Resistance to fracture of endodontically treated teeth: Influence of the post systems and cements

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: De Matos, Luanne
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Oliveira, Lucas [UNESP], Silva, Aryvelto [UNESP], Silva, Jessica [UNESP], Silva, Marcelo
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1735-3327.302888
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/205632
Resumo: Background: Endodontically treated teeth with extensive structural damage present higher fragility due to the low amount and worse quality of the reminiscent tissues of the crown. Materials and Methods: The present in vitro study evaluated the effect of different intraradicular retainers and cementation agents on the fracture resistance of devitalized teeth. Incisive teeth (n = 40) of bovine mandibles were used. After preparation of the root canals, they were immersed in polyether, in a polyvinyl chloride cylinder containing acrylic resin, to simulate the periodontal ligament. The specimens were randomly divided into four groups (n = 10), according to the type of retainer (anatomical or main with accessory posts) and resin cement used (conventional resin cement-RelyX ARC or self-adhesive resin cement-RelyX U200). The specimens were stored in distilled water at 37°C and submitted to fracture resistance testing. ANOVA and Tukey's test were applied for data analysis, with significance level set at 5%. Results: There was no interaction between cement type and intraradicular retainers (P = 0.56) or even between the types of cement used (P = 0.65). However, in the variation of the types of retainers, the group using main with accessory posts presented greater resistance to the fracture than the anatomical post (P = 0.04). Conclusion: Different cementing agents have no effect on the fracture strength of devitalized teeth, unlike the use of posts, in which the use of accessory post proved more resistant when compared to the anatomical post.
id UNSP_0f102466d121fb71b100636a2b6ecc5a
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/205632
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Resistance to fracture of endodontically treated teeth: Influence of the post systems and cementsDental cementsdental pinstooth fracturesBackground: Endodontically treated teeth with extensive structural damage present higher fragility due to the low amount and worse quality of the reminiscent tissues of the crown. Materials and Methods: The present in vitro study evaluated the effect of different intraradicular retainers and cementation agents on the fracture resistance of devitalized teeth. Incisive teeth (n = 40) of bovine mandibles were used. After preparation of the root canals, they were immersed in polyether, in a polyvinyl chloride cylinder containing acrylic resin, to simulate the periodontal ligament. The specimens were randomly divided into four groups (n = 10), according to the type of retainer (anatomical or main with accessory posts) and resin cement used (conventional resin cement-RelyX ARC or self-adhesive resin cement-RelyX U200). The specimens were stored in distilled water at 37°C and submitted to fracture resistance testing. ANOVA and Tukey's test were applied for data analysis, with significance level set at 5%. Results: There was no interaction between cement type and intraradicular retainers (P = 0.56) or even between the types of cement used (P = 0.65). However, in the variation of the types of retainers, the group using main with accessory posts presented greater resistance to the fracture than the anatomical post (P = 0.04). Conclusion: Different cementing agents have no effect on the fracture strength of devitalized teeth, unlike the use of posts, in which the use of accessory post proved more resistant when compared to the anatomical post.Department of Prosthesis and Periodontics School of Dentistry Campinas UniversityDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics School of Dentistry Saõ Paulo State University (Unesp), 1680 Humaita Street, CentroDepartment of Restorative Dentistry School of Dentistry Saõ Paulo State University (Unesp)Department of Dentistry School of Dentistry Wyden Educational Group FACID WYDENDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics School of Dentistry Saõ Paulo State University (Unesp), 1680 Humaita Street, CentroDepartment of Restorative Dentistry School of Dentistry Saõ Paulo State University (Unesp)Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)FACID WYDENDe Matos, LuanneOliveira, Lucas [UNESP]Silva, Aryvelto [UNESP]Silva, Jessica [UNESP]Silva, Marcelo2021-06-25T10:18:39Z2021-06-25T10:18:39Z2020-11-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article417-423http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1735-3327.302888Dental Research Journal, v. 17, n. 6, p. 417-423, 2020.2008-02551735-3327http://hdl.handle.net/11449/20563210.4103/1735-3327.3028882-s2.0-85098118107Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengDental Research Journalinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-10-22T12:25:08Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/205632Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T17:48:06.686875Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Resistance to fracture of endodontically treated teeth: Influence of the post systems and cements
title Resistance to fracture of endodontically treated teeth: Influence of the post systems and cements
spellingShingle Resistance to fracture of endodontically treated teeth: Influence of the post systems and cements
De Matos, Luanne
Dental cements
dental pins
tooth fractures
title_short Resistance to fracture of endodontically treated teeth: Influence of the post systems and cements
title_full Resistance to fracture of endodontically treated teeth: Influence of the post systems and cements
title_fullStr Resistance to fracture of endodontically treated teeth: Influence of the post systems and cements
title_full_unstemmed Resistance to fracture of endodontically treated teeth: Influence of the post systems and cements
title_sort Resistance to fracture of endodontically treated teeth: Influence of the post systems and cements
author De Matos, Luanne
author_facet De Matos, Luanne
Oliveira, Lucas [UNESP]
Silva, Aryvelto [UNESP]
Silva, Jessica [UNESP]
Silva, Marcelo
author_role author
author2 Oliveira, Lucas [UNESP]
Silva, Aryvelto [UNESP]
Silva, Jessica [UNESP]
Silva, Marcelo
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
FACID WYDEN
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv De Matos, Luanne
Oliveira, Lucas [UNESP]
Silva, Aryvelto [UNESP]
Silva, Jessica [UNESP]
Silva, Marcelo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Dental cements
dental pins
tooth fractures
topic Dental cements
dental pins
tooth fractures
description Background: Endodontically treated teeth with extensive structural damage present higher fragility due to the low amount and worse quality of the reminiscent tissues of the crown. Materials and Methods: The present in vitro study evaluated the effect of different intraradicular retainers and cementation agents on the fracture resistance of devitalized teeth. Incisive teeth (n = 40) of bovine mandibles were used. After preparation of the root canals, they were immersed in polyether, in a polyvinyl chloride cylinder containing acrylic resin, to simulate the periodontal ligament. The specimens were randomly divided into four groups (n = 10), according to the type of retainer (anatomical or main with accessory posts) and resin cement used (conventional resin cement-RelyX ARC or self-adhesive resin cement-RelyX U200). The specimens were stored in distilled water at 37°C and submitted to fracture resistance testing. ANOVA and Tukey's test were applied for data analysis, with significance level set at 5%. Results: There was no interaction between cement type and intraradicular retainers (P = 0.56) or even between the types of cement used (P = 0.65). However, in the variation of the types of retainers, the group using main with accessory posts presented greater resistance to the fracture than the anatomical post (P = 0.04). Conclusion: Different cementing agents have no effect on the fracture strength of devitalized teeth, unlike the use of posts, in which the use of accessory post proved more resistant when compared to the anatomical post.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-11-01
2021-06-25T10:18:39Z
2021-06-25T10:18:39Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1735-3327.302888
Dental Research Journal, v. 17, n. 6, p. 417-423, 2020.
2008-0255
1735-3327
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/205632
10.4103/1735-3327.302888
2-s2.0-85098118107
url http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1735-3327.302888
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/205632
identifier_str_mv Dental Research Journal, v. 17, n. 6, p. 417-423, 2020.
2008-0255
1735-3327
10.4103/1735-3327.302888
2-s2.0-85098118107
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Dental Research Journal
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 417-423
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808128860356608000