Effects of six weeks of plyometric training on the ground vs on a mini-trampoline on strength, jump performance, and balance in male basketball players—randomized clinical trial

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Villalba, Marina M. [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Eltz, Giovana D. [UNESP], Fujita, Rafael A., Panhan, Ana C., Cardozo, Adalgiso C. [UNESP], Gonçalves, Mauro [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11332-022-00968-3
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/241671
Resumo: Purpose: To compare the effects of a 6-week plyometric training protocol performed on the ground or a mini-trampoline on basketball players' strength, jumping, landing, and balance. Methods: This randomized clinical trial recruited 30 male basketball athletes, (17–21 years), were divided into three groups: plyometric training on the mini-trampoline group (MT) (n = 11), plyometric training on the ground group (GR) (n = 9), and control group (CON) (n = 10). Isometric strength, countermovement jump height, landing impact (ground reaction force) in single-leg drop landing jump, and balance [center of pressure (COP) Area, COP length] in single-leg standing tests (eyes closed and open) were evaluated before and after intervention performing a MANOVA with repeated measures (pre- and post-training) for each dependent variable. Results: No statistical effects were found for strength and jump height for any group or moment. In the single-leg drop landing, GR and CON showed lower landing impact than MT (p < 0.001). For the COP area with eyes open, GR showed better results after training (p =.013), and MT showed worse results (p < 0.001). Regarding COP area with eyes closed, all groups demonstrated improvements (p = 0.001). Regarding the COP length with eyes open, interactions showed differences between all groups, but not for moments pre- and post-training (p = 0.37). Improvements in COP length with eyes closed were observed post-training for all groups (p = 0.041). Conclusion: To improve landing during jumps and balance performance, coaches should tend toward conventional plyometric training rather than on a mini-trampoline.
id UNSP_1851cc65ebe24536cc86339bcf17d1fc
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/241671
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Effects of six weeks of plyometric training on the ground vs on a mini-trampoline on strength, jump performance, and balance in male basketball players—randomized clinical trialAthletic performancePlyometric exerciseResistance trainingSports trainingPurpose: To compare the effects of a 6-week plyometric training protocol performed on the ground or a mini-trampoline on basketball players' strength, jumping, landing, and balance. Methods: This randomized clinical trial recruited 30 male basketball athletes, (17–21 years), were divided into three groups: plyometric training on the mini-trampoline group (MT) (n = 11), plyometric training on the ground group (GR) (n = 9), and control group (CON) (n = 10). Isometric strength, countermovement jump height, landing impact (ground reaction force) in single-leg drop landing jump, and balance [center of pressure (COP) Area, COP length] in single-leg standing tests (eyes closed and open) were evaluated before and after intervention performing a MANOVA with repeated measures (pre- and post-training) for each dependent variable. Results: No statistical effects were found for strength and jump height for any group or moment. In the single-leg drop landing, GR and CON showed lower landing impact than MT (p < 0.001). For the COP area with eyes open, GR showed better results after training (p =.013), and MT showed worse results (p < 0.001). Regarding COP area with eyes closed, all groups demonstrated improvements (p = 0.001). Regarding the COP length with eyes open, interactions showed differences between all groups, but not for moments pre- and post-training (p = 0.37). Improvements in COP length with eyes closed were observed post-training for all groups (p = 0.041). Conclusion: To improve landing during jumps and balance performance, coaches should tend toward conventional plyometric training rather than on a mini-trampoline.Ribeirão Preto College of Nursing University of São Paulo, Av. Bandeirantes, 3900, Monte Alegre, São PauloDepartment of Bioscience São Paulo State University, São PauloUniversity of Dentistry of Piracicaba Campinas State University, São PauloDepartment of Bioscience São Paulo State University, São PauloUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)Villalba, Marina M. [UNESP]Eltz, Giovana D. [UNESP]Fujita, Rafael A.Panhan, Ana C.Cardozo, Adalgiso C. [UNESP]Gonçalves, Mauro [UNESP]2023-03-01T21:16:06Z2023-03-01T21:16:06Z2022-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11332-022-00968-3Sport Sciences for Health.1825-12341824-7490http://hdl.handle.net/11449/24167110.1007/s11332-022-00968-32-s2.0-85132278072Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengSport Sciences for Healthinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-08-15T18:46:12Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/241671Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-15T18:46:12Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Effects of six weeks of plyometric training on the ground vs on a mini-trampoline on strength, jump performance, and balance in male basketball players—randomized clinical trial
