Compatibilidade de metarhizium anisopliae com fotoprotetores lipossolúveis e avaliação do efeito protetor contra a radiação solar

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Mochi, Dinalva Alves
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Monteiro, Antonio Carlos, Pietro, Rosemeire Cristina Linhari Rodrigues [UNESP], Corrêa, Marcos Antonio [UNESP], Barbosa, José Carlos [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.14393/BJ-v33n4a2017-34080
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/228373
Resumo: The aim of this study was to analyze the compatibility of the Metarhizium anisopliae JAB 68 isolate with liposoluble photoprotectants and the photoprotection conferred to its conidia. The fungus was cultivated in a medium with the photoprotectants Neo Heliopan® BB, Neo Heliopan® E 1000, Eusolex® 6007 and Neo Heliopan® AV in various concentrations. Vegetative growth, sporulation and germination were assessed to determine compatibility. Then, conidia were suspended in oil containing the compatible photoprotectants, in their respective concentrations, and exposed to 0-7 hours of light from a solar simulator operating at 1,000 W m-2. Neo Heliopan BB® and Neo Heliopan® E 1000 were compatible with M. anisopliae at 2% and 1%, respectively. Eusolex® 6007 and Neo Heliopan® AV were compatible up to 8% a 7%, respectively. Conidia exposed to radiation from the solar simulator, with photoprotectant-free oil as its carrier, presented germination of 78.12% after five hours. When adding any photoprotectant to the conidia oily suspension, the germination percentage was always higher than that obtained in the control. Neo Heliopan® BB at 1 and 2% and Neo Heliopan® AV at 0.5% increased the germination. After 7 hours of exposure the germination percentages were 93.77, 94.55 and 98.82%, respectively. Eusolex® 6007 was not as efficient as previous products, but in the same exposure period was able to protect the conidia (88.60% germination) when used at a 1% concentration. Adding photoprotectants in oily formulations of M. anisopliae protects against the harmful effects of UV radiation contributing to the fungus efficiency in the field.
id UNSP_1910e64e7ded176be7e1683bc63ccac3
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/228373
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Compatibilidade de metarhizium anisopliae com fotoprotetores lipossolúveis e avaliação do efeito protetor contra a radiação solarCompatibility of metarhizium anisopliae with liposoluble photoprotectants and protective effect evaluation against solar radiationEntomopathogenic fungusMicrobial controlPhotoprotectionSunlightUV radiationThe aim of this study was to analyze the compatibility of the Metarhizium anisopliae JAB 68 isolate with liposoluble photoprotectants and the photoprotection conferred to its conidia. The fungus was cultivated in a medium with the photoprotectants Neo Heliopan® BB, Neo Heliopan® E 1000, Eusolex® 6007 and Neo Heliopan® AV in various concentrations. Vegetative growth, sporulation and germination were assessed to determine compatibility. Then, conidia were suspended in oil containing the compatible photoprotectants, in their respective concentrations, and exposed to 0-7 hours of light from a solar simulator operating at 1,000 W m-2. Neo Heliopan BB® and Neo Heliopan® E 1000 were compatible with M. anisopliae at 2% and 1%, respectively. Eusolex® 6007 and Neo Heliopan® AV were compatible up to 8% a 7%, respectively. Conidia exposed to radiation from the solar simulator, with photoprotectant-free oil as its carrier, presented germination of 78.12% after five hours. When adding any photoprotectant to the conidia oily suspension, the germination percentage was always higher than that obtained in the control. Neo Heliopan® BB at 1 and 2% and Neo Heliopan® AV at 0.5% increased the germination. After 7 hours of exposure the germination percentages were 93.77, 94.55 and 98.82%, respectively. Eusolex® 6007 was not as efficient as previous products, but in the same exposure period was able to protect the conidia (88.60% germination) when used at a 1% concentration. Adding photoprotectants in oily formulations of M. anisopliae protects against the harmful effects of UV radiation contributing to the fungus efficiency in the field.Department of Plant ProductionDepartment of Drugs and Medicines Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences - Sao Paulo State UniversityDepartment of Mathematical Sciences Faculty of Agrarian and Veterinary Sciences – Sao Paulo State UniversityDepartment of Drugs and Medicines Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences - Sao Paulo State UniversityDepartment of Mathematical Sciences Faculty of Agrarian and Veterinary Sciences – Sao Paulo State UniversityUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Mochi, Dinalva AlvesMonteiro, Antonio CarlosPietro, Rosemeire Cristina Linhari Rodrigues [UNESP]Corrêa, Marcos Antonio [UNESP]Barbosa, José Carlos [UNESP]2022-04-29T08:09:43Z2022-04-29T08:09:43Z2017-07-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article1028-1037http://dx.doi.org/10.14393/BJ-v33n4a2017-34080Bioscience Journal, v. 33, n. 4, p. 1028-1037, 2017.1981-31631516-3725http://hdl.handle.net/11449/22837310.14393/BJ-v33n4a2017-340802-s2.0-85026487419Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengBioscience Journalinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-06-24T13:46:11Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/228373Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T20:59:16.827365Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Compatibilidade de metarhizium anisopliae com fotoprotetores lipossolúveis e avaliação do efeito protetor contra a radiação solar
