Rentabilidade na semeadura cruzada da cultura da soja

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Silva, Paulo R. A. [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Tavares, Leandro A. F. [UNESP], Sousa, Saulo F. G. de [UNESP], Correia, Tiago P. da S. [UNESP], Riquetti, Neilor B. [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1415-43662015000300293&lng=pt&nrm=iso&tlng=en
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/129247
Resumo: Soybean cross-seeding tillage came from better spatial arrangement of plants per area, so some producers have opted for this tillage system, which consists in seeding the area in two steps, forming a chessboard with perpendicular lines of tillage. This study aims to analyse the soybean productivity and production costs when it planted in different dispositions of crossed tillage. The experiment was conducted during the harvests 2011/2012 and 2012/2013 at Lageado Farm of the FCA/UNESP, Botucatu-SP, in an area cultivated under no-tillage. The experimental design was in randomized block with five treatments and eight replications. The treatments were: seeding in parallel rows with recommended fertilization and recommended plant population (conventional); cross-seeding with doubled fertilization and doubled plant population; cross-seeding with recommended plant population and doubled fertilization; cross-seeding with doubled plant population and recommended fertilization; cross-seeding with fertilization and recommended plant population. The results showed statistical difference among the treatments, with increased productivity for the cross-seeding with doubled plant population and recommended fertilization. However the conventional tillage with parallel lines shows higher net earnings than soybean cross-seeding, being more profitable for producer.
id UNSP_0de7d50f77efe4a467f6df32275ca71d
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/129247
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Rentabilidade na semeadura cruzada da cultura da sojaSoybean rentability in cross-seedingOperating costsPlants spatial arrangementProductivitySoybean cross-seeding tillage came from better spatial arrangement of plants per area, so some producers have opted for this tillage system, which consists in seeding the area in two steps, forming a chessboard with perpendicular lines of tillage. This study aims to analyse the soybean productivity and production costs when it planted in different dispositions of crossed tillage. The experiment was conducted during the harvests 2011/2012 and 2012/2013 at Lageado Farm of the FCA/UNESP, Botucatu-SP, in an area cultivated under no-tillage. The experimental design was in randomized block with five treatments and eight replications. The treatments were: seeding in parallel rows with recommended fertilization and recommended plant population (conventional); cross-seeding with doubled fertilization and doubled plant population; cross-seeding with recommended plant population and doubled fertilization; cross-seeding with doubled plant population and recommended fertilization; cross-seeding with fertilization and recommended plant population. The results showed statistical difference among the treatments, with increased productivity for the cross-seeding with doubled plant population and recommended fertilization. However the conventional tillage with parallel lines shows higher net earnings than soybean cross-seeding, being more profitable for producer.O plantio cruzado da soja consiste em semear a área em duas passadas de modo que a segunda fique perpendicular à primeira, formando um tabuleiro de xadrez. Desta forma, o objetivo do trabalho foi avaliar a produtividade e os custos de produção da cultura da soja quando semeada em diferentes arranjos de semeadura cruzada. O experimento foi realizado nas safras 2011/2012 e 2012/2013, em área cultivada em sistema de plantio direto. O delineamento experimental foi em blocos casualizados com 5 tratamentos e 8 repetições. Os tratamentos foram: semeadura em linhas paralelas com adubação e população de plantas recomendada; semeadura cruzada com população e adubo em dobro; semeadura cruzada com população recomendada e adubo em dobro; semeadura cruzada com população em dobro e adubação recomendada; semeadura cruzada com população de plantas e adubo recomendado. Os resultados mostraram maior produtividade para o tratamento de semeadura cruzada com população de plantas em dobro e adubo recomendado; apesar disto, a semeadura convencional em linhas paralelas apresenta maior receita líquida do que a semeadura cruzada da soja sendo, então, mais rentável para o produtor.FCA Unesp, Dept Engn Rural, Botucatu, SP, BrazilDepartamento de Engenharia Rural, FCA Unesp, SP, Botucatu, SP, BrazilUniv Federal Campina GrandeUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Silva, Paulo R. A. [UNESP]Tavares, Leandro A. F. [UNESP]Sousa, Saulo F. G. de [UNESP]Correia, Tiago P. da S. [UNESP]Riquetti, Neilor