Resistência à tração de coroas de NiCr cimentadas sobre munhões de liga de titânio, com 4 diferentes tipos de cimentos

• Autor(a) principal: Toledo, Fabiane Lopes
• Data de Publicação: 2010
• Outros Autores: Freitas, Marcia Furtado Antunes de, Oliveira, Rickson Mello e, Guastaldi, Antonio Carlos [UNESP], Freitas, Cesar Antunes de
• Tipo de documento: Artigo
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
• Texto Completo: http://revodonto.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S1984-59602010000300004&lng=pt&nrm=iso&tlng=pt; http://hdl.handle.net/11449/123483
• topic: Dental implant; Cementation; Tensile Strength

In this work of tensile strength was evaluated the efficacy of 4 cements (S. S. White zinc phoshate, Ketac Cem Easymix glass ionomer, RelyX Luting 2 composite resin/glass ionomer and Panavia 21 TC special acrylic resin) used to fix NiCr crowns to usinated titanium alloy abutments. Were used 40 abutments distributed in groups of 10 elements, to each material. The mechanical essays were developed at a MTS 810 universal machine, adjusted to a 0.5 mm/m velocity. The ANOVA applied to data pointed out the existence of significant differences between groups; the subsequent Tukey´s test (p<0.05) also detected significant differences, except at comparisons of phosphate versus RelyX and phosphate versus Ketac Cem. The better performance was presented by Panavia 21 (1,127.996 N); RelyX (478.197 N) showed itself similar only to phosphate (430.662 N), wich had a performance similar to that of Ketac Cem (227.705 N).