Compatibility of metarhizium anisopliae with liposoluble photoprotectants and protective effect evaluation against solar radiation
title Compatibilidade de metarhizium anisopliae com fotoprotetores lipossolúveis e avaliação do efeito protetor contra a radiação solar
spellingShingle Compatibilidade de metarhizium anisopliae com fotoprotetores lipossolúveis e avaliação do efeito protetor contra a radiação solar
Mochi, Dinalva Alves
Entomopathogenic fungus
Microbial control
Photoprotection
Sunlight
UV radiation
title_short Compatibilidade de metarhizium anisopliae com fotoprotetores lipossolúveis e avaliação do efeito protetor contra a radiação solar
title_full Compatibilidade de metarhizium anisopliae com fotoprotetores lipossolúveis e avaliação do efeito protetor contra a radiação solar
title_fullStr Compatibilidade de metarhizium anisopliae com fotoprotetores lipossolúveis e avaliação do efeito protetor contra a radiação solar
title_full_unstemmed Compatibilidade de metarhizium anisopliae com fotoprotetores lipossolúveis e avaliação do efeito protetor contra a radiação solar
title_sort Compatibilidade de metarhizium anisopliae com fotoprotetores lipossolúveis e avaliação do efeito protetor contra a radiação solar
author Mochi, Dinalva Alves
author_facet Mochi, Dinalva Alves
Monteiro, Antonio Carlos
Pietro, Rosemeire Cristina Linhari Rodrigues [UNESP]
Corrêa, Marcos Antonio [UNESP]
Barbosa, José Carlos [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Monteiro, Antonio Carlos
Pietro, Rosemeire Cristina Linhari Rodrigues [UNESP]
Corrêa, Marcos Antonio [UNESP]
Barbosa, José Carlos [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Mochi, Dinalva Alves
Monteiro, Antonio Carlos
Pietro, Rosemeire Cristina Linhari Rodrigues [UNESP]
Corrêa, Marcos Antonio [UNESP]
Barbosa, José Carlos [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Entomopathogenic fungus
Microbial control
Photoprotection
Sunlight
UV radiation
topic Entomopathogenic fungus
Microbial control
Photoprotection
Sunlight
UV radiation
description The aim of this study was to analyze the compatibility of the Metarhizium anisopliae JAB 68 isolate with liposoluble photoprotectants and the photoprotection conferred to its conidia. The fungus was cultivated in a medium with the photoprotectants Neo Heliopan® BB, Neo Heliopan® E 1000, Eusolex® 6007 and Neo Heliopan® AV in various concentrations. Vegetative growth, sporulation and germination were assessed to determine compatibility. Then, conidia were suspended in oil containing the compatible photoprotectants, in their respective concentrations, and exposed to 0-7 hours of light from a solar simulator operating at 1,000 W m-2. Neo Heliopan BB® and Neo Heliopan® E 1000 were compatible with M. anisopliae at 2% and 1%, respectively. Eusolex® 6007 and Neo Heliopan® AV were compatible up to 8% a 7%, respectively. Conidia exposed to radiation from the solar simulator, with photoprotectant-free oil as its carrier, presented germination of 78.12% after five hours. When adding any photoprotectant to the conidia oily suspension, the germination percentage was always higher than that obtained in the control. Neo Heliopan® BB at 1 and 2% and Neo Heliopan® AV at 0.5% increased the germination. After 7 hours of exposure the germination percentages were 93.77, 94.55 and 98.82%, respectively. Eusolex® 6007 was not as efficient as previous products, but in the same exposure period was able to protect the conidia (88.60% germination) when used at a 1% concentration. Adding photoprotectants in oily formulations of M. anisopliae protects against the harmful effects of UV radiation contributing to the fungus efficiency in the field.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-07-01
2022-04-29T08:09:43Z
2022-04-29T08:09:43Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.14393/BJ-v33n4a2017-34080
Bioscience Journal, v. 33, n. 4, p. 1028-1037, 2017.
1981-3163
1516-3725
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/228373
10.14393/BJ-v33n4a2017-34080
2-s2.0-85026487419
url http://dx.doi.org/10.14393/BJ-v33n4a2017-34080
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/228373
identifier_str_mv Bioscience Journal, v. 33, n. 4, p. 1028-1037, 2017.
1981-3163
1516-3725
10.14393/BJ-v33n4a2017-34080
2-s2.0-85026487419
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Bioscience Journal
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 1028-1037
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808129270884597760