B. [UNESP]2015-10-21T20:41:03Z2015-10-21T20:41:03Z2015-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article293-297application/pdfhttp://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1415-43662015000300293&lng=pt&nrm=iso&tlng=enRevista Brasileira De Engenharia Agricola E Ambiental. Campina Grande Pb: Univ Federal Campina Grande, v. 19, n. 3, p. 293-297, 2015.1807-1929http://hdl.handle.net/11449/12924710.1590/1807-1929/agriambi.v19n3p293-297S1415-43662015000300293WOS:000352567300015S1415-43662015000300293.pdfWeb of Sciencereponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPporRevista Brasileira De Engenharia Agricola E Ambiental0.619info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-04-30T14:01:51Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/129247Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T19:31:09.404337Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Rentabilidade na semeadura cruzada da cultura da soja
Soybean rentability in cross-seeding
title Rentabilidade na semeadura cruzada da cultura da soja
spellingShingle Rentabilidade na semeadura cruzada da cultura da soja
Silva, Paulo R. A. [UNESP]
Operating costs
Plants spatial arrangement
Productivity
title_short Rentabilidade na semeadura cruzada da cultura da soja
title_full Rentabilidade na semeadura cruzada da cultura da soja
title_fullStr Rentabilidade na semeadura cruzada da cultura da soja
title_full_unstemmed Rentabilidade na semeadura cruzada da cultura da soja
title_sort Rentabilidade na semeadura cruzada da cultura da soja
author Silva, Paulo R. A. [UNESP]
author_facet Silva, Paulo R. A. [UNESP]
Tavares, Leandro A. F. [UNESP]
Sousa, Saulo F. G. de [UNESP]
Correia, Tiago P. da S. [UNESP]
Riquetti, Neilor B. [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Tavares, Leandro A. F. [UNESP]
Sousa, Saulo F. G. de [UNESP]
Correia, Tiago P. da S. [UNESP]
Riquetti, Neilor B. [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Silva, Paulo R. A. [UNESP]
Tavares, Leandro A. F. [UNESP]
Sousa, Saulo F. G. de [UNESP]
Correia, Tiago P. da S. [UNESP]
Riquetti, Neilor B. [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Operating costs
Plants spatial arrangement
Productivity
topic Operating costs
Plants spatial arrangement
Productivity
description Soybean cross-seeding tillage came from better spatial arrangement of plants per area, so some producers have opted for this tillage system, which consists in seeding the area in two steps, forming a chessboard with perpendicular lines of tillage. This study aims to analyse the soybean productivity and production costs when it planted in different dispositions of crossed tillage. The experiment was conducted during the harvests 2011/2012 and 2012/2013 at Lageado Farm of the FCA/UNESP, Botucatu-SP, in an area cultivated under no-tillage. The experimental design was in randomized block with five treatments and eight replications. The treatments were: seeding in parallel rows with recommended fertilization and recommended plant population (conventional); cross-seeding with doubled fertilization and doubled plant population; cross-seeding with recommended plant population and doubled fertilization; cross-seeding with doubled plant population and recommended fertilization; cross-seeding with fertilization and recommended plant population. The results showed statistical difference among the treatments, with increased productivity for the cross-seeding with doubled plant population and recommended fertilization. However the conventional tillage with parallel lines shows higher net earnings than soybean cross-seeding, being more profitable for producer.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-10-21T20:41:03Z
2015-10-21T20:41:03Z
2015-03-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1415-43662015000300293&lng=pt&nrm=iso&tlng=en
Revista Brasileira De Engenharia Agricola E Ambiental. Campina Grande Pb: Univ Federal Campina Grande, v. 19, n. 3, p. 293-297, 2015.
1807-1929
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/129247
10.1590/1807-1929/agriambi.v19n3p293-297
S1415-43662015000300293
WOS:000352567300015
S1415-43662015000300293.pdf
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1415-43662015000300293&lng=pt&nrm=iso&tlng=en
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/129247
identifier_str_mv Revista Brasileira De Engenharia Agricola E Ambiental. Campina Grande Pb: Univ Federal Campina Grande, v. 19, n. 3, p. 293-297, 2015.
1807-1929
10.1590/1807-1929/agriambi.v19n3p293-297
S1415-43662015000300293
WOS:000352567300015
S1415-43662015000300293.pdf
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira De Engenharia Agricola E Ambiental
0.619
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 293-297
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Univ Federal Campina Grande
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Univ Federal Campina Grande
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Web of Science
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808129080246140928