Compatibilidade de metarhizium anisopliae com fotoprotetores lipossolúveis e avaliação do efeito protetor contra a radiação solar
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.14393/BJ-v33n4a2017-34080 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/228373 |
Resumo: | The aim of this study was to analyze the compatibility of the Metarhizium anisopliae JAB 68 isolate with liposoluble photoprotectants and the photoprotection conferred to its conidia. The fungus was cultivated in a medium with the photoprotectants Neo Heliopan® BB, Neo Heliopan® E 1000, Eusolex® 6007 and Neo Heliopan® AV in various concentrations. Vegetative growth, sporulation and germination were assessed to determine compatibility. Then, conidia were suspended in oil containing the compatible photoprotectants, in their respective concentrations, and exposed to 0-7 hours of light from a solar simulator operating at 1,000 W m-2. Neo Heliopan BB® and Neo Heliopan® E 1000 were compatible with M. anisopliae at 2% and 1%, respectively. Eusolex® 6007 and Neo Heliopan® AV were compatible up to 8% a 7%, respectively. Conidia exposed to radiation from the solar simulator, with photoprotectant-free oil as its carrier, presented germination of 78.12% after five hours. When adding any photoprotectant to the conidia oily suspension, the germination percentage was always higher than that obtained in the control. Neo Heliopan® BB at 1 and 2% and Neo Heliopan® AV at 0.5% increased the germination. After 7 hours of exposure the germination percentages were 93.77, 94.55 and 98.82%, respectively. Eusolex® 6007 was not as efficient as previous products, but in the same exposure period was able to protect the conidia (88.60% germination) when used at a 1% concentration. Adding photoprotectants in oily formulations of M. anisopliae protects against the harmful effects of UV radiation contributing to the fungus efficiency in the field. |
id |
UNSP_1910e64e7ded176be7e1683bc63ccac3 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/228373 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Compatibilidade de metarhizium anisopliae com fotoprotetores lipossolúveis e avaliação do efeito protetor contra a radiação solarCompatibility of metarhizium anisopliae with liposoluble photoprotectants and protective effect evaluation against solar radiationEntomopathogenic fungusMicrobial controlPhotoprotectionSunlightUV radiationThe aim of this study was to analyze the compatibility of the Metarhizium anisopliae JAB 68 isolate with liposoluble photoprotectants and the photoprotection conferred to its conidia. The fungus was cultivated in a medium with the photoprotectants Neo Heliopan® BB, Neo Heliopan® E 1000, Eusolex® 6007 and Neo Heliopan® AV in various concentrations. Vegetative growth, sporulation and germination were assessed to determine compatibility. Then, conidia were suspended in oil containing the compatible photoprotectants, in their respective concentrations, and exposed to 0-7 hours of light from a solar simulator operating at 1,000 W m-2. Neo Heliopan BB® and Neo Heliopan® E 1000 were compatible with M. anisopliae at 2% and 1%, respectively. Eusolex® 6007 and Neo Heliopan® AV were compatible up to 8% a 7%, respectively. Conidia exposed to radiation from the solar simulator, with photoprotectant-free oil as its carrier, presented germination of 78.12% after five hours. When adding any photoprotectant to the conidia oily suspension, the germination percentage was always higher than that obtained in the control. Neo Heliopan® BB at 1 and 2% and Neo Heliopan® AV at 0.5% increased the germination. After 7 hours of exposure the germination percentages were 93.77, 94.55 and 98.82%, respectively. Eusolex® 6007 was not as efficient as previous products, but in the same exposure period was able to protect the conidia (88.60% germination) when used at a 1% concentration. Adding photoprotectants in oily formulations of M. anisopliae protects against the harmful effects of UV radiation contributing to the fungus efficiency in the field.Department of Plant ProductionDepartment of Drugs and Medicines Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences - Sao Paulo State UniversityDepartment of Mathematical Sciences Faculty of Agrarian and Veterinary Sciences – Sao Paulo State UniversityDepartment of Drugs and Medicines Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences - Sao Paulo State UniversityDepartment of Mathematical Sciences Faculty of Agrarian and Veterinary Sciences – Sao Paulo State UniversityUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Mochi, Dinalva AlvesMonteiro, Antonio CarlosPietro, Rosemeire Cristina Linhari Rodrigues [UNESP]Corrêa, Marcos Antonio [UNESP]Barbosa, José Carlos [UNESP]2022-04-29T08:09:43Z2022-04-29T08:09:43Z2017-07-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article1028-1037http://dx.doi.org/10.14393/BJ-v33n4a2017-34080Bioscience Journal, v. 33, n. 4, p. 1028-1037, 2017.1981-31631516-3725http://hdl.handle.net/11449/22837310.14393/BJ-v33n4a2017-340802-s2.0-85026487419Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengBioscience Journalinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-06-24T13:46:11Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/228373Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T20:59:16.827365Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Compatibilidade de metarhizium anisopliae com fotoprotetores lipossolúveis e avaliação do efeito protetor contra a radiação solar Compatibility of metarhizium anisopliae with liposoluble photoprotectants and protective effect evaluation against solar radiation |
