Comparing different methods for estimating hourly solar ultraviolet radiation: Empirical models, artificial neural network and support vector machine

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Teramoto, Érico Tadao [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Dos Santos, Cícero Manoel, Escobedo, João Francisco [UNESP], Dal Pai, Alexandre [UNESP], da Silva, Silvia Helena Modenese Gorla [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0102-7786351010
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/200413
Resumo: In the present paper, the comparison of three of the main estimation methods of solar radiation was performed: empirical models, Artificial Neural Network (ANN) and Support Vector Machine (SVM). Four classical empirical models were calibrated and validated in order to estimate hourly solar UV data in Botucatu, São Paulo State, Brazil. Taken the empirical models as reference of accuracy and set for input variables, the performance of ANN and SVM were assessed. Through the statistical parameters Mean Bias Error (MBE) and Mean Absolute Error (MAE) was confirmed the super-iority of the SVM over the ANN and empirical models. The SVM is capable to generate better results than ANN using a less number of input variables. Among all estimation methods, SVM using the set of input variables {UV0, KT } is con-sidered the best alternative due to the smaller number of input variables and relative precision.
id UNSP_0f0b06655d5dec529873e47074cd529e
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/200413
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Comparing different methods for estimating hourly solar ultraviolet radiation: Empirical models, artificial neural network and support vector machineComparação de métodos de estimativa da radiação solar ultravioleta horária: Modelos empíricos, redes neurais artificiais e máquina de vetores de suporteInput variables selectionMachine learningSolar radiationIn the present paper, the comparison of three of the main estimation methods of solar radiation was performed: empirical models, Artificial Neural Network (ANN) and Support Vector Machine (SVM). Four classical empirical models were calibrated and validated in order to estimate hourly solar UV data in Botucatu, São Paulo State, Brazil. Taken the empirical models as reference of accuracy and set for input variables, the performance of ANN and SVM were assessed. Through the statistical parameters Mean Bias Error (MBE) and Mean Absolute Error (MAE) was confirmed the super-iority of the SVM over the ANN and empirical models. The SVM is capable to generate better results than ANN using a less number of input variables. Among all estimation methods, SVM using the set of input variables {UV0, KT } is con-sidered the best alternative due to the smaller number of input variables and relative precision.Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)National Aeronautics and Space AdministrationCampus Experimental da Unesp em Registro Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho”Campus Universitário de Altamira Universidade Federal do ParáFaculdade de Ciências Agrárias de Botucatu Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho”Campus Experimental da Unesp em Registro Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho”Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias de Botucatu Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho”Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Universidade Federal do Pará (UFPA)Teramoto, Érico Tadao [UNESP]Dos Santos, Cícero ManoelEscobedo, João Francisco [UNESP]Dal Pai, Alexandre [UNESP]da Silva, Silvia Helena Modenese Gorla [UNESP]2020-12-12T02:05:55Z2020-12-12T02:05:55Z2020-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article35-43application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0102-7786351010Revista Brasileira de Meteorologia, v. 35, n. 1, p. 35-43, 2020.1982-43510102-7786http://hdl.handle.net/11449/20041310.1590/0102-7786351010S0102-778620200001000352-s2.0-85084656556S0102-77862020000100035.pdfScopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPporRevista Brasileira de Meteorologiainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-05-03T13:20:21Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/200413Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-05-03T13:20:21Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparing different methods for estimating hourly solar ultraviolet radiation: Empirical models, artificial neural network and support vector machine
Comparação de métodos de estimativa da radiação solar ultravioleta horária: Modelos empíricos, redes neurais artificiais e máquina de vetores de suporte
title Comparing different methods for estimating hourly solar ultraviolet radiation: Empirical models, artificial neural network and support vector machine
spellingShingle Comparing different methods for estimating hourly solar ultraviolet radiation: Empirical models, artificial neural network and support vector machine
Teramoto, Érico Tadao [UNESP]
Input variables selection
Machine learning
Solar radiation
title_short Comparing different methods for estimating hourly solar ultraviolet radiation: Empirical models, artificial neural network and support vector machine
title_full Comparing different methods for estimating hourly solar ultraviolet radiation: Empirical models, artificial neural network and support vector machine
title_fullStr Comparing different methods for estimating hourly solar ultraviolet radiation: Empirical models, artificial neural network and support vector machine
title_full_unstemmed Comparing different methods for estimating hourly solar ultraviolet radiation: Empirical models, artificial neural network and support vector machine
title_sort Comparing different methods for estimating hourly solar ultraviolet radiation: Empirical models, artificial neural network and support vector machine
author Teramoto, Érico Tadao [UNESP]
author_facet Teramoto, Érico Tadao [UNESP]
Dos Santos, Cícero Manoel
Escobedo, João Francisco [UNESP]
Dal Pai, Alexandre [UNESP]
da Silva, Silvia Helena Modenese Gorla [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Dos Santos, Cícero Manoel
Escobedo, João Francisco [UNESP]
Dal Pai, Alexandre [UNESP]
da Silva, Silvia Helena Modenese Gorla [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
Universidade Federal do Pará (UFPA)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Teramoto, Érico Tadao [UNESP]
Dos Santos, Cícero Manoel
Escobedo, João Francisco [UNESP]
Dal Pai, Alexandre [UNESP]
da Silva, Silvia Helena Modenese Gorla [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Input variables selection
Machine learning
Solar radiation
topic Input variables selection
Machine learning
Solar radiation
description In the present paper, the comparison of three of the main estimation methods of solar radiation was performed: empirical models, Artificial Neural Network (ANN) and Support Vector Machine (SVM). Four classical empirical models were calibrated and validated in order to estimate hourly solar UV data in Botucatu, São Paulo State, Brazil. Taken the empirical models as reference of accuracy and set for input variables, the performance of ANN and SVM were assessed. Through the statistical parameters Mean Bias Error (MBE) and Mean Absolute Error (MAE) was confirmed the super-iority of the SVM over the ANN and empirical models. The SVM is capable to generate better results than ANN using a less number of input variables. Among all estimation methods, SVM using the set of input variables {UV0, KT } is con-sidered the best alternative due to the smaller number of input variables and relative precision.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-12-12T02:05:55Z
2020-12-12T02:05:55Z
2020-01-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0102-7786351010
Revista Brasileira de Meteorologia, v. 35, n. 1, p. 35-43, 2020.
1982-4351
0102-7786
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/200413
10.1590/0102-7786351010
S0102-77862020000100035
2-s2.0-85084656556
S0102-77862020000100035.pdf
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0102-7786351010
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/200413
identifier_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Meteorologia, v. 35, n. 1, p. 35-43, 2020.
1982-4351
0102-7786
10.1590/0102-7786351010
S0102-77862020000100035
2-s2.0-85084656556
S0102-77862020000100035.pdf
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Meteorologia
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 35-43
application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799965395733446656