Sagital abdominal diameter, but not waist circumference is strongly associated with glycemia, triacilglycerols and HDL-c levels in overweight adults

• Autor(a) principal: Pimentel, G. D. [UNESP]
• Data de Publicação: 2011
• Outros Autores: Moreto, F. [UNESP], Takahashi, M. M. [UNESP], Portero-Mclellan, K. C. [UNESP], Burini, Roberto Carlos [UNESP]
• Tipo de documento: Artigo
• Idioma: eng
• Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
• Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.3305/nh.2011.26.5.5241; http://hdl.handle.net/11449/13299
• topic: Sagital abdominal diameter; Waist circumference; Hyperglycemia; Dyslipidemia; Inflammation; Anthropometric measurements

Aim: To correlate the sagittal abdominal diameter (SAD) and waist circumference (WC) with metabolic syndrome-associated abnormalities in adults.Methods: This cross-sectional study included one-hundred twelve adults (M = 27, F = 85) aging 54.0 +/- 11.2 yrs and average body mass index (BMI) of 30.5 +/- 9.0 kg/m(2). The assessment included blood pressure, plasma and anthropometric measurements.Results: In both men and female, SAD and WC were associated positively with body fat% (r = 0.53 vs r = 0.55), uric acid (r = 0.45 vs r = 0.45), us-PCR (r = 0.50 vs r = 0.44), insulin (r = 0.89 vs r = 0.75), insulin resistance HOMA-IR (r = 0.86 vs r = 0.65), LDL-ox (r = 0.51 vs r = 0.28), GGT (r = 0.70 vs r = 0.61), and diastolic blood pressure (r = 035 vs r = 0.33), and negatively with insulin sensibility QUICK! (r = -0.89 vs r = -0.82) and total cholesterol/TG ratio (r = -0.40 vs r = -0.22). Glycemia, TG, and HDL-c were associated significantly only with SAD (r = 031; r = 39, r = -0.43, respectively).Conclusion: Though the SAD and WC were associated with numerous metabolic abnormalities, only SAD correlated with dyslipidemia (TG and HDL-c) and hyperglycemia (glycemia).