title Effects of six weeks of plyometric training on the ground vs on a mini-trampoline on strength, jump performance, and balance in male basketball players—randomized clinical trial
spellingShingle Effects of six weeks of plyometric training on the ground vs on a mini-trampoline on strength, jump performance, and balance in male basketball players—randomized clinical trial
Villalba, Marina M. [UNESP]
Athletic performance
Plyometric exercise
Resistance training
Sports training
title_short Effects of six weeks of plyometric training on the ground vs on a mini-trampoline on strength, jump performance, and balance in male basketball players—randomized clinical trial
title_full Effects of six weeks of plyometric training on the ground vs on a mini-trampoline on strength, jump performance, and balance in male basketball players—randomized clinical trial
title_fullStr Effects of six weeks of plyometric training on the ground vs on a mini-trampoline on strength, jump performance, and balance in male basketball players—randomized clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Effects of six weeks of plyometric training on the ground vs on a mini-trampoline on strength, jump performance, and balance in male basketball players—randomized clinical trial
title_sort Effects of six weeks of plyometric training on the ground vs on a mini-trampoline on strength, jump performance, and balance in male basketball players—randomized clinical trial
author Villalba, Marina M. [UNESP]
author_facet Villalba, Marina M. [UNESP]
Eltz, Giovana D. [UNESP]
Fujita, Rafael A.
Panhan, Ana C.
Cardozo, Adalgiso C. [UNESP]
Gonçalves, Mauro [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Eltz, Giovana D. [UNESP]
Fujita, Rafael A.
Panhan, Ana C.
Cardozo, Adalgiso C. [UNESP]
Gonçalves, Mauro [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Villalba, Marina M. [UNESP]
Eltz, Giovana D. [UNESP]
Fujita, Rafael A.
Panhan, Ana C.
Cardozo, Adalgiso C. [UNESP]
Gonçalves, Mauro [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Athletic performance
Plyometric exercise
Resistance training
Sports training
topic Athletic performance
Plyometric exercise
Resistance training
Sports training
description Purpose: To compare the effects of a 6-week plyometric training protocol performed on the ground or a mini-trampoline on basketball players' strength, jumping, landing, and balance. Methods: This randomized clinical trial recruited 30 male basketball athletes, (17–21 years), were divided into three groups: plyometric training on the mini-trampoline group (MT) (n = 11), plyometric training on the ground group (GR) (n = 9), and control group (CON) (n = 10). Isometric strength, countermovement jump height, landing impact (ground reaction force) in single-leg drop landing jump, and balance [center of pressure (COP) Area, COP length] in single-leg standing tests (eyes closed and open) were evaluated before and after intervention performing a MANOVA with repeated measures (pre- and post-training) for each dependent variable. Results: No statistical effects were found for strength and jump height for any group or moment. In the single-leg drop landing, GR and CON showed lower landing impact than MT (p < 0.001). For the COP area with eyes open, GR showed better results after training (p =.013), and MT showed worse results (p < 0.001). Regarding COP area with eyes closed, all groups demonstrated improvements (p = 0.001). Regarding the COP length with eyes open, interactions showed differences between all groups, but not for moments pre- and post-training (p = 0.37). Improvements in COP length with eyes closed were observed post-training for all groups (p = 0.041). Conclusion: To improve landing during jumps and balance performance, coaches should tend toward conventional plyometric training rather than on a mini-trampoline.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-01-01
2023-03-01T21:16:06Z
2023-03-01T21:16:06Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11332-022-00968-3
Sport Sciences for Health.
1825-1234
1824-7490
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/241671
10.1007/s11332-022-00968-3
2-s2.0-85132278072
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11332-022-00968-3
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/241671
identifier_str_mv Sport Sciences for Health.
1825-1234
1824-7490
10.1007/s11332-022-00968-3
2-s2.0-85132278072
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Sport Sciences for Health
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808128116563902464