title |
Compatibilidade de metarhizium anisopliae com fotoprotetores lipossolúveis e avaliação do efeito protetor contra a radiação solar |
spellingShingle |
Compatibilidade de metarhizium anisopliae com fotoprotetores lipossolúveis e avaliação do efeito protetor contra a radiação solar Mochi, Dinalva Alves Entomopathogenic fungus Microbial control Photoprotection Sunlight UV radiation |
title_short |
Compatibilidade de metarhizium anisopliae com fotoprotetores lipossolúveis e avaliação do efeito protetor contra a radiação solar |
title_full |
Compatibilidade de metarhizium anisopliae com fotoprotetores lipossolúveis e avaliação do efeito protetor contra a radiação solar |
title_fullStr |
Compatibilidade de metarhizium anisopliae com fotoprotetores lipossolúveis e avaliação do efeito protetor contra a radiação solar |
title_full_unstemmed |
Compatibilidade de metarhizium anisopliae com fotoprotetores lipossolúveis e avaliação do efeito protetor contra a radiação solar |
title_sort |
Compatibilidade de metarhizium anisopliae com fotoprotetores lipossolúveis e avaliação do efeito protetor contra a radiação solar |
author |
Mochi, Dinalva Alves |
author_facet |
Mochi, Dinalva Alves Monteiro, Antonio Carlos Pietro, Rosemeire Cristina Linhari Rodrigues [UNESP] Corrêa, Marcos Antonio [UNESP] Barbosa, José Carlos [UNESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Monteiro, Antonio Carlos Pietro, Rosemeire Cristina Linhari Rodrigues [UNESP] Corrêa, Marcos Antonio [UNESP] Barbosa, José Carlos [UNESP] |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Mochi, Dinalva Alves Monteiro, Antonio Carlos Pietro, Rosemeire Cristina Linhari Rodrigues [UNESP] Corrêa, Marcos Antonio [UNESP] Barbosa, José Carlos [UNESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Entomopathogenic fungus Microbial control Photoprotection Sunlight UV radiation |
topic |
Entomopathogenic fungus Microbial control Photoprotection Sunlight UV radiation |
description |
The aim of this study was to analyze the compatibility of the Metarhizium anisopliae JAB 68 isolate with liposoluble photoprotectants and the photoprotection conferred to its conidia. The fungus was cultivated in a medium with the photoprotectants Neo Heliopan® BB, Neo Heliopan® E 1000, Eusolex® 6007 and Neo Heliopan® AV in various concentrations. Vegetative growth, sporulation and germination were assessed to determine compatibility. Then, conidia were suspended in oil containing the compatible photoprotectants, in their respective concentrations, and exposed to 0-7 hours of light from a solar simulator operating at 1,000 W m-2. Neo Heliopan BB® and Neo Heliopan® E 1000 were compatible with M. anisopliae at 2% and 1%, respectively. Eusolex® 6007 and Neo Heliopan® AV were compatible up to 8% a 7%, respectively. Conidia exposed to radiation from the solar simulator, with photoprotectant-free oil as its carrier, presented germination of 78.12% after five hours. When adding any photoprotectant to the conidia oily suspension, the germination percentage was always higher than that obtained in the control. Neo Heliopan® BB at 1 and 2% and Neo Heliopan® AV at 0.5% increased the germination. After 7 hours of exposure the germination percentages were 93.77, 94.55 and 98.82%, respectively. Eusolex® 6007 was not as efficient as previous products, but in the same exposure period was able to protect the conidia (88.60% germination) when used at a 1% concentration. Adding photoprotectants in oily formulations of M. anisopliae protects against the harmful effects of UV radiation contributing to the fungus efficiency in the field. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-07-01 2022-04-29T08:09:43Z 2022-04-29T08:09:43Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.14393/BJ-v33n4a2017-34080 Bioscience Journal, v. 33, n. 4, p. 1028-1037, 2017. 1981-3163 1516-3725 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/228373 10.14393/BJ-v33n4a2017-34080 2-s2.0-85026487419 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.14393/BJ-v33n4a2017-34080 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/228373 |
identifier_str_mv |
Bioscience Journal, v. 33, n. 4, p. 1028-1037, 2017. 1981-3163 1516-3725 10.14393/BJ-v33n4a2017-34080 2-s2.0-85026487419 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Bioscience Journal |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
1028-1037 |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808129270884597760 |