deonizio, Arthur Pollo [UNESP]
Abbade, Joelcio Francisco [UNESP]
Mbuagbaw, Lawrence
Thabane, Lehana
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
McMaster Univ
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Miranda, Jessica Steffany [UNESP]
Fernandes Abbade, Luciana Patricia [UNESP]
Deonizio, Arthur Pollo [UNESP]
Abbade, Joelcio Francisco [UNESP]
Mbuagbaw, Lawrence
Thabane, Lehana
description Pressure ulcers (PUs) have a high incidence, especially in hospital units. Randomised clinical trials (RCTs) of therapeutic interventions for PU should include a clear description of the outcomes and results to enhance transparency and replicability. Objectives The primary objective of this study is to assess the completeness of the descriptions of the outcomes of therapeutic interventions in RCTs in adult patients with PU. The secondary objectives are to evaluate the types of reported primary outcomes, measurement methods or tools used to evaluate the outcomes and the results of reported outcomes. Methods We will conduct a systematic survey of RCTs published from January 2006 to April 2018. The selection process of the studies will be done in two stages of screening: title and abstract, and full text revision, always by two researchers independently. The completeness of the outcome will be assessed according to five criteria: domain (outcome title), specific measurement or technique/ instrument used, specific metric or format of the outcome data that will be used for analysis, method of aggregation (how data from each group will be summarised) and time-points that will be used for analysis. The quality of the results of the outcome will be classified as either complete, incomplete or unreported. We will conduct a descriptive analysis of the number, type and degrees of outcome specification in the included RCTs. The frequency of categories in each domain of the outcomes will also be reported. The median and IQR will be estimated for each element of the specified outcome (out of five). Ethics and dissemination This will be the first systematic assessment of the outcomes of therapeutic interventions used for pressure ulcers. After completion, this review will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journals.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-10-04T12:38:42Z
2019-10-04T12:38:42Z
2019-06-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024633
Bmj Open. London: Bmj Publishing Group, v. 9, n. 2, 6 p., 2019.
2044-6055
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/185798
10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024633
WOS:000471124600160
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024633
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/185798
identifier_str_mv Bmj Open. London: Bmj Publishing Group, v. 9, n. 2, 6 p., 2019.
2044-6055
10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024633
WOS:000471124600160
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Bmj Open
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 6
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Bmj Publishing Group
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Bmj Publishing Group
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Web of Science
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808128159097290752