The year 2017: Megafires and management in the cerrado

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Fidelis, Alessandra [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Alvarado, Swanni T. [UNESP], Barradas, Ana Carolina S., Pivello, Vânia R.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/fire1030049
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/197922
Resumo: The year 2017 was a megafire year, when huge areas burned on different continents. In Brazil, a great extension of the Cerrado burned, raising once more the discussion about the “zero-fire” policy. Indeed, most protected areas of the Cerrado adopted a policy of fire exclusion and prevention, leading to periodic megafire events. Last year, 78% of the Chapada dos Veadeiros National Park burned at the end of the dry season, attracting media attention. Furthermore, 85% of the Reserva Natural Serra do Tombador burned as a result of a large accumulation of fuel caused by the zero-fire policy. In 2014, some protected areas started to implement the Integrate Fire Management (IFM) strategy. During 2017, in contrast to other protected areas, the Estação Ecológica Serra Geral do Tocantins experienced no megafire events, suggesting that a few years of IFM implementation led to changes in its fire regime. Therefore, we intended here to compare the total burned area and number of fire scars between the protected areas where IFM was implemented and those where fire exclusion is the adopted policy. The use of fire as a management tool aimed at wildfire prevention and biodiversity preservation should be reconsidered by local managers and environmental authorities for most Cerrado protected areas, especially those where open savanna physiognomies prevail. Changing the paradigm is a hard task, but last year’s events showed the zero-fire policy would bring more damage than benefits to Cerrado protected areas.
id UNSP_0c4d53c932850bd98bb1656765b47739
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/197922
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling The year 2017: Megafires and management in the cerradoAltered fire regimeFire incidenceFire riskFuel loadIntegrated Fire ManagementMegafiresProtected areasTropical savannaThe year 2017 was a megafire year, when huge areas burned on different continents. In Brazil, a great extension of the Cerrado burned, raising once more the discussion about the “zero-fire” policy. Indeed, most protected areas of the Cerrado adopted a policy of fire exclusion and prevention, leading to periodic megafire events. Last year, 78% of the Chapada dos Veadeiros National Park burned at the end of the dry season, attracting media attention. Furthermore, 85% of the Reserva Natural Serra do Tombador burned as a result of a large accumulation of fuel caused by the zero-fire policy. In 2014, some protected areas started to implement the Integrate Fire Management (IFM) strategy. During 2017, in contrast to other protected areas, the Estação Ecológica Serra Geral do Tocantins experienced no megafire events, suggesting that a few years of IFM implementation led to changes in its fire regime. Therefore, we intended here to compare the total burned area and number of fire scars between the protected areas where IFM was implemented and those where fire exclusion is the adopted policy. The use of fire as a management tool aimed at wildfire prevention and biodiversity preservation should be reconsidered by local managers and environmental authorities for most Cerrado protected areas, especially those where open savanna physiognomies prevail. Changing the paradigm is a hard task, but last year’s events showed the zero-fire policy would bring more damage than benefits to Cerrado protected areas.Lab of Vegetation Ecology Instituto de Biociências Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Avenida 24-A 1515Ecosystem Dynamics Observatory Instituto de Geociências e Ciências Exatas Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Avenida 24-A 1515Estação Ecológica Serra Geral do Tocantins Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade (ICMBio), Avenida Beira Rio, Qd. 02, 6Department of Ecology Instituto de Biociências Universidade de São Paulo, Rua do Matão, Travessa 14, 321Lab of Vegetation Ecology Instituto de Biociências Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Avenida 24-A 1515Ecosystem Dynamics Observatory Instituto de Geociências e Ciências Exatas Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Avenida 24-A 1515Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade (ICMBio)Universidade de São Paulo (USP)Fidelis, Alessandra [UNESP]Alvarado, Swanni T. [UNESP]Barradas, Ana Carolina S.Pivello, Vânia R.2020-12-12T00:54:09Z2020-12-12T00:54:09Z2018-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article1-11http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/fire1030049Fire, v. 1, n. 3, p. 1-11, 2018.2571-6255http://hdl.handle.net/11449/19792210.3390/fire10300492-s2.0-85065837743Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengFireinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-10-23T07:07:29Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/197922Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462021-10-23T07:07:29Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The year 2017: Megafires and management in the cerrado
title The year 2017: Megafires and management in the cerrado
spellingShingle The year 2017: Megafires and management in the cerrado
Fidelis, Alessandra [UNESP]
Altered fire regime
Fire incidence
Fire risk
Fuel load
Integrated Fire Management
Megafires
Protected areas
Tropical savanna
title_short The year 2017: Megafires and management in the cerrado
title_full The year 2017: Megafires and management in the cerrado
title_fullStr The year 2017: Megafires and management in the cerrado
title_full_unstemmed The year 2017: Megafires and management in the cerrado
title_sort The year 2017: Megafires and management in the cerrado
author Fidelis, Alessandra [UNESP]
author_facet Fidelis, Alessandra [UNESP]
Alvarado, Swanni T. [UNESP]
Barradas, Ana Carolina S.
Pivello, Vânia R.
author_role author
author2 Alvarado, Swanni T. [UNESP]
Barradas, Ana Carolina S.
Pivello, Vânia R.
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade (ICMBio)
Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Fidelis, Alessandra [UNESP]
Alvarado, Swanni T. [UNESP]
Barradas, Ana Carolina S.
Pivello, Vânia R.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Altered fire regime
Fire incidence
Fire risk
Fuel load
Integrated Fire Management
Megafires
Protected areas
Tropical savanna
topic Altered fire regime
Fire incidence
Fire risk
Fuel load
Integrated Fire Management
Megafires
Protected areas
Tropical savanna
description The year 2017 was a megafire year, when huge areas burned on different continents. In Brazil, a great extension of the Cerrado burned, raising once more the discussion about the “zero-fire” policy. Indeed, most protected areas of the Cerrado adopted a policy of fire exclusion and prevention, leading to periodic megafire events. Last year, 78% of the Chapada dos Veadeiros National Park burned at the end of the dry season, attracting media attention. Furthermore, 85% of the Reserva Natural Serra do Tombador burned as a result of a large accumulation of fuel caused by the zero-fire policy. In 2014, some protected areas started to implement the Integrate Fire Management (IFM) strategy. During 2017, in contrast to other protected areas, the Estação Ecológica Serra Geral do Tocantins experienced no megafire events, suggesting that a few years of IFM implementation led to changes in its fire regime. Therefore, we intended here to compare the total burned area and number of fire scars between the protected areas where IFM was implemented and those where fire exclusion is the adopted policy. The use of fire as a management tool aimed at wildfire prevention and biodiversity preservation should be reconsidered by local managers and environmental authorities for most Cerrado protected areas, especially those where open savanna physiognomies prevail. Changing the paradigm is a hard task, but last year’s events showed the zero-fire policy would bring more damage than benefits to Cerrado protected areas.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-12-01
2020-12-12T00:54:09Z
2020-12-12T00:54:09Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/fire1030049
Fire, v. 1, n. 3, p. 1-11, 2018.
2571-6255
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/197922
10.3390/fire1030049
2-s2.0-85065837743
url http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/fire1030049
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/197922
identifier_str_mv Fire, v. 1, n. 3, p. 1-11, 2018.
2571-6255
10.3390/fire1030049
2-s2.0-85065837743
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Fire
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 1-11
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1803046